Social Indicators Research

, Volume 131, Issue 2, pp 659–680 | Cite as

Easy Come, Easy Go? Economic Performance and Satisfaction with Democracy in Southern Europe in the Last Three Decades

  • Mario Quaranta
  • Sergio Martini


In the literature on political support, much empirical effort has been devoted to the link between economic performance and satisfaction with democracy. Nevertheless, analyses are often inconclusive in their findings. This study tries to renew the interest in the topic by using multilevel models to analyse 108 surveys from the repeated cross-sectional Eurobarometer data between 1985 and 2013, and focuses on southern European countries which share political and economic characteristics. Thus, the article links economic trends to changes in satisfaction with democracy in Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain, also emphasizing the relevance of transformations in their political systems. The results demonstrate that low economic performance seems to negatively affect citizens’ satisfaction with democracy in the four countries and across the whole period analysed. This also holds true for different model specifications and when other potential factors such as the format and the performance of the institutional context are controlled for. By providing empirical evidence based on a longitudinal analysis, this article contributes to the wider debate on how economic conditions influence opinions about democracy.


Satisfaction with democracy Economic performance Political institutions Political support Southern Europe Multilevel modelling 

Supplementary material

11205_2016_1270_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (161 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 161 kb)


  1. Aarts, K., & Thomassen, J. (2008). Satisfaction with democracy: Do institutions matter? Electoral Studies, 27(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agresti, A. (2010). Analysis of ordinal categorical data. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alesina, A., & Wacziarg, R. (2000). The economics of civic trust. In S. Pharr & R. Putnam (Eds.), Disaffected democracies: What’s troubling the trilateral countries? (pp. 149–170). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, C. J., & Guillory, C. A. (1997). Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy: A cross-national analysis of consensus and majoritarian systems. American Political Science Review, 91(1), 66–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, C. J., & Singer, M. M. (2008). The sensitive left and the impervious right: Multilevel models and the politics of inequality, ideology, and legitimacy in Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 41(4–5), 564–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson, C. J., & Tverdova, Y. V. (2003). Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anduiza, E., Cristancho, C., & Sabucedo, J. M. (2014). Mobilization through online social networks: The political protest of the Indignados in Spain. Information, Communication and Society, 17(6), 750–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Armingeon, K., & Baccaro, L. (2012). The sorrows of young Euro: The sovereign debt crises of Ireland and Southern Europe. In N. Bermeo & J. Pontusson (Eds.), Coping with crisis: Government reactions to the Great Recession (pp. 162–198). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  9. Armingeon, K., & Guthmann, K. (2014). Democracy in crisis? The declining support for national democracy in European countries, 2007–2011. European Journal of Political Research, 53(3), 423–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bellucci, P., & Memoli, V. (2012). The determinants of satisfaction with democracy in Europe. In D. Sanders, P. Magãlhaes, & G. Toka (Eds.), Citizens and the European polity (pp. 9–38). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bermeo, N., & Bartels, L. M. (Eds.). (2014). Mass politics in tough times. Opinions, votes and protest in the Great Recession. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bordignon, F., & Ceccarini, L. (2013). Five stars and a cricket. Beppe Grillo shakes Italian politics. South European Society and Politics, 18(4), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bosco, A., & Verney, S. (2012). Electoral epidemic: The political cost of economic crisis in Southern Europe, 2010–11. South European Society and Politics, 17(2), 129–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Canache, D., Mondak, J., & Seligson, M. (2001). Meaning and measurement in cross-national research on satisfaction with democracy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65(4), 506–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chang, E. C., Golden, M. A., & Hill, S. J. (2010). Legislative malfeasance and political accountability. World Politics, 62(2), 177–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clarke, H., Dutt, N., & Kornberg, A. (1993). The political economy of attitudes toward polity and society in Western European democracies. Journal of Politics, 55(4), 998–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Costas-Pérez, E., Solé-Ollé, A., & Sorribas-Navarro, P. (2012). Corruption scandals, voter information, and accountability. European Journal of Political Economy, 28(4), 469–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Criado, H., & Herreros, F. (2007). Political support: Taking into account the institutional context. Comparative Political Studies, 40(12), 1511–1532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Curini, L., Jou, W., & Memoli, V. (2012). Satisfaction with democracy and the winner/loser debate: The role of policy preferences and past experience. British Journal of Political Science, 42(2), 241–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dahlberg, S., & Holmberg, S. (2014). Democracy and bureaucracy: How their quality matters for popular satisfaction. West European Politics, 37(3), 515–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices: The erosion of political support in advanced industrial societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Della Porta, D., & Vannucci, A. (2007). Corruption and anti-corruption: The political defeat of ‘Clean Hands’ in Italy. West European Politics, 30(4), 830–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Di Mascio, F. (2012). Changing political parties, persistent patronage: The Italian case in comparative perspective. Comparative European Politics, 10(4), 377–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Diamandorous, N. K., & Gunther, R. (2001). Parties, politics and democracy in the new Southern Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Diamond, L. (1999). Developing democracy: Toward consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Duch, R. M., & Stevenson, R. T. (2008). The economic vote: How political and economic institutions condition election results. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Easton, D. (1975). A re-assessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science, 5(4), 435–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ellinas, A. A. (2013). The rise of Golden Dawn: The new face of the far right in Greece. South European Society and Politics, 18(4), 543–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. European Commission. (2014). AMECOAnnual macro-economic database. Accessed 15 October 2014.
  30. Ezrow, L., & Xezonakis, G. (2011). Citizen satisfaction with democracy and parties’ policy offerings. Comparative Political Studies, 44(9), 1152–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gallagher, M. (1991). Proportionality, disproportionality and electoral systems. Electoral Studies, 10(1), 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gallagher, M. (2014). Election indices dataset. Accessed 15 October 2014.
  33. Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Golden, M. A. (2006). Some puzzles of political corruption in modern advanced democracies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Japan Political Science Association, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  35. Guardiola, J., Picazo-Tadeo, A. J., & Rojas, M. (2015). Economic crisis and well-being in Europe: Introduction. Social Indicators Research, 120(2), 319–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gunther, R., Diamandouros, N., & Puhle, H.-J. (Eds.). (1995). The politics of democratic consolidation: Southern Europe in comparative perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Huang, M., Chang, Y., & Yun-han, C. (2008). Identifying sources of democratic legitimacy: A multilevel analysis. Electoral Studies, 27(1), 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. International Monetary Fund. (2014). World Economic Outlook database. Accessed 15 October 2014.
  39. Kenworthy, L., & Owens, L. A. (2011). The surprisingly weak effect of recessions on public opinion. In D. B. Grusky, B. Western, & C. Wimer (Eds.), The Great Recession (pp. 196–219). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  40. Khramov, V., & Lee, J. R. (2013). The Economic Performance Index (EPI): An intuitive indicator for assessing a country’s economic performance dynamics in an historical perspective. IMF Working Paper, WP/13/214.Google Scholar
  41. Laakso, M., & Taagepera, R. (1979). Effective number of parties: A measure with application to Western Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 12(1), 3–27.Google Scholar
  42. Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy. Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Linde, J., & Ekman, J. (2003). Satisfaction with democracy: A note on a frequently used indicator in comparative politics. European Journal of Political Research, 42(3), 391–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Listhaug, O., Aardal, B., & Ellis, I. O. (2009). Institutional variation and political support. An analysis of CSES data from 29 Countries. In H.-D. Klingemann (Ed.), The comparative study of electoral systems (pp. 311–332). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Long, S. J. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Magalhães, P. C. (2005). Disaffected democrats: Political attitudes and political action in Portugal. West European Politics, 28(5), 973–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mair, P. (2009). Representative versus responsible government. MPIfG Working Paper 09/8. Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne.Google Scholar
  48. Martini, S., & Quaranta, M. (2015). Finding out the hard way: Uncovering the structural foundations of political dissatisfaction in Italy, 1973–2013. West European Politics, 38(1), 28–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McAllister, I. (1999). The economic performance of governments. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical citizens: Global support for democratic governance (pp. 188–203). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Memoli, V. (2009). Il sostegno democratico in Italia. Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica, 39(1), 21–51.Google Scholar
  51. Mertens, A., & Beblo, M. (2015). Self-reported satisfaction and the economic crisis of 2007–2010: Or how people in the UK and Germany perceive a severe cyclical downturn. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-014-0854-9.Google Scholar
  52. Montero, J. R., Gunther, R., & Torcal, M. (1997). Democracy in Spain: Legitimacy, discontent and disaffection. Studies in Comparative International Development, 32(3), 124–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Morlino, L. (1998). Democracy between consolidation and crisis. Parties, groups, and citizens in Southern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Morlino, L. (2011). Changes for democracy. Actors, structures, processes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Morlino, L., & Montero, J. R. (1995). Legitimacy and democracy in Southern Europe. In R. Gunther, N. Diamandouros, & H.-J. Puhle (Eds.), The politics of democratic consolidation: Southern Europe in comparative perspective (pp. 231–260). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Morlino, L., & Tarchi, M. (1996). The dissatisfied society: The roots of political change in Italy. European Journal of Political Research, 30(1), 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Norris, P. (Ed.). (1999). Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: The critical citizens revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. OECD. (2014). OECD. Stat ExtractsNational accounts. Accessed 15 October 2014.
  60. Pagoulatos, G., & Triantopoulos, C. (2009). The return of the Greek patient: Greece and the 2008 global financial crisis. South European Politics and Society, 14(1), 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pellegata, A., & Memoli, V. (2015). Can corruption erode confidence in political institutions among European countries? Comparing the effects of different measures of perceived corruption. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-1036-0.Google Scholar
  62. Powell, B. G. (2000). Elections as instruments of democracy: Majoritarian and proportional visions. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Quaranta, M. (2015). Protesting in ‘hard times’: Evidence from a comparative analysis of Europe, 2000–2014. Current Sociology. doi: 10.1177/0011392115602937.Google Scholar
  64. Roccas, M., & Padoa-Schioppa, T. (2001). Economic change and the process of democratization in Southern Europe. In H. D. Gibson (Ed.), Economic transformation, democratization and integration into the European Union: Southern Europe in comparative perspective (pp. 30–74). Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  65. Royo, S. (2009). After the fiesta: The Spanish economy meets the global financial crisis. South European Society and Politics, 14(1), 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Shor, B., Bafumi, J., Keele, L., & Park, D. (2007). A Bayesian multilevel modeling approach to time-series cross-sectional data. Political Analysis, 15(2), 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Somarriba Arechavala, N., Zarzosa Espina, P., & Pena Trapero, B. (2015). The economic crisis and its effects on the quality of life in the European Union. Social Indicators Research, 120(2), 323–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sotiropoulos, D. A. (2006). Old problems and new challenges: The enduring and changing functions of Southern European state bureaucracies. In R. Gunther, N. Diamandouros, & D. D. Sotiropoulos (Eds.), Democracy and the state in the new Southern Europe (pp. 197–234). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Thomassen, J. (1995). Support for democratic values. In H.-D. Klingemann & D. Fuchs (Eds.), Citizens and the state (pp. 383–416). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Toniolo, G. (2013). An overview of Italy’s economic growth. In G. Toniolo (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Italian economy since unification (pp. 3–36). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Torcal, M., & Magalhães, P. C. (2010). Cultura política en el sur de Europa: Un estudio comparado en busca de su excepcionalismo. In M. Torcal (Ed.), La ciudania europea en el siglo XXI (pp. 45–84). Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.Google Scholar
  72. Torcal, M., & Montero, J. R. (2006). Political disaffection in comparative perspective. In M. Torcal & J. R. Montero (Eds.), Political disaffection in contemporary democracies: Social capital, institutions and politics (pp. 3–20). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  73. Torres, F. (2009). Back to external pressure: Policy responses to the financial crisis in Portugal. South European Society and Politics, 14(1), 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Transparency International. (2015). Corruption perceptions index. Accessed 30 January 2015.
  75. Wagner, A. F., Schneider, F., & Halla, M. (2009). The quality of institutions and satisfaction with democracy in Western Europe—A panel analysis. European Journal of Political Economy, 25(1), 30–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wiarda, H., & MacLeish Mott, M. (2001). Catholic roots and democratic flowers: political systems in Spain and Portugal. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceLUISS “Guido Carli”RomeItaly
  2. 2.Department of Political and Social SciencesUniversitat Pompeu FabraBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations