Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 130, Issue 1, pp 1–8 | Cite as

Long-Term Trends in Quality of Life: An Introduction

  • J. BoelhouwerEmail author
  • R. Bijl
Article

Abstract

Attention for quality of life today is if anything more widespread than ever: it is not just scientists who take an interest, but politicians and policymakers, too. This not only led to increased attention for quality of life in a number of countries, but also to more and renewed attention from supranational organisations such as the OECD and Eurostat. In many cases, this attention led to the new or renewed gathering and analysis of data in the form of social monitors or monitoring systems. Much of the power of social monitors and the social indicators of which they are comprised lies in repetition. The longer the time series, the greater the insight into processes that may potentially play a role. For example: which developments go hand in hand with economic growth and which do not, or to a much lesser extent? But there are also downsides to having a long time series, some of which are substantive, others are methodological. This special issue of Social Indicator Research aims at sharing experiences in relation both to the outcomes of long-term research and to dealing with the methodological challenges.

Keywords

Quality of life Long term Development Methodological issues 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The RC55 midterm conference was organised by Prof. Ruut Veenhoven, Dr. Rob Bijl and Dr. Jeroen Boelhouwer. This special publication was edited by Dr. Jeroen Boelhouwer and Dr. Rob Bijl. Each article in this special has been reviewed by the editorial team as well as two external reviewers. We would like to thank all of them for their contribution: Sergiu Baltescu, Jan Delhey, Denis Huschka, Jurjen Iedema, Orsolya Lelkes, Tadas Leoncikas, Mariano Rojas, Conal Smith, Christian Suter and Stefan Weick.

References

  1. Bauer, R. A. (Ed.). (1966). Social Indicators. Cambridge, Massachusetts/London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Boelhouwer, J. (2010). Wellbeing in the Netherlands. The SCP life situation index since 1974. The Hague: Netherlands Institute for Social Research¦SCP (SCP publication 2010/17).Google Scholar
  3. Bundestag, D. (2013). Abschlussbericht Projektgruppe 2 “Entwicklung eines ganzheitlichen Wohlstands- bzw. Fortschrittsindikators”. Enquete-Kommission Wachstum, Wohlstand, Lebensqualität. Including a “Änderungsantrag der Fraktion Bündnis 90/Die Grünen” and a “Bericht der Fraktion Die Linke”. Berlin; Deutscher Bundestag.Google Scholar
  4. Cobb, C. W., & Rixford, C. (1998). Lessons learned from the history of social indicators. San Francisco: Redefining Progress.Google Scholar
  5. ESS (2011). Sponsorship group on measuring progress, Well-being and sustainable development. Final report adopted by the European statistical system committee. European statistical system. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/pgp_ess/about_ess/measuring_progress.
  6. Gasteyer, S., & Butler Flora, C. Social indicators. An annotated bibliography on trends, sources and developments. http://www.ag.iastate.edu/centers/rdev/indicators/introduction.html#reflections (consulted 22 October 2004).
  7. Hagerty, M. R., Cummins, R., Ferris, A. L., Land, K., Michalos, A. C., Peterson, M., Sharpe, A., Sirgy, J., & Vogel, J. (2001). Quality of life indexes for national policy review and agenda for research. In: Social indicators research 55, (pp. 1–99). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Horn, R. V. (1993). Statistical indicators for the economic and social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. House of Parliament. (2012). Measuring national well-being. London: The Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
  10. Land, K. (2000). Social indicators. In E. F. Bargotta & R. V. Montgomery (Eds.), Encyclopedia of sociology, revised edition. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Noll, H.-H. (1996). Social indicators and social reporting: The International experience. Presentation at the symposium on measuring well-being and social indicators. Final report, Canadian Council on Social Development, Ottawa. http://www.ccsd.ca/noll1.html.
  12. Noll H.-H. (2002). Towards a european system of social indicators: Theoretical considerations, dimensions of measurement and system architecture. In: Social Indicators Research 58, (pp. 47–84). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Noll, H.-H., & Berger, C. (2014). Stocktaking Report on social monitoring and reporting in Europe. Mannheim: GESIS—Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences; Social Indicators Research Centre (ZSi).Google Scholar
  14. OECD. (1973). List of social concerns. Common to most OECD countries. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  15. OECD. (1976). Measuring social wellbeing. A progress report on the development of social indicators. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  16. OECD. (1982). The OECD list of social indicators. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  17. OECD. (1986). Living conditions in OECD countries. A compendium of social indicators. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  18. OECD. (2013a). OECD guidelines on measuring subjective well-being. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  19. OECD. (2013b). New approaches to economic challenges (NAEC). Interim report. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  20. OECD (2013c). Better life index. Consulted July 2013 via www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/.
  21. Rapley, M. (2003). Quality of life research. A critical introduction: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Consulted September 2014 via www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/en/index.htm.
  23. Vrooman, J. C., & Hoff, S. (2013). The disadvantaged among the Dutch: A survey approach to the multidimensional measurement of social exclusion. Social Indicators Research, 113, 1262–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Netherlands Institute for Social Research | SCPThe HagueThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations