When Education Explains Strong Institutions: Trade Policy also Matters
This paper empirically examines the contribution of trade liberalisation to differences in the level of prosperity across nations. We compare this with the relative contribution of institutional capacity to prosperity, as well as the role of human capital accumulation in that respect. We employ several concepts of institutional quality, trade policy and openness variables following various definitions prevalent in the literature. Unlike in the comparable study by Rodrik et al. (2004) we have (a) included a role for human capital, (b) employed six institutional variables compared to one only in Rodrik et al. (rule of law), (c) included trade policy variables, and not just openness indicators and (d) expanded the set of openness measures employed. We discover that opening up domestic markets to foreign competition by removing trade restrictions and barriers may promote economic performance. Furthermore, developing human capital is as important as superior institutional functioning for economic wellbeing. We find that openness counts for little per se in explaining income differences across countries. This is because it is an outcome and not a cause. Trade policies, and liberalisation, on the other hand, are not insignificant in explaining cross-country per-capita income variation. With regard to trade policies, export taxes are the most important in explaining cross-country per-capita income differences.
KeywordsLong term growth Trade policy Social development
- Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson J. A. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review 91(5): 1369–1401. http://emlab.berkeley.edu/users/chad/e236c_f04/ajr2001.pdf.
- Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. (2004) Institutions as the fundamental cause of long-run growth. NBER Working Papers 10481, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.Google Scholar
- Alcala, F., & Ciccone, A. (2004). Trade and productivity. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 3095.Google Scholar
- Baliamoune-Lutz, M., & Ndikumana, L. (2007). The growth effects of openness to trade and the role of institutions: New evidence from African Countries. Working Paper 2007-05, Department of Economics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
- Barro, R. J., & Lee, J. W. (1996). International measures of schooling years and schooling quality. American Economic Review, 86(2), 218–223.Google Scholar
- Basu, S. R. (2008). A new way to link development to institutions, policies and geography. Policy Issues in International Trade and Commodities Study Series No. 37, UNCTAD.Google Scholar
- Baum, C. F., Schaffer, M. E., & Stillman, S. (2003). Instrumental variables and GMM: Estimation and testing. The Statat Journal, 3(1), 1–31.Google Scholar
- Bhupatiraju, S., & Verspagen, B. (2013). Economic devdevelopment, growth, institutions and geography. UNU-MERIT Working Paper No. 2013-56.Google Scholar
- Dollar, D. (1992). Outward-oriented developing economies really do grow more rabidly: Evidence from 95 LDCs, 1976–85. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 40(3), 523–544Google Scholar
- Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2004). Trade growth, and poverty. Economic Journal, 114, F22–F49.Google Scholar
- Edwards, S. (1998). Openness, productivity and growth: What do we really know? Economic Journal, 108, 383–398.Google Scholar
- Glaeser, E. L., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer A. (2004b). Explaining growth: Institutions, human capital, and leaders. PD: Preliminary Draft. http://www.brook.edu/es/commentary/journals/bpea_macro/papers/20040325_glaeser.pdf.
- Kaufman, D., Kraay, A. & Lobaton Z. (2003). Governance matters III: Governance indicators for 1996–2002’, Policy Research Working Paper 2772, Washington DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/pdf/govmatters3.pdf.
- Leamer, E. (1988). Measures of openness. In R. Baldwin (Ed.), Trade policy and empirical analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Rodrik, D. (1998). Trade policy and economic performance in sub-saharan africa. NBER Working Paper 6562.Google Scholar
- Rodrik, D. (2004). Globalization and growth-looking in the wrong places. Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, 26(4): 513–517Google Scholar
- Rodrik, D. (2015). Premature deindustrialization. IAS School of Social Science Economics Working Paper No. 107.Google Scholar
- Rose, A. (2002). Do WTO members have a more liberal trade policy? NBER Working Paper 9347.Google Scholar
- Stock. J. H. & Yogo, M. (2004). Testing for weak instruments in linear iv regression. NBER Technical Working Papers 0284, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.Google Scholar
- Wood, C. (2004). The empirics of trade and growth: Where are the policy recommendations. http://www.ires.ucl.ac.be/DP/IRES_DP/2004-13.pdf.