Social Indicators Research

, Volume 135, Issue 3, pp 1057–1078 | Cite as

Replies to Our Commentators

  • Alex C. Michalos
  • Kenneth C. Land


This paper is written to briefly summarize comments made on our paper “Fifty years after the social indicators movement: Has the promise been fulfilled? An assessment and an agenda for the future”, including additional ideas suggested by our reflections on the commentators’ remarks.


Quality of life Social indicators Social indicators movement Happiness Satisfaction 


  1. Andrews, N., Khalema, N. E., & Assié-Lumumba, N. D. T. (Eds.). (2015). Millennium development goals (MDGs) in retrospect. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle, (1998). Politics (C.D.C. Reeve, Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson, T., Cantillon, B., Marlier, E., & Nolan, B. (2002). Social indicators: The EU and social inclusion. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrington-Leigh, C., & Escande, A. (2016). Measuring progress and well-being: A comparative review of indicators. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1505-0.
  5. Bauer, R. A. (1966). Social indicators. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bestuzhev-Lada, I. V. (1980). Way of life and related concepts as parts of a system of social indicators. In A. Szalai & F. M. Andrews (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 159–170). London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Bieber, U. (2013). Social monitoring and reporting—The role of governments. 8th.Google Scholar
  8. Boelhouwer, J. (2017). The social indicators movement at 50: Onwards in unity or divided. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-017-1561-0.
  9. Brundtland Commission. (1987). Our common future World Commission on Environment and Development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brusegard, D. (1979). Rethinking national social reports. Social Indicators Research, 6, 261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carstens, R., & Sandoval-Hernandez, A. (2015). UNESCO Commissioned Study on the Measurement of GCED and ESD: Background, framing, indicators, feasibility and data collection. Netherlands: IEA.Google Scholar
  12. Casas, F. (1997). Children’s rights and children’s quality of life: Conceptual and practical issues. Social Indicators Research, 42, 283–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Casas, F. (2016). Children, adolescents and quality of life: The social sciences perspective over two decades. In F. Maggino (Ed.), A life devoted to quality of life, festschrift in honor of Alex C. Michalos (pp. 3–21). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Casas, F. (2017). Comments on “Fifty years after the social indicators movement”. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-017-1551-2.
  15. Chakraborty, A. (2002). Issues in social indicators, composite indices and inequality. Economic and Political Weekly, 18, 1199–1202.Google Scholar
  16. Cicero, M. T. (2001). On old age, on friendship, on divination. (W.A. Falconer, Trans.). Cambridge: Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Conference “Social monitoring and reporting in Europe”. Menaggio: Villa Vigoni, 13.-15.03. 2013.Google Scholar
  18. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Cummins, R. A. (1996). The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38, 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cummins, R. A. (2010). Subjective well-being, homeostatically protected mood and depression: A synthesis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cummins, R. A. (2013). Positive psychology and subjective well-being homeostasis: A critical examination of congruence. In D. Moraitou & A. Efklides (Eds.), Quality of life: A positive psychology perspective (pp. 67–86). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Cummins, R. A. (2014). Can happiness change? Theories and evidence. In K. M. Sheldon & R. E. Lucas (Eds.), Stability and happiness: theories and evidence on whether happiness can change (pp. 75–97). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science BV.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cummins, R. A. (2016). The theory of subjective well-being homeostasis: a contribution of understanding life quality. In F. Maggino (Ed.), A Life devoted to quality of life—festschrift in honor of Alex C. Michalos (pp. 61–79). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cummins, R. A. (2017). Subjective well-being as a social indicator. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1496-x.
  25. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1980). The empirical exploration of intrinsic motivational processes. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 39–80). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  26. Di Bella, E., Leporatti, L., & Maggino, F. (2017). Big data and social indicators: Actual trends and new perspectives. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1495-y.
  27. Diener, E. (2005). Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Diener, E., Helliwell, J. F., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.). (2010). International differences in well-being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Diener, E., Scollon, C. N., & Lucas, R. E. (2004). The evolving concept of subjective well-being: The multifaceted nature of happiness. In P. T. Costa & I. C. Siegler (Eds.), Recent advances in psychology and aging (pp. 188–219). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science BV.Google Scholar
  30. Drewnowski, J. (1978). The affluence line. Social Indicators Research, 5, 263–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gilman, R., & Huebner, E. S. (2000). Review of life satisfaction measures for adolescents. Behaviour Change, 17, 178–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Glatzer, W. (2017). The network of social indicators research—five decades later. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-017-1595-3.Google Scholar
  33. Glatzer, W., & Zapf, W. (2015). The spread of social indicators and quality of life research in Germany and Europe: An overview in honour of Alex Michalos. In F. Maggino (Ed.), A life devoted to quality of life, festschrift in honor of Alex Michalos (pp. 195–208). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Hagerty, M. R., Cummins, R. A., Ferriss, A. L., Land, K., Michalos, A. C., Peterson, M., et al. (2001). Quality of life indexes for national policy: Review and agenda for research. Social Indicators Research, 55, 1–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hagerty, M. R., & Land, K. C. (2007). Constructing summary indices of quality of life: A model for the effect of heterogeneous importance weights. Sociological Methods and Research, 35, 455–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Headey, B., Muffels, R., & Wagner, G. G. (2013). Choices which change life satisfaction: Similar results for Australia, Britain and Germany. Social Indicators Research, 112, 725–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Helliwell, J. F. (2017). What’s special about happiness as a social indicator? Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-017-1549-9.
  38. Helliwell, J. F., Huang, H., & Wang, S. (2015). The geography of world happiness. Chapter 2. In J. F. Helliwell, R. Layard, & J. Sachs (Eds.), World happiness report 2015 (pp. 12–41). New York: Sustainable Development Research Network.Google Scholar
  39. Hicks, S. (2013). Social monitoring and reporting—The role of Official Governments. 8th Conference “Social Monitoring and Reporting in Europe”, Menaggio: Villa Vigoni, 13.-15.03. 2013.Google Scholar
  40. Huebner, E. S. (2017). Quality of life and personality development: A reply to Land and Michalos. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-017-1560-1.
  41. Huebner, E. S., & Hills, K. J. (2013). Assessment of subjective well-being in children and adolescents. In D. Saklofske, C. R. Reynolds, & V. Schwean (Eds.), Oxford handbook of psychological assessment of children and adolescents (pp. 773–787). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. IEA. (2009). International civic and citizenship education study (ICCS) 2009.
  43. Johnston, I. (1997). Lecture on Aristotle’s Nicomachean ethics.
  44. Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 280–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Be careful what you wish for: optimal functioning and the relative attainment of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. In P. Schmuck & K. M. Sheldon (Eds.), Life goals and well-being: towards a positive psychology of human striving (pp. 115–129). Goettingen: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers.Google Scholar
  46. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  47. Land, K. C. (2012). The well-being of America’s children: Developing and improving the child and youth well-being index. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Land, K. C. (2016). A new round of neo-marxist books on the crisis of capitalism: Lessons for social indicators/quality-of-life/well-being studies. Social Indicators Network News. Numbers 126&127 (combined May and August).Google Scholar
  49. Land, K. C., & Michalos, A. C. (2017). Fifty years after the social indicators movement: Has the promise been fulfilled? An assessment and an agenda for the future. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-017-1571-y.Google Scholar
  50. Land, K. C., & Schneider, S. H. (1987). Forecasting in the social and natural sciences: Some Isomorphisms. In K. C. Land & S. H. Schneider (Eds.), Forecasting in the social and natural sciences (pp. 7–31). Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Liamputtong, P. (2008). Doing cross-cultural research. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. LMTF (Learning Metrics Task Force). (2013). Toward universal learning: Recommendations from the Learning Metrics Task Force. Montreal and Washington, D.C.: UNESCO Institute for Statistics and Center for Universal Education at the Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  53. McAdams, D. P. (2015). The art and science of personality development. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  54. Michalos, A. C. (1970). Cost-beneifit versus expected utility acceptance rules. Theory and Decision, 1, 61–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Michalos, A. C. (1980a). A reconsideration of the science court. In P. T. Durbin (Ed.), Philosophy and technology: An annual compilation of research (Vol. 3, pp. 10–28). Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press. Reprinted in Michalos 2017.Google Scholar
  56. Michalos, A. C. (1980b). North American social report: Foundations Population and Health (Vol. 1). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Michalos, A. C. (1980c). North American social report: Crime, justice and politics (Vol. 2). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Michalos, A. C. (1981a). North American social report: Science, education and recreation (Vol. 3). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Michalos, A. C. (1981b). North American social report: Environment, transportation and housing (Vol. 4). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Michalos, A. C. (1981c). Technology assessment, facts and values. In P. T. Durbin & F. Rapp (Eds.), Philosophy and technology (pp. 59–81). Dordrecht: D. Reidel. Reprinted in Michalos 2017.Google Scholar
  61. Michalos, A. C. (1982). North American social report: Economics, religion and morality (Vol. 5). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Michalos, A. C. (1985). Multiple discrepancies theory (MDT). Social Indicators Research, 16, 347–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Michalos, A. C. (1988). A case for a progressive annual net wealth tax. Public Affairs Quarterly, 2, 105–140.Google Scholar
  64. Michalos, A. C. (2003). Identifying the horse, the cart and their proper order in sustainable development. RivistaItaliana de EconomiaDemografia e Statistica, 57, 151–162.Google Scholar
  65. Michalos, A. C. (Ed.). (2005). Citation classics from social indicators research. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  66. Michalos, A. C. (2006). Logic, philosophy of science and the quality of life. In philosophy and world problems, John McMurtry (Ed.), the Encyclopedia of life support systems (EOLSS), Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO, Paris, France: Eolss Publishers. (
  67. Michalos, A. C. (2008a). Education, happiness and well-being. Social Indicators Research, 87, 347–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Michalos, A. C. (2008b). Connecting communities with community indicators. In OECD (Ed.), Statistics, knowledge and policy 2007: Measuring and fostering the progress of societies (pp. 133–135). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  69. Michalos, A. C. (2014). Quality of life, two variable theory. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 6427–6429). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Michalos, A. C. (2015). Ancient views on the quality of life. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  71. Michalos, A. C. (2017a). Selected works of Alex C. Michalos: Philosophy, science and technology (Vol. 1). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  72. Michalos, A. C. (2017b). Selected works of Alex C. Michalos: Business ethics and public policy (Vol. 2). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  73. Michalos, A. C. (2017c). Milestones of quality of life research in Canada, 1960s–2014. In selected works of Alex C Michalos: Health, education and quality of life (Vol. 4, pp. xx–xx). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  74. Michalos, A. C., & Kahlke, P. M. (2010). Arts and the perceived quality of life in British Columbia. Social Indicators Research, 96, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Michalos, A. C., Kahlke, P. M., Rempel, K., Lounatvuori, A., MacDiarmid, A., Creech, H., et al. (2015). Progress in measuring knowledge, attitudes and behaviours concerning sustainable development among tenth grade students in Manitoba. Social Indicators Research, 123, 303–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Michalos, A. C., Ramsey, D., Eberts, D., & Kahlke, P. M. (2011a). Good health is not the same as a good life: survey results from Brandon, Manitoba. Social Indicators Research, 107, 201–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Michalos, A. C., Smale, B., Labonté, R., Muharjarine, N., Scott, K., Moore, K et al.(2011b). The Canadian index of Wellbeing. Technical report 1.0. Waterloo, Ontario: Canadian Index of Wellbeing and University of Waterloo.Google Scholar
  78. Møller, V. (2017). Whatever happened to social indicators in Africa? Whatever happened indeed! A developing world perspective on the Kenneth C. Land and Alex C. Michalos report on ‘Fifty years after the social indicators movement’. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-017-1555-y.
  79. Niceforo, A. (1916–1917). È possibile un Sistema di indici quantitativi. Rivista di Antropologia, 21, 129–201.Google Scholar
  80. Noll, H.-H. (2017). Social monitoring and reporting—A success story in applied research on social indicators and quality of life. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1513-0.
  81. Noll, H.-H. & Berger, C. (2014). Stocktaking report on social monitoring and reporting in Europe. GESIS—Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Social Indicators Research Centre (Zsi): Mannheim, Germany.
  82. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Posner, J., Russell, J. A., & Peterson, B. S. (2005). The circumplex model of affect: an integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 715–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Rojas, M. (2017). On people and indicators of the well-being situation. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1507-y.Google Scholar
  85. Ryan, R. M., Huta, V., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on Eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 139–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 13–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sabbadini, L. L., & Maggino, F. (2017). Quality of life in Italian official surveys. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-017-1639-8.Google Scholar
  88. Saris, W. E., Pirralha, A., & Rojas, D. Z. (2016). Testing the comparability of different types of social indicators across groups. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1506-z.
  89. Sen, A. (1982). Choice, welfare and measurement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  90. Sen, A. (1985). Well-being, agency and freedom: The Dewey lectures 1984. Journal of Philosophy, 82, 169–221.Google Scholar
  91. Shek, D. T. L., Chan, Y. K., & Lee, P. S. N. (Eds.). (2005). Quality-of-life research in Chinese, Western and global contexts. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  92. Shek, D. T. L., & Wu, F. K. Y. (2017). The social indicators movement: Progress, paradigms, puzzles, promise and potential research directions. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-017-1552-1.Google Scholar
  93. Shin, D. C., & Inoguchi, T. (Eds.). (2010). The quality of life in confucian Asia. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  94. Shin, D. C., Rutkowski, C. P., & Park, C.-M. (Eds.). (2003). The quality of life In Korea. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  95. Solomon, E. S., et al. (1980). UNESCO’s policy-relevant quality of life research program. In A. Szalai & F. M. Andrews (Eds.), The quality of life. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  96. Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Paris: Commission.
  97. Suter, C. (2017). Comments on “Fifty years after the social indicators movement: Has the promise been fulfilled?” of K. Land and A. Michalos. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-017-1576-6.
  98. Suter, C., & Ravazzini, L. (2013). Social monitoring and reporting: The role of academic research and think tanks. Neuchatet: Expert Opinion, commissioned by GESIS.Google Scholar
  99. Tonon, G. (Ed.). (2016). Indicators of quality of life in Latin America. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  100. Tsai, M.-C. (2017). Social indicators movement and human agency: Comment on Land and Michalos. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-017-1553-0.
  101. UNESCO. (2014). Global citizenship education: Preparing learners for the challenges of the 21st century. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  102. Veenhoven, R. (2017). Co-Development of happiness research: Addition to ‘Fifty years after the social indicator movement. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-017-1554-z.
  103. Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., & Conti, C. (2008). The implications of two conceptions of happiness (hedonic enjoyment and eudaimonia) for the understanding of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 41–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Zumbo, B. D., & Chan, E. K. H. (Eds.). (2014). Validity and validation in social, behavioral, and health sciences. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Northern British ColumbiaPrince GeorgeCanada
  2. 2.Social Science Research InstituteDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations