A Cross-National Examination of the Effect of the Schwartz Cultural Dimensions on PISA Performance Assessments

Article
  • 74 Downloads

Abstract

In recent years, PISA assessments have become more frequent, and transnational policy borrowing and policy adaptation have steadily increased, with implications on national education reform policies. The growing impact of globalization in education policy seems to have reinforced the underlying legitimacy of an educational world that lacks cultural diversity. This study seeks to highlight cultural dimensions as significant indicators of disparities in educational performance across countries in international tests. Combining data from the World Values Survey with the PISA scores, we examined how the Schwartz cultural dimensions relate to student PISA achievement at the national level. Results of regression analysis indicate that when controlling for GDP per capita, Conservatism (i.e., traditionalism, conformity, and security) remains the best predictor of PISA test results in the three core disciplines. Cultural dimensions in general, and Conservatism in particular, play a significant role in explaining academic achievements per country. Paradoxically, while globalization, in some instances, has led to positive educational policies and multicultural values that challenge Conservatism and Traditionalism, Conservatism may ultimately serve to build the group identity, social cohesion, and national solidarity necessary in this dynamic global era. This study emphasizes the need for comparative exploration that takes into account the influence of cultural dimensions at the national level. This is something that we hope will assist educational administrators to make their educational systems both more effective and more socially responsive.

Keywords

Schwartz cultural dimensions PISA Comparative approach Indicators of performance Globalization 

References

  1. Alexander, R. J. (2012a). International evidence, national policy and classroom practice: Questions of judgement, vision and trust. In Paper presented at the from regulation to trust: Education in the 21st century, Third Van Leer international conference on education, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, R. J. (2012b). Moral panic, miracle cures and educational policy: What can we really learn from international comparison? Scottish Educational Review, 44(1), 4–21.Google Scholar
  3. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  4. Arum, R. (1998). Invested dollars or diverted dreams: The effect of resources on vocational students’ educational outcomes. Sociology of education, 71, 130–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Avolio, B. J., Yammarino, F. J., & Bass, B. M. (1991). Identifying common methods variance with data collected from a single source: An unresolved sticky issue. Journal of Management, 17(3), 571–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bajunid, I. A. (1996). Preliminary explorations of indigenous perspectives of educational management: The evolving Malaysian experience. Journal of Educational Administration, 34(5), 50–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baker, D. P., Goesling, B., & LeTendre, G. K. (2002). Socioeconomic status, school quality, and national economic development: A cross-national analysis of the “Heyneman-Loxley effect” on mathematics and science achievement. Comparative Education Review, 46(3), 291–312.Google Scholar
  8. Bernardo, A. B. I. (2008). Individual and social dimensions of Filipino students’ achievement goals. International Journal of Psychology, 43, 886–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berry, J. W. (2000). Cross-cultural psychology: A symbiosis of cultural and comparative approaches. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3(3), 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bieber, T., Dobbins, M., Fulge, T., & Martens, K. (2014). Reacting to internationalization processes in education – at last!. In K. Martens, P. Knodel & M. Windzio (Eds.), A new constellation of statehood in education policy? Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. (2011). The forms of capital. (1986). Cultural theory: An anthology, 1, 81–93.Google Scholar
  12. Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 371–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chang, W. C., & Wong, K. (2008). Socially-oriented achievement goals of Chinese university students in Singapore: Structure and relationships with achievement motives, goals and affective outcomes. International Journal of Psychology, 43, 880–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cheng, R. W. Y., & Lam, S.-F. (2013). The interaction between social goals and self-construal on achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 136–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dimmock, C., & Walker, A. (2000a). Globalisation and societal culture: Redefining schooling and school leadership in the twenty-first century. Compare, 30(3), 303–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dimmock, C., & Walker, A. (2000b). Developing comparative and international educational leadership and management: A cross-cultural model. School Leadership & Management, 20(2), 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Earley, P. C. (1993). East meets West meets Mideast: Further explorations of collectivistic and individualistic work groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36(2), 319–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Feldman, S. (2003). Values, ideology, and structure of political attitudes. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 477–508). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Feniger, Y., & Lefstein, A. (2014). How not to reason with PISA data: An ironic investigation. Journal of Education Policy, 29(6), 845–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Feniger, Y., Livneh, I., & Yogev, A. (2012). Globalisation and the politics of international tests: The case of Israel. Comparative Education, 48(3), 323–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gaziel, H. (2009). The impact of globalization upon education: Universal or contextual? World Study in Education, 10(2), 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Giddens, A. (1994). Beyond left and right: The future of radical politics. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Glazer, S. (2006). Social support across cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30(5), 605–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Greenfield, P. M. (2006). Applying developmental psychology to bridge cultures in the classroom. In S. I. Donaldson, D. E. Berger, & K. Pezdek (Eds.), Applied psychology: New frontiers and rewarding careers (pp. 135–152). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Greenfield, P. M., & Quiroz, B. (2013). Context and culture in the socialization and development of personal achievement values: Comparing Latino immigrant families, European American families, and elementary school teachers. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 34(2), 108–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hallinger, P., & Leithwood, K. (1996). Culture and educational administration: A case of finding out what you don’t know you don’t know. Journal of Educational Administration, 34(5), 98–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2010). The High cost of low educational performance: The long-run economic impact of improving PISA outcomes. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  29. Held, D. (1999). Global transformations: Politics, economics and culture. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hirst, P., & Thompson, G. (1999). Globalisation in question: The international economy and the possibilities of governance. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hitlin, S., & Kramer, K. (2007). Value-dimensions in America, ANES Pilot Study Report, no. nes011893.Google Scholar
  32. Hofstede, G. (1997). Organization culture. In A. Sorge & M. Warner (Eds.), The IBM handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 193–210). London: Thomson Business Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Huntly, I., Kaiser, G., & Luna, E. (2012). International comparisons in mathematics education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and post-modernization: Cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Inglehart, R. (Ed.). (2004). Human beliefs and values: A cross-cultural sourcebook based on the 19992002 values surveys. Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
  37. Inglehart, R. (2006). Mapping global values. Comparative Sociology, 5(2):115–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65, 19–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Inoguchi, T., & Shin, D. C. (2009). The quality of life in Confucian Asia: From physical welfare to subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 92, 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Irwin, J. R., & McClelland, G. H. (2003). Negative consequences of dichotomizing continuous predictor variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 40, 366–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jerrim, J., & Alvaro, C. (2014). The mathematics skills of school children: How does the UK compare to the high performing East Asian nations? Journal of Education Policy, 29, 349–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. King, R. B., & McInerney, D. M. (2012). Including social goals in achievement motivation research: Examples from the Philippines (p. 5). Unit: Online Readings in Psychology and Culture.Google Scholar
  43. King, R. B., McInerney, D. M., & Watkins, D. A. (2012). Studying for the sake of others: The role of social goals on academic engagement. Educational Psychology, 32, 749–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Larson, R. W., & Verma, S. (1999). How children and adolescents spend time across the world: Work, play, and developmental opportunities. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lee, J. (2009). Universals and specifics of math self-concept, math self-efficacy, and math anxiety across 41 PISA 2003 participating countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 355–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lee, W. O. (1996). The cultural context for Chinese learners: Conceptions of learning in the Confucian tradition. In D. A. Watkins & B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences, Hongkong and Melbourne (pp. 25–41). Melbourne: Comparative Education Research Centre and Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  47. Lewis, C. C. (1995). Educating hearts and minds: Reflections on Japanese preschool and elementary education. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Li, J. (2002). A cultural model of learning. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 248–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Li, J. (2012). Cultural foundations of learning: East and West. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lingard, B. (2010). Policy borrowing, policy learning: Testing times in Australian schooling. Critical Studies in Education, 51(2), 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lingard, B., & Rawolle, S. (2010). Globalization and the rescaling of education politics and policy: Implications for comparative education. In M. Larsen (Ed.), New thinking in comparative education: Honouring the work of Dr Robert Cowen. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  52. Lingard, B., & Rawolle, S. (2011). New scalar politics: Implications for education policy. Comparative Education, 47(4), 489–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lingard, B., Rawolle, S., & Taylor, S. (2005). Globalising policy sociology in education: Working with Bourdieu. Journal of Education Policy, 20(6), 759–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Meyer, H. D., & Benavot, A. (Eds.). (2013). PISA, power and policy: The emergence of global educational governance. Oxford: Symposium Books.Google Scholar
  56. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (1996). Education indicators: An international perspective, indicator 40: Teacher salaries. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education.Google Scholar
  57. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2001). Public school teachers’ salaries in primary education. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education.Google Scholar
  58. Novoa, A., & Yariv-Mashal, T. (2003). Le comparatisme en éducation: mode de gouvernance ou enquête historique. L’education comparee: un outil pour l’Europe: l’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  59. OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). (2009). PISA 2006 technical report. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/document/41/0,3343,en_32252351_32236191_42025897_1_1_1_1,00.html.
  60. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). (2012). PISA 2012 results in focus. What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  61. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  62. Phillips, D., & Schweisfurth, M. (2014). Comparative and international education: An introduction to theory, method, and practice. London: A & C Black.Google Scholar
  63. Power, C. (2015). The power of education. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  64. Raeff, C., Greenfield, P. M., & Quiroz, B. (2000). Conceptualizing interpersonal relationships in the cultural contexts of individualism and collectivism. In S. Harkness, C. Raeff, & C. M. Super (Eds.), New directions for child and adolescent development, variability in the social construction of the child (pp. 59–74). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  65. Rawolle, S. (2010). Understanding the mediatisation of educational policy as practice. Critical Studies in Education, 51(1), 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rawolle, S., & Lingard, B. (2008). The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu and researching education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 23(6), 729–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schleicher, A., & Stewart, V. (2008). Learning from world-class schools. Educational Leadership, 66(2), 44–51.Google Scholar
  68. Schriewer, J., & Martinez, C. (2004). Constructions of internationality in education. In G. Steiner-Khamsi (Ed.), The global politics of educational borrowing and lending. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  69. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  70. Schwartz, S. H. (1994a). Are there universal aspects in the content and structure of values? Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schwartz, S. H. (1994b). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method and applications (pp. 85–119). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  72. Schwartz, S. H. (1999). Cultural value differences: Some implications for work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48, 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schwartz, S. H. (2005). Basic human values: Their content and structure across countries. In A. Tamayo & J. B. Porto (Eds.), Values and Behavior in Organizations (pp. 21–55). Petrópolis: Vozes.Google Scholar
  74. Schwartz, S. H. (2006). Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations. In R. Jowell, C. Roberts, R. Fitzgerald, & G. Eva (Eds.), measuring attitudes cross-nationally—lessons from the European Social Survey. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  75. Schwartz, S. H. (2011). Values: Individual and cultural. In S. M. Breugelmans, A. Chasiotis, & F. J. R. van de Vijver (Eds.), Fundamental questions in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 463–493). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schwartz, S. H., & Bardi, A. (1997). Influences of adaptation to communist rule on value priorities in Eastern Europe. Political Psychology, 18, 385–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schwartz, S. H., & Huisman, S. (1995). Value priorities and religiosity in four Western religions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(2), 88–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Schwartz, S. H., & Ros, M. (1995). Values in the west: A theoretical and empirical challenge to the individualism-collectivism cultural dimension. World Psychology, 1, 99–122.Google Scholar
  79. Schwippert, K. (2007). Progress in reading literacy: The impact of PIRLS 2001 in 13 countries. New York: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  80. Schwippert, K., & Lenkeit, J. (2012). Progress in reading literacy in national and international context. The impact of PIRLS 2006 in 12 countries. New York: Waxmann Verlag.Google Scholar
  81. Science and Engineering Indicators. (2002). Elementary and secondary education: Trends in teacher salaries (pp. 1–39). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics.Google Scholar
  82. Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2014). The OECD and the expansion of PISA: New global modes of governance in education. British Educational Research Journal, 40(6), 917–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Shapiro, I., & Kamin, D. (2004). Share of economy going to wages and salaries drops for unprecedented 14th straight quarter. Austin, TX: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.Google Scholar
  84. Shin, D. C., & Inoguchi, T. (2009). Avowed happiness in Confucian Asia: Ascertaining its distribution, patterns, and sources. Social Indicators Research, 92, 405–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Simola, H. (2005). The Finnish miracle of PISA: Historical and sociological remarks on teaching and teacher education. Comparative Education, 41(4), 455–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Steiner-Khamsi, G., & Waldow, F. (Eds.). (2012). Policy borrowing and lending. World yearbook of education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  87. Swick, K. J., & Broadway, F. (1997). Parental efficacy and successful parent involvement. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 24(1), 69–81.Google Scholar
  88. Tan, C. (2012). Learning from Shanghai: Lessons on achieving educational success. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  89. Tan, S. J., & Tambyah, S. K. (2011). Generalized trust and trust in institutions in Confucian Asia. Social Indicators Research, 103(3), 357–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tao, V. Y. K., & Hong, Y. Y. (2014). When academic achievement is an obligation: Perspectives from social-oriented achievement motivation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 110–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Tilak, J. B. (2003). Vocational education and training in Asia. International handbook of educational research in the Asia-Pacific Region (pp. 673–686). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  92. Trumbull, E., Rothstein-Fisch, C., Greenfield, P., & Quiroz, B. (2001). Bridging cultures between home and school: A guide for teachers. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  93. Tsai, C. L., & Zhou, L. S. (2015). A cultural confrontation: Western impacts on female college students’ leisure opportunities in Taiwan and China. Social Indicators of Research, 120(1), 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wiseman, A. W., Astiz, M. F., Fabrega, R., & Baker, D. P. (2011). Making citizens of the world: The political socialization of youth in formal mass education systems. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 41(5), 561–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Yeganeh, H. (2014). Culture and corruption: A concurrent application of Hofstede’s, Schwartz’s and Inglehart’s frameworks. International Journal of Development Issues, 13(1), 2–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Yeganeh, H., Su, Z., & Sauers, D. (2009). The applicability of widely employed frameworks in cross-cultural management research. Journal of Academic Research in Economics, 1(1), 1–24.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Leadership and Policy, The School of EducationBar-Ilan UniversityRamat-GanIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Education and PsychologyThe Open University of IsraelRaananaIsrael

Personalised recommendations