The Education Effect: Higher Educational Qualifications are Robustly Associated with Beneficial Personal and Socio-political Outcomes
- 1.8k Downloads
Level of education is a predictor of a range of important outcomes, such as political interest and cynicism, social trust, health, well-being, and intergroup attitudes. We address a gap in the literature by analyzing the strength and stability of the education effect associated with this diverse range of outcomes across three surveys covering the period 1986–2011, including novel latent growth analyses of the stability of the education effect within the same individuals over time. Our analyses of the British Social Attitudes Survey, British Household Panel Survey, and International Social Survey Programme indicated that the education effect was robust across these outcomes and relatively stable over time, with higher education levels being associated with higher trust and political interest, better health and well-being, and with less political cynicism and less negative intergroup attitudes. The education effect was strongest when associated with political outcomes and attitudes towards immigrants, whereas it was weakest when associated with health and well-being. Most of the education effect appears to be due to the beneficial consequences of having a university education. Our results demonstrate that this beneficial education effect is also manifested in within-individual changes, with the education effect tending to become stronger as individuals age.
KeywordsThe education effect Education Well-being Social attitudes
- Angrist, J., & Pischke, J. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. IZA Discussion Papers, No. 4800. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w15794
- Attewell, S., & Newman, K. S. (2010). Growing gaps: Educational inequality around the world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Becker, G. (1994). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Brandt, M. J., & Henry, P. J. (2012). Psychological defensiveness as a mechanism explaining the relationship between low socioeconomic status and religiosity. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 22, 321–332. doi: 10.1080/10508619.2011.646565.
- Coenders, M. (2001). Nationalistic attitudes and ethnic exclusionism in a comparative perspective: An empirical study of attitudes towards the country and ethnic immigrants in 22. Nijmegen: Radbound Repositor. Retrieved from http://dare.ubn.kun.nl/handle/2066/19170
- Curhan, K. B., Levine, C. S., Markus, H. R., Kitayama, S., Park, J., Karasawa, M., & Ryff, C. D. (2014). Subjective and objective hierarchies and their relations to psychological well-being: A U.S./Japan Comparison. Social Psychological and Personality Science,. doi: 10.1177/1948550614538461.Google Scholar
- Department for Children, Schools and Families. (2009). Departmental Report 2009. http://www.dcsf.gov.uk.
- Deth, J. V. & Elff, M. (2001). Politicisation and political interest in Europe: a multi-level approach. In Arbeitspapiere—Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung (Vol. 36, pp. 1–66). Retrieved from, http://www.mzes.uni-mannheim.de/publications/wp/erpa/wp-36.html
- Egerton, M. (2002). Political partisanship, voting abstention and higher education: Changing preferences in a British youth cohort in the 1990s. Higher Education Quarterly, 56, 156–177. doi: 10.1111/1468-2273.00209.
- Elchardus, M., Keere, K. De, & De Keere, K. (2013). Republicanism in mediated society. A comparative analysis on public and private evaluation guided by the theory of symbolic society. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 26, 273–290. doi: 10.1007/s10767-013-9145-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Elchardus, M., & Siongers, J. (2003). Cultural practice and educational achievement: The role of the parents’ media preferences and taste culture. Netherlands’ Journal of Social Sciences, 39, 151–171.Google Scholar
- Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2002). Income and well-being. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, 02-019/3.Google Scholar
- Fiske, S., & Markus, H. (2012). Facing social class. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Goldberg, D. (1992). General health questionnaire (GHQ-12). Windsor, UK: Nfer-Nelson.Google Scholar
- Graham, C., & Pettinato, S. (2002). Happiness and hardship: Opportunity and insecurity in new market economies. Washington D.C.: Brookings Instition Press.Google Scholar
- Hox, J. J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). Hove: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hyman, H. H., Wright, C. R., & Reed, J. S. (1975). The enduring effects of education. Chicago, US: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Jones, O. (2011). Chavs: The demonizatiion of the working class. London, UK: Verso.Google Scholar
- Kraus, M. W., Rheinschmidt, M. L., & Piff, P. K. (2012). The intersection of resources and rank: Signaling social class in face to face interactions. In S. T. Fiske & H. R. Markus (Eds.), Facing social class: How societal rank influences interaction (pp. 152–172). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Lareau, A., & Conley, D. (2008). Social class: How does it work?. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1948). The peoples choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Leckie, G. (2013). Cross-classified multilevel models – Concepts. LEMMA VLE Module, 12, 1–60. http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/learning/course.html.
- Maria, A. M. (2004). Who is against immigration?: A cross-country investigation of individual attitudes towards immigrants. IZA Discussion Paper Series, 1115.Google Scholar
- Meghir, C., & Palme, M. (2005). Educational reform, ability, and family background. The American Economic Review, 95, 414–424.Google Scholar
- Miilunpalo, S., Vuori, I., Oja, P., Pasanen, M., & Urponen, H. (1997). Self-rated health status as a health measure: The predictive value of self-reported health status on the use of physician services and on mortality in the working-age population. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50, 517–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Oguz, S., Merad, S., & Snape, D. (2013). Measuring national well-being: What matters most to personal well-being? Newport, Wales: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
- Powdthavee, N., Lekfuangfu, W., & Wooden, M. (2013). The marginal income effect of education on happiness: Estimating the direct and indirect effects of compulsory schooling on well-being in Australia. CEP Discussion Paper, (1214): Econstor. Retrieved from http://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/80669
- Reardon, S. F. (2011). The widening gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In G. J. Duncan & R. J. Murname (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools and children’s life chances (pp. 91–119). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modelling change and event occurrence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Stember, C. H. (1961). Education and attitude change. New York, NY: Institute of Human Relations Press.Google Scholar
- Stouffer, S. A. (1955). Communism, conformity, and civil liberties: A cross-section of the nation speaks its mind. New York, NY: Doubleday & Co.Google Scholar
- Taylor, M. F., Brice, J., Buck, N., & Prentice-Lane, E. (2010) British household panel survey user manual volume A: Introduction, technical report and appendices. Colchester: University of Essex.Google Scholar
- United Nations Development Programme. (2013). Human development report 2013. New York, NY: United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
- Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. (2010). The spirit level: Why equality is better for everyone. London, UK: Penguin Group.Google Scholar