Social Indicators Research

, Volume 131, Issue 1, pp 43–64 | Cite as

Comparing Hospitals and Health Prices and Volumes Across Countries: A New Approach

  • Francette Koechlin
  • Paul Konijn
  • Luca Lorenzoni
  • Paul Schreyer
Article

Abstract

Health services are among the most comparison-resistant services in international comparisons such as the Eurostat–OECD Purchasing Power Parities (PPP) program and the ICP. Traditionally, PPPs for health services are estimated on the basis of input methods, e.g. by comparing salaries of doctors and nurses. This mainly reflects the difficulties inherent in measuring the output of services produced by nonmarket producers. Since 2007, OECD and Eurostat have undertaken work, with their Member States, to develop explicit output-based measures of prices and volumes of hospital services directed at comparisons across countries. The approach is based on collecting quasi-prices for a basket of comparable and representative medical and surgical hospital services. Eurostat and OECD used the new approach for the first time in their PPP calculations that entered the 2011 ICP benchmark round. The paper describes the output-based approach, the way it was developed and tested to assess its feasibility, and the results based on the latest data collection.

Keywords

Health prices Hospital prices Purchasing power parities 

References

  1. ABS. (2011). 6401.0 Consumer Price Index, Australia. Canberra.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, T. (2005). Atkinson review: Final report. Measurement of government output and productivity for the national accounts. Great Britain: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  3. Castelli, A., Dawson, D., Gravelle, H., & Street, A. (2007). Improving the measurement of health system output growth. Health Economics, 16(10), 1091–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deveci, N. (2011). General government output and productivity, 2002–2009. Statistics Denmark.Google Scholar
  5. Diewert, W. E. (2011). Measuring productivity in the public sector: Some conceptual problems. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 36, 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Diewert, W. E. (2012). The measurement of productivity in the nonmarket sector. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 37, 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eurostat. (2001). Handbook on price and volume measures in national accounts. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  8. Eurostat & OECD (2012). Eurostat-OECD methodological manual on purchasing power parities (2012th ed.). Luxembourg: European Union.Google Scholar
  9. Evans, R. G. (2013). Waste, Economists and American Healthcare. Healthcare Policy, 9(2), 12–20.Google Scholar
  10. Gerdtham, U., & Jönnson, B. (1991). Conversion factor instability in international comparisons of health care expenditure. Journal of Health Economics, 10, 227–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gutacker, N., Bojke, C., Daidone, S., Devlin, N., Parkin, D., & Street, A. (2011). Truly inefficient or providing better quality of care? Analysing the relationship between risk-adjusted hospital costs and patients’ health outcomes. Centre for Health Economics. University of York.Google Scholar
  12. Health and Social Care Information Centre. Patient reported outcome measures, http://www.hscic.gov.uk/proms
  13. Joumard, I., Hoeller, P., André, C., & Nicq, C. (2010). Health care systems: Efficiency and policy settings. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kavanos, P., & Mossialos, E. (1999). International comparisons of health care expenditures: What we know and what we do not know. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 4(2), 122–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Koechlin, F., Lorenzoni, L., & Schreyer, P. (2010). Comparing price levels of hospital services across countries: Results of a pilot study. OECD Health Working Paper 53. www.oecd.org/els/health/workingpapers
  16. Lorenzoni, L., & Pearson, M. (2011). Description of alternative approaches to measure and place a value on hospital products in seven PECD countries. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Melberg, H. (2011). Some problems with international comparisons of health spending—and a suggestion how to quantify the size of the problem. Working paper 2011:4, University of Oslo & HERO, Department of Health Management and Health Economics.Google Scholar
  18. Newman, D., & Davis, C. (2010). The independent payment advisory board. Washington DC: CRS Report for Congress, Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
  19. OECD. (2013). Health at a Glance 2013: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. OECD, Eurostat, WHO. (2011). A system of health accounts. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Schreyer, P. (2010). Towards measurement the volume output of education and health services. A handbook. OECD Statistics Working papers, 2010/02, Paris.Google Scholar
  22. Schreyer, P. (2012). Output, outcome and quality adjustment in measuring health and education services. Review of Income and Wealth, 58(2), 257–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wordsworth, S., & Ludbrook, A. (2005). Comparing costing results in across-country economic evaluations: The use of technology specific purchasing power parities. Health Economics, 14, 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Union 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francette Koechlin
    • 1
  • Paul Konijn
    • 2
  • Luca Lorenzoni
    • 1
  • Paul Schreyer
    • 1
  1. 1.OECDParisFrance
  2. 2.EurostatLuxembourgLuxembourg

Personalised recommendations