Social Indicators Research

, Volume 131, Issue 1, pp 367–391 | Cite as

Measures of Social Isolation

Article

Abstract

Social isolation is a deprivation of social connectedness. It is a crucial aspect that continues to be named by people as a core impediment for achieving well-being and as a relevant factor for understanding poverty. However it is not routinely included in surveys that provide data on multidimensional poverty measurement. Although the challenge of measuring social connectedness is daunting, this paper argues that existing research in several fields provides solid ground for the construction of basic internationally comparable indicators that measure specific aspects of social isolation. In particular, this paper synthesises the relevant literature on the measurement of social isolation and related phenomena, and on the basis of this synthetic review, proposes a module of indicators to measure social connectedness that could be feasibly incorporated into an internationally comparable multi-topic household survey.

Keywords

Social indicators Social connectedness Social isolation Relational poverty Multidimensional poverty Personal relations 

JEL Classification

C8 I3 Z130 

References

  1. Abbott, S., & Freeth, D. (2008). Social capital and health: Starting to make sense of the role of generalized trust and reciprocity. Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 874–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acket, S., Borsenberger, M., Dickes, D., & Sarracino, F. (2011). Measuring and validating social cohesion: A bottom-up approach. In CEPS-INSTEAD Working Paper.Google Scholar
  3. Adam, F., & Roncevic, B. (2003). Social capital: Recent debates and research trends. Social Science Information, 42(2), 155–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Antonucci, T. C., Fuhrer, R., & Jackson, J. S. (1990). Social support and reciprocity: A cross-ethnic and cross-national perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 519–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brock, K. (1999). It’s not only wealth that matters: It’s peace of mind too. A review of participatory work on poverty and illbeing. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  6. Cagney, K. A., Glass, T. A., Skarupski, K. A., Barnes, L. L., Schwartz, B. S., & Mendes de Leon, C. F. (2009). Neighborhood-level cohesion and disorder: Measurement and validation in two older adult urban populations. Journal of Gerontology, 64B(3), 415–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell, K., & Barrett, L. (1992). Sources of personal neighbor networks: Social integration, need, or time? Social Forces, 70, 1077–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cattan, M., White, M., Bond, J., & Learmouth, A. (2005). Preventing social isolation and loneliness among older people: A systematic review of health promotion interventions. Ageing and Society, 25, 41–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cotterell, G., & Crothers, C. (2011). Social indicators and social reporting in New Zealand, and the potential contribution of the Family Whanau and Wellbeing Project. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 37, 152–171.Google Scholar
  10. Cummins, R. A. (1996). The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38, 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Jong Gierveld, J., & Van Tilburg, T. (2006). A 6-item scale for overall, emotional, and social loneliness: Confirmatory tests on survey data. Research on Aging, 28(5), 582–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Jong Gierveld, J., & Van Tilburg, T. (2010). The De Jong Gierveld short scales for emotional and social loneliness: Tested on data from seven countries in the UN Generations and Gender Surveys. European Journal of Ageing, 7(2), 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deci, E. L., La Guardia, J. G., Moller, A. C., Scheiner, M. J., & Ryan, R. M. (2006). On the benefits of giving as well as receiving autonomy support: Mutuality in close friendships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(2), 313–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. (2006). Representative trust and reciprocity: Prevalence and determinants. Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).Google Scholar
  15. du Toit, A., Skuse, A., & Cousins, T. (2007). The political economy of social capital: Chronic poverty, remoteness and gender in the rural Eastern Cape. Social Identities, 13(4), 521–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Durlauf, S. N., & Fafchamps, M. (2004). Social capital. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Easterly, W., Ritzen, J., & Woolcock, M. (2006). Social cohesion, institutions and growth. Economic and Politics, 18(2), 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fafchamps, M., & Shilpi, F. (2008). Isolation and subjective welfare: Evidence from South Asia. Policy Research. Washington DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  19. Fine, M., & Spencer, R. (2009). Social isolation: Development of an assessment tool for HACC services. Centre for Research on Social Inclusion, New South Wales Department of Disability, Ageing and Home Care.Google Scholar
  20. Fischer, C. (1982). To dwell among friends: Personal networks in town and city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Foxton, F., & Jones, R. (2011). Social capital indicators review. London: Office for National Statistics (ONS).Google Scholar
  22. Genero, N., Miller, J. B., Surrey, J., & Baldwin, L. M. (1992). Measuring perceived mutuality in close relationships: Validation of the mutual psychological development questionnaire. Journal of Family Psychology, 6(1), 36–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Glaeser, E. L., Laibson, D. I., Scheinkman, J. A., & Soutter, C. L. (2000). Measuring trust. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 811–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gonzalez de la Rocha, M. (2007). The construction of the myth of survival. Development and Change, 38(1), 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gordon, D., Levitas, R., Pantazis, C., Patsios, D., Payne, S., Townsend, P., et al. (2000). Poverty and social exclusion in Britain. New York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  26. Gordon, D., Mack, J., Lansley, S., Main, G., Nandy, S., Patsios, D., et al. (2013). The impoverishment of the UK: PSE UK first results. Living standards. Bristol: The Poverty and Social Exclusion in the UK project.Google Scholar
  27. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Granovetter, M. S. (1982). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In P. V. Marsden & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 201–233). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Grootaert, C. (1998). Social capital: The missing link? Social Capital Initiative. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  30. Grootaert, C., Narayan, D., Nyhan Jones, V., & Woolcock, M. (2004). Measuring social capital: An integrated questionnaire. Washington, DC: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gundelach, B., & Traunmuller, R. (2013). Beyond generalised trust: Norms of reciprocity as an alternative form of social capital in an assimilationist integration regime. Political Studies,. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12064.Google Scholar
  32. Harper, R., & Kelly, M. (2003). Measuring Social Capital in the United Kingdom. London: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
  33. Hawkley, L. C., Browne, M. W., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2005). How can I connect with thee? Let me count the ways. Psychological Science, 16(10), 798–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2009). Loneliness. In H. R. S. Sprecher (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human relationships (pp. 985–990). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010). Loneliness matters: A theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 40, 218–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Healy, T. (2002). The measurement of social capital at the international level. International conference on the measurement of social capital. London: UK Office for National Statistics and the OECD.Google Scholar
  37. Hooghe, M. (2007). Social capital and diversity: Generalized trust, social cohesion and regimes of diversity. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 709–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hortulanus, R., Machielse, A., & Meeuwesen, L. (2006). Social isolation in modern society. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Hyyppä, M. T. (2010). Healthy ties: Social capital, population health and survival. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jones, V. N., & Woolcock, M. (2007). Using mixed methods to assess social capital in low income countries: A practical guide. Manchester: Brooks World Poverty Institute.Google Scholar
  41. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kawachi, I., Kennedy, B. P., Lochner, K., & Prothrow-Stith, D. (1997). Social capital, income inequality, and mortality. American Journal of Public Health, 78(9), 1491–1498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Keefe, J., Andrew, A., Fancey P., & Hallet, M. (2006). A profile of social isolation in Canada. Report submitted to the F/P/T Working Group on Social Isolation. Province of British Columbia and Mount Saint Vincent University.Google Scholar
  44. Kim, E. S., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2013). Perceived neighborhood social cohesion and stroke. Social Science and Medicine, 97, 49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Klinenberg, E. (2001). Dying alone: The social production of urban isolation. Ethnography, 2, 501–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Krueger, A. B., Kahneman, D., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. (2009). National time accounting: The currency of life. In A. B. Kruger (Ed.), Measuring the subjective well-being of nations: National accounts of time use and well-being. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Leavy, J., & Howard, J. (2013). What matters most? Evidence from 84 participatory studies with those living with extreme poverty and marginalisation. London: Institute of Development Studies (IDS).Google Scholar
  48. Lochner, K. A., Kawachi, I., Brennan, R. T., & Buka, S. L. (2003). Social capital and neighborhood mortality rates in Chicago. Social Science and Medicine, 56, 1797–1805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lochner, K., Kawachi, I., & Kennedy, B. P. (1999). Social capital: A guide to its measurement. Health and Place, 5, 259–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Maximiano, S. (2012). Measuring reciprocity: Do survey and experimental data correlate? (Krannert School of Management Working Paper). West Lafayette: Krannert School of Management, Purdue University.Google Scholar
  51. Maxwell, J. (1996). Social dimensions of economic growth. The Eric John Hanson Memorial Lecture Series. Department of Economics, University of Alberta.Google Scholar
  52. McGee, R. (1998). Looking at poverty from different points of view: A Colombian case study (PhD. Thesis). University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  53. MIND. (2004). Not alone? Isolation and mental distress. London: MIND.Google Scholar
  54. Minnesota Department of Health. (2010). Social connectedness: Evaluating the healthy people 2020 framework. Minnesota Department of Health Community and Family Health Division, Office of Public Health Practice.Google Scholar
  55. Moore, S., Bockenholt, U., Daniel, M., Frohlich, K., Kestens, Y., & Richard, L. (2011). Social capital and core network ties: A validation study of individual-level social capital measures and their association with extra- and intra-neighborhood ties, and self-rated health. Health and Place, 17(2), 536–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Narayan, D., Chambers, R., Shah, M. K., & Petesch, P. (2000). Voices of the poor: Crying out for change. New York: Oxford University Press for the World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. New Zealand Ministry of Social Development. (2010). The social report 2010. New Zealand: The Ministry of Social Development.Google Scholar
  58. OECD. (2011). How’s life? Measuring well-being. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  59. Office for National Statistics. (2011). Measuring national well-being, measuring what matters: National statistician’s reflections on the national debate on measuring national well-being. London: Office for National Statistics (ONS).Google Scholar
  60. Onyx, J., & Bullen, P. (2000). Measuring social capital in five communities. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36, 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pinquart, M., & Sörensen, S. (2001). Influences on loneliness in older adults: A meta-analysis. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23, 245–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pollack, C. E., & von dem Knesebeck, O. (2004). Social capital and health among the aged: Comparisons between the United States and Germany. Health and Place, 10, 383–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Putnam, R. D. (2001). Social capital: Measurement and consequences. Isuma: Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2, 41–51.Google Scholar
  64. Quane, J. M., & Wilson, W. J. (2012). Critical commentary. Making the connection between the socialisation and the social isolation of the inner-city poor. Urban Studies, 49, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Robinson, D., & Williams, T. (2001). Social capital and voluntary activity: giving and sharing in Maori and non-Maori society. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 17, 52–71.Google Scholar
  66. Rook, K. S. (1988). Toward a more differentiated view of loneliness. In S. W. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, Research, Interventions (pp. 571–589). Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
  67. Rotenberg, K. J., & MacKie, J. (1999). Stigmatization of social and intimacy loneliness. Psychological Reports, 84, 147–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Russell, D. W. (1982). The measurement of loneliness. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 81–104). New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
  69. Russell, D. W. (1996). UCLA loneliness scale (version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66(1), 20–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Samman, E. (2007). Psychological and subjective wellbeing: A proposal for internationally comparable indicators. Oxford Development Studies, 35(4), 459–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Savikko, N., Routasalo, P., Tilvis, R. S., Strandberg, T. E., & Pitkälä, K. H. (2005). Predictors and subjective causes of loneliness in an aged population. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 41(3), 223–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Self, A., Thomas, J., & Randall, C. (2012). Measuring national well-being-our relationships. London: Office for National Statistics UK.Google Scholar
  75. Stafford, M., Bartley, M., Sacker, A., & Marmot, M. (2003). Measuring the social environment: Social cohesion and material deprivation in English and Scottish neighbourhoods. Environment and Planning, 35, 1459–1475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stewart, M. J., Makwarimba, E., Reutter, L. I., Veenstra, G., Raphael, D., & Love, R. (2009). Poverty, sense of belonging and experiences of social isolation. Journal of Poverty, 13, 173–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Stiglitz, J.E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Paris.Google Scholar
  78. Stone, W. (2001). Measuring social capital: Towards a theoretically informed measurement framework for researching social capital in family and community life Melbourne (Research Paper No. 24). Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.Google Scholar
  79. Suedfeld, P. (1974). Social isolation: A case for interdisciplinary research. The Canadian Psychologist, 15(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Thomas, B. K., Muradian, R., de Groot, G., & de Ruijter, A. (2010). Resilient and resourceful? A case study on how the poor cope in Kerala, India. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 45(1), 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Tigges, L. M., Browne, I., & Green, G. P. (1998). Social isolation of the urban poor: race, class, and neighborhood effects on social resources. The Sociological Quarterly, 39(1), 53–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Van Tilburg, T., Van Sonderen, E., & Ormel, J. (1991). The measurement of reciprocity in ego-centered networks of personal relationships: A comparison of various indices. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54(1), 54–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Victor, C., Scambler, S., Bond, J., & Bowling, A. (2000). Being alone in later life: Loneliness, social isolation and living alone. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 10(4), 407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  85. Zavaleta, D., Samuel, K., & Mills, C. (2014). Social isolation: A conceptual and measurement proposal. OPHI Working Papers 67.Google Scholar
  86. Ziersch, A. M., Baum, F. E., MacDougall, C., & Putland, C. (2005). Neighbourhood life and social capital: The implications for health. Social Science and Medicine, 60, 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI)University of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.Institute for the Study of International Development (ISID)McGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Critical Educational Psychology, School of EducationUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations