An individual’s, and indeed the nation’s, social and economic futures are highly dependent on early childhood development (ECD) outcomes, with poor ECD inhibiting future opportunities. Ecological ECD literature describes family, community and institutions as being key factors in children’s wellbeing, with suggestions that community factors may ameliorate impacts of poor ECD. It is therefore important to develop a greater understanding of those modifiable factors that positively, and negatively, affect ECD outcomes so as ECD policy and practice can be designed and implemented effectively. One approach to this analysis is through the identification and analysis of influencing factors identified within off-diagonal communities—that is those communities where children have either developed well in consideration of their high-levels of socio-economic disadvantage, or developed poorly in consideration of their low levels of socio-economic disadvantage. In this paper we describe a new method for the identification of off-diagonal communities. The method provides a clear and transparent approach to community selection, including a range of methods to further interrogate the community selection ensuring a rigorous and considered selection process. This new method, based on population Census and Australian Early Development Census data, provides the first step in identifying community factors likely to facilitate childhood wellbeing. These findings could inform policy making to reduce inequities by assisting in policy and service delivery design targeted to community needs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Note that the triennial Australian Early Development Census used to be called the Australian Early Development Index. For consistency and ease of reading, we have referred to the censuses of child development as the AEDC throughout the paper.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2011). Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS): Volume 1 - Main Structure and Greater Capital City Statistical Areas, Australia (Vol. 1). Cat # 1270.0.55.001, ABS: Canberra.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2013). Socio-economic indexes for areas (SEIFA) 2011: Technical paper. Cat No. 2033.0.55.001, ABS: Canberra.
Centre for Community Child Health, & Telethon Institute for Child Health Research. (2009). A snapshot of early childhood development in Australia: AEDI National report 2009. Canberra: Australian Government.
Centre for Community Child Health, & Telethon Institute for Child Health Research. (2012). A snapshot of early childhood development in Australia: AEDI National report 2012. Canberra: Australian Government.
Ellen, I., & Turner, M. (1997). Does neighbourhood matter? Assessing recent evidence. Housing Policy Debate, 8, 833–866. doi:10.1080/10511482.1997.9521280.
Fair Work Commission. (2014). Draft national minimum wage order 2014. Melbourne: Fair Work Commission.
Goldfeld, S., Mathews, T., Brinkman, S., Woolcock, G., Myers, J., Kershaw, P., Katz, I., Tanton, R., & Wiseman, J. (2010). The Kids in Communities Study: Measuring community level factors influencing children’s development. Report for VicHealth. Melbourne: Murdoch Children’s Research Institute.
Goldfeld, S., Woolcock, G., Katz, I., Tanton, R., Brinkman, S., O’Connor, E., et al. (2014). Neighbourhood effects influencing early childhood development: Conceptual model and trial measurement methodologies from the Kids in Communities Study. Social Indicators Research. doi:10.1007/s11205-014-0578-x.
Hertzman, C. (2010). Framework for the social determinants of early child development. In R. E. Tremblay, R. G. Barr, R. D. Peters, M. Boivin (Eds.), Encyclopedia on early childhood development. Montreal: Centre of Excellence for Early Childhood Development. http://www.child-encyclopedia.com/
Hertzman, C. (2012). Bringing a population health perspective to early biodevelopment: An emerging approach. In D. P. Keating (Ed.), Nature and nurture in early child development (pp. 217–244). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511975394.
Janus, M., & Offord, D. (2007). Development and psychometric properties of the early development instrument (EDI): A measure of children’s school readiness. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 39, 1–22. doi:10.1037/cjbs2007001.
Kohen, D. E., Leventhal, T., Dahinten, V. S., & McIntosh, C. N. (2008). Neighborhood disadvantage: Pathways of effects for young children. Child Development, 79, 156–169. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01117.x.
Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighbourhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 309–337. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.126.2.309.
Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2003). Children and youth in neighbourhood contexts. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 27–31. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.01216.
Shonkoff, J. P., & Boyce, W. T. (2009). Neuroscience, molecular biology, and the childhood roots of health disparities: Building a new framework for health promotion and disease prevention. Journal of the American Medical Association, 301, 2252–2259. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.754.
Swisher, R. (2008). Neighborhoods and youth: How neighborhood demographics and social processes affect youth outcomes. The Prevention Researcher, 15, 7–11.
Tanton, R., Harding, A., Daly, A., McNamara, J., & Yap, M. (2010). Australian children at risk of social exclusion: A spatial index for gauging relative disadvantage. Population, Space and Place, 16(2), 135–150.
This research was supported under the Australian Research Council's Linkage Projects funding scheme (Project Number LP130100411).
About this article
Cite this article
Tanton, R., Dare, M., Brinkman, S. et al. Identifying Off-Diagonal Communities Using the Australian Early Development Census Results. Soc Indic Res 132, 977–992 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1333-2
- Built environment
- Child development
- Socio-economic standards