Skip to main content

Volatile Places, Volatile Times: Predicting Revolutionary Situations with Nations’ Governance and Fragility Indicators

Abstract

The current study examines the predictive validity of the World Bank’s World Governance Indicators (WGI) and the Fund for Peace’s Fragile States Index (FSI) in identifying the location and timing of revolutionary situations in 26 countries that have popular mobilization movements within the last two decades. The results of case comparative analyses provide some empirical support for both the WGI and FSI measures in predicting the timing of revolutionary situations (i.e., the year preceding the onset of mass protest was often one of the most “fragile” time period in a nation’s pre-revolutionary history). However, these aggregate measures have low predictive value in identifying the between-nation differences in their relative risks of having a revolutionary situation (i.e., revolutionary nations are not necessarily countries with the lowest scores on measures of misgovernance and fragility). Possible explanations for these findings and limitations of the current study are discussed in terms of their implications for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. Based on its original coding and calibration (Kaufmann et al. 2010), both the general composite index of governance and the specific subcomponents of it are expressed in standardized units that range from -2.50 to +2.50. Low scores on these measures represent less governance.

  2. The negative relationship between these two composite indices is due to the valence of their respective scales. Specifically, values on the WGI are standardized from −2.50 to +2.50 (more positive values are interpreted as having higher quality of governance), whereas composite FSI values range from 0 to 120 (higher values are interpreted as indicative of having greater fragility).

  3. It is important to note that the so-called Purple Revolution of 2005 in Iraq was a metaphor for the elections in Iraq that happened that year, but these elections did not result in any protests. In contrast, the events of 2011 in Iraq were part of the Arab Spring, when people went to the streets in mass protest; the country had all three elements of the revolutionary situations in 2011 as opposed to 2005.

  4. These additional supplemental analyses are not shown here but are available from the authors on request.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olesya Venger.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 4

Table 4 Summary of Characteristics of nations with revolutionary situations in 21st century

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Venger, O., Miethe, T.D. Volatile Places, Volatile Times: Predicting Revolutionary Situations with Nations’ Governance and Fragility Indicators. Soc Indic Res 138, 373–402 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1651-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1651-z

Keywords

  • World governance indicators
  • Fragile states index
  • Case comparative analysis
  • Revolutionary situations
  • Temporal and spatial variability