Abstract
This study examined the extent to which people think that the government is directly implicated each time an addictive substance user’s health deteriorates. Eighty stories were composed according to a five within-subject orthogonal design: (a) scientific evidence available, (b) time since first concerns with substance dangerousness, (c) personal susceptibility, (d) level of consumption, and (c) current state policy regarding the substance: no information campaign and free market, no information campaign and state monopoly; information campaigns and free market, information campaigns and state monopoly; information campaigns and complete prohibition. Participants (236 adults aged 18–86) were asked to rate, in each case, the level of the government’s responsibility. Participants associated user’s health and government responsibility: It is only in the case of total prohibition that the government is perceived as relieved from any responsibility. Leftists tend to attribute more responsibility to the government than rightists, and rightists are more sensitive to scientific evidence than leftists. As long as citizens attribute heavy responsibility to the state’s government for any health problem encountered by substance users, the government will not have any other choice than to stick to the most conservative policies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, N. H. (2008). Unified social cognition. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Béguin, F. (2015). La future « salle de shoot » parisienne à Lariboisière. Retrieved on 11 June 2015 http://www.lemonde.fr/societe/article/2015/05/25/la-future-salle-de-shoot-parisienne-a-lariboisiere_4639702_3224.html.
Blendon, R. J., & Young, J. T. (1998). The public and the war in illicit drugs. Journal of American Medical Association, 279, 827–832.
Bretteville-Jensen, A. L. (2006). To legalize or not to legalize? Economic approachs to the decriminalization of drugs. Substance Use and Misuse, 41, 555–565.
Campos, I. (2011). In search of real reform: Lessons from Mexico’s long history of drug prohibition. NACLA Reports on the Americas, 44, 14–18.
Camus, J., Munoz Sastre, M. T., Sorum, P. C., & Mullet, E. (2014). French people’s positions regarding national policies about illicit drugs: A preliminary study. Social Indicators Research, 118, 1191–1204.
Costes, J. M., Le Nézet, O., Spilka, S., & Lafitteau, C. (2010). Dix ans d’évolution des perceptions et des opinons de Français sur les drogues (1999–2008). [French people’s perceptions and opinions regarding drugs: Ten years of evolution]. Tendances, 71, 1–6.
Courtwright, D. T. (1982). Dark paradise: Opiate addiction in America before 1940. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Dávila Cervantes, C. A., & Pardo Montaño, A. M. (2014). Death by homicide in Colombia and Mexico: Magnitude and trends, 2000–2011. Pan American Journal of Public Health, 36, 10–16.
Doll, R., & Bradford, H. A. (1950). Smoking and carcinoma of the lung. Preliminary report. British Medical Journal, 2, 739–748.
Fetherston, J., & Lenton, S. (2005). Community attitudes towards cannabis law and the proposed Cannabis Infringement Notice scheme in Western Australia. Drug and Alcohol Review, 24, 301–309.
Friedman, M. (1991). Interview on the drug of war. Available at http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/Misc/friedm1.htm. Retrieved 12 February 2012.
Frones, I. (2007). Theorizing indicators: On indicators, signs and trends. Social Indicators Research, 83, 5–23.
Goode, E. (1998). Strange bedfellows: Ideology, politics, and drug legalization. Society, 35, 18–27.
Haab, F. (2015). Supervised injecting center: The response must be scientific. Retrieved on 10 June 2015 http://www.huffingtonpost.fr/francois-haab/salle-de-shoot-loi-sante_b_6690540.html.
Hall, W. (2010). What are the policy lessons of national alcohol prohibition in the United States, 1920–1933. Addiction, 105, 1164–1173.
Hauge, R. (2003). Legalization of illicit drugs: Two sides to the coin. Addiction, 98, 717–718.
Hopwood, M., Brener, L., Frankland, A., & Treloar, C. (2010). Assessing community support for harm reduction services: Comparing two measures. Drug and Alcohol Review, 29, 385–391.
Jauffret-Roustide, M. (2015). Les salles de consommation à moindre risque: De l’épidémiologie à la politique. Retrieved on 11 June 2015 http://www.salledeconsommation.fr/_media/mj-jauffret-roustide-les-scmr-de-lepidemiologie-a-la-politique-la-vie-des-idees-22-01-2015-2.pdf.
Jelsma, M. (2011). The development of international drug control: Lessons learned and strategic challenges for the future. Working paper prepared for the first meeting of the Global Commission on Drug policy.
Jenner, M. S. (2011). International drug trafficking: A global problem with a domestic solution. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 18, 901–927.
Lambert, E. G., Ventura, L. A., Baker, D. N., & Jenkins, M. (2006). Drug views: Does race matter? Journal of Ethnicity and Criminal Justice, 4, 93–111.
López López, W., Pineda Marín, C., Sorum, P.C., & Mullet, E. (2015). Prohibition, regulation or free market: A mapping of Colombian people’s perspectives regarding National Drug Policies. Social Indicators Research, in press.
Michalak, L., & Trocki, K. (2006). Alcohol and Islam: An overview. Contemporary Drug Problems: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 33, 523–562.
Michalos, A. C. (2004). Social indicators research and health-related quality of life research. Social Indicators Research, 65, 27–72.
Millhorn, M., Monaghan, M., Montero, D., Reyes, M., Roman, T., Tollasken, R., & Walls, R. (2009). North Americans’ attitudes toward illegal drugs. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 19, 125–141.
Munoz Sastre, M. T., Mullet, E., & Sorum, P. (1999). Relationship between cigarette dose and perceived risk of lung cancer. Preventive Medicine, 28, 566–571.
Poloméni, P., & Schwan, R. (2014). Management of opioid addiction with buprenorphine: French history and current management. International Journal of General Medicine, 7, 143–148.
Porter, R., & Teich, M. (1995). Drugs and narcotics in history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ribassin-Majed, L., & Hill, C. (2015). Trends in tobacco-attributable mortality in France. European Journal of Public Health, Date of Electronic Publication: 9 May 2015.
Room, R. (2014). Legalizing a market for cannabis for pleasure: Colorado, Washington, Uruguay and beyond. Addiction, 109, 345–351.
Rudiger, A., & Meier, B. M. (2011). A rights-based approach to health care reform. In E. Beracochea, C. Weinstein, & D. Evans (Eds.), Rights-based approaches to public health (pp. 69–86). New York: Springer.
Schleifer, A. (2005). Understanding regulation. European Financial Management, 11, 439–451.
Schneider, M. (2005). Big mother: Psychopathologie de la vie politique. Paris: Odile Jacob.
Sterling, E. E. (1991). What should we do about drugs? Vital Speeches of the Day, 62, 626–632.
Terra Nova (2015). Cannabis: Legalization would be beneficial for public finances. Retrieved on 10 June 2015 http://www.tnova.fr/revue-de-presse/cannabis-la-l-galisation-serait-b-n-fique-aux-finances-publiques-selon-terra-nova.
Timberlake, J. M., Lock, E. D., & Rasinski, K. A. (2003). How should we wage the war on drugs? Determinants of public preferences for drug control alternatives. The Policy Studies Journal, 31, 71–88.
Timberlake, J. M., Rasinski, K. A., & Lock, E. D. (2001). Effects of conservative sociopolitical attitudes on public support for drug rehabilitation spending. Social Science Quarterly, 82, 184–196.
Thoumi, F. E. (2012). Illegal drugs, anti-drug policy failure, and the need for institutional reforms in Colombia. Substance Use and Misuse, 47, 972–1004.
Treloar, C., & Fraser, S. (2007). Public opinion on needle and syringe programmes: Avoiding assumptions for policy and practice. Drug and Alcohol Review, 26, 355–361.
Uchtehagen, A. (2009). Heroin-assisted treatment in Switzerland: A case study in policy change. Addiction, 105, 29–37.
United Kingdom Drug Policy Commission (2012). Final report of the UK Drug Policy Commission. http://www.ukdpc.org.uk. Retrieved 8 August 2013.
Valenciano, M., Emmanuelli, J., & Lert, F. (2001). Unsafe injecting practices among attendees of syringe exchange programmes in France. Addiction, 96, 597–606.
Van de Wijngaart, G. F. (1990). The Dutch approach: Normalization of drug problems. Journal of Drug Issues, 20, 667–678.
Van der Meer, T., & Dekker, P. (2011). Trustworthy states, trusting citizens? A multilevel study into objective and subjective determinants of political trust. In S. Zmerli & M. Hooghe (Eds.), Political trust: Why context matters (pp. 95–116). Colchester: European Consortium for Political Research Press.
Van Ours, J.C. (2012). Commentaries on Caulkins et al. Addiction, 107, 872-873.add_3625 8.
Watson, R. (1996). European Union divided over drugs policy. British Medical Journal (International Edition), 312, 660.
Wear, A. (1999). The early modern debate about foreign drugs: localism versus universalism in medicine. Lancet, 354, 149–151.
World Drug Report (2014). Retrieved 8 August, http://www.unodc.org.
World Health Organization (2006). Basic documents. Retrieved on 10 June 2015 http://www.who.int/governance/eb/who_constitution_en.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Camus, J., Lhermite, A., Munoz Sastre, M.T. et al. Addictive Substances, Users’ Health, and the Government’s Perceived Responsibility: French People’s Perspective. Soc Indic Res 128, 1011–1027 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1067-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1067-6