Social Indicators Research

, Volume 128, Issue 2, pp 731–750 | Cite as

Religiosity Moderates the Relationship between Income Inequality and Life Satisfaction across the Globe

Article

Abstract

This paper reports two studies that sought to examine whether religiosity moderates the relationship between income inequality and life satisfaction. Practice-based and belief-based aspects of religion were both included in the analyses. Using multi-level analyses on 85 nations across the world (N = 217,591) and 27 European nations (N = 49,763), we found evidence in support of our hypothesis that religiosity mitigates the negative influence of income inequality on life satisfaction. Our results also indicate that it is religious belief, not religious practice, that functions as a buffer in the relationship between income inequality and life satisfaction. The importance and implications of the results are discussed.

Keywords

Income inequality The GINI Religiosity Subjective well-being Life satisfaction Happiness 

References

  1. Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2005). Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5), 897–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88, 2009–2042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Association of Religion Data Archives (2011). Cross-National Socio-Economic and Religion Data. http://www.thearda.com/Archive/Files/Descriptions/ECON11.asp.
  4. Atkinson, T., & Piketty, T. (2007). Top incomes over the twentieth century: A contrast between continental european and english-speaking countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barro, R., & Mitchell, J. (2004). Religious faith and economic growth: What matters most—Belief or belonging? [Lecture]. Retrieved from http://www.heritage.org/Research/Lecture/Religious-Faith-andEconomic-Growth-What-Matters-Most-Belief-or-Belonging.
  6. Ben-Nun Bloom, P., & Arikan, G. (2012). A two-edged sword: The differential effect of religious belief and religious social context on attitudes towards democracy. Political Behavior, 34(2), 249–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ben-Nun Bloom, P., & Arikan, G. (2013). Religion and support for democracy: A cross-national test of the mediating mechanisms. British Journal of Political Science, 43(02), 375–397.Google Scholar
  8. Berg, M. C., & Veenhoven, R. (2010). Income inequality and happiness in 119 nations. In Bent Greve (Ed.), Social policy and happiness in Europe (pp. 174–194). Cheltenham, UK: Edgar Elgar.Google Scholar
  9. Bergan, A., & McConatha, J. T. (2001). Religiosity and life satisfaction. Activities, Adaptation and Aging, 24(3), 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1359–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R., & Oswald, A. (2003). The macroeconomics of happiness. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 809–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diener, E., Tay, L., & Myers, D. G. (2011). The religion paradox: If religion makes people happy, why are so many dropping out? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 1278–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellison, C. G. (1994). Religion, the life stress paradigm, and the study of depression. In Jeffrey S. Levin & Thousand Oaks (Eds.), Religion in aging and health: Theoretical foundations and methodological frontiers (pp. 78–121). CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. European Social Survey Round 6 Data (2012). Data file edition 2.1. Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Norway—Data Archive and distributor of ESS data.Google Scholar
  16. EVS (2011). European Values Study 19812008, Longitudinal Data File. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne, Germany, ZA4804 Data File Version 2.0.0 (2011-12-30).Google Scholar
  17. Gebauer, J. E., Nehrlich, A. D., Sedikides, C., & Neberich, W. (2012). The psychological benefits of income are contingent on individual-level and culture-level religiosity. Social Psychological and Personality Science. Retrieved from http://spp.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/12/20/1948550612469819.full.pdf+html.
  18. Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1986). The causes and consequences of a need for self-esteem: A terror management theory. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Public self and private self (pp. 189–212). The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greene, K. V., & Yoon, B. J. (2004). Religiosity, economics and life satisfaction. Review of Social Economy, 62(2), 245–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hackney, C. H., & Sanders, G. S. (2003). Religiosity and mental health: A meta-analysis of recent studies. Journal for the scientific study of religion, 42(1), 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Helliwell, J. F. (2003). How’s life? combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modelling, 20, 331–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hox, J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Inglehart, R. (2010). Faith and freedom: Traditional and modern ways to happiness. In E. Diener, J. F. Helliwell, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), International differences in well-being (pp. 351–397). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Joshanloo, M. & Weijers, D. (2015). Religiosity reduces the negative influence of injustice on subjective well-being: A Study in 121 Nations. Applied Research in Quality of Life. Online first. Retrieved March 31, 2015 from: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11482-014-9384-5.
  25. Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Coping theory and research: Past, present, and future. Psychosomatic Medicine, 55(3), 234–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Legatum Institute (2012). The 2012 Legatum prosperity index: Methodology and technical appendix. Retrieved from: http://www.prosperity.com/.
  27. Louis, V. V., & Zhao, S. (2002). Effects of family structure, family SES, and adulthood experiences on life satisfaction. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 986–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Napier, J. L., & Jost, J. T. (2008). Why are conservatives happier than liberals? Psychological Science, 19, 565–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2011). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oishi, S., Kesebir, S., & Diener, E. (2011). Income inequality and happiness. Psychological Science, 22, 1095–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peugh, J. L., & Enders, C. K. (2005). Using the SPSS mixed procedure to fit cross-sectional and longitudinal multilevel models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(5), 717–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life (2007). U.S. Religious Landscape Survey. Retrieved from http://religions.pewforum.org/reports.
  33. Pickett, K. E., & Wilkinson, R. G. (2010). Inequality: An underacknowledged source of mental illness and distress. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 197(6), 426–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rözer, J., & Kraaykamp, G. (2012). Income inequality and subjective well-being: A cross-national study on the conditional effects of individual and national characteristics. Social Indicators Research, 113(3), 1009–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ryff, C. D., Singer, B. H., & Palmersheim, K. A. (2004). Social inequalities in health and well-being: The role of relational and religious protective factors. In O. G. Brim, C. D. Ryff, & R. C. Kessler (Eds.), How healthy are we? A national study of well-being at midlife (pp. 90–123). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Saroglou, V. (2011). Believing, bonding, behaving, and belonging: The big four religious dimensions and cultural variation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(8), 1320–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Savani, K., & Rattan, A. (2012). A choice mind-set increases the acceptance and maintenance of wealth inequality. Psychological Science, 23(7), 796–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schnittker, J. (2001). When is Faith Enough? The Effects of Religious Involvement on Depression. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40(3), 393–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sen, A. K. (1997). From income inequality to economic inequality. Southern Economic Journal, 64(2), 384–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Senik, C. (2009). Income distribution and subjective happiness: A survey (No. 96). Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith, T. B., McCullough, M. E., & Poll, J. (2003). Religiousness and depression: Evidence for a main effect and the moderating influence of stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 614–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Soper, D. S. (2013). Interaction (version 1.7.22.11) [Computer Program]. Fullerton: California State University.Google Scholar
  43. Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2009). The paradox of declining female happiness. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 1(2), 190–225.Google Scholar
  44. United Nations Development Programme. (2013). Human development report: The rise of the south: Human progress in a diverse world. New York: UNDP.Google Scholar
  45. Verme, P. (2011). Life satisfaction and income inequality. Review of Income and Wealth, 57(1), 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Williams, D. R., Larson, D. B., Buckler, R. E., Heckmann, R. C., & Pyle, C. M. (1991). Religion and psychological distress in a community sample. Social Science and Medicine, 32(11), 1257–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Witter, R. A., Okun, M. A., Stock, W. A., & Haring, M. J. (1984). Education and subjective well-Being: A meta-analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 6(2), 165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. WVS (2009). World Value Survey 1981–2008 official aggregate v. 20090902, 2009. World Values Survey Association (www.worldvaluessurvey.org). Aggregate File Producer: ASEP/JDS Data Archive, Madrid, Spain.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyKeimyung UniversityDaeguSouth Korea
  2. 2.Philosophy DepartmentCalifornia State UniversitySacramentoUSA

Personalised recommendations