Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Partnership, Gender, and the Well-Being Cost of Unemployment

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine the relationship between unemployment, life satisfaction and affective well-being depending on family status and, within couples, on the employment status of one’s partner. Our data, that we collected using the Day Reconstruction Method, show that unemployment is negatively related to life satisfaction, but not to affective well-being. Living in a partnership strengthens the loss in life satisfaction of men, but weakens that of women. Unemployment of a person’s partner is associated with a smaller loss in life satisfaction for unemployed men, but with a larger loss for women. We argue that these findings reflect to a large extent changes in cognitive well-being, which is closely related to identity utility. The unemployed’s feeling of identity appears to be affected by traditional gender roles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For a discussion of the subdimensions of well-being, see Campbell (1976), Diener (1984), and Schimmack et al. (2008).

  2. A more detailed description of the survey design can be found in Knabe et al. (2010).

  3. We compared our findings when using weighted and unweighted data. Even though the statistical significance of some of the results differs depending on the use of weights, our qualitative findings remain unaffected.

  4. For a discussion of the net affect and alternative measures of affective experiences see e.g. the contributions in the volume edited by Krueger (2009).

  5. The correlation coefficient between life satisfaction and net affect at the individual level is 0.36.

  6. Throughout this section, Wald tests are used to examine statistical significance.

  7. This identification strategy faces a number of caveats, which we will discuss in Sect. 5.

References

  • Akerlof, G. A., & Kranton, R. E. (2000). Economics and identity. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 715–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton et al.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittman, M., England, P., Sayer, L., Folbre, N., & Matheson, G. (2003). When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work. American Journal of Sociology, 109(1), 186–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88(7–8), 1359–1386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Oxford: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, H., & Roberts, J. (2014). Gender role identity, breadwinner status and psychological well-being in the household, Sheffield Economics Research Paper Series No. 2014004, The University of Sheffield.

  • Campbell, A. (1976). Subjective measures of well-being. American Psychologist, 31, 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, N. (2007). Unemployment and psychological well-being. Economic Record, 83(262), 287–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chadi, A. (2011). Regional unemployment and norm-induced effects on life satisfaction. In SOEP Papers on multidisciplinary panel data research No 387.

  • Clark, A. (2003). Unemployment as a social norm: Psychological evidence from panel data. Journal of Labor Economics, 21, 323–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A., Knabe, A., & Rätzel, S. (2010). Boon or bane? Well-being, others’ unemployment, and job unsecurity. Labour Economics, 17, 52–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creed, P. A., & Macintyre, S. R. (2001). The relative effects of deprivation of the latent and manifest benefits of employment on the well-being of unemployed people. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 324–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., et al. (2009). Income’s differential influence on judgments of life versus affective well-being. In E. Diener (Ed.), Assessing well-being: The collected works of Diener (pp. 233–245). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, P., & Kahneman, D. (2008). Interpretations of utility and their implications for the valuation of health. Economic Journal, 118, 215–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, P., & Powdthavee, N. (2012). Thinking about it: A note on attention and well-being losses from unemployment. Applied Economics Letters, 19, 325–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortin, N. M. (2005). Gender role attitudes and the labour-market outcomes of women across OECD countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21, 416–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grogan, L., & Koka, K. (2013). Economic crises and wellbeing: Social norms and home production. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 92, 241–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hetschko, C., Knabe, A., & Schöb, R. (2014). Changing identity: Retiring from unemployment. Economic Journal, 124(575), 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahoda, M. (1981). Work, employment, and unemployment. Values, theories, and approaches in social research. American Psychologist, 36, 184–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahoda, M. (1982). Employment and unemployment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective Happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being. The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 3–25). New York: Russel Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences, 107, 16489–16493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004a). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306, 1776–1780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004b). Toward national well-being accounts. American Economic Review, 94, 429–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knabe, A., & Rätzel, S. (2011a). Scarring or scaring? The psychological impact of past unemployment and future unemployment risk. Economica, 78, 283–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knabe, A., & Rätzel, S. (2011b). Quantifying the psychological costs of unemployment: the role of permanent income. Applied Economics, 43, 2751–2763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knabe, A., Rätzel, S., Schöb, R., & Weimann, J. (2010). Dissatisfied with life, but having a good day: Time-use and well-being of the unemployed. Economic Journal, 120, 867–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A. B. (Ed.). (2009). Measuring the subjective well-being of nations: National accounts of time use and well-being. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein, G. (2009). That which makes life worthwhile. In A. B. Krueger (Ed.), Measuring the subjective well-being of nations: National accounts of time use and well-being. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, M., Weiss, P., Hosoya, G., & Eid, M. (2014). Honey, I got fired! A longitudinal dyadic analysis of the effect of unemployment on life satisfaction in couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(1), 163–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, J. (2013). The effect of unemployment on the mental health of spouses—Evidence from plant closures in Germany. Journal of Health Economics, 32(3), 546–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadyen, R. G. (1995). Coping with threatened identities: Unemployed people’s self-categorizations. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, 14, 233–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2013). Subjective well-being: Measuring happiness, suffering, and other dimensions of experience Panel on measuring subjective well-being in a policy-relevant framework. In A. A. Stone & C. Mackie (Eds.), Committee on national statistics, division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2005). What are equivalence scales? http://www.oecd.org/eco/growth/OECD-Note-EquivalenceScales.pdf.

  • Paul, K. I., & Batinic, B. (2010). The need for work: Jahoda’s latent functions of employment in a representative sample of the German population. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powdthavee, N. (2007). Are there geographical variations in the psychological cost of unemployment in South Africa? Social Indicators Research, 80, 629–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, C. E., Mirowsky, J., & Huber, J. (1983). Dividing work, sharing work, and in-between: Marriage patterns and depression. American Sociological Review, 48, 809–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmack, U., Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2002). Life-satisfaction is a momentary judgment and a stable personality characteristic: The use of chronically accessible and stable sources. Journal of Personality, 70, 345–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmack, U., Schupp, J. E., & Wagner, G. G. (2008). The influence of environment and personality on the affective and cognitive component of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 89, 41–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shields, M. A., & Price, S. Wheatley. (2005). Exploring the economic and social determinants of psychological well-being and perceived social support in England. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 168(3), 513–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shields, M., Price, S. W., & Wooden, M. (2009). Life satisfaction and the economic and social characteristics of neighbourhoods. Journal of Population Economics, 22, 421–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt. (2013). Datenreport 2013. Ein Sozialbericht für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.

  • Thornton, A., Alwin, D. F., & Camburn, D. (1983). Causes and consequences of sex-role attitudes and attitude change. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warr, P., & Parry, G. (1982). Paid employment and women’s psychological well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 498–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, L. E., & Moore, K. A. (2002). Predicting self-esteem during unemployment: The effect of gender, financial deprivation, alternate roles, and social support. Journal of Employment Counseling, 39, 171–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weimann, J., Knabe, A., & Schöb, R. (2015). Measuring happiness: The economics of well- being. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkelmann, L., & Winkelmann, R. (1995). Happiness and unemployment: A panel data analysis for Germany. Konjunkturpolitik, 41(4), 293–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkelmann, L., & Winkelmann, R. (1998). Why are the unemployed so unhappy? Evidence from panel data. Economica, 65, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronnie Schöb.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 3.

Table 3 Descriptive statistics

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Knabe, A., Schöb, R. & Weimann, J. Partnership, Gender, and the Well-Being Cost of Unemployment. Soc Indic Res 129, 1255–1275 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1167-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1167-3

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation