Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 128, Issue 1, pp 413–437 | Cite as

Construction, Robustness Assessment and Application of an Index of Perceived Level of Socio-Economic Threat from Immigrants: A Study of 47 European Countries and Regions

  • Marco Marozzi
Article

Abstract

In contemporary globalization, migrations to Europe have accelerated in speed and scale. Over the last decades, there has been an increase in negative attitudes towards immigration, and many studies have emphasized marked differences in the strength of anti-immigrant attitudes among European countries. However, very few studies performed a rigorous statistical assessment of the issue. A new index measuring the level of perceived threat from immigrants is proposed and applied to a data set covering 47 European countries and regions. The results show that Malta and Cyprus have the strongest perception of socio-economic threat from immigrants, followed by Austria, Great Britain, Northern Ireland and Hungary, and that the countries/regions with the weakest perception of threat are Armenia, Sweden, Romania and Northern Cyprus. It is shown that the proposed index has many theoretical and practical advantages over the existing indexes of perceived threat from immigrants. The robustness of the index is assessed using uncertainty analysis. It is very important for policy makers to monitor the level of perceived socio-economic threat from immigrants because negative attitudes towards immigrants make integration difficult and affect social capital, a key aspect of societal wellbeing and economic development. Monitoring is the basis for further political measures aimed at fostering immigrant integration. The proposed index is a useful monitoring tool, an entry point for the ongoing debate on tolerance and can spark further research for a better understanding of the issue.

Keywords

Composite indicator Tolerance towards immigrants Prejudice against immigrants Uncertainty analysis Monte Carlo methods 

References

  1. Aiello, F., & Attanasio, M. (2004). How to transform a batch of simple indicators to make up a unique one? In D. Cocchi (Ed.), Atti del Convegno SIS (pp. 327–338). Padova: Cleup.Google Scholar
  2. Arboretti, G. R., Bonnini, S., & Salmaso, L. (2007). A performance indicator for multivariate data. Quaderni di Statistica, 9, 1–29.Google Scholar
  3. Artiles, A. M., & Meardi, G. (2014). Public opinion, immigration and welfare in the context of uncertainty. European Review of Labour and Research, 20, 53–68.Google Scholar
  4. Barbieri, E., Di Tommaso, M. R., & Bonnini, S. (2012). Industrial development policies and performances in Southern China: Beyond the specialised industrial cluster program. China Economic Review, 23, 613–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barbulescu, R., & Beaudonnet, L. (2014). Protecting us, protecting Europe? Public concern about immigration and declining support for European integration in Italy. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 15, 216–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barrett, A., & Maitre, B. (2013). Immigrant welfare receipt across Europe. International Journal of Manpower, 34, 8–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blalock, H. M. (1982). Conceptualization and measurement on the social sciences. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Boccuzzo, G., & Gianecchini, M. (2014). Measuring young graduates job quality through a composite indicator. Social Indicators Research, 122, 453–478. doi: 10.1007/s11205-014-0695-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Citrin, J., Green, D., Muste, C., & Wong, C. (1997). Public opinion toward immigration reform: The role of economic motivations. Journal of Politics, 59, 858–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Constant, A. F., & Zimmermann, K. F. (2013). International handbook on the economics of migration. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cox, D. R., Fitzpatrick, R., Fletcher, A. E., Gore, S. M., Spiegelhalter, D. J., & Jones, D. R. (1992). Quality-of-life assessment: Can we keep it simple (with discussion)? Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 155, 353–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. D’Amuri, F., Ottaviano, I. P. G., & Peri, G. (2010). The labor market impact of immigration in Western Germany in the 1990’s. European Economic Review, 52, 550–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dickes, P., & Valentova, M. (2013). Construction, validation and application of the measurement of social cohesion in 47 European countries and regions. Social Indicators Research, 113, 827–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ekici, T., & Yucel, D. (2014). What determines religious and racial prejudice in Europe? The effects of religiosity and trust. Social Indicators Research, 122, 105–133. doi: 10.1007/s11205-014-0674-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. European Social Survey. (2014). ESS Round 6 (2012/2013). Technical Report.Google Scholar
  16. European Commission. (2010). Future of Europe. Standard Eurobarometer, 71. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm. Accessed 21 Dec 2014.
  17. European Commission. (2012) Discrimination in the EU in 2012. Special Eurobarometer, 393. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm. Accessed 12 April 2015.
  18. European Commission. (2014a) Future of Europe. Special Eurobarometer, 413. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm. Accessed 14 April 2015.
  19. European Commission. (2014b). Public opinion in the European Union, first results. Standard Eurobarometer, 82. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm. Accessed 18 April 2015.
  20. EVS. (2011). European Values Study 2008: Integrated dataset (EVS 2008). ZA4800 Data file Version 3.0.0, GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. doi: 10.4232/1.11004
  21. Fayers, P. M., & Hand, D. J. (2002). Causal variables, composite indicators and measurement scales: an example from quality of life. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 165, 233–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hagerty, M. R., & Land, K. C. (2007). Constructing summary indices of quality of life. Sociological Methods and Research, 35, 455–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hainmueller, J., & Hiscox, M. J. (2007). Educated preferences: Explaining individual attitudes toward immigration in Europe. International Organization, 61, 399–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hochbaum, D. S., & Levin, A. (2006). Methodologies and algorithms for group-rankings decision. Management Science, 52, 1394–1408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoskins, B., Saisana, M., & Villalba, C. M. H. (2014). Civic competence of youth in Europe: Measuring cross national variation through the creation of a composite indicator. Social Indicators Research,. doi: 10.1007/s11205-014-0746-z.Google Scholar
  26. Kahanec, M., & Zaiceva, A. (2009). Labor market outcomes of immigrants and non-citizens in the EU: An east–west comparison. International Journal of Manpower, 30, 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kahanec, M., & Zimmermann, K. F. (2010). EU labor markets after post-enlargement migration. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gilardoni, G., D’Odorico, M., & Carrillo, D. (2015). Evidence on migrants’ integration in Europe, KING knowledge for integration governance. Milan: Fondazione ISMU.Google Scholar
  29. Kurekova, L. (2013). Welfare systems as emigration factor: Evidence from the new accession states. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51, 721–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lago, A., & Pesarin, F. (2000). Nonparametric combination of dependent rankings with application to the quality assessment of industrial products. Metron, 58, 39–52.Google Scholar
  31. Lahav, G. (2004). Public opinion toward immigration in the European Union: Does it matter? Comparative Political Studies, 37, 1151–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee, F. L. F. (2014). Tolerated one way but not the other: Levels and determinants of social and political tolerance in Hong Kong. Social Indicators Research, 118, 711–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Logan, J., & Zhang, C. (2010). Global neighbourhoods: New pathways to diversity and separation. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 1069–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Longhi, S., Nijkamp, P., & Poot, J. (2010). Joint impacts of immigration on wages and employment: Review and meta-analysis. Journal of Geographical Systems, 12, 355–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lutterbeck, D. (2009). Small frontier island: Malta and the challenge of irregular immigration. Mediterranean Quarterly, 20, 119–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marozzi, M. (2009). A composite indicator dimension reduction procedure with application to university student satisfaction. Statistica Neerlandica, 63, 258–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Marozzi, M. (2012). Tertiary student satisfaction with socialization: A statistical assessment. Quality and Quantity, 46, 1271–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marozzi, M. (2014a). Construction, dimension reduction and uncertainty analysis of an index of trust in public institutions. Quality and Quantity, 48, 939–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Marozzi, M. (2014b). Measuring trust in European public institutions. Social Indicators Research. doi: 10.1007/s11205-014-0765-9.Google Scholar
  40. Marozzi, M. (2015). Skills and training requirements of municipal directors: A statistical assessment. Quality and Quantity. doi: 10.1007/s11135-015-0192-2.
  41. McLaren, L. (2003). Anti-immigrant prejudice in Europe: Contact, threat perception, and preferences for the exclusion of migrants. Social Forces, 81, 909–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Meuleman, B., Davidov, E., & Billiet, J. (2009). Changing attitudes toward immigration in Europe, 2002–2007: A dynamic group conflict theory approach. Social Science Research, 38, 352–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Munda, G., Nardo, M., Saisana, M., & Srebotnjak, T. (2009). Measuring uncertainties in composite indicators of sustainability. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 11, 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. OECD. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators. http://composite-indicators.jrc.ec.europa.eu. Accessed 14 April 2015.
  45. O’Rourke, K. H., & Sinnott, R. (2006). The determinants of individual attitudes towards immigration. European Journal of Political Economy, 22, 838–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. OSCE. (2013). Armenia: A migrant integration policy index assessment. OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights. http://www.osce.org/odihr. Accessed 21 Dec 2014.
  47. Ottaviano, G. I. P., & Peri, G. (2012). Rethinking the effect of immigration on wages. Journal of the European Economic Association, 10, 152–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Poletti, M., & Regalia, M. (2014). Economic or cultural threat? Orientations towards immigration and European integration among EU citizens and national parties over time. KING Project—Political Science Unit Desk Research Papers, 5. http://www.king.ismu.org. Accessed 26 Mar 2014.
  49. Quintini, G. (2011). Over-qualified or under-skilled? A review of existing literature. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Raijman, R., & Hochman, O. (2011). National attachments, economic competition, and social exclusion of non-ethnic migrants in Israel: A mixed-methods approach. Quality and Quantity, 45, 1151–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Roed, M., & Schone, P. (2012). Does immigration increase labour market flexibility? Labour Economics, 19, 527–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2005). Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 168, 307–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Saisana, M., D’Hombres, B., & Saltelli, A. (2011). Rickety numbers: Volatility of university rankings and policy implications. Research Policy, 40, 165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Saltelli, A. (2007). Composite indicators between analysis and advocacy. Social Indicators Research, 81, 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Scheve, K. F., & Slaughter, M. J. (2001). Labor market competition and individual preferences over immigration policy. Review of Economic and Statistics, 83, 133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schlueter, E., Meuleman, B., & Davidov, E. (2013). Immigrant integration policies and perceived group threat: A multilevel study of 27 Western and Eastern European countries. Social Science Research, 42, 670–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Semyonov, M., Raijman, R., & Gorodzeisky, A. (2006). The rise of anti-foreigner sentiment in European societies, 1988–2000. American Sociological Review, 71, 426–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sides, J., & Citrin, J. (2007). European opinion about immigration: The role of interests, identities, and information. British Journal of Political Science, 37, 477–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stapleton, L. M., & Garrod, G. D. (2007). Keeping things simple: Why the Human Development Index should not diverge from its equal weights assumption. Social Indicators Research, 84, 179–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Strabac, Z., & Listhaug, O. (2008). Anti-Muslim prejudice in Europe: A multilevel analysis of survey data from 30 countries. Social Science Research, 37, 268–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and group relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  62. van Oorschot, W. (2008). Solidarity towards immigrants in European welfare states. International Journal of Social Welfare, 17, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Journal of Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30, 1024–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Warin, T., & Svaton, P. (2008). European migration: Welfare migration or economic migration? Global Economy Journal, 8, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CalabriaRendeItaly

Personalised recommendations