Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Media Use and Satisfaction with Democracy: Testing the Role of Political Interest

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the process of political communication, media use has strong influences on citizens’ attitudes toward politics. However, the importance of political interest in shaping the relationship between media use and satisfaction with democracy has not been extensively studied. This study makes a contribution to identify the role of political interest in mediating the effects of media use on satisfaction with democracy. Consistent with the virtuous circle theory, the findings from this study show that there are significantly positive associations between reading a newspaper, listening to the radio, and using the Internet for political information and political interest. Citizens who are more interested in politics also tend to be more satisfied with democracy. By contrast, in accordance with the media malaise theory, our results also show that reading a newspaper, listening to the radio, and using the Internet for political information are negatively related to satisfaction with democracy. Distinct from existing literature, our findings indicate that the indirect positive effects of media use mediated by political interest are outweighed by the negative direct effects of media use on satisfaction with democracy. Hence, the relative magnitudes of direct and indirect effects are critical for the overall effects of media use on satisfaction with democracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The participating countries of ISSP 2014 include Austria (AT); Australia (AU); Belgium (BE); Switzerland (CH); Chile (CL); Czech Republic (CZ); Germany (DE); Denmark (DK); Spain (ES); Finland (FI); France (FR); Great Britain (GB-GBN); Georgia (GE); Croatia (HR); Hungary (HU); Israel (IL); India (IN); Iceland (IS); Japan (JP); Korea, Republic of (KR); Lithuania (LT); Netherlands (NL); Norway (NO); Philippines (PH); Poland (PL); Russian Federation (RU); Sweden (SE); Slovenia (SI); Slovakia (SK); Turkey (TR); Taiwan (TW); United States (US); Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of (VE); South Africa (ZA).

  2. The citizenship norms are constructed from respondents’ answers to the questions related to what are important things for being a good citizen. More details about the definitions of duty-based and engaged citizenship norms can be seen in Table 1.

  3. More details about the World Bank’s Governance Indicators can be seen in the website of WGI: http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#home.

References

  • Aarts, K., & Semetko, H. (2003). The divided electorate: Media use and political involvement. Journal of Politics, 65, 759–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aarts, K., & Thomassen, J. (2008). Satisfaction with democracy: Do institutions matter? Electoral Studies, 27(1), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almond, G., & Verba, S. (1963). Civic culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, K., & Guthmann, K. (2014). Democracy in crisis? The declining support for national democracy in European countries, 2007–2011. European Journal of Political Research, 53(3), 423–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avery, J. M. (2009). Videomalaise or virtuous circle? The influence of the news media on political trust. International Journal of Press/Politics, 14(4), 410–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailard, C. S. (2012). Testing the Internet’s effect on democratic satisfaction: A multi-methodological, cross-national approach. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 9, 185–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benstead, L. J. (2015). Why do some Arab citizens see democracy as unsuitable for their country? Democratization, 22(7), 1183–1208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernauer, J., & Vatter, A. (2012). Can’t get no satisfaction with the Westminster model? Winners, losers and the effects of consensual and direct democratic institutions on satisfaction with democracy. European Journal of Political Research, 51(4), 435–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bimber, B., Cunill, M. C., Copeland, L., & Gibson, R. (2015). Digital media and political participation: The moderating role of political interest across acts and over time. Social Science Computer Review, 33(1), 21–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulianne, S. (2009). Does Internet us affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political Communication, 26(2), 249–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulianne, S. (2011). Stimulating or reinforcing political interest: Using panel data to examine reciprocal effects between news media and political interest. Political Communication, 28(2), 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Karp, J. A. (2007). Enraged or engaged? Preferences for direct citizen participation in affluent democracies. Political Research Quarterly, 60(3), 351–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceron, A. (2015). Internet, news, and political trust: The difference between social media and online media outlets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(5), 487–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceron, A., & Memoli, V. (2015). Trust in government and media slant: A cross-sectional analysis of media effects in twenty-seven European countries. International Journal of Press/Politics, 20(3), 339–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., Ping, S., & Chen, G. (2015). Far from reach but near at hand: The role of social media for cross-national mobilization. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 443–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, J., Shah, D., McLeod, J. M., McLeod, D. M., Scholl, R. M., & Gotlieb, M. R. (2009). Campaigns, reflection, and deliberation: Advancing an O-S-R-O-R model of communication effects. Communication Theory, 19, 66–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciftci, S. (2010). Modernization, Islam, or social capital: What explains attitudes toward democracy in the Muslim world? Comparative Political Studies, 43(11), 1442–1470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffé, H. (2017). Citizens’ media use and the accuracy of their perceptions of electoral integrity. International Political Science Review, 38(3), 281–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conroy-Krutz, J., & Kerr, N. (2015). Dynamics of democratic satisfaction in transitional settings: Evidence from a panel study in Uganda. Political Research Quarterly, 68(3), 593–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, J., Coen, S., Soroka, S., Aalberg, T., Hayashi, K., Hichy, Z., et al. (2014). Reconsidering “virtuous circle” and “media malaise” theories of the media: An 11-nation study. Journalism, 15(7), 815–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, S., & Holmberg, S. (2014). Democracy and bureaucracy: How their quality matters for popular satisfaction. West European Politics, 37(3), 515–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, S., Linde, J., & Holmberg, S. (2015). Democratic discontent in old and new democracies: Assessing the importance of democratic input and governmental output. Political Studies, 63(S1), 18–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R. J. (1999). Political support in advanced industrial democracies’. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical citizens: Global support for democratic governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R. J. (2008). Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. Political Studies, 56, 76–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R., Shin, D., & Jou, W. (2007) Understanding democracy: Data from unlikely places. Journal of Democracy, 18, 142–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vreese, C. H., & Semetko, H. (2002). Cynical and engaged: Strategic campaign coverage, public opinion, and mobilization in a referendum. Communication Research, 29(6), 615–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drew, D., & Weaver, D. (2006). Voter learning in the 2004 presidential election: Did the media matter? Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(1), 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eveland, W. P. (2004). The effect of political discussion in producing informed citizens: The roles of information, motivation and elaboration. Political Communication, 21, 177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eveland, W. P., Hayes, A. F., Shah, D. V., & Kwak, N. (2005). Understanding the relationship between communication and political knowledge: A model comparison approach using panel data. Political Communication, 22, 423–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eveland, W. P., & Scheufele, D. (2000). Connecting news media use with gaps in knowledge and participation. Political Communication, 17, 215–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezrow, L., & Xezonakis, G. (2011). Citizen satisfaction with democracy and parties’ policy offerings. Comparative Political Studies, 44(9), 1152–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gainous, J., Wagner, K. M., & Abbott, J. P. (2015). Civic disobedience: Does Internet use stimulate political unrest in East Asia? Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12, 219–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gainous, J., Wagner, K. M., & Gray, T. (2016). Internet freedom and social media effects: Democracy and citizen attitudes in Latin America. Online Information Review, 40(5), 712–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil de Zúñiga, H., Copeland, L., & Bimber, B. (2014). Political consumerism: Civic engagement and the social media connection. New Media & Society, 16(3), 488–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 319–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher, L. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS® system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F., Preacher, K. J., & Myers, T. A. (2011). Mediation and the estimation of indirect effects in political communication research. In E. P. Bucy & R. L. Holbert (Eds.), The sourcebook for political communication research. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P. W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 945–960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, S., & Rothstein, B. (Eds.). (2012). Good government: The relevance of political science. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp, J. A., & Bowler, S. (2001). Coalition government and satisfaction with democracy: An analysis of New Zealand’s reaction to proportional representation. European Journal of Political Research, 40(1), 57–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2009). Governance Matters VIII: Governance Indicators for 1996–2008 (Washington. World Bank): DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaye, B. K., & Johnson, T. J. (2002). Online and in the know: Uses and gratifications of the web for political information. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(1), 54–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenski, K., & Stroud, N. J. (2006). Connections between Internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(2), 173–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupia, A., & Philpot, T. S. (2005). Views from inside the net: How websites affect young adults’ political interest. Journal of Politics, 67(4), 1122–1142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magalhães, P. C. (2014). Government effectiveness and support for democracy. European Journal of Political Research, 53(1), 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martini, S., & Quaranta, M. (2015) Finding out the hard way: Uncovering the structural foundations of political dissatisfaction in Italy, 1973–2013. West European Politics, 38(1), 28–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattes, R., & Bratton, M. (2007). Learning about democracy in Africa: Awareness, performance and experience. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 192–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, J. M., Daily, K., Guo, Z., Eveland, W. P., Jr., Bayer, J., & Yang, S. (1996). Community integration, local media use and democratic processes. Communication Research, 23, 179–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeller, J., & de Vreese, C. (2013). The differential role of the media as an agent of political socialization in Europe. European Journal of Communication, 28(3), 309–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutz, D. C., & Reeves, B. (2005). The new videomalaise: Effects of televised incivility on political trust. American Political Science Review, 99, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, K. (1999). Mass media effects: Mobilization or media malaise? British Journal of Political Science, 29, 577–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, K. (2006). Political support: Social capital, civil society and political and economic performance. Political Studies, 54(4), 846–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, E. C., Stoycheff, E., & Pearce, K. E. (2012). Internet use and democratic demands: A multinational, multilevel model of Internet use and citizen attitudes about democracy. Journal of Communication, 62, 249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (1999). Conclusions: The growth of critical citizens and its consequences. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical citizens: Global support for democratic governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (2000). A virtuous circle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (2012). Making democratic governance work: How regimes shape prosperity, welfare and peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36(4), 717–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quaranta, M., & Martini, S. (2016). Does the economy really matter for satisfaction with democracy? Longitudinal and cross-country evidence from the European Union. Electoral Studies, 42, 164–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B. (2009). Creating political legitimacy: Electoral government versus quality of government. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(3), 311–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligson, M. A. (2002). The impact of corruption on regime legitimacy: A comparative study of four Latin American countries. Journal of Politics, 62(2), 408–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Eveland, W. P., & Kwak, N. (2005). Information and expression in a digital age: Modeling internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research, 32, 531–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Nah, S., Gotlieb, M. R., Hwang, H., Lee, N., et al. (2007). Campaign ads, online messaging, and participation: Extending the communication mediation model. Journal of Communication, 57, 676–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, D. V., McLeod, J. M., & Lee, N. J. (2009). Communication competence as a foundation for civic competence: Processes of socialization into citizenship. Political Communication, 26(1), 102–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J. H. (1999). EzPATH: Causal modeling. Evanston, IL: SYSTAT Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strömbäck, J. (2008). Four phases of mediatization: An analysis of the mediatization of politics. International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(3), 228–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strömbäck, J., Djerf-Pierre, M., & Shehata, A. (2013). The dynamics of political interest and news media consumption: A longitudinal perspective. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(4), 414–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strömbäck, J., Djerf-Pierre, M., & Shehata, A. (2016). A question of time? A longitudinal analysis of the relationship between news media consumption and political trust. International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(1), 88–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strömbäck, J., & Shehata, A. (2010). Media malaise or a virtuous circle? Exploring the causal relationships between news media exposure, political news attention and political interest. European Journal of Political Research, 49, 575–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tufekci, Z., & Wilson, C. (2012). Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication, 62, 363–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, K. M., & Gainous, J. (2013). Digital uprising: The Internet revolution in the Middle East. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 10(3), 261–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, A. F., Schneider, F., & Halla, M. (2009). The quality of institutions and satisfaction with democracy in Western Europe—A panel analysis. European Journal of Political Economy, 25, 30–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xenos, M., & Moy, P. (2007). Direct and differential effects of the Internet on political and civic engagement. Journal of Communication, 57, 704–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto, M., & Kushin, M. J. (2014). More harm than good? Online media use and political disaffection among college students in the 2008 Election. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 430–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto, M., Kushin, M. J., & Dalisay, F. (2017). Social media and political disengagement among young adults: A moderated mediation model of cynicism, efficacy, and social media use on apathy. Mass Communication and Society, 20, 149–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X., & Chaffee, S. H. (1995). Campaign advertisements versus television news as sources of political issue information. Public Opinion Quarterly, 59(1), 41–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST-106-2410-H-305-038).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Public Finance, National Taipei University, 151 University Road, San Shia District, New Taipei City, Taiwan

    Wen-Chun Chang

Authors
  1. Wen-Chun Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen-Chun Chang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, WC. Media Use and Satisfaction with Democracy: Testing the Role of Political Interest. Soc Indic Res 140, 999–1016 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1806-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1806-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation