Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 132, Issue 3, pp 953–975 | Cite as

More Unequal in Income, More Unequal in Wellbeing

  • Adam Okulicz-KozarynEmail author
  • Joan Maya Mazelis
Article

Abstract

This study focuses on the long-term trend in happiness by income level in the United States. General Social Survey data suggest that in the past, rich and poor Americans were not only more equal in terms of income, but also in terms of their subjective wellbeing: the happiness gap between the poor and the rich has been increasing. Today’s poor suffer greater relative unhappiness than the poor of past decades. The gap between the poor and the rich is substantial, approximately 0.4 on a 1–3 happiness scale. The increase in the happiness gap is striking: comparing the 1970s to the 2000s, the gap has widened by about 40 % between the poor and the rich, and by about 50 % between the middle class and the rich.

Keywords

Happiness Life satisfaction Subjective wellbeing Income inequality Fairness Social justice US General Social Survey (GSS) 

References

  1. Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88, 2009–2042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Attanasio, O., Hurst, E., & Pistaferri, L. (2012). The Evolution of Income, Consumption, and Leisure inequality in the US, 1980–2010. Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  3. Bartal, I., Decety, J., & Mason, P. (2011). Empathy and pro-social behavior in rats. Science, 334, 1427–1430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berg, M., & Veenhoven, R. (2010). Income inequality and happiness in 119 nations. repub.eur.nl.Google Scholar
  5. Bjørnskov, C., Dreher, A., Fischer, J. A., Schnellenbach, J., & Gehring, K. (2013). Inequality and happiness: When perceived social mobility and economic reality do not match. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 91, 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanchflower, D., & Oswald, A. (2003). Does inequality reduce happiness? Evidence from the states of the USA from the 1970s to the 1990s. Mimeographed, Warwick University.Google Scholar
  7. Blanchflower, D., & Oswald, A. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1359–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2011). International happiness: A new view on the measure of performance. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 25, 6–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bok, D. (2010). The politics of happiness: What government can learn from the new research on well-being. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Janoff-Buman, R. (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 917–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  12. Cassidy, J. (2013). American inequality in six charts. New York: The New Yorker.Google Scholar
  13. Chokshi, N. (2009). Education costs rising faster than health care. Washington: The Atlantic.Google Scholar
  14. Davis, J. A. (1966). The campus as a frog pond: An application of the theory of relative deprivation to career decisions of college men. American Journal of Sociology, 72, 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis, J. A., Smith, T. W., & Marsden, P. V. (2007): General Social Surveys, 1972–2006 [Cumulative File], Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
  16. Delhey, J., & Dragolov, G. (2014). Why inequality makes Europeans less happy: The role of distrust, status anxiety, and perceived conflict. European Sociological Review, 30, 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Delhey, J., & Kohler, U. (2010). Is happiness inequality immune to income inequality? New evidence through instrument-effect-corrected standard deviations. Social Science Research, 40(3), 742–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Delhey, J., & Urlich, K. (2006). From nationally bounded to Pan-European inequalities? On the importance of foreign countries as reference groups. European Sociological Review, 22, 125–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Desmond, M. (2015). Severe deprivation in America: An introduction. RSF 1(2):1–11. http://www.rsfjournal.org/doi/full/10.7758/RSF.2015.1.2.01. Retrieved 12 Jan 2016.
  20. Diener, E., & Lucas, R. R. (1999). Personality and subjective well-being. In E. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 213–229). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  21. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramovitz (Vol. 89, pp. 98–125). New York: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
  23. Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. The Economic Journal, 111, 465–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Easterlin, R. A., McVey, L. A., Switek, M., Sawangfa, O., & Zweig, J. S. (2010). The happiness–income paradox revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 22463–22468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Easterlin, R. A., Morgan, R., Switek, M., & Wang, F. (2012). China’s life satisfaction, 1990–2010. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 9775–9780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Edelman, P. (2012). So rich, so poor: Why it’s so hard to end poverty in America. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  27. Edin, K. J., & Shaefer, H. L. (2015). $2.00 a Day: Living on almost nothing in America. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  28. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? Economic Journal, 114, 641–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fischer, C. S. (2008). What wealth-happiness paradox? A short note on the American case. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 219–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fischer, C. S. (2010). Made in America: A social history of American culture and character. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Frank, R. H. (2010). Hey, big spender: You need a surtax. New York: New York Times.Google Scholar
  32. Frank, R. (2012). The Darwin economy: Liberty, competition, and the common good. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Frank, R. H. (2014). The vicious circle of income inequality. New York: New York Times.Google Scholar
  34. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic literature, 40(2), 402–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gilbert, D. L. (2011). The American class structure in an age of growing inequality (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  36. Gould, E., & Davis, A. (2015). Persistent poverty’s largest cause is inequality, not family structure. August 10. https://thesocietypages.org/families/2015/08/10/poverty-caused-by-inequality-not-family-structure/. Retrieved 17 Feb 2015.
  37. Graham, C., & Felton, A. (2006). Inequality and happiness: Insights from Latin America. Journal of Economic Inequality, 4, 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2012). World happiness report. New York: The Earth Institute, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  39. Hout, M. (2004). Getting the most out of the GSS income measures. Washington: National Opinion Research Center.Google Scholar
  40. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ligon, E. ([1989] 1994). The development and use of a consistent income measure for the General Social Survey. National Opinion Research Center, The University of ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  42. Massey, Douglas S. (2007). Categorically unequal: The American stratification system. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  43. Meara, E. R., Richards, S., & Cutler, D. M. (2008). The gap gets bigger: changes in mortality and life expectancy, by education, 1981–2000. Health Affairs, 27, 350–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Michalos, A. (1985). Multiple discrepancies theory (MDT). Social Indicators Research, 16, 347–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Myers, D. G. (2004). Exploring psychology. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  46. Ng, Y.-K. (1997). A case for happiness, cardinalism, and interpersonal comparability. The Economic Journal, 107, 1848–1858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Conversations with History: Martha Nussbaum. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qy3YTzYjut4&list=PLDmIbYyjfK8BAq8q-ZYzakLXnGtQ8PS0I&index=147.
  48. O’Connell, M. (2004). Fairly satisfied: Economic equality, wealth and satisfaction. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25, 297–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Oishi, S., Kesebir, S., & Diener, E. (2011). Income inequality and happiness. Psychological Science, 22, 1095–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Oishi, S., Schimmack, U., & Diener, E. (2012). Progressive taxation and the subjective well-being of nations. Psychological Science, 23, 86–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Okulicz-Kozaryn, A., Holmes IV, O., & Avery, D. R. (2014). The subjective well-being political paradox: Happy welfare states and unhappy liberals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(6), 1300–1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Oshio, T., & Kobayashi, M. (2010). Income inequality, perceived happiness, and self-rated health: Evidence from nationwide surveys in Japan. Social Science and Medicine, 70, 1358–1366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Oshio, T., & Kobayashi, M. (2011). Area-level income inequality and individual happiness: Evidence from Japan. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 633–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pickett, K. E. & Wilkinson, R. G. (2014). Income inequality and health: A causal review. Social Science & Medicine, 128, 316–326.Google Scholar
  55. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the 21st century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Putnam, R. D. (2001). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American Community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  57. Putnam, Robert D. (2015). Our kids: The American dream in crisis. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  58. Radcliff, B. (2013). The political economy of human happiness: How voters’ choices determine the quality of life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schulz, W. (1995). Multiple-discrepancies theory versus resource theory. Social Indicators Research, 34, 153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sen, A. (2000). Development as freedom. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  61. Shaefer, H. L., Edin, K., & Talbert, E. (2015). Understanding the dynamics of $2-a-day poverty in the United States. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 1(1):120–38. http://www.rsfjournal.org/doi/full/10.7758/RSF.2015.1.1.0. Retrieved 12 Jan 2016.
  62. Snowdon, C. (2010). The spirit level delusion: Fact-checking the left’s new theory of everything. Ripon: Little Dice.Google Scholar
  63. Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Happiness inequality in the United States. Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  64. Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2009). The paradox of declining female happiness. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 1, 190–225.Google Scholar
  65. Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). The price of inequality: How today’s divided society endangers our future. New York: WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  66. Stiglitz, J. E. (2013). Student debt and the crushing of the American dream. New York: The New York Times.Google Scholar
  67. Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. (2009). Report by the Commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr.
  68. The Economist. (2011). The rich and the rest What to do (and not do) about inequality. Economist.Google Scholar
  69. The Economist. (2012a). For richer, for poorer. The Economist.Google Scholar
  70. The Economist. (2012b). True progressivism. The Economist.Google Scholar
  71. The Economist. (2013). Having your cake; Less inequality does not need to mean less efficiency. The Economist.Google Scholar
  72. Tricomi, E., Rangel, A., Camerer, C., & O’Doherty, J. (2010). Neural evidence for inequality-averse social preferences. Nature, 463, 1089–1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Veenhoven, R. (2005). Return of inequality in modern society? Test by dispersion of life-satisfaction across time and nations. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 457–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Veenhoven, R. (2008). Sociological theories of subjective well-being. In M. Eid & R. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being: A tribute to ed Diener (pp. 44–61). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  75. Veenhoven, R., & Ehrhardt, J. (1995). The cross-national pattern of happiness: Test of predictions implied in three theories of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 34, 33–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Veenhoven, R., & Vergunst, F. (2013). The Easterlin illusion: economic growth does go with greater happiness. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, Paper No. 43983.Google Scholar
  77. Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. E. (2006). Income inequality and population health: A review and explanation of the evidence. Social Science and Medicine, 62, 1768–1784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. E. (2010). The spirit level: Why equality is better for everyone. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  79. Winkelmann, L., & Winkelmann, R. (2010). Does inequality harm the middle class? Kyklos, 63, 301–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wynne, C. (2004). Animal behaviour: Fair refusal by capuchin monkeys. Nature, 428, 140–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Yellen, J. (2006). Economic inequality in the United States. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (FRBSF) Economic Letter, 2006-33-34 (December 1, 2006).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rutgers – CamdenCamdenUSA
  2. 2.Rutgers – CamdenCamdenUSA

Personalised recommendations