Work–Family Conflict and Well-Being Across Europe: The Role of Gender Context
- 1.7k Downloads
This study analysed whether gender context is important to differences in the relationship between work–family conflict (WFC) and well-being across Europe. We hypothesised that in countries that support equality in work life and where norms support women’s employment, the relationship between WFC and low well-being is weaker than in countries with less support for gender equality. Cohabiting men and women aged 18–65 years from 25 European countries were selected from the European Social Survey. A multilevel analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between well-being and WFC, and two measurements were used to represent gender context: gender equality in work life and norms regarding women’s employment. Contrary to the hypothesis, the results showed that the negative relationship was stronger in countries with high levels of gender equality in work life and support for women’s employment than in countries with a relatively low level of gender equality in work life and support for traditional gender relations. The context in which gender is constructed may be important when studying the relationship between WFC and well-being. In addition, emphasis should be placed on policies that equalise both the labour market and the work performed at home.
KeywordsGender context Europe Gender relations Multilevel analysis Well-being Work–family conflict
This work was supported by the following grant sponsors: The Swedish Research Council and the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme, known as the SOPHIE project (Evaluating the Impact of Structural Policies on Health Inequalities and their Social Determinants, and Fostering Change).
This work was supported by the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013, call Health-2011) under Grant 278173 (SOPHIE project) and the Swedish Research Council under Grant 421-2009-2153.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
No conflicts of interest.
- Aliaga, C. (2006). How is the time of women and men distributed in Europe? Statistics in Focus Population and Social Conditions, 4, 1–11.Google Scholar
- Annandale, E., & Hunt, K. (2000). Gender inequalities in health. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Connell, R. W. (2009). Om genus (C. Hjukström & A. Sörmark, Trans (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polty Press.Google Scholar
- European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, & Eurofound. (2014). Eurofound yearbook 2013: Living and working in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
- Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76–88.Google Scholar
- Hausmann, R., Tyson, L. D., & Zahidi, S. (2010). The global gender gap report 2010. Switzerland: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
- Hox, J. J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.Google Scholar
- Ray, R., Gornick, J. C., & Schmitt, J. (2009). Parental leave policies in 21 countries: Assessing generosity and gender equality. Retrieved from: http://www.cite.gov.pt/asstscite/images/grafs11/Parent_Leave_Policies_21.pdf.
- Rostgaard, T. (2004). Family support policy in central and eastern Europe–A decade and a half of transition. Early Childhood and Family Policy Series, 8, 1–37.Google Scholar
- Strandh, M., & Nordenmark, M. (2006). The interference of paid work with household demands in different social policy contexts: Perceived work-household conflict in Sweden, the UK, the Netherlands, Hungary, and the Czech Republic. The British Journal of Sociology, 57(4), 597–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar