Work–Family Conflict and Well-Being Across Europe: The Role of Gender Context

Abstract

This study analysed whether gender context is important to differences in the relationship between work–family conflict (WFC) and well-being across Europe. We hypothesised that in countries that support equality in work life and where norms support women’s employment, the relationship between WFC and low well-being is weaker than in countries with less support for gender equality. Cohabiting men and women aged 18–65 years from 25 European countries were selected from the European Social Survey. A multilevel analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between well-being and WFC, and two measurements were used to represent gender context: gender equality in work life and norms regarding women’s employment. Contrary to the hypothesis, the results showed that the negative relationship was stronger in countries with high levels of gender equality in work life and support for women’s employment than in countries with a relatively low level of gender equality in work life and support for traditional gender relations. The context in which gender is constructed may be important when studying the relationship between WFC and well-being. In addition, emphasis should be placed on policies that equalise both the labour market and the work performed at home.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aliaga, C. (2006). How is the time of women and men distributed in Europe? Statistics in Focus Population and Social Conditions, 4, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Annandale, E., & Hunt, K. (2000). Gender inequalities in health. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Artazcoz, L., Cortès, I., Puig-Barrachina, V., Benavides, F. G., Escribà-Agüir, V., & Borrell, C. (2013). Combining employment and family in Europe: The role of family policies in health. The European Journal of Public Health, 24(4), 649–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bergqvist, K., Yngwe, M. Å., & Lundberg, O. (2013). Understanding the role of welfare state characteristics for health and inequalities-an analytical review. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 1234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boye, K. (2011). Work and well-being in a comparative perspective—The role of family policy. European Sociological Review, 27(1), 16–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brighouse, H., & Wright Olin, E. (2008). Strong gender egalitarianism. Politics & Society, 36(3), 360–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Byron, K. (2005). A meta-analytic review of work–family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 67(2), 169–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Connell, R. W. (2009). Om genus (C. Hjukström & A. Sörmark, Trans (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polty Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Connell, R. W. (2012). Gender, health and theory: Conceptualizing the issue, in local and world perspective. Social Science and Medicine, 74(11), 1675–1683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Crompton, R., & Lyonette, C. (2006). Work-life ‘balance’ in Europe. Acta Sociologica, 49(4), 379–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Drobnič, S. (2011). Introduction: Job quality and work-life balance. In S. Drobnič & A. M. Guillén (Eds.), Work-life balance in Europe. The role of job quality (pp. 1–16). New York: Pelgrave and Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Drobnič, S., Beham, B., & Präg, P. (2010). Good job, good life? Working conditions and quality of life in Europe. Social Indicators Research, 99(2), 205–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Elvin-Nowak, Y., & Thomsson, H. (2001). Motherhood as idea and practice a discursive understanding of employed mothers in Sweden. Gender & Society, 15(3), 407–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Elwér, S., Aléx, L., & Hammarström, A. (2010). Health against the odds: Experiences of employees in elderly care from a gender perspective. Qualitative Health Research, 20(9), 1202–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, & Eurofound. (2014). Eurofound yearbook 2013: Living and working in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Evertsson, M., & Nermo, M. (2004). Dependence within families and the division of labor: Comparing Sweden and the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(5), 1272–1286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fahlén, S. (2014). Does gender matter? Policies, norms and the gender gap in work-to-home and home-to-work conflict across Europe. Community, Work & Family, 17(4), 371–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferrera, M. (1996). The ‘Southern model’ of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1), 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gallie, D., & Russell, H. (2009). Work–family conflict and working conditions in Western Europe. Social Indicators Research, 93(3), 445–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76–88.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Grönlund, A. (2007). More control, less conflict? Job demand–control, gender and work–family conflict. Gender, Work & Organization, 14(5), 476–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Grönlund, A., & Öun, I. (2010). Rethinking work–family conflict: Dual-earner policies, role conflict and role expansion in Western Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 20(3), 179–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gutek, B. A., Searle, S., & Klepa, L. (1991). Rational versus gender role explanations for work–family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(4), 560–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Haas, L., Allard, K., & Hwang, P. (2002). The impact of organizational culture on men’s use of parental leave in Sweden. Community, Work & Family, 5(3), 319–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hagqvist, E., Gådin, K. G., & Nordenmark, M. (2012). Division of labor, perceived labor-related stress and well-being among European couples. Open Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2(4), 452–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hausmann, R., Tyson, L. D., & Zahidi, S. (2010). The global gender gap report 2010. Switzerland: World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hobson, B., & Fahlén, S. (2009). Competing scenarios for European fathers: Applying Sen’s capabilities and agency framework to work–Family balance. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 624(1), 214–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hook, J. L. (2006). Care in context: Men’s unpaid work in 20 countries, 1965–2003. American Sociological Review, 71(4), 639–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hox, J. J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Korpi, W., Ferrarini, T., & Englund, S. (2013). Women’s opportunities under different family policy constellations: Gender, class, and inequality tradeoffs in western countries re-examined. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 20(1), 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lewis, J., Campbell, M., & Huerta, C. (2008). Patterns of paid and unpaid work in Western Europe: Gender, commodification, preferences and the implications for policy. Journal of European Social Policy, 18(1), 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lunau, T., Bambra, C., Eikemo, T. A., van der Wel, K. A., & Dragano, N. (2014). A balancing act? Work–life balance, health and well-being in European welfare states. The European Journal of Public Health, 24(3), 422–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Marmot, M., Friel, S., Bell, R., Houweling, T. A., Taylor, S., & Commission on Social Determinants of Health. (2008). Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. The Lancet, 372(9650), 1661–1669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. McGinnity, F., & Calvert, E. (2009). Work–life conflict and social inequality in Western Europe. Social Indicators Research, 93(3), 489–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Öhman, A. (2008). Global public health and gender theory: The need for integration. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 36(5), 449–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pascall, G., & Lewis, J. (2004). Emerging gender regimes and policies for gender equality in a wider Europe. Journal of Social Policy, 33(3), 373–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ray, R., Gornick, J. C., & Schmitt, J. (2009). Parental leave policies in 21 countries: Assessing generosity and gender equality. Retrieved from: http://www.cite.gov.pt/asstscite/images/grafs11/Parent_Leave_Policies_21.pdf.

  38. Rostgaard, T. (2004). Family support policy in central and eastern Europe–A decade and a half of transition. Early Childhood and Family Policy Series, 8, 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Saltonstall, R. (1993). Healthy bodies, social bodies: Men’s and women’s concepts and practices of health in everyday life. Social Science and Medicine, 36(1), 7–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Strandh, M., & Nordenmark, M. (2006). The interference of paid work with household demands in different social policy contexts: Perceived work-household conflict in Sweden, the UK, the Netherlands, Hungary, and the Czech Republic. The British Journal of Sociology, 57(4), 597–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Thébaud, S. (2010). Masculinity, bargaining, and breadwinning understanding men’s housework in the cultural context of paid work. Gender & Society, 24(3), 330–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Thévenon, O. (2011). Family policies in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. Population and Development Review, 37(1), 57–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Winter, T., Roos, E., Rahkonen, O., Martikainen, P., & Lahelma, E. (2006). Work–family conflicts and self-rated health among middle-aged municipal employees in Finland. International Journal of Behavioural Medicine, 13(4), 276–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the following grant sponsors: The Swedish Research Council and the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme, known as the SOPHIE project (Evaluating the Impact of Structural Policies on Health Inequalities and their Social Determinants, and Fostering Change).

Funding

This work was supported by the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013, call Health-2011) under Grant 278173 (SOPHIE project) and the Swedish Research Council under Grant 421-2009-2153.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emma Hagqvist.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hagqvist, E., Gådin, K.G. & Nordenmark, M. Work–Family Conflict and Well-Being Across Europe: The Role of Gender Context. Soc Indic Res 132, 785–797 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1301-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Gender context
  • Europe
  • Gender relations
  • Multilevel analysis
  • Well-being
  • Work–family conflict