Abstract
Is there a relationship between political participation and individual life satisfaction? The idea that political participation makes people more satisfied with their lives has long been debated. However, the existing empirical research has not been very successful in demonstrating that such a relationship exists while some studies show that instead it is individual life satisfaction that impacts political participation. This paper aims to shed some light on the issue of causality between political participation and individual life satisfaction. Unlike former studies, we resort to panel data and apply a three wave model which allows us great flexibility to test several hypotheses. Also unlike previous studies, after correcting for measurement error, our analysis shows no compelling evidence of a causal relationship between political participation and life satisfaction.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


Notes
“Beteiligung in Bürgerinitiativen, in Parteien, in der Kommunalpolitik”.
References
Aldrich, J. (1993). Rational Choice and Turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 37(1), 246.
Alwin, D. F. (2007). Margins of error: A study of reliability in survey measurement. New York: Wiley.
Arrow, K. J. (1950). A difficulty in the concept of social welfare. Journal of Political Economy, 58(4), 328–346.
Barnes, S., Farah, B., & Heunks, F. (1979a). Personal dissatisfaction. In S. Barnes, M. Kaase, et al. (Eds.), Political action: Mass participation in five western democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Barnes, S., Kaase, M., et al. (1979b). Political action: Mass participation in five western democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Bentler, P., & Chou, P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modelling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16, 78–117.
Claassen, R. L. (2008). Testing the reciprocal effects of campaign participation. Political Behavior, 30(3), 277–296.
Dahl, R. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Diener, E., Suh, E., Lucas, R., & Smith, H. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.
Dorn, D., Fischer, J. A. V., Kirchgassner, G., & Sousa-Poza, A. (2008). Direct democracy and life satisfaction revisited: New evidence for Switzerland. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 227–255.
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of political action in a democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 65(2), 135–150.
Finkel, S. (1985). Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy: A panel analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29, 891–913.
Finkel, S. E. (1995). Causal analysis with panel data (p. 105). Thousand Oaks: Sage. QASS.
Finkel, S. E. (2007). Linear panel analysis. In S. Menard (Ed.), Handbook of longitudinal research: Design, measurement, and analysis. New York: Elsevier.
Flavin, P., & Keane, M. (2012). Life satisfaction and political participation: Evidence from the United States. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(1), 63–78.
Frey, B. S., Benz, M., & Stutzer, A. (2004). Introducing procedural utility: Not only what, but also how matters. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 160, 377–401.
Headey, B., & Muffels, R. (2014). Two-way causation in life satisfaction research: Structural equation models with granger-causation. IZA Discussion Paper No. 8665, pp. 1–52.
Ikeda, K., Kobayashi, T., & Hoshimoto, M. (2008). Does political participation make a difference? The relationship between political choice, civic engagement and political efficacy. Electoral Studies, 27, 77–88.
Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among western publics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (2005). LISREL 8.57. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
Kessler, R., & Greenberg, D. (1981). Linear Panel Analysis. New York: Academic Press.
Lane, R. E. (1988). Procedural goods in a democracy: How one is treated versus what one gets. Social Justice Research, 2, 177–192.
Oishi, S., Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (2007). The optimal level of well-being: Can we be too happy? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 346–360.
Pacheco, G., & Lange, T. (2010). Political participation and life satisfaction: A cross-European analysis. International Journal of Social Economics, 37(10), 686–702.
Petrescu, M. (2013). Marketing research using single-item indicators in structural equation models. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 1, 99–117.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Quintelier, E., & Hooghe, M. (2012). Political attitudes and political participation: A panel study on socialization and self-selection effects among late adolescents. International Political Science Review, 33(1), 63–81.
Riker, W., & Ordeshook, P. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review, 62(1), 25–42.
Saris, W. E., & Gallhofer, I. N. (2007). Design, evaluation, and analysis of questionnaires for survey research. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Saris, W. E., Satorra, A., & van der Veld, W. (2009). Testing structural equation models or detection of misspecifications? Structural Equation Modelling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 561–582.
Saris, W., Oberski, D., Revilla, M., Zavala-Rojas, D., Lilleoja, L., Gallhofer, I. N., & Gruner, T. (2011). The development of the program SQP 2.0 for the prediction of the quality of survey questions. RECSM Working Paper 24. Available at: https://www.upf.edu/documents/3966940/3986764/RECSM_wp024.pdf.
Schimmack, U. (2009). Wellbeing: Measuring wellbeing in the SOEP. Schmollers Jahrbuch, 129, 1–9.
Stadelmann-Steffen, I., & Vatter, A. (2012). Does satisfaction with democracy really increase happiness? Direct democracy and individual satisfaction in Switzerland. Political Behavior, 34(3), 539–559.
Stutzer, A., & Frey, B. S. (2006). Political participation and procedural utility: An empirical study. European Journal of Political Research, 45, 391–418.
Talò, C., & Mannarini, T. (2015). Measuring participation: Development and validation the participatory behaviors scale. Social Indicators Research, 123(3), 799–816.
Teorell, J. (2006). Political participation and three theories of democracy: A research inventory and agenda. European Journal of Political Research, 45, 787–810.
UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) (2011). ISCED: International Standard Classification of Education. http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/Pages/international-standard-classification-of-education.aspx.
van der Veld, W., Saris, W. E., & Satorra, A. (2008). Judgement rule aid for structural equation models version 3.0.4 beta.
Veenhoven, R. (1988). The utility of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 20(4), 333–354.
Wagner, G. G., Frick, J. R., & Schupp, J. (2007). The german socio-economic panel study (SOEP)—Scope, evolution and enhancements. Schmollers Jahrbuch, 127(1), 139–169.
Warren, M. (1992). Democratic theory and self-transformation. American Political Science Review, 86, 8–23.
Weitz-Shapiro, R., & Winters, M. S. (2011). The link between voting and life satisfaction in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society, 53(4), 101–126.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1: Political Participation Construct Validity
The most suitable test of the validity of the items proposed to measure political participation is construct validity. Therefore, we will compare the correlations of our proposed participation measure and other measures of concepts that are theoretically expected to be related with political participation.
For the case of political participation, the variable selected from the SOEP data to test construct validity is the following: Generally speaking, how much are you interested in politics? (1) Not at all; (2) Not so much; (3) Much; (4) Very much.
This question is a measure of political interest. It should be correlated with political participation, measured here by the frequency of reported political activities. We expect that the higher the political interest of the respondent, the higher the frequency of political participation actions the respondent will declare to have participated.
Political interest | Wave 1 | Wave 2 | Wave 3 |
---|---|---|---|
Political participation | 0.2414* | 0.2574* | 0.2278* |
N | 20,214 | 18,917 | 20,059 |
We see a moderate positive correlation between political participation and political interest in all waves included in our study, as it was initially expected. In order to assess further the validity of our political participation measure, we decided to put together a Civic Participation index, which consists of one item asking if the respondent was a member of a trade union and another item regarding membership of professional associations, generated from the first wave of the SOEP data used in this paper.
In the table below we can see that the correlation of civic participation with political interest is weak and much weaker than the correlation of our measure of political participation with political interest. We can then reasonably assume that our measure of political participation and this measure of civic participation are measuring different things, therefore reinforcing our confidence in the validity of the political participation measurement.
Political interest | |
---|---|
Civic participation | 0.1506* |
N | 19,930 |
Appendix 2: Summary/Descriptives of Variables
Wave | Variable | Mean | SD | Min | Max |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007 | Political participation | 0.107 | 0.382 | 0 | 3 |
Life satisfaction | 6.933 | 1.782 | 0 | 10 | |
Education | 3.671 | 1.434 | 1 | 6 | |
Income | 2.898 | 2.198 | 1 | 10 | |
Unemployed | 0.680 | 0.251 | 0 | 1 | |
Partner | 0.610 | .487 | 0 | 1 | |
Prof. ass. ss | 0.077 | 0.267 | 0 | 1 | |
Other | 0.358 | 0.479 | 0 | 1 | |
Environment | 0.043 | 0.203 | 0 | 1 | |
2008 | Political participation | 0.138 | 0.424 | 0 | 3 |
Life satisfaction | 6.968 | 1.758 | 0 | 10 | |
2009 | Political participation | 0.110 | 0.384 | 0 | 3 |
Life satisfaction | 6.966 | 1.785 | 0 | 10 |
Appendix 3: Correction for Measurement Error: Quality Coefficients and Error Variances
Quality coeff. | Source | Error variance (1 − q2) | |
---|---|---|---|
Endogenous variables | |||
Life satisfaction 2007 | 0.736 | SQP own coding | 0.338 |
Life satisfaction 2008 | 0.736 | SQP own coding | 0.459 |
Life satisfaction 2009 | 0.736 | SQP own coding | 0.338 |
Political participation 2007 | 0.814 | SQP own coding | 0.459 |
Political participation 2008 | 0.814 | SQP own coding | 0.338 |
Political participation 2009 | 0.814 | SQP own coding | 0.459 |
Control variables | |||
Education | 0.898 | Alwin (2007, p. 328) | 0.102 |
Income | 0.777 | Alwin (2007, p. 328) | 0.223 |
Unemployed | 0.677 | Alwin (2007, p. 328) | 0.177 |
Partner | 0.966 | Alwin (2007, p. 328) | 0.017 |
Social membership | Loadings |
---|---|
Member of other types of associations | 1.00 |
Member of a Environmental association | 0.66** (0.04) |
Member of a professional association | 1.00** (0.05) |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pirralha, A. The Link Between Political Participation and Life Satisfaction: A Three Wave Causal Analysis of the German SOEP Household Panel. Soc Indic Res 138, 793–807 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1661-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1661-x
Keywords
- Life satisfaction
- Political participation
- Political science
- Causality