Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 129, Issue 3, pp 979–999 | Cite as

Using Thresholds of Severity to Threats to and the Resilience of Human Systems in Measuring Human Security

  • Pedcris M. OrencioEmail author
  • Aiko Endo
  • Makoto Taniguchi
  • Masahiko Fujii
Article

Abstract

Ever since the contemporary view of the concept of human security has expanded from a state level to an individual level, it has been tied to a normative measurement of risk from perennial and pervasive threats that affect the vital core of human values. The vital core comprises an individual’s set of functions for development relative to conditions such as safety, freedom, and wellbeing. Despite theoretical advances, a universal method for operationalizing the current human security concept has not yet been fully achieved. In this paper, we review different indicator-based frameworks in order to suggest a more feasible measurement of security at the individual level at different geographical scales. We see that a procedural evaluation at this level could be enhanced by using indicators based on (1) a severity threshold for risks that arise from threats that affect the vital core of an individual and (2) the overall capacity of an individual to respond to these threats. Suitability, accessibility, and reliability of data for evaluating the indicator variables of a particular security objective, however, could be a challenge when determining the variables on a local scale. Combining variables of varying quantitative and qualitative data types seems plausible only that there exists a grey area on which scale and dimension the approach can be more effectively applied.

Keywords

Individual threshold Risk Resilience Human values Security 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by the R-08 Init Project entitled, “Human-Environmental Security in Asia–Pacific Ring of Fire: Water-Energy-Food Nexus,” of the Research Institute for Humanity and Nature (RIHN), Kyoto, Japan.

References

  1. Acton, J. M., & Hibbs, M. (2012). Why Fukushima was preventable. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
  2. Alkire, S. (2003). A conceptual framework for human security. Oxford: Centre for Research on Inequality, Human Security and Ethnicity, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. Amouyel, A. (2006). What is human security? Human Security Journal, 1(06), 10–23.Google Scholar
  4. Baechler, G. (1998). Why environmental transformation causes violence. Environmental Change and Security Project Report, 4, 24–44.Google Scholar
  5. Bajpai, K. P. (2000). Human security: Concept and measurement. Notre Dame: Joan B. Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies, University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
  6. Bankoff, G. (2007). Dangers to going it alone: Social capital and the origins of community resilience in the Philippines. Community and Change, 22(2), 327–355.Google Scholar
  7. Barnett, J., & Adger, W. N. (2007). Climate change, human security and violent conflict. Political Geography, 26(6), 639–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bohi, D. R., Toman, M. A., & Walls, M. A. (1996). The economics of energy security. Boston: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Booysen, F. (2002). An overview and evaluation of composite indices of development. Social Indicators Research, 59(2), 115–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brooks, N., Adger, W. N., & Kelly, P. M. (2005). The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation. Global Environmental Change, 15(2), 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buckle, P., Marsh, G., & Smale, S. (2000). Assessing resilience and vulnerability: Principles, strategies and actions. Emergency Management, Australia, Project 15/2000. http://www.eird.org/cd/on-better-terms/docs/Buckle-Marsh-Smale-Assessing-Resilience-Vulnerability-Principles-Strategies-Actions.pdf.
  12. Caney, S. (2010). Climate change, human rights, and moral thresholds. In S. Gardiner, S. Caney, D. Jamieson, & H. Shue (Eds.), Climate ethics: Essential readings (pp. 163–177). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Carolan, M. (2012). The food and human security index: Rethinking food security and ‘Growth’. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 19(2), 176.Google Scholar
  14. Childs, I. (2008). Emergence of new volunteerism: Increasing community resilience to natural disasters in Japan. In K. Gow & D. Paton (Eds.), The phoenix of natural disasters: Community resilience (pp. 171–180). New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Collier, P., & Hoeffler, A. (2001). Data issues in the study of conflict. Paper prepared for the conference on identifying wars: Systematic conflict research and its utility in conflict resolution and prevention. Uppsala, Sweden, June 2001. http://www.csae.ox.ac.uk/econdata/pdfs/edds2002-01.pdf.
  16. Commission on Human Security (CHS). (2003). Human security now. New York. ISBN 0-9741108-0-9.Google Scholar
  17. Cummins, R. A., Eckersley, R., Pallant, J., Van Vugt, J., & Misajon, R. (2003). Developing a national index of subjective wellbeing: The Australian Unity Wellbeing Index. Social Indicators Research, 64(2), 159–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dercon, S. (2001). Assessing vulnerability. Oxford: Publication of the Jesus College and CSAE, Department of Economics, Oxford University.Google Scholar
  19. Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2011). A whole community approach to emergency management: Principles, themes, and pathways for action. Washington, D.C., Federal Emergency Management Agency. http://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1813-25045-0649/whole_community_dec2011__2_.pdf.
  20. Fekete, A., Damm, M., & Birkmann, J. (2010). Scales as a challenge for vulnerability assessment. Natural Hazards, 55(3), 729–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Flynn, S. (2007). The edge of disaster: Rebuilding a resilient nation. New York: Random House LLC.Google Scholar
  22. Fraser, E. D., Mabee, W., & Slaymaker, O. (2003). Mutual vulnerability, mutual dependence: The reflexive relation between human society and the environment. Global Environmental Change, 13(2), 137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fukuda-Parr, S., & Messineo, C. (2012). Human security: A critical review of the literature. Centre for Research on Peace and Development (CRPD), Working paper 11.Google Scholar
  24. Fusfield, D. R. (1987). Economics: Principles of political economy (3rd ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.Google Scholar
  25. Gallopin, G. C. (1997). Indicators and their use: Information for decision-making. SCOPE-Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment. International Council of Scientific Unions, 58, 13–27.Google Scholar
  26. Gunderson, L. H., & Holling, C. S. (2002). Resilience and adaptive cycles. In L. H. Gunderson, & C. S. Holling (Eds.), Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems (pp. 25–62). Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hampson, F. O., Daudelin, J., Hay, J., Reid, H., & Marting, T. (2002). Madness in the multitude: Human security and world disorder. Don Mills: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hastings, D. A. (2010). The human security index: An update and a new release. In GIS IDEAS 2010 conference “Envisioning Environmental Security for Sustainable Development”. http://wgrass.media.osaka-cu.ac.jp/gisideas10/viewabstract.php?id=381.
  29. Heinbecker, P. (1999). Human security. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 7(1), 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hiete, M., & Merz, M. (2009). An indicator framework to assess the vulnerability of industrial sectors against indirect disaster losses. In International ISCRAM Conference, Gothenburg (Sweden).Google Scholar
  31. Hoffman, J. (2000). The roots index: Exploring indices as measures of local sustainable development, New York City: 1990–95. Social Indicators Research, 52(2), 95–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Homer-Dixon, T. F. (1999). Environment, scarcity, and conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Human Security Unit (HSU). (2009). Human security in theory and practice: Application of Human Security Concept and United Nations Trust Fund for Human Security. United Nations: Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs.Google Scholar
  34. Jansen, J. C. (2009). Energy services security: Concepts and metrics. Vienna: International atomic energy project on selecting and defining integrated indicators for nuclear energy. October 2009. ECN-09-080.Google Scholar
  35. Jimba, M., Hubbard, S., Sase, E., Suzuki, T., & K. Otsuka. (2011). Human Security Approaches for Disaster Recovery and Resilience. Disasters.Google Scholar
  36. Jolly, R., & Ray, D. B. (2007). Human security—National perspectives and global agendas: Insights from national human development reports. Journal of International Development, 19(4), 457–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kahl, C. H. (2006). States, scarcity, and civil strife in the developing world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Khagram, S., Clark, W., & Raad, D. F. (2003). From the environment and human security to sustainable security and development. Journal of Human Development, 4(2), 289–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. King, G., & Murray, C. J. (2001). Rethinking human security. Political Science Quarterly, 116(4), 585–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Klein, R. J., Nicholls, R. J., & Thomalla, F. (2003). Resilience to natural hazards: How useful is this concept? Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards, 5(1), 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lake, D. A., & Morgan, P. M. (1997). Regional orders: Building security in a new world. University Park: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
  42. Leaning, J., & Arie, S. (2000). Human security: A framework for assessment in conflict and transition. Boston, MA: Human Security Programme, Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  43. Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology.Google Scholar
  44. Lonergan, S., Gustavson, K., & Carter, B. (2000). The index of human insecurity. Aviso, 6, 1–7.Google Scholar
  45. Lonergan, S., Langeweg, F., & Hilderink, H. (2002). Chapter 4. Global environmental change and human security: What do indicators indicate? In E. A. Page, & M. R. Redclift (Eds.), Human security and the environment: International comparisons (pp. 85–102). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  46. MacLean, G. (2002). Building on a legacy or bucking tradition? Evaluating Canada’s human security initiative in an era of globalization. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 9(3), 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. MacLean, G. A. (2006). Human security in the national interest? Canada, POGG and the ‘New’ Multilateralism. In S. Maclean, J. David, R. Black, & T. M. Shaw (Eds.), A decade of human security—Global governance and new multilateralisms (pp. 63–72). Aldershot and Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  48. Margarit, A. (2009). The concept of security revisited new approaches: Human security and risk assessment. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Relationes Internationales, 2(1). http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/internationalis/article/view/1474/1215.
  49. Moser, C. (2003). “Apt Illustration” or “Anecdotal Information?” Can qualitative data be representative or robust? In R. Kanbur (Ed.), Qual-quant. Qualitative and quantitative poverty appraisal: Complementarities, tensions and the way forward. Working paper no 2001-05 (pp. 79–89). Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca.Google Scholar
  50. National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA), UNDP, & ECHO. (2008). Mainstreaming disaster risk reduction in sub-national development and land use/physical planning in the Philippines. ISBN 978-971-8535-23-3.Google Scholar
  51. Nef, J. (1999). Human security and mutual vulnerability. The Global Political Economy of Development and Underdevelopment. (Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, 1999); and UNDP and European Commission (EC). Attacking Poverty While Improving the Environment. Google Scholar
  52. Nef, J. (2006). Human security, mutual vulnerability, and sustainable development: A critical view. Whitehead J. Dipl. & Int’l Rel., 7, 55.Google Scholar
  53. Newman, E. (2010). Critical human security studies. Review of International Studies, 36(1), 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nussbaum, M., & Sen, A. (1993). The quality of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. O’Brien, K., Leichenko, R., Kelkar, U., Venema, H., Aandahl, G., Tompkins, H., & West, J. (2004). Mapping vulnerability to multiple stressors: Climate change and globalization in India. Global Environmental Change, 14(4), 303–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ogata, S., & A. Sen. (2003). Human security now: Protecting and empowering people. Human Security Commission. http://www.humansecurity-chs.org.
  57. Orencio, P. M., & Fujii, M. (2013a). An index to determine vulnerability of communities in a coastal zone: A case study of Baler, Aurora, Philippines. Ambio, 42(1), 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Orencio, P. M., & Fujii, M. (2013b). A localized disaster-resilience index to assess coastal communities based on an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 3, 62–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Orencio, P. M., & Fujii, M. (2014). A spatiotemporal approach for determining disaster-risk potential based on damage consequences of multiple hazard events. Journal of Risk Research, 17(7), 815–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Owen, T. (2003). Measuring human security: Overcoming the Paradox. Human Security Bulletin 2(3). http://www.taylorowen.com/Articles/2003_Paradox.pdf.
  61. Owen, T. (2004). Human security-conflict, critique and consensus: Colloquium remarks and a proposal for a threshold-based definition. Security Dialogue, 35(3), 373–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Owen, T. (2008). Measuring human security. Environmental change and human security: Recognizing and acting on hazard impacts (pp. 35–64). Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rothschild, E. (1995). What is security? Daedalus, 124(3), 53–98.Google Scholar
  64. Rummel, (2001). Freedom is a right and creates human security. In Saving Lives, Enriching Lives. http://www.mega.nu:8080/ampp/rummel/wf.chap8.htm.
  65. Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis. Working paper 72, Institute for Development Studies, Brighton, UK.Google Scholar
  66. Sen, A. K. (1985). Well-being, agency and freedom: The Dewey lectures 1984. Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), 169–221.Google Scholar
  67. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Sullivan, C. A., Cohen, A., Faurès, J. M., & Santini, G. (2010). The rural water livelihoods index. Working paper. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome. http://www.fao.org/nr/water/docs/FAOW_RWLI_paper.pdf.
  69. Sygna, L., O’Brien, K., & Wolf, J. (2013). A Changing environment for human security: Transformative approaches to research. Routledge, London: Policy and Action.Google Scholar
  70. Tadjbakhsh, S. (2005). Human security: The seven challenges of operationalizing the concept. Human Security: 60 Minutes to Convince. Organized by UNESCO, Section of SHS/FPH/PHS September 13, 2005-09-14 Paris, France.Google Scholar
  71. Tadjbakhsh, S., & Chenoy, A. (2012). Human security: Concepts and implications. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  72. Thakur, R. (2004). A political worldview. Security Dialogue, 35(3), 347–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Twigg, J. (2007). Characteristics of a disaster-resilient community: A Guidance Note, Version 1. UK Department for International Development’s Disaster Risk Reduction Interagency Coordination Group, London. https://practicalaction.org/docs/ia1/community-characteristics-en-lowres.pdf.
  74. Ul Haq, M. (1999). Reflections on Human Development. New York and Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  75. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (1990). UNDP Human Development report 1990. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  76. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (1994). Human Development report 1994. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  77. United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP). (2002). Assessing human vulnerability due to environmental change: Concepts, issues, methods and case studies. Nairobi: UNEP.Google Scholar
  78. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). (2006). Food Security Assessment. US.Google Scholar
  79. United States Department of Homeland Security. (2013). NIPP 2013 Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience. http://www.dhs.gov/national-infrastructure-protection-plan.
  80. Vivoda, V. (2010). Evaluating energy security in the Asia-Pacific region: A novel methodological approach. Energy Policy, 38(9), 5258–5263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Webb, D., & Wills-Herrera, E. (2012). Subjective well-being and security (Vol. 46). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  82. Wills, E. (2009). Spirituality and subjective well-being: Evidences for a new domain in the personal well-being index. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(1), 49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wolfers, A. (1952). “National Security” as an ambiguous symbol. Political Science Quarterly, 67, 483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pedcris M. Orencio
    • 1
    Email author
  • Aiko Endo
    • 2
  • Makoto Taniguchi
    • 2
  • Masahiko Fujii
    • 3
  1. 1.Urban Disaster Risk Reduction DepartmentCatholic Relief Services- Philippines (Manila Office)ManilaPhilippines
  2. 2.Research Institute for Humanity and NatureKyotoJapan
  3. 3.Faculty of Environmental Earth ScienceHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan

Personalised recommendations