Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 137, Issue 2, pp 625–640 | Cite as

Quality of Life in Intentional Communities

  • Bjørn GrindeEmail author
  • Ragnhild Bang Nes
  • Ian F. MacDonald
  • David Sloan Wilson
Article

Abstract

The present study was initiated to investigate levels and predictors of wellbeing among inhabitants of intentional communities (ICs). An anonymous, Internet-based questionnaire was distributed to US and Canadian ICs. Responses were obtained from 913 members. Wellbeing was measured by the widely used satisfaction with life scale (SWLS). Hierarchical linear regression analyses were run to test the predictive validity of Social support, Identity fusion, Meaning in life, Community satisfaction and Life change, and Religious activity above and beyond demographic variables and personality traits. Mean scores on the SWLS were estimated to 5.27 and 5.47 (1–7 scale) for men and women, respectively. The full model explained 41.4% of the variance for men and 38.2% for women. Personality explained 13.4 (men) and 14.4% (women) of the variation, while demographic variables only had a minor impact. Overall, presence of Meaning in life and Social support were the most important predictors. The IC inhabitants reported wellbeing on par with the highest scores previously published. The findings support the contention that sustainability, in the form of a communal lifestyle of low ecological footprint, may be promoted without forfeiting wellbeing.

Keywords

Intentional communities Life satisfaction Sustainability Meaning in life Social support Ecovillages 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Laird Schaub and the Fellowship for Intentional Community for support in carrying out the research. The work was supported by a John Templeton Foundation grant titled “Religion’s Impact on Human Life: Integrating Proximate and Ultimate Perspectives”.

References

  1. Avital, E., & Jablonka, E. (2001). Animal traditions: Behavioural inheritance in evolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Blumstein, T., Benyamini, Y., Fuchs, Z., Shapira, Z., Novikov, I., Walter-Ginzburg, A., et al. (2004). The effect of a communal lifestyle on depressive symptoms in late life. Journal of Aging and Health, 16(2), 151–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clench-Aas, J., Nes, R. B., Dalgard, O. S., & Aaro, L. E. (2011). Dimensionality and measurement invariance in the satisfaction with life scale in Norway. Quality of Life Research, 20(8), 1307–1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen, S., Mermelstein, R., Kamarck, T., & Hoberman, H. (1985). Measuring the functional components of social support. In I. Sarason & B. Sarason (Eds.), Social support: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 73–94). Holland: Marinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crawford, C., & Krebs, D. (2008). Foundations of evolutionary psychology. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  6. Daams, M. N., & Veneri, P. (2016). Living near to attractive nature? A well-being indicator for ranking Dutch, Danish, and German functional urban areas. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1375-5.Google Scholar
  7. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2015). National accounts of subjective well-being. American Psychologist, 70(3), 234–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferriss, A. L. (2002). Religion and the quality of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gallagher, E. N., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2008). Social support and emotional intelligence as predictors of subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(7), 1551–1561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gomez, A., Brooks, M. L., Buhrmester, M. D., Vazquez, A., Jetten, J., & Swann, W. B. (2011). On the nature of identity fusion: Insights into the construct and a new measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5), 918–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the big-five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grinde, B. (2005). Can science promote religion for the benefit of society? Zygon, 40, 277–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grinde, B. (2009). Can the concept of discords help us find the causes of mental diseases? Medical Hypotheses, 73(1), 106–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grinde, B. (2012). The biology of happiness. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grinde, B., & Patil, G. G. (2009). Biophilia: Does visual contact with nature impact on health and well-being? International Journal of Environmental Research and Publib Health, 6(9), 2332–2343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grouden, M. E., & Jose, P. E. (2015). Do sources of meaning differentially predict search for meaning, presence of meaning, and wellbeing? International Journal of Wellbeing, 5(1), 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hendrickson, D. J., & Wittman, H. K. (2010). Post-occupancy assessment: Building design, governance and household consumption. Building Research and Information, 38(5), 481–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Henrich, J. (2015). The secret of our success: How culture is driving human evolution, domesticating our species, and making us smarter. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Ingelhart, R., Foa, R., Peterson, C., & Welzel, C. (2008). Development, freedom, and rising happiness a global perspective (1981–2007). Perspectives in Psychological Science, 3(4), 264–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. (2006). Evolution in four dimensions: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Jarvis, H. (2011). Saving space, sharing time: Integrated infrastructures of daily life in cohousing. Environment and Planning A, 43(3), 560–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jaskiewicz, M., & Besta, T. (2014). Is easy access related to better life? Walkability and overlapping of personal and communal identity as predictors of quality of life. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 9(3), 505–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 107(38), 16489–16493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kasser, T., Rosenblum, K. L., Sameroff, A. J., Deci, E. L., Niemiec, C. P., Ryan, R. M., et al. (2014). Changes in materialism, changes in psychological well-being: Evidence from three longitudinal studies and an intervention experiment. Motivation and Emotion, 38(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kitzes, J., & Wackernagel, M. (2009). Answers to common questions in ecological footprint accounting. Ecological Indicators, 9(4), 812–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Koenig, H. G., & Cohen, H. J. (2002). The link between religion and health: Psychoneuroimmunology and the faith factor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Layard, R. (2005). Happiness—lessons from a new science. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  29. Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 616–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Merz, E. L., Roesch, S. C., Malcarne, V. L., Penedo, F. J., Llabre, M. M., Weitzman, O. B., et al. (2014). Validation of interpersonal support evaluation list-12 (ISEL-12) scores among English- and Spanish-speaking Hispanics/Latinos from the HCHS/SOL sociocultural ancillary study. Psychological Assessment, 26(2), 384–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mulder, K., Costanza, R., & Erickson, J. (2006). The contribution of built, human, social and natural capital to quality of life in intentional and unintentional communities. Ecological Economics, 59(1), 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nimgaonkar, V. L., Fujiwara, T. M., Dutta, M., Wood, J., Gentry, K., Maendel, S., et al. (2000). Low prevalence of psychoses among the Hutterites, an isolated religious community. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157(7), 1065–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Brien, C. (2008). Sustainable happiness: How happiness studies can contribute to a more sustainable future. Canadian Psychology-Psychologie Canadienne, 49(4), 289–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Paul, R. A. (2015). Mixed messages: Cultural and genetic inheritance in the constitution of human society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The satisfaction with life scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(2), 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Perkins, D., & Long, D. (2002). Neighborhood sense of community and social capital: A multi-level analysis. In A. Fisher, C. Sonn, & B. Bishop (Eds.), Psychological sense of community: Research, applications, and implications. New York: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  37. Reyes-Garcia, V., Godoy, R. A., Vadez, V., Ruiz-Mallen, I., Huanca, T., Leonard, W. R., et al. (2009). The pay-offs to sociability. Human Nature-an Interdisciplinary Biosocial Perspective, 20(4), 431–446.Google Scholar
  38. Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  39. Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Romero, E., Villar, P., Gomez-Fraguela, J. A., & Lopez-Romero, L. (2012). Measuring personality traits with ultra-short scales: A study of the Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) in a Spanish sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(3), 289–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sanguinetti, A. (2014). Transformational practices in cohousing: Enhancing residents’ connection to community and nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 86–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Seaford, C. (2011). Policy: Time to legislate for the good life. Nature, 477(7366), 532–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sripada, R. K., Bohnert, A. S. B., Teo, A. R., Levine, D. S., Pfeiffer, P. N., Bowersox, N. W., et al. (2015). Social networks, mental health problems, and mental health service utilization in OEF/OIF National Guard veterans. Socical Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 50(9), 1367–1378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Steger, M. F. (2012). Making meaning in life. Psychological Inquiry, 23(4), 381–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(1), 80–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Steger, M. F., Kashdan, T. B., Sullivan, B. A., & Lorentz, D. (2008a). Understanding the search for meaning in life: Personality, cognitive style, and the dynamic between seeking and experiencing meaning. Journal of Personality, 76(2), 199–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Steger, M. F., Kawabata, Y., Shimai, S., & Otake, K. (2008b). The meaningful life in Japan and the United States: Levels and correlates of meaning in life. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(3), 660–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress.Google Scholar
  49. Sulemana, I. (2015). Are happier people more willing to make income sacrifices to protect the environment? Social Indicators Research, 127, 447–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wilson, D. S., Ostrom, E., & Cox, M. E. (2013). Generalizing the core design principles for the efficacy of groups. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 90, S21–S32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wittchen, H. U., Jacobi, F., Rehm, J., Gustavsson, A., Svensson, M., Jonsson, B., et al. (2011). The size and burden of mental disorders and other disorders of the brain in Europe 2010. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 21(9), 655–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wong, P. (2013). The human questo for meaning: Theories, research, and applications. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Norwegian Institute of Public HealthOsloNorway
  2. 2.Binghamton UniversityBinghamtonUSA

Personalised recommendations