Vocational Status, Hukou and Housing Migrants in the New Century: Evidence from a Multi-city Study of Housing Inequality

Abstract

Vocational status and living conditions are key factors that determine the quality of life of workers. In light of a rural–urban migration wave during the past decade, this study examined migrants’ experiences of occupational and housing inequality in major urban centers. Based on data from original household-level surveys conducted in four large cities, the study investigated the vocational and tenurial situations of different social groups. Estimates obtained using a binary logistic model indicated that apart from socioeconomic factors similar to those impacting Western societies, specific institutional factors such as the Hukou system, state-associated vocations, and residential status, were significant determinants of housing inequality. The study confirmed that there were significant disparities in the vocational status and housing conditions of urban residents and migrant workers in major Chinese cities. Along with excessive privatization of urban housing, the predominance of the Hukou urban housing system has created inequalities in employment, and in the housing market, in major Chinese urban centers, leading to housing poverty among migrant households.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Hukou (household registration) system was promulgated in China through the 1958 Hukou regulation (Hukou dengji tiaoli). Hukou is a system of identification requiring every citizen to be registered at the place of his or her birth, the place to which he or she is permitted to move, or his or her mother’s place of registration. It divides Chinese citizens into two major categories: agricultural and non-agricultural residents. See Guo and Iredale (2004) for a detailed discussion on this subject.

  2. 2.

    Permanent immigrants are individuals who have received official permission to change their registration from their place of origin to their place of relocation. By contrast, temporary migrants are individuals who have not changed their place of registration, even though they are living elsewhere for periods extending from a few days to several days or more (Chan 2010).

  3. 3.

    See the official document of the Government of Offices Administration of the State Council: http://www.ggj.gov.cn/xzsp/200912/t20091230_269559.htm.

  4. 4.

    Over a long period of time extending from the Mao era to present-day China, the Hukou system has been the standard tool for stratifying urban residents. Kam Wing Chan (1996) has described China’s stratified urban structure as a “two-class urban society”.

References

  1. Chan, K. W. (1996). Post-Mao China: A two-class urban society in the making. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 20(1), 134–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chan, K. W. (2010). The global financial crisis and migrant workers in China: ‘There is no future as a labourer; returning to the village has no meaning’. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(3), 659–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, J., Guo, F., & Wu, Y. (2011a). One decade of urban housing reform in China: Urban housing price dynamics and the role of migration and urbanization, 1995–2005. Habitat International, 35(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, J., Guo, F., & Wu, Y. (2011b). Chinese urbanization and urban housing growth since the mid-1990s. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 26(2), 219–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clark, W. A. V., & Dieleman, F. M. (1996). Households and housing: Choice and outcomes in the housing market. New Brunswick: Center for Urban Policy Research, the State University of New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dynarski, M. (1985). Housing demand and disequilibrium. Journal of Urban Economics, 17, 42–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fu, Y., Tse, D. K., & Zhou, N. (2000). Housing choice behavior of urban workers in China’s transition to a housing market. Journal of Urban Economics, 47(1), 61–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guo, F., & Iredale, R. (2004). The impact of Hukou status on migrants’ employment: Findings from the 1997 Beijing migrant census. International Migration Review, 38(2), 709–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hausman, J., & McFadden, D. (1984). Specification tests for the multinominal logit model. Econometrica, 52(5), 1219–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Henderson, J. V., & Ioannides, Y. M. (1983). A model of housing tenure choice. American Economic Review, 73(1), 98–113.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hiroshi, S. (2006). Housing inequality and housing poverty in urban China in the late 1990s. China Economic Review, 17(1), 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang, Y., & Clark, W. A. V. (2002). Housing tenure choice in transitional urban China: A multilevel analysis. Urban Studies, 39(1), 7–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang, Y., & Jiang, L. (2009). Housing inequality in transitional Beijing. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(4), 936–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ioannides, Y. M. (1979). Temporal risks and the tenure decision in housing markets. Economics Letters, 4(3), 293–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kennedy, P. (1998). A guide to econometrics (4th ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lee, J. (2000). From welfare housing to home ownership: The dilemma of China’s housing reform. Housing Studies, 15, 61–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li, S., & Li, L. (2006). Life course and housing tenure change in urban China: A study of Guangzhou. Housing Studies, 21(5), 653–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lux, M., Sunega, P., & Katrňák, T. (2013). Classes and castles: Impact of social stratification on housing inequality in post-socialist states. European Sociological Review, 29(2), 274–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, Y. P., & Murie, A. (1999). Commercial housing development in urban China. Urban Studies, 36(9), 1475–1494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu, F. (2001). Housing provision under globalisation: A case study of Shanghai. Environment and Planning A, 33, 1741–1764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yi, C., & Huang, Y. (2014). Housing consumption and housing inequality in Chinese cities during the first decade of the twenty-first century. Housing Studies, 29(2), 291–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao, Y.-H. (2002). Causes and consequences of return migration: Recent evidence from China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 30(2), 376–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71473283), and Beijing Municipal Social Science Foundation (14JGB078).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junhua Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, J., Wu, Y. & Li, H. Vocational Status, Hukou and Housing Migrants in the New Century: Evidence from a Multi-city Study of Housing Inequality. Soc Indic Res 139, 309–325 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1562-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Migrants
  • Vocational status
  • Hukou
  • Housing inequality
  • China