Donating Time or Money? The Effects of Religiosity and Social Capital on Civic Engagement in Qatar

Abstract

Few studies have examined the role of religiosity and social capital on civic engagement in the context of a Muslim country. In this paper, we explore the impact of religiosity and social capital on charitable donations and volunteerism in Qatar. Drawing on a nationally representative survey from Qatar, we consider various attitudinal and behavioral measures for capturing religiosity and social capital. The results indicate that, even after controlling for a wide range of demographic variables, behavioral measures have a stronger effect than attitudes. Individuals who regularly perform daily prayers are more likely to donate than those individuals who simply describe themselves as religious. Similarly, individuals who are more active in their neighborhood engagement are more likely to volunteer than those who merely report high levels of social trust. These results suggest that when it comes to the relationship between religiosity, social capital and civic engagement, individual behavior is much more predictive than attitudes alone. We also find that even in the case of Qatar, where citizen wealth has rapidly increased in the last few decades, there is little evidence of substitution effects: citizens do not appear to trade-off or substitute between time and money. Instead, more religious and active citizens are likely to do both.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    However, Wuthnow (1999) cautions researchers about the use of religious participation as a predictor of volunteering in the United States. He argues that because religious participation has remained almost the same over time, the decline in other forms of civic engagement cannot be simply explained by an eroding base in religion. He argues that the relationship between religious participation and civic engagement, as well as the composition of religious participation, may be changing and hence signaling future problems for civic engagement in the United States.

  2. 2.

    A growing literature on religiosity and political behavior has shown how important it is that we take context seriously. Individual attitudes on democracy and corruption depend on a complex, conditional relationship between macro-political structures (e.g., a country’s regime type) and an individual’s local religious context (Bloom and Arikan 2012; Sommer et al. 2013).

  3. 3.

    We wish to thank an anonymous reviewer for pointing this to us.

  4. 4.

    The correlation between the religiosity and social capital variables is as follow: religiosity and trust (−0.0009); religiosity and social capital (0.0157); Fajr and trust (−0.0111); Fajr and social capital (0.0718).

  5. 5.

    In the regression, we standardized the income variable by subtracting the mean and dividing by the standard deviation.

  6. 6.

    We wish to thank the anonymous reviewer who suggested this treatment of the income variable to us.

References

  1. Beblawi, H. (1987). The rentier state in the Arab world. Arab Studies Quarterly, 9, 383–398.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bekkers, R., & Schuyt, T. (2008). And who is your neighbor? Explaining denominational differences in charitable giving and volunteering in the Netherlands. Review of Religious Research, 50(1), 74–96.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beyerlein, K., & Hipp, J. R. (2005). Social capital, too much of a good thing? American religious traditions and community crime. Social Forces, 84(2), 995–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bloom, P. B. N., & Arikan, G. (2012). A two-edged sword: The differential effect of religious belief and religious social context on attitudes towards democracy. Political Behavior, 34(2), 249–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 999–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Central Intelligence Agency. (2014). Qatar. In The World Factbook. Washington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency.

  7. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), S95–S120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Colletta, N. J., & Cullen, M. L. (2000). Violent conflict and the transformation of social capital: Lessons from Cambodia, Rwanda, Guatemala, and Somalia (Vol. 795). Washington: World Bank Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dana, K., Barreto, M. A., & Oskooii, K. A. (2011). Mosques as American institutions: Mosque attendance, religiosity and integration into the political system among American Muslims. Religions, 2(4), 504–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. de Tocqueville, A. (1835). Democracy in America. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gardner, A. M. (2011). Gulf migration and the family. Journal of Arabian Studies, 1(1), 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gengler, J., Tessler, M., Al-Emadi, D., & Diop, A. (2013). Civic life and democratic citizenship in Qatar findings from the First Qatar World Values Survey. Middle East Law and Governance, 5(3), 258–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gill, A., & Lundsgaarde, E. (2004). State welfare spending and religiosity a cross-national analysis. Rationality and Society, 16(4), 399–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Greeley, A. (2001). The future of religion in America. Society, 38(3), 32–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Grootaert, C., & Van Bastelaer, T. (2001). Understanding and measuring social capital: A synthesis of findings and recommendations from the social capital initiative (Vol. 24). World Bank, Social Development Family, Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Network.

  16. Guterbock, T. M., & Fries, J. C. (1997). Maintaining America’s social fabric: The AARP survey of civic involvement. Washington, DC: American Association of Retired Persons.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hall, P. (1999). Social Capital in Britain. British Journal of Political Science, 29, 417–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies (Vol. 19). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jamal, A. (2005). The political participation and engagement of Muslim Americans’mosque involvement and group consciousness. American Politics Research, 33(4), 521–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kamrava, M. (2012). Political economy of the Persian Gulf. London: Hurst.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lam, P. Y. (2002). As the flocks gather: How religion affects voluntary association participation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41(3), 405–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Langohr, V. (2004). Too much civil society, too little politics: Egypt and liberalizing Arab regimes. Comparative Politics, 36(2), 181–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Le, T., Kien, J. M., Brick, A., & Diop, D. A. (2013). Within household sampling conditioning on household size. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(1), 108–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li, Y. (2015a). The flow of soul: A sociological study of generosity in England and Wales (2001–2011). In Y. Li (Ed.), The handbook of research methods and applications on social capital (pp. 40–59). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Li, Y. (2015b). Social capital in sociological research: Conceptual rigour and empirical application. In Y. Li (Ed.), The handbook of research methods and applications on social capital (pp. 1–20). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Li, Y., Pickles, A., & Savage, M. (2005). Social capital and social trust in Britain. European Sociological Review, 21(2), 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li, Y., Savage, M., & Pickles, A. (2003). Social capital and social exclusion in England and Wales (1972–1999). British Journal of Sociology, 54(4), 497–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li, Y., Savage, M., & Warde, A. (2015). Social stratification, social capital and cultural practice in the UK. In Y. Li (Ed.), The handbook of research methods and applications on social capital (pp. 21–39). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lim, C., & Putnam, R. D. (2010). Religion, social networks, and life satisfaction. American Sociological Review, 75(6), 914–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Miller, A. H., & Wattenberg, M. P. (1984). Politics from the Pulpit: Religiosity and the 1980 elections. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48(1B), 301–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Montagu, C. (2010). Civil society and the voluntary sector in Saudi Arabia. The Middle East Journal, 64(1), 67–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Musick, M. A., Wilson, J., & Bynum, W. B. (2000). Race and formal volunteering: The differential effects of class and religion. Social Forces, 78(4), 1539–1570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nagy, S. (2006). Making room for migrants, making sense of difference: Spatial and ideological expressions of social diversity in urban Qatar. Urban Studies, 43(1), 119–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2002). Islamic culture and democracy: Testing the ‘clash of civilizations’ thesis. Comparative Sociology, 1(3), 235–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Okruhlik, G. (1999). Rentier wealth, unruly law, and the rise of opposition: The political economy of oil states. Comparative Politics, 31(3), 295–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Paxton, P. (1999). Is social capital declining in the United States? A multiple indicator assessment. American Journal of Sociology, 105(1), 88–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Peterson, S. A. (1992). Church participation and political participation: The spillover effect. American Politics Quarterly, 20(1), 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Pfaff, S., & Gill, A. J. (2006). Will a million Muslims march? Muslim interest organizations and political integration in Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 39(7), 803–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone, the collapse and revival of civic America. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Putnam, R. D. (2007). E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century, the 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 33(2), 137–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Putnam, R. D., Campbell, D. E., & Garrett, S. R. (2012). American Grace: How religion divides and Unites Us. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ringgren, H. (2014). The problems of syncretism. Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis, 3, 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rubin, U. (1987). Morning and evening prayers in early Islam. JSAI, 10, 40–67.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ruiter, S., & De Graaf, N. D. (2006). National context, religiosity, and volunteering: Results from 53 countries. American Sociological Review, 71(2), 191–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Sarkissian, A. (2012). Religion and civic engagement in Muslim countries. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 51(4), 607–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Schofer, E., & Fourcade-Gourinchas, M. (2001). The structural contexts of civic engagement: Voluntary association membership in comparative perspective. American Sociological Review, 66(6), 806–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Schwadel, P. (2005). Individual, congregational, and denominational effects on church members’ civic participation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44(2), 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Schwarz, R. (2008). The political economy of state-formation in the Arab Middle East: Rentier states, economic reform, and democratization. Review of International Political Economy, 15(4), 599–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Shah, N. M. (2013). Labour migration from Asian to GCC countries: Trends, patterns and policies. Middle East Law and Governance, 5(1–2), 36–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Smidt, C. (1999). Religion and civic engagement: A comparative analysis. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 565(1), 176–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Sobh, R., & Belk, R. (2011). Domains of privacy and hospitality in Arab Gulf homes. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 2(2), 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Sommer, U., Bloom, P. B. N., & Arikan, G. (2013). Does faith limit immorality? The politics of religion and corruption. Democratization, 20(2), 287–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Uslaner, E. M. (2008). Where you stand depends upon where your grandparents sat: The inheritability of generalized trust. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(4), 725–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Uslaner, E. (2015). The rootes of trust. In Y. Li (Ed.), The handbook of research methods and applications on social capital (pp. 60–75). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., Brady, H. E., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics (Vol. 4). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Wilson, J. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 215–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Wilson, J., & Musick, M. (1997). Who cares? Toward an integrated theory of volunteer work. American Sociological Review, 62(5), 694–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Wuthnow, R. (1999). Mobilizing civic engagement: The changing impact of religious involvement. In Skocpol, T., Fiorina M.P. (Ed.) Civic engagement in American Democracy (pp. 331–363). Washington, DC: Broolings Institution.

  60. Wuthnow, R. (2003). The impact of religious involvement on civic life. In E. J. Dionne Jr., K. Meltzer Dorgosz, & E. R. Litan (Eds.), United We Serve: National service and the future of citizenship (pp. 222–237). Washington, DC: Brookings University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdoulaye Diop.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Diop, A., Johnston, T., Le, K.T. et al. Donating Time or Money? The Effects of Religiosity and Social Capital on Civic Engagement in Qatar. Soc Indic Res 138, 297–315 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1646-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Social capital
  • Religiosity
  • Volunteering
  • Charitable donations
  • Muslim countries
  • Gulf cooperation countries