Patterns of Socioeconomic Inequality in Adolescent Health Differ According to the Measure of Socioeconomic Position
Socioeconomic differences in health are ubiquitous across age groups, cultures, and health domains. However, variation in the size and pattern of health inequalities appears to relate to the measure of socioeconomic position (SEP) applied. Little attention has been paid to these differences in adolescents and their implications for health surveillance and policy. We examined health inequalities in 1371 adolescents in seven European countries using four measures of SEP: youth-reported material assets and subjective social status and parent-reported material assets and household income. For each SEP variable, we estimated risk ratios, risk differences, concentration curves, and concentration indices of inequality for fair/poor self-rated health and low life satisfaction. Results showed that inequalities in health and life satisfaction were largest when subjective social status was used as the SEP variable. Moreover, health inequalities defined by subjective social status did not change after differences in assets and income were statistically controlled. Although material assets yielded similar health inequalities as household income, the results suggest that subjective and objective SEP relate differently to adolescent health and are not equivalent indicators of the same construct. In addition, possible bidirectional effects on health and wellbeing may inflate health inequalities defined by subjective social status. These results indicate that SEP differences in adolescent health are relate more closely to psychosocial processes than to material inequality.
KeywordsSubjective social status Socioeconomic status Health inequality Adolescents Family affluence scale
- American Psychological Association Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA task force on socioeconomic status. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concern. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
- Currie, C., Inchley, J., Molcho, M., Lenzi, M., Veselska, Z., & Wild, F. (2014). Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study protocol: Background, methodology and mandatory items for the 2013/14 Survey. St. Andrews: Child and Adolescent Health Research Unit, St. Andrews University.Google Scholar
- Currie, C., Zanotti, C., Morgan, A., Currie, D., de Looze, M., Roberts, C., Samdal, O., Smith, O. R. F., & Barnekow, V. (2012). Social determinants of health and well-being among young people. In Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) Study: International Report from the 2009/10 Survey (Health Policies for Children and Adolescents, No. 6. 2012). Copenhagen: World Health Organisation.Google Scholar
- Elgar, F. J., Pförtner, T. K., Moor, I., De Clercq, B., Stevens, G. W., & Currie C. (in press). Socioeconomic inequalities in adolescent health 2002–2010: A time-series analysis of 34 countries participating in the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children study. The Lancet. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61460-4.
- Hollingshead, A. A. (1975). Four-factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript, New Haven, CT: Yale University.Google Scholar