Abstract
Normative criteria for evaluations of economic and social outcomes are often formulated in terms of social welfare functions which are essentially and importantly non-satiable. However, there are good reasons to consider certain normative criteria and many policy objectives to be capped, i.e. bounded, and thus satiable provided sufficient resources are made available for their satisfaction. Inspired by the Foster–Greer–Thorbecke class of indicators, this paper uses an interdisciplinary approach to develop a model for assessing outcomes in terms of capped objectives based on an understanding of individual shortfalls from the objective, denoted needs. We present an indicator to measure need satisfaction in a population of individuals with heterogeneous needs and highlight an aggregation problem under scarcity. For such situations, we develop three ways in which the indicator can be weighted that reflect respectively concerns over the frequency, depth and severity of the need shortfalls and show that normative evaluations based on these weighting schemes can conflict, yielding mutually inconsistent outcome rankings. The indicator can be adapted to measure a wide variety of phenomena, e.g. health needs, education shortfalls, deprivation, etc., and it is suited for targeting exercises and other policy implementations. In particular, it allows for exogenous weighting schemes, i.e. weights that can incorporate non-shortfall characteristics relevant for the evaluation, e.g. age, gender, ethnicity, etc. The indicator thus enables new ways for researchers to promote and study satiable objectives in a wide variety of contexts relevant to economic and social policy, e.g. human development programs, poverty reduction, healthcare policies, etc.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alkire, S. (2002). Valuing freedoms: Sen’s capabilities approach and poverty reduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alkire, S. (2005). Needs and capabilities. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 57, 229–252.
Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 476–487.
Alkire, S., Foster, J., Suman, S., Santos, M. E., Roche, J. M., & Ballon, P. (2015). Multidimensional poverty measurement analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bognar, G., & Hirose, I. (2014). The ethics of health care rationing. New York: Routledge.
Broome, J. (2015). Equality versus priority: A useful distinction. Economics and Philosophy, 31(2), 219–228.
Crisp, R. (2003). Equality, priority, and compassion. Ethics, 113(4), 745–763.
Daoud, A. (2007). (Quasi)Scarcity and Global Hunger: A sociological critique of the scarcity postulate with an effort to synthesis. Journal of Critical Realism, 6(2), 199–225.
Daoud, A. (2011). Sufficiency, abundance and scarcity: contributions to social and economic theory. Dissertation, University of Gothenburg.
Dorsey, D. (2012). The basic minimum: A welfarist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Doyal, L., & Gough, I. (1991). A theory of human need. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Foster, J., Greer, J., & Thorbecke, E. (1984). A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica, 52(3), 761–766.
Foster, J., Greer, J., & Thorbecke, E. (2010). The Foster–Greer–Thorbecke (FGT) poverty measure: 25 years later. Journal of Economic Inequality, 8(4), 491–524.
Foster, J., & Sen, A. (1997). On economic inequality: After a quarter century. In A. Sen (Ed.), On economic inequality (pp. 109–219). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gough, I. (2015). Climate change and sustainable welfare: the centrality of human needs. Cambridge Journal of Economics, doi:10.1093/cje/bev039.
Herlitz, A. (2012). Choice: An essay on pluralism, value conflicts and decision-making. Dissertation, European University Institute.
Herlitz, A., & Horan, D. (2016a). Measuring needs for priority setting in healthcare planning and policy. Social Science and Medicine, 157, 96–102.
Herlitz, A., & Horan, D. (2016b). Prioritizing the “worse off” under attainability constraints: An indeterminacy problem for distributive fairness. UCD Geary Institute for Public Policy Discussion Paper Series, Geary WP2016/08.
Hicks, J. R., & Allen, R. G. D. (1934). A reconsideration of the theory of value. Economica, 1(2), 52–76.
Hirose, I. (2015). Moral aggregation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Horan, D. (2012). Essays on innovation, R&D policy and industrial clusters. Dissertation, European University Institute.
Juth, N. (2015). Challenges for principles of need in health care. Health Care Analysis, 23(1), 73–87.
Marozzi, M. (2014). Measuring trust in European Public Institutions. Social Indicators Research, 123(3), 879–895.
Marozzi, M. (2015) Construction, robustness assessment and application of an index of perceived level of socio-economic threat from immigrants: A study of 47 European countries and regions. Social Indicators Research, doi:10.1007/s11205-015-1037-z.
Mitchell, P. M., Roberts, T. E., Barton, P. M., & Coast, J. (2015). Assessing sufficient capability: A new approach to economic evaluation. Social Science and Medicine, 139, 71–79.
OECD (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide, OECD 2008, ISBN 978-92-64-04345-9.
Pareto, V. (1974). Manuale di economia politica con una introduzione alla scienza sociale. Padova: Cedam.
Parfit, D. (1997). Equality and priority. Ratio, 10(3), 202–221.
Parfit, D. (2012). Another defence of the priority view. Utilitas, 24(3), 399–440.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2005). Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 168, 307–323.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1954). History of economic analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. (1976). Poverty: An ordinal approach to measurement. Econometrica, 44(2), 219–231.
Sen, A. (1979). Issues in the measurement of poverty. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 81(2), 285–307.
Sen, A. (1981). Poverty and famines: An essay on entitlement and deprivation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Shields, L. (2012). The prospects for sufficientarianism. Utilitas, 24(1), 101–117.
Temkin, L. (1993). Inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Temkin, L. (2012). Rethinking the good: Moral ideals and the nature of practical reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wiggins, D. (1987). Claims of need. In D. Wiggins (Ed.), Needs, values, truth (pp. 1–58). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wiggins, D. (2005). An idea we cannot do without: What difference will it make (e.g. to moral, political and environmental philosophy) to recognize and put to use a substantial concept of need? Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 80, 25–50.
Acknowledgments
This work has been conducted with the support of COFAS Marie Curie fellowship program and the Central Research Fund (Oxford Brookes University). The authors would like to thank Henrik Andersson, Christine Chwaszcza, Pascal Courty, Adel Daoud, Sean Dineen, Charles Gottlieb, Ian Gough, Urban Herlitz, Dennis Patterson, Richard Spady, Rick Van der Ploeg, Christoph Weiss and seminar participants at OPHI, University of Oxford and ZEF, University of Bonn as well as two anonymous reviewers for valuable feedback.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Herlitz, A., Horan, D. A Model and Indicator of Aggregate Need Satisfaction for Capped Objectives and Weighting Schemes for Situations of Scarcity. Soc Indic Res 133, 413–430 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1373-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1373-7