Skip to main content

The Essentials of Social Cohesion: A Literature Review

Abstract

The social cohesion literature repeatedly criticizes a lack of consensus regarding the theoretical conceptualization of the construct. The current paper attempts to clarify this ambiguity by providing a literature review on the recent approaches. By taking a bird’s eye view on previous conceptualizations of social cohesion we emphasize that in the majority of approaches there is in fact more overlap in the concept than has so far been assumed. In particular, we suggest three essential dimensions of social cohesion: (1) social relations, (2) identification with the geographical unit, and (3) orientation towards the common good. Each dimension is further differentiated into several sub-dimensions. We argue that additional elements identified in the literature (shared values, inequality, quality of life) are rather determinants or consequences of social cohesion, but not constituting elements. Suggestions for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. 1.

    The alternative would be a more deductive ‘aggregative’ approach which collects information within the framework of a particular theory in order to test hypothesis or synthesize findings with regard to a particular phenomenon (Gough et al. 2013).

  2. 2.

    Most of the searches were performed with Web of Science since it covers more disciplinces than specialized data bases.

  3. 3.

    It would be impossible to go through all publications that turned up in our search (e.g., Google Scholar gives almost 4000 hits for the term ‘social cohesion’ in titles). As a rule of thumb, we checked the first 100 entries of each list, sorted by relevance. Depending on the relevance of the articles listed at later pages, we sometimes included more or less pages.

  4. 4.

    A clear assignment of the six components to one of the three dimensions is, however, not always possible. Cooperation, for example, can be conceptualized as cooperative behavior (i.e., relational dimension) or as the subjective value of cooperating with others (ideational dimension; see also Moody and White 2003). Similarly, social exclusion contains relational (negative relations between groups) as well as distributive (e.g., social exclusion through disadvantages on the labor market) aspects.

References

  1. Acket, S., Borsenberger, M., Dickes, P., & Sarracino, F. (2011). Measuring and validating social cohesion: A bottom-up approach. In International Conference on Social Cohesion and Development, OECD, Development Center, Paris (pp. 20–21). https://search.oecd.org/development/pgd/46839973.pdf.

  2. Adam, F., & Rončević, B. (2004). Social capital as a useful scientific metaphor. In N. Genov (Ed.), Advances in sociological knowledge (pp. 183–204). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W., Kurlat, S., & Wacziarg, R. (2003). Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth, 8(2), 155–194. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024471506938.

  4. Ariely, G. (2014). Does diversity erode social cohesion? Conceptual and methodological issues. Political Studies, 62(3), 573–595. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12068.

  5. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2006). Measures of Australia’s progress. A case study of a national report based on key economic, social and environment indicators. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics. http://www.oecd.org/site/worldforum/33808575.doc.

  6. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2005). Australia’s welfare 2005: The seventh biennial welfare report of the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Beauvais, C., & Jenson, J. (2002). Social cohesion: Updating the state of the research. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Network. http://cprn3.library.carleton.ca/documents/12949_en.pdf.

  8. Berger-Schmitt, R. (2000). Social cohesion as an aspect of the quality of societies: Concept and measurement (EU Reporting working paper No. 14). Mannheim: Zentrum für Umfrage, Methoden und Analysen (ZUMA).

  9. Berger-Schmitt, R., & Noll, H.-H. (2000). Conceptual framework and structure of a European system of social indicators (EU Reporting working paper No. 9). Zentrum für Umfrage, Methoden und Analysen (ZUMA).

  10. Berman, Y., & Phillips, D. (2004). Indicators for social cohesion. http://www.socialquality.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Indicators-June-2004.pdf.

  11. Bernard, P. (1999). Social cohesion: A critique. Canadian Policy Research Networks.

  12. Bjørnskov, C. (2008). Social trust and fractionalization: A possible reinterpretation. European Sociological Review, 24(3), 271–283. http://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcn004.

  13. Bohle, H. H., Heitmeyer, W., Kühnel, W., & Sander, U. (1997). Anomie in der moderne Gesellschaft: Bestandsaufnahme und Kritik eines klassischen Ansatzes soziologischer Analyse. In W. Heitmeyer (Ed.), Was treibt die Gesellschaft auseinander? (pp. 29–69). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bollen, K. A., & Hoyle, R. H. (1990). Perceived cohesion: A conceptual and empirical examination. Social Forces, 69(2), 479–504. http://doi.org/10.1093/sf/69.2.479.

  15. Bollen, K. A., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 305–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Botterman, S., Hooghe, M., & Reeskens, T. (2012). “One size fits all”? An empirical study into the multidimensionality of social cohesion indicators in Belgian local communities. Urban Studies, 49(1), 185–202. http://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010397397.

  17. Boucher, G., & Samad, Y. (2013). Introduction: Social cohesion and social change in Europe. Patterns of Prejudice, 47(3), 197–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chan, J., To, H.-P., & Chan, E. (2006). Reconsidering social cohesion: Developing a definition and analytical framework for empirical research. Social Indicators Research, 75(2), 273–302. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-2118-1.

  20. Cheong, P. H., Edwards, R., Goulbourne, H., & Solomos, J. (2007). Immigration, social cohesion and social capital: A critical review. Critical Social Policy, 27(1), 24–49. http://doi.org/10.1177/0261018307072206.

  21. Chiesi, A. M. (2004). Social cohesion and related concepts. In N. Genov (Ed.), Advances in Sociological Knowledge (pp. 205–219). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Claßen, G. (1997). Zur Genese von abweichendem Verhalten. Die Bedeutung familiärer Erziehungsstile und Wertorientierungen für die Herausbildung eines anomischen Lebensgefuehls bei deutschen und polnischen Jugendlichen. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Commission, European. (1996). First European social cohesion report. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Council of Europe. (1998). Fighting social exclusion and strengthening social cohesion in Europe. (Recommendation No. 1355). Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing. http://assembly.coe.int/main.asp?Link=/documents/adoptedtext/ta98/erec1355.htm.

  26. Council of Europe. (2005). Concerted development of social cohesion indicators (Methodological guide). Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing. http://www.coe.int/t/dg3/socialpolicies/socialcohesiondev/source/RevisedStrategy_en.pdf.

  27. Delhey, J. (2004). European social integration: From convergence of countries to transnational relations between peoples (WZB Discussion Paper). Berlin: Social Science Research Center Berlin (WZB). http://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/44144.

  28. Delhey, J. (2007). Do enlargements make the European Union less cohesive? An analysis of trust between EU nationalities. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(2), 253–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Delhey, J., & Dragolov, G. (2015). Happier together. Social cohesion and subjective well-being in Europe. International Journal of Psychology, Early view. http://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12149.

  30. Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative development to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 269–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dickes, P., & Valentova, M. (2012). Construction, validation and application of the measurement of social cohesion in 47 European countries and regions. Social Indicators Research, 113(3), 827–846. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0116-7.

  32. Dickes, P., Valentova, M., & Borsenberger, M. (2010). Construct validation and application of a common measure of social cohesion in 33 European countries. Social Indicators Research, 98(3), 451–473. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9551-5.

  33. Dragolov, G., Ignácz, S., Lorenz, J., Delhey, J., & Boehnke, K. (2013). Social cohesion radar. Measuring common ground. An international comparison of social cohesion. Methods report. Gütersloh, Germany: Bertelsmann Foundation.

  34. Dragolov, G., Ignácz, S., Lorenz, J., Delhey, J., & Boehnke, K. (2014). Radar gesellschaftlicher Zusammenhalt. Messen was verbindet. Gesellschaftlicher Zusammenhalt in Deutschland. Gütersloh, Germany: Bertelsmann Foundation. http://www.gesellschaftlicher-zusammenhalt.de/fileadmin/Inhalte/Radar_Deutschlandstudie_2014_web.pdf.

  35. Duckitt, J., Callaghan, J., & Wagner, C. (2005). Group identification and outgroup attitudes in four South African ethnic groups: A multidimensional approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(5), 633–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Durkheim, É. (1893). De la division du travail social: Etude sur l’organisation de societes superieures. Paris: Felix Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Easterly, W., Ritzen, J., & Woolcock, M. (2006). Social cohesion, institutions, and growth. Economics and Politics, 18(2), 103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Etzioni, A. (1995). The spirit of community: Rights, responsibilities, and the communitarian agenda. London: Fontana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  39. European Commission. (2001). The social situation in the European Union 2001. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/social_situation/docs/SSR2001_en.pdf.

  40. European Commission. (2007). Growing regions, growing Europe. Fourth report on economic and social cohesion. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/cohesion4/pdf/4cr_en.pdf.

  41. European Committee for Social Cohesion. (2004). A new strategy for social cohesion. Revised strategy for cohesion. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing. http://www.coe.int/t/dg3/socialpolicies/socialcohesiondev/source/RevisedStrategy_en.pdf.

  42. Ferlander, S., & Timms, D. (1999). Social cohesion and online community. Luxembourg/Brussels: European Commission. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A427155&dswid=-3828.

  43. Friedkin, N. E. (2004). Social Cohesion. Annual Review of Sociology, 30(1), 409–425. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110625.

  44. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust. The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Giardiello, M. (2014). The generative theory of social cohesion and civic integration. European Scientific Journal, Special Edition, 2, 80–89.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). Introduction to systematic reviews. London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2013). Learning from research: Systematic reviews for informing policy decisions: A quick guide. A paper for the Alliance for Useful Evidence. London: Nesta.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Gough, I., & Olofsson, G. (Eds.). (1999). Capitalism and social cohesion: Essays on exclusion and integration. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Green, A., & Janmaat, J. G. (2011). Regimes of social cohesion: Societies and the crisis of globalization. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  50. Green, A., Janmaat, J. G., & Han, C. (2009). Regimes of social cohesion. London: Centre for Learning and Life Chances in Knowledge Economies and Societies. Institute of Education. http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/10486/1/Z.-Regimes-of-Social-Cohesion.pdf.

  51. Green, A., Preston, J., & Janmaat, J. G. (2006). Education, equality and social cohesion. A comparative analysis. New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  52. Grootaert, C., & van Bastelaer, T. (2001). Understanding and measuring social capital: A synthesis of findings and recommendations from the social capital initiative (Working Paper No. 24). Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTSOCIALCAPITAL/Resources/Social-Capital-Initiative-Working-Paper-Series/SCI-WPS-24.pdf.

  53. Harell, A., & Stolle, D. (2014). Diversity and social cohesion. In S. Vertovec (Ed.), Routledge international handbook of diversity studies (pp. 294–301). Abington, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Hofstede, G. H. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Beverly Hills, CA.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Home Office Community Cohesion Unit. (2003). Building a picture of community cohesion. A guide for local authorities and their partners. London: Home Office Community Cohesion Unit. http://resources.cohesioninstitute.org.uk/Publications/Documents/Document/DownloadDocumentsFile.aspx?recordId=91&file=PDFversion.

  56. House of Commons. (2004). Social cohesion. Sixth report of session 2003-04. London: The Stationary Office. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmodpm/45/45.pdf.

  57. House of Commons. (2008). Community cohesion and migration. Tenth report of session 2007-08. London: The Stationary Office. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmselect/cmcomloc/369/369i.pdf.

  58. Hulse, K., & Stone, W. (2007). Social cohesion, social capital and social exclusion: A cross cultural comparison. Policy Studies, 28(2), 109–128. http://doi.org/10.1080/01442870701309049.

  59. Hunt, J. (2005). Combating social exclusion: The EU’s contribution. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 27(1), 113–120. http://doi.org/10.1080/09649060500085974.

  60. Huntington, S. (2004). Who are we? The challenges to America’s national identity. London: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Jackson, A., Fawcett, G., Milan, A., Roberts, P., Schetagne, S., Scott, K., & Tsoukalas, S. (2000). Social cohesion in Canada: Possible indicators. Ottawa: Canadian Council on Social Development.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Janmaat, J. G. (2011). Social cohesion as a real-life phenomenon: Assessing the explanatory power of the universalist and particularist perspectives. Social Indicators Research, 100(1), 61–83. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9604-9.

  63. Jeannotte, M. S. (2000). Social cohesion around the world: An international comparison of definitions and Issues. Ottawa: Strategic Research and Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Jeannotte, M. S., Stanley, D., Pendakur, R., Jamieson, B., Williams, M., Aizlewood, A., & Planning, S. (2002). Buying in or dropping out: The public policy implications of social cohesion research. Ottawa: Strategic Research and Analysis (SRA), Strategic Planning and Policy Coordination, Department of Canadian Heritage. http://socialsciences.uottawa.ca/governance/eng/documents/buying_in_dropping_out.pdf.

  65. Jenson, J. (1998). Mapping social cohesion: The state of Canadian research. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Network.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Jenson, J. (2010). Defining and measuring social cohesion. London: UNRISD & Commonwealth Secretariat.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  67. Jupp, J., Nieuwenhuysen, J., & Dawson, E. (Eds.). (2007). Social cohesion and human rights: Would a bill of rights enhance social cohesion in Australia?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Kearns, A., & Forrest, R. (2000). Social cohesion and multilevel urban governance. Urban Studies, 37(5–6), 995–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. KfW Bankengruppe. (2010). Konzeptpapier des KfW-Nachhaltigkeitsindikators 2010. Frankfurt am Main: KfW Bankengruppe. https://www.kfw.de/Download-Center/Konzernthemen/Research/PDF-Dokumente-KfW-Nachhaltigkeitsindikator/KfW-Nachhaltigkeitsindikator-2010_Konzeptpapier.pdf.

  70. Klein, C. (2013). Social capital or social cohesion: What matters for subjective well-being? Social Indicators Research, 110(3), 891–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1251–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Larsen, C. A. (2013). The rise and fall of social cohesion: The construction and de-construction of social trust in the US, UK, Sweden and Denmark. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  73. Laurence, J. (2009). The effect of ethnic diversity and community disadvantage on social cohesion: A multi-level analysis of social capital and interethnic relations in UK communities. European Sociological Review. doi:10.1093/esr/jcp057jcp057.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Letki, N. (2008). Does diversity erode social cohesion? Social capital and race in British neighbourhoods. Political Studies, 56(1), 99–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Lockwood, D. (1999). Civic integration and social cohesion. In I. Gough & G. Olofsson (Eds.), Capitalism and social cohesion: Essays on exclusion and integration (pp. 63–84). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

  76. Mann, M. (1970). The social cohesion of liberal democracy. American Sociological Review, 35(3), 423–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Maxwell, J. (1996). Social dimensions of economic growth. Presented at the Eric John Hanson Memorial Lecture Series, Edmonton, Alberta. http://www.ipe.ualberta.ca/en/Eric%20J%20Hanson%20Memorial%20Lecture/~/media/economics/EventsAndS/Hanson/Hanson-Maxwell-Text.pdf.

  78. McCracken, M. (1998). Social cohesion and macroeconomic performance (pp. 30–31). Presented at the CSLS Conference on the State of Living Standards and the Quality of Life in Canada, Ottawa, Ontario. http://www.csls.ca/events/oct98/mccr.pdf.

  79. Merton, R. K. (1957). Social theory and social structure (revised and enlarged ed.). New York: Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Mitchell, D. (2000). Globalization and social cohesion: Risks and responsibilities. In Presented at the The Year 2000 International Research Conference on Social Security, Helsinki, Helsinki. http://praha.vupsv.cz/fulltext/hel_57.pdf.

  81. Moody, J., & White, D. R. (2003). Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups. American Sociological Review, 68(1), 103-127. http://doi.org/10.2307/3088904.

  82. Morrone, A., Tontoranelli, N., & Ranuzzi, G. (2009). How good is trust? Measuring trust and its role for the progress of societies (OECD Statistics Working Papers No. 2009/03). Paris: OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/workingpaper/220633873086.

  83. Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22(2), 103–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Newton, K., & Norris, P. (1999). Confidence in public institution: Faith culture or performance?. Boston: Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Niessen, J. (2000). Diversité et cohésion: de nouveaux défis pour Diversity and cohesion. New challenges for the integration of immigrants and minorities. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Noelle-Neumann, E., & Köcher, R. (1987). Die verletzte Nation. Stuttgart, Germany: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Norris, P. (2001). Making democracies work: Social capital and civic engagement in 47 Societies. Boston: Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Norton, A., & de Haan, A. (2013). Social cohesion: Theoretical debates and practical applications with respect to jobs. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/12147.

  89. Novy, A., Swiatek, D. C., & Moulaert, F. (2012). Social cohesion: A conceptual and political elucidation. Urban Studies, 49(9), 1873–1889. http://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012444878.

  90. OECD. (2011). Society at a glance 2011 (OECD Social Indicators). Paris: OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/society-at-a-glance-2011_soc_glance-2011-en.

  91. Paxton, P. (2002). Social capital and democracy: An interdependent relationship. American Sociological Review, 67(2), 254. http://doi.org/10.2307/3088895.

  92. Peace, R., Spoonley, P., Butcher, A., & O’Neill, D. (2005). Immigration and social cohesion: Developing an indicator framework for measuring the impact of settlement policies in New Zealand. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, (24).

  93. Phipps, S. (2003). Social cohesion and the well-being of Canadian children. In L. Osberg (Ed.), Teamwork: The economics of social cohesion (pp. 79–120). Toronto: The University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Policy Research Sub-Committee on Social Cohesion. (1997). Social cohesion workplan (SRA No. 226). http://socialsciences.uottawa.ca/governance/eng/documents/social_cohesion_research_workplan.pdf.

  95. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  96. Rajulton, F., Ravanera, Z. R., & Beaujot, R. (2007). Measuring Social Cohesion: An Experiment using the Canadian National Survey of Giving, Volunteering, and Participating. Social Indicators Research, 80(3), 461–492. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-006-0011-1.

  97. Ratcliffe, P. (2011). From community to social cohesion: Interrogating a policy paradigm. In Promoting Social (Ed.), Promoting social cohesion: Implications for policy and evaluation (pp. 15–40). Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Ritzen, J. (2001). Social cohesion, public policy and economic growth: Implications for OECD countries. In J. F. Helliwell (Ed.), The contribution of human and social capital to sustained well-being and growth. International Symposium Report (pp. 291–309). Québec. https://oecd.org/edu/innovation-education/1825690.pdf.

  99. Ritzen, J., Easterly, W., & Woolcock, M. J. (2000). On“good” politicians and“bad” policies: Social cohesion, institutions, and growth (Policy Research Working Paper No. 2448). World Bank.

  100. Sani, F., Bowe, M., Herrera, M., Manna, C., Cossa, T., Miao, X., & Zhou, Y. (2007). Perceived collective continuity: Seeing groups as entities that move through time. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(6), 1118–1134. http://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.430.

  101. Schmeets, H., & te Riele, S. (2014). Declining social cohesion in the Netherlands? Social Indicators Research, 115(2), 791–812. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0234-x.

  102. Schmidt-Denter, U. (2011). Die Deutschen und ihre Migranten. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz Juventa.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25(1), 1–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Schwartz, S. H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5(2), 137–182. http://doi.org/10.1163/156913306778667357.

  105. Serageldin, I., & Dasupta, P. (2000). Social capital: A multifaceted perspective. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Spoonley, P., Peace, R., Butcher, A., & O’Neill, D. (2005). Social cohesion: A policy and indicator framework for assessing immigrant and host outcomes. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 24(1), 85–110.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Stanley, D. (2003). What do we know about social cohesion: The research perspective of the federal government’s social cohesion research network. The Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie, 28(1), 5–17. http://doi.org/10.2307/3341872.

  108. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

  109. Thomas, D. R. (2006). A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. http://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748.

  110. Tönnies, F. (1887). Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft. Abhandlung des Communismus und des Socialismus als empirischer Culturformen. Leipzig: Fues’s Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Touraine, A. (2000). Can we live together? Equality and difference. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Toye, M. (2007). Social cohesion: The Canadian urban context. Parliamentary Information and Research Service. http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/LOP/researchpublications/prb0756-e.pdf.

  113. Triandis, H. C., Leung, K., Villareal, M. J., & Clack, F. I. (1985). Allocentric versus idiocentric tendencies: Convergent and discriminant validation. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(4), 395–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Upperman, K., & Gauthier, A. H. (1998). What makes a difference for children. Social capital and neighbourhood characteristics. Policy Options, 19(7), 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Uslaner, E. M. (2012). Segregation and mistrust: Diversity, isolation, and social cohesion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  116. Villarreal, A., & Silva, B.F.A. (2006). Social cohesion, criminal victimization and perceived risk of crime in Brazilian neighborhoods. Social Forces, 84(3), 1725–1753. http://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0073.

  117. Wickes, R., Zahnow, R., White, G., & Mazerolle, L. (2014). Ethnic diversity and its impact on community social cohesion and neighborly exchange: Ethnic diversity, social cohesion, and neighborly exchange. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(1), 51–78. http://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12015.

  118. Wrong, D. (1994). The problem of order: What unites and divides society. London: Free Press.

  119. Yuval-Davis, N., Anthias, F., & Kofman, E. (2005). Secure borders and safe haven and the gendered politics of belonging: Beyond social cohesion. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28(3), 513–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Zick, A., & Küpper, B. (2012). Zusammenhalt durch Ausgrenzung? Wie die Klage über den Zerfall der Gesellschaft und die Vorstellung von kultureller Homogenität mit Gruppenbezogener Menschenfeindlichkeit zusammenhängen. In W. Heitmeyer (Ed.), Deutsche Zustände 10 (pp. 152–176). Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Prof. Klaus Boehnke and Prof. Jan Delhey for their support and guidance with regard to the realization of the research project, as well as their valuable feedback to earlier versions of this manuscript.

Funding

This paper is based on a research project funded by the Bertelsmann Foundation.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Schiefer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schiefer, D., van der Noll, J. The Essentials of Social Cohesion: A Literature Review. Soc Indic Res 132, 579–603 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1314-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Social cohesion
  • Social relations
  • Identification
  • Orientation towards the common good