Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

What About the Social Efficiency in Credit Cooperatives? Evidence from Spain (2008–2014)

  • 400 Accesses

  • 6 Citations

Abstract

Credit cooperatives are financial intermediaries that pay attention to social criteria. Thus, if such entities want to survive and thrive in the new international context, they cannot ignore their inefficiencies in both the financial and social dimensions of their activity. However, previous research on efficiency in credit cooperatives is very limited and only considers their financial activity. To date, no study has been published giving evidence through indicators on whether these banking institutions are socially efficient. This paper therefore constructs a social efficiency index of Spanish credit cooperatives during the period 2008–2014 and examines its main explanatory factors. After applying a two-stage Data Envelopment Analysis approach, the results from the first stage indicate that, on average, the social efficiency of Spanish credit cooperatives reaches an acceptable level of 66.42 %. Second-stage truncated regression reveals that entities with a greater proportion of branches in urban areas are socially less efficient, whereas both their size and the number of service points have a positive effect. Interestingly, social efficiency also varies significantly depending on the regional location of credit cooperatives in Spain. As a result, our findings enable these Social Economy financial institutions to both know their performance relative to their social activity and use this information to improve their competitiveness in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Notes

  1. 1.

    The minimum acceptable value for technical efficiency indicators is 50 %, while the lowest threshold indicating that an entity is seriously efficient is 90 % (Cooper et al. 2007).

  2. 2.

    Paradoxically, although there is no empirical evidence on the social efficiency of credit cooperatives located in developed countries, there have been many recent studies on this subject for microfinance institutions (MFIs) working in developing countries (Piot-Lepetit and Nzongang 2014; Wijesiri et al. 2015; Mia and Chandran 2015, among others). Microfinance institutions are credit entities that also have an important social role, mainly in poorly-developed countries where they give loans to social groups that are excluded from the traditional financial system. It is precisely the loans policy of such entities that prevents the existing evidence on their social efficiency from being transferred to credit cooperatives.

  3. 3.

    See Wilson (1993, 2010) for details.

  4. 4.

    See Greene (1993), Berger and Mester (1997) and Coelli et al. (1998) for details on both frontier methods.

  5. 5.

    The “constant returns to scale (CRS) DEA model” was proposed by Charnes et al. (1978) and is only appropriate when all organizations operate at an optimal scale, which is difficult because of the existence of imperfect competition, government regulations, constraints on finance, etc. For this reason, Banker et al. (1984) proposed the “variable returns to scale (VRS) DEA model”.

  6. 6.

    The conventional DEA model, which is applied in all prior studies on efficiency in credit cooperatives, gives the values for original efficiency without taking into account any sample noise in the estimates, so the results may be misleading.

References

  1. Asociación Española de Banca. (2008–2014). Anuarios Estadísticos/Statistical Yearbooks. Madrid. www.aebanca.es/

  2. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in DEA. Management Science, 30, 1078–1092.

  3. Barra, C., Destefanis, S., & Lavadera, G. L. (2013). Regulation and the risk: The efficiency of Italian cooperative banks. In Working paper no 338. Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples (Italy).

  4. Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing: Insights from the study of social enterprises. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397–441.

  5. Battilana, J., Sengul, M., Pache, A. C., & Model, J. (2015). Harnessing productive tensions in hybrid organizations: The case of work integration social enterprises. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 1658–1685. doi:10.5465/amj.2013.0903)

  6. Belmonte, L. J. (2012). La eficiencia social de las cooperativas de crédito españolas: Una aproximación mediante el análisis DEA. Revista de Micro-finanzas y Banca Social, 1, 133–151.

  7. Belmonte, L. J., & Plaza, J. A. (2008). Análisis de la eficiencia en las cooperativas de crédito en España: Una propuesta metodológica basada en el análisis envolvente de datos (DEA). CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, 63, 113–133.

  8. Berger, A. N., & Humphrey, D. B. (1997). Efficiency of financial institutions: International survey and directions for future research. European Journal of Operational Research, 98, 175–212.

  9. Berger, A. N., & Mester, L. J. (1997). Inside the black box: What explains differences in the efficiencies of financial institutions? Journal of Banking & Finance, 21(7), 895–947.

  10. Bogetoft, P., & Otto, L. (2011). Benchmarking with DEA, SFA, and R. New York: Springer Science + Business Media LLC.

  11. Brown, R. (2006). Mismanagement or mismeasurement? Pitfalls and protocols for DEA studies in the financial services sector. European Journal of Operational Research, 174(2), 1100–1116.

  12. Brown, R., Brown, R., & O’Connor, I. (1999). Efficiency, bond of association and exit patterns in credit cooperatives: Australian evidence. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 70, 5–23.

  13. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.

  14. Coelli, T., Rao, D., & Battese, G. (1998). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  15. Confederación Española de Cajas de Ahorros. (2008–2014). Informes Anuales/Annual Reports. Madrid. www.ceca.es/

  16. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2007). Data envelopment analysis. New York: Springer.

  17. Cornée, S., & Szafarz, A. (2014). Vive la différence: Social banks and reciprocity in the credit market. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(3), 361–380.

  18. Curi, C., Guarda, P., Lozano-Vivas, A., & Zelenyuk, V. (2012). Is foreign-bank efficiency in financial centers driven by home or host country characteristics? Journal of Productivity Analysis, 40(3), 367–385.

  19. De Castro, M., & Motellón, C. (2011). El modelo de banca cooperativa: el acierto de un siglo. In Unión Nacional de Cooperativas de Crédito (Ed.): 40 Años de la UNACC: El Nuevo Mapa del Sistema Financiero (pp. 73–77). Madrid: UNACC.

  20. Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction of the bootstrap. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC.

  21. Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A Part III, 120, 253–290.

  22. Fortin, M., & Leclerc, A. (2011). L’efficience des cooperatives de services financiers: Une analyse de la contribution du milieu. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 82(1), 45–62.

  23. Fried, H. O., Lovell, C. A. K., & Vanden Eeckaut, P. (1993). Evaluating the performance of U.S. credit cooperatives. Journal of Banking and Finance, 17(2/3), 251–265.

  24. Fried, H. O., Lovell, C. A. K., & Yaisawarng, S. (1999). The impact of mergers on credit union service provision. Journal of Banking & Finance, 23, 367–386.

  25. Ftiti, Z., Nafti, O., & Sreiri, S. (2013). Efficiency of Islamic banks during subprime crisis: Evidence of GCC countries. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 29(1), 285–304.

  26. Fukuyama, H. (1996). Returns to scale and efficiency of credit associations in Japan. Japan and the World Economy, 8, 259–277.

  27. Fukuyama, H., Guerra, R., & Weber, W. L. (1999). Efficiency and ownership: Evidence from Japanese credit cooperatives. Journal of Economics and Business, 51, 473–487.

  28. Garden, K. A., & Ralston, D. E. (1999). The X-efficiency and allocative efficiency effects of credit union mergers. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 9, 285–301.

  29. Glass, J. C., McKillop, D. G., Quinn, B., & Wilson, J. (2014). Cooperative bank efficiency in Japan: A parametric distance function analysis. The European Journal of Finance, 20(3), 291–317.

  30. Greene, W. H. (1993). The econometric approach to efficiency analysis. In H. O. Fried, C. A. L. Lovell, & S. S. Schmidt (Eds.), The measurement of productive efficiency: Techniques and applications. New York: Oxford University Press.

  31. Gutiérrez, M., & Palomo, R. (2012). Los sistemas institucionales de protección como respuesta de la banca cooperativa española ante la crisis: Hacia la búsqueda de la eficiencia en su integración. CIRIEC-Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, 76, 27–50.

  32. Gutiérrez-Nieto, B., Serrano-Cinca, C., & Camón-Cala, J. (2015). A credit score system for socially responsible lending. Journal of Business Ethics,. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2448-5)

  33. Gutiérrez-Nieto, B., Serrano-Cinca, C., & Mar Molinero, C. (2009). Social efficiency in microfinance institutions. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60, 104–119.

  34. Jackson, K. T. (2015). Economy of mutuality: Merging financial and social sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics,. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2408-0

  35. Kalmi, P. (2012). Cooperative banking. In J. Toporowski & J. Michell (Eds.), Handbook of critical issues in finance (pp. 56–65). London: Edward Elgar Publishing.

  36. Kleinbaum, D. G., Kupper, L. L., Muller, K. E., & Nizan, A. (1998). Applied regression analysis and other multivariate methods. Boston: Duxbury Press.

  37. Lampe, H. W., & Hilgers, D. (2015). Trajectories of efficiency measurement: A bibliometric analysis of DEA and SFA. European Journal of Operational Research, 240, 1–21.

  38. Martínez-Campillo, A., Cabeza-García, L., & Marbella-Sánchez, F. (2013). Responsabilidad social corporativa y resultado financiero: Evidencia sobre la doble dirección de la causalidad en el sector de las cajas de ahorros. Cuadernos de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 16(1), 54–68.

  39. Mcalevey, L., Sibbald, A., & Tripe, D. (2010). New Zealand credit union mergers. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 81(3), 423–444.

  40. McKillop, D., & Wilson, J. O. S.  (2011). Credit unions: A theoretical and empirical overview. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, 20, 79–123.

  41. Mester, L. J. (1996). A study of bank efficiency taking into account risk-preferences. Journal of Banking & Finance, 20, 1025–1045.

  42. Mia, M. A., & Chandran, V. G. R. (2015). Measuring financial and social outreach productivity of microfinance institutions in Bangladesh. Social Indicators Research,. doi:10.1007/s11205-015-0979-5

  43. Miles, M. P., Verreynne, M. L., & Luke, B. (2014). Social enterprises and the performance advantages of a Vincentian marketing orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(4), 549–556.

  44. Moradi-Motlagh, A., Valadkhani, A., & Saleh, A. S. (2015). Rising efficiency and cost saving in Australian banks: A bootstrap approach. Applied Economics Letters, 22(3), 189–194.

  45. Ory, J. N., & Lemzeri, Y. (2012). Efficiency and hybridization in cooperative banking: The French case. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 83(2), 215–250.

  46. Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 972–1001.

  47. Piot-Lepetit, I., & Nzongang, J. (2014). Financial sustainability and poverty outreach within a network of village banks in Cameroon: A multi-DEA approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 234(1), 319–330.

  48. Ralston, D., Wright, A., & Garden, K. (2001). Can mergers ensure the survival of credit cooperatives in the third millennium? Journal of Banking & Finance, 25, 2277–2304.

  49. Ramus, T., & Vaccaro, A. (2015). Stakeholders matter: How social enterprises address mission drift. Journal of Business Ethics,. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2353-y)

  50. Server, R. J., & Capó-Vicedo, J. (2011). The interrelationship between the demands of Corporate Social Responsibility and cooperative principles and values. CIRIEC-España: Revista de Economía Pública. Social y Cooperativa, 73, 213–232.

  51. Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2000). A general methodology for bootstrapping in non-parametric frontier models. Journal of Applied Statistics, 27(6), 779–802.

  52. Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2007). Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometrics, 136, 31–64.

  53. Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2011). Two-stage DEA: Caveat emptor. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 36, 205–218.

  54. Unión Nacional de Cooperativas de Crédito—UNACC (2008–2014). Anuarios Estadísticos de las Cooperativas de Crédito/Statistical Yearbooks of Credit Cooperatives. Madrid. www.unacc.com/

  55. Wanke, P., & Barros, C. (2014). Two-stage DEA: An application to major Brazilian banks. Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 2337–2344.

  56. Wijesiri, M., Viganò, L., & Meoli, M. (2015). Efficiency of microfinance institutions in Sri Lanka: A two-stage double bootstrap DEA approach. Economic Modelling, 47(1), 74–83.

  57. Wilson, P. W. (1993). Detecting outliers in deterministic nonparametric frontier models with multiple outputs. Journal of Business and Economics Statistics, 11(3), 319–323.

  58. Wilson, P. W. (2008). FEAR: A software package for frontier efficiency analysis with R. Socio-Economic Planning Science, 42(4), 247–254.

  59. Wilson, P. W. (2010). Detecting outliers in deterministic nonparametric frontier models with multiple outputs: Correction. In Working paper. Department of Economics. Clemson University.

  60. Worthington, A. C. (1998a). Testing the association between production and financial performance: Evidence from a not-for-profit co-operative setting. Annals of Public and Co-operative Economics, 69, 67–83.

  61. Worthington, A. C. (1998b). The determinants of non-bank financial institution efficiency: A stochastics frontier approach. Applied Financial Economics, 8, 279–287.

  62. Worthington, A. C. (1999). Measuring technical efficiency in Australian credit cooperatives. The Manchester School, 67(2), 231–248.

  63. Worthington, A. C. (2001). Efficiency in pre-merger and post-merger non-bank financial institutions. Managerial and Decision Economics, 22, 439–452.

  64. Worthington, A. C. (2010). Frontier efficiency measurement in deposit-taking financial mutuals: A review of techniques, applications, and future research directions. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 81(1), 39–75.

  65. Zvolská, M., & Olsson, J. (2012). Cooperatives and restructuring. Brussels: European Economic and Social Committee.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Almudena Martínez-Campillo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martínez-Campillo, A., Fernández-Santos, Y. What About the Social Efficiency in Credit Cooperatives? Evidence from Spain (2008–2014). Soc Indic Res 131, 607–629 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1277-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Social efficiency
  • Credit cooperatives
  • Spain
  • DEA approach
  • Truncated regression