Skip to main content

Multidimensional/Multisystems/Multinature Indicators of Quality of Life: Cross-Cultural Evidence from Mexico and Spain

Social Indicators Research volume 126, pages 467–482 (2016)Cite this article

Abstract

The aim of this study is to provide cross-cultural empirical support that endorses the scientific nature of Quality of Life (QoL), which a review of definitions reveals as a nomothetic and multidimensional concept (personal and environmental circumstances), made up of a set of subjective and objective indicators. Although this is commonly accepted, many instruments and authors reduce it to subjective and personal conditions. Bearing in mind the aim described, multi-group Structural Equation Modelling analysis was applied to two representative samples made up of 1217 participants aged over 60 from Mexico and Spain, recruited both at random (through the random route procedure), who completed the CUBRECAVI (Brief Questionnaire of Quality of Life). In this model two third-order latent variables are considered for QoL: personal and external factors, both made up of objective and subjective indicators. As predicted, the results permit us to state that the structural model is invariant across the two countries—that is, although the QoL construct has the same structure in the two countries, the importance of the indicators (factor loadings) and the relationships between them are not equivalent.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  • Andrews, G. R., Sidorenko, A. V., Gutman, C., Gray, J. E., Anisimov, V. N., Bezrukov, V. V., et al. (2006). Research on ageing: priorities for the European region. Advances in gerontology = Uspekhi gerontologii/Rossiiskaia akademiia nauk. Gerontologicheskoe obshchestvo, 18, 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashkanasy, N. M. (2011). International happiness: A multilevel perspective. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(1), 23–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D. (2011). International happiness: A new view on the measure of performance. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(1), 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowling, A. (2004). A taxonomy and overview of Quality of Life. In J. Brown, A. Bowling, & T. Flynn (Eds.), Models of quality of life: A taxonomy and systematic review of the literature. Sheffield: University of Sheffield, FORUM Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowling, A., & Gabriel, Z. (2004). An integrational model of quality of life in older age: Results from the ESRC/MRC HSRC quality of life survey in Britain. Social Indicators Research, 69(1), 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowling, A., Gabriel, Z., Dykes, J., Dowding, L. M., Evans, O., Fleissig, A., et al. (2003). Let’s ask them: a national survey of definitions of quality of life and its enhancement among people aged 65 and over. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 56(4), 269–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brett, C. E., Gow, A. J., Corley, J., Pattie, A., Starr, J. M., & Deary, I. J. (2012). Psychosocial factors and health as determinants of quality of life in community-dwelling older adults. Quality of Life Research, 21(3), 505–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J., Bowling, A., & Flynn, T. (2004). Models of quality of life. A taxonomy and systematic review of the literature. Sheffield: European Forum on Population Ageing Research/Quality of life.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing, 1(1), 55–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (1981). The sense of well-being in America: Recent patterns and trends. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Sandvik, E., Seidlitz, L., & Diener, M. (1993). The relationship between income and subjective well-being: Relative or absolute? Social Indicators Research, 28(3), 195–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40(1–2), 189–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar, M. (1995). Elderly people’s definitions of quality of life. Social Science and Medicine, 41(10), 1439–1446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, S., Branscombe, N. R., Gómez, Á., & Morales, J. (2012). Influence of the social context on use of surgical-lengthening and group-empowering coping strategies among people with dwarfism. Rehabilitation Psychology, 57(3), 224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Ballesteros, R. (1998). Quality of life: Concept and assessment. In J. G. Adair, D. Belanger, & K. L. Dion (Eds.), Advances in psychological science. Social, personal and cultural aspects (Vol. I, pp. 387–706). Montreal: Psychological Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Ballesteros, R. (2011). Quality of life in old age: Problematic issues. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 6(1), 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Ballesteros, R., Arias, E. D., Santacreu, M., & Ruvalcaba, N. M. (2011). Calidad de Vida: un estudio comparativo entre Colima, Jalisco (México) y Alicante (España).

  • Fernandez-Ballesteros, R., Arias-Merino, E. D., Santacreu, M., & Ruvalcaba, N. M. (2012). Quality of life in Mexico and in Spain. In J. L. Powell & S. Chen (Eds.), The global dynamics of aging (pp. 9–30). New York: Nova Science Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Ballesteros, R., & Santacreu, M. (2010). Aging and quality of life. In J. H. Stone, & M. Blouin (Eds.), International encyclopedia of rehabilitation. Available online: http://cirrie.buffalo.edu/encyclopedia/en/article/296/

  • Fernandez-Ballesteros, R., & Santacreu, M. (2014). Quality of life: Problematic issues. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life research (pp. 5363–5371). Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Ballesteros, R., & Zamarron, M. D. (1996). New findings on social desirability and faking. Psychological Reports, 79(2), 612–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Ballesteros, R., & Zamarron, M. D. (1997, 2007). Cuestionario Breve de Calidad de Vida (CUBRECAVI). Madrid: TEA Ediciones.

  • Gabriel, Z., & Bowling, A. (2004). Quality of life from the perspectives of older people. Ageing and Society, 24(5), 675–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. J., Snell, A. F., & Foust, M. S. (1999). Item parceling strategies in SEM: Investigating the subtle effects of unmodeled secondary constructs. Organizational Research Methods, 2(3), 233–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, P., Hyde, M., Wiggins, R., & Blane, D. (2003). Researching quality of life in early old age: the importance of the sociological dimension. Social Policy & Administration, 37(3), 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A., & McCoach, D. B. (2003). Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(3), 333–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, P. S., & Engelbrecht, S. W. (2010). Happiness around the World the Paradox of Happy Peasants and Miserable Millionaires. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 5(3), 165–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, M. P. (1991). Background: A multidimensional view of quality of life in frail elders. In J. E. Birren, J. Lubben, J. Rowe, & D. Deutchman (Eds.), The concept and measurement of quality of life in the Frail Eldery. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, T. D. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(1), 53–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, G., & Molzahn, A. E. (2007). Predictors of quality of life in old age: A cross-validation study. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(2), 141–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Martin, P., Prieto-Flores, M., Forjaz, M. J., Fernandez-Mayoralas, G., Rojo-Perez, F., Rojo, J., et al. (2012). Components and determinants of quality of life in community-dwelling older adults. European Journal of Ageing, 9(3), 255–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C., Ramsey, D., Eberts, D., & Kahlke, P. M. (2012). Good health is not the same as a good life: Survey results from Brandon. Manitoba. Social Indicators Research, 107(2), 201–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motel-Klingebiel, A., von Kondratowitz, H., & Tesch-Römer, C. (2004). Social inequality in the later life: cross-national comparison of quality of life. European Journal of Ageing, 1(1), 6–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, M., & Wiklund, I. (1993). A critical review of dimension-specific measures of health-related quality of life in cross-cultural research. Quality of Life Research, 2(6), 397–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Netuveli, G., & Blane, D. (2008). Quality of life in older ages. British Medical Bulletin, 85, 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Boyle, C. A. (1997). Measuring the quality of later life. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 352(1363), 1871–1879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palys, T. S., & Little, B. R. (1983). Perceived life satisfaction and the organization of personal project systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(6), 1221–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinquart, M., & Sörensen, S. (2000). Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 15(2), 187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richard, L., Laforest, S., Dufresne, F., & Sapinski, J. (2005). The quality of life of older adults living in an urban environment: Professional and lay perspectives. Canadian Journal on Aging/La Revue canadienne du vieillissement, 24(01), 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skevington, S. M. (2002). Advancing cross-cultural research on quality of life: observations drawn from the WHOQOL development. Quality of Life Research, 11(2), 135–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tesch-Roemer, C. (2012). Active ageing and quality of life in old age. Geneva (Switzerland): Unitd Nations Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (1996). Happy life-expectancy. Social Indicators Research, 39(1), 1–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2013). The four qualities of life ordering concepts and measures of the good life. In A. Delle Fave (Ed.), The exploration of happiness present and future perspective (pp. 195–226). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. (2005a). A European perspective on quality of life in old age. European Journal of Ageing, 2(1), 2–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. (2005b). Quality of life in old age in Europe. Suffolk: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A., & Lowenstein, A. (2009). European perspectives on quality of life in old age. European Journal of Ageing, 6(2), 61–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wettergren, L., Kettis-Lindblad, Å., Sprangers, M., & Ring, L. (2009). The use, feasibility and psychometric properties of an individualised quality-of-life instrument: A systematic review of the SEIQoL-DW. Quality of Life Research, 18(6), 737–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHOQOL Group. (1993). Measuring quality of life: the development of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQOL). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, R. D., Higgs, P. F., Hyde, M., & Blane, D. B. (2004). Quality of life in the third age: key predictors of the CASP-19 measure. Ageing and Society, 24(5), 693–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamarron, M. D., & Fernandez Ballesteros, R. (2000). Satisfacción con la vida en personas mayores que viven en sus domicilios y en residencias: factores determinantes. Revista Española de Geriatría y Gerontología, 35(Supl. 2), 17–29.

  • Zapf, W. (1984). Individuelle Wohlfahrt: Lebensbedingungen und wahrgenommene Lebensqualität. In W. Glatzer, & W. Zapf (Eds.), Lebensqualität in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Objektive Lebensbedingungen und subjectives Wohlbefinden (pp. 13–26). Frankfurt/Main: Campus.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological and Health Psychology, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, C/Ivan Pavlov, 6. Ciudad Universitaria de Cantoblanco, 28049, Madrid, Spain

    Marta Santacreu & Rocio Fernandez-Ballesteros

  2. Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), C/Juan del Rosal, 10, 28040, Madrid, Spain

    Antonio Bustillos

Authors
  1. Marta Santacreu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Antonio Bustillos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rocio Fernandez-Ballesteros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marta Santacreu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santacreu, M., Bustillos, A. & Fernandez-Ballesteros, R. Multidimensional/Multisystems/Multinature Indicators of Quality of Life: Cross-Cultural Evidence from Mexico and Spain. Soc Indic Res 126, 467–482 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0906-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0906-9

Keywords

  • Quality of Life indicators
  • Old age
  • Structural equation modelling (SEM)
  • Cross-cultural comparisons