Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 129, Issue 2, pp 893–907 | Cite as

Religion and Gender Equality Worldwide: A Country-Level Analysis

  • Landon Schnabel
Article

Abstract

Does religion help or hinder gender equality worldwide? Are some major world religions more conducive to equality than others? This study answers these questions using country-level data assembled from multiple sources. Much of the research on religion and gender has focused on the relationship between individual religious belief and practice and gender attitudes. This study, alternatively, compares the macro effects of the proportion of religious adherents in a country on two indicators of material gender equality: the United Nations Gender Inequality Index and the Social Watch Gender Equity Index. Comparing the world’s four largest religious groups reveals that the largest distinction is not between any of the three largest faiths—Christianity, Islam, and Hinduism—but between the religious and the non-religious. The more non-religious people in a country, the more gender equal that country tends to be. This finding holds when accounting for human development and other country-level factors, as well as in instrumental variable analysis.

Keywords

Gender equality Religion Non-religion Atheism Agnosticism Christianity Islam Hinduism 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to Art Alderson, Brian Powell, and the anonymous reviewers for their feedback on this project.

References

  1. Adamczyk, A., & Hayes, B. E. (2012). Religion and sexual behaviors: Understanding the influence of Islamic cultures and religious affiliation for explaining sex outside of marriage. American Sociological Review, 77(5), 723–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adamczyk, A., & Pitt, C. (2009). Shaping attitudes about homosexuality: The role of religion and cultural context. Social Science Research, 38(2), 338–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agadjanian, V., Yabiku, S. T., & Fawcett, L. (2009). History, community milieu, and Christian–Muslim differentials in contraceptive use in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48(3), 462–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartkowski, J. P., & Read, J. G. (2003). Veiled submission: Gender, power, and identity among evangelical and muslim women in the United States. Qualitative Sociology, 26(1), 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bolzendahl, C., & Myers, D. (2004). Feminist attitudes and support for gender equality: Opinion change in women and men, 1974–1998. Social Forces, 83(2), 759–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooks, C., & Bolzendahl, C. (2004). The transformation of U.S. gender role attitudes: Cohort replacement, social-structural change, and ideological learning. Social Science Research, 33(1), 106–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burn, S. M., & Busso, J. (2005). Ambivalent sexism, scriptural literalism, and religiosity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29(4), 412–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charles, M. (2011). A world of difference: International trends in women’s economic status. Annual Review of Sociology, 37(1), 355–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Charrad, M. M. (2011). Gender in the Middle East: Islam, state, agency. Annual Review of Sociology, 37(1), 417–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis, K., Kingsbury, B., & Merry, S. (2012). Indicators as a technology of global governance. Law and Society Review, 46(1), 71–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fish, M. Steven. (2002). Islam and authoritarianism. World Politics, 55(1), 4–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Furseth, I. (2010). Atheism, secularity, and gender. In P. Zuckerman (Ed.), Atheism and secularity (pp. 209–227). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
  13. Fuwa, M. (2004). Macro-level gender inequality and the division of household labor in 22 countries. American Sociological Review, 69(6), 751–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gerhards, J., Schäfer, M. S., & Kämpfer, S. (2009). Gender equality in the European Union: The EU script and its support by European citizens. Sociology, 43(3), 515–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hout, M., & Fischer, C. S. (2002). Why more Americans have no religious preference: Politics and generations. American Sociological Review, 67(2), 165–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hout, M., & Fischer, C. S. (2014). Explaining why more Americans have no religious preference: Political backlash and generational succession, 1987–2012. Sociological Science, 1(October), 423–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2003a). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2003b). The true clash of civilizations. Foreign Policy, 135, 62–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kucinskas, J. (2010). A research note on Islam and gender egalitarianism: An examination of Egyptian and Saudi Arabian youth attitudes. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49(4), 761–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
  21. Moore, L. M., & Vanneman, R. (2003). Context matters: Effects of the proportion of fundamentalists on gender attitudes. Social Forces, 82(1), 115–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Noland, M. (2005). Religion and economic performance. World Development, 33(8), 1215–1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2011). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Peek, C. W., Lowe, G. D., & Susan Williams, L. (1991). Gender and God’s word: Another look at religious fundamentalism and sexism. Social Forces, 69(4), 1205–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Petersen, L. R., & Donnenwerth, G. V. (1998). Religion and declining support for traditional beliefs about gender roles and homosexual rights. Sociology of Religion, 59(4), 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reitz, J. G., Phan, M. B., & Banerjee, R. (2015). Gender equity in Canada’s newly growing religious minorities. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38(5), 681–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rizzo, H., Abdel-Latif, A.-H., & Meyer, K. (2007). The relationship between gender equality and democracy: A comparison of Arab versus non-Arab Muslim societies. Sociology, 41(6), 1151–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schnabel, L. (Forthcoming). Gender and homosexuality attitudes across American religious groups from the 1970s to 2014: Similarity, distinction, and adaptation. Social Science Research.Google Scholar
  30. Seguino, S. (2011). Help or hindrance? Religion’s impact on gender inequality in attitudes and outcomes. World Development, 39(8), 1308–1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stavrova, O., Fetchenhauer, D., & Schlösser, T. (2013). Why are religious people happy? The effect of the social norm of religiosity across countries. Social Science Research, 42(1), 90–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tranby, E., & Zulkowski, S. E. (2012). Religion as cultural power: The role of religion in influencing Americans’ symbolic boundaries around gender and sexuality. Sociology Compass, 6(11), 870–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. VanHeuvelen, T. (2014). The religious context of welfare attitudes. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 53(2), 268–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yodanis, C. (2005). Divorce culture and marital gender equality: A cross-national study. Gender & Society, 19(5), 644–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zuckerman, P. (2008). Society without God: What the least religious nations can tell us about contentment. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  36. Zuckerman, P. (2009). Atheism, secularity, and well-being: How the findings of social science counter negative stereotypes and assumptions. Sociology Compass, 3(6), 949–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations