Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 126, Issue 1, pp 225–240 | Cite as

Flames and Debates: Do Social Media Affect Satisfaction with Democracy?

  • Andrea Ceron
  • Vincenzo Memoli
Article

Abstract

Media plays an important role in defining the quality of democracy in consolidated democracy. Internet, in turn, can wield effects on democracy and many scholars have investigated such relationship. Moving from this literature we use Eurobarometer data to estimate the effect of Internet on the satisfaction with the functioning of democracy among European citizens. The results show that Internet usage, per se, has no effect on the satisfaction with democracy. However, the consumption of online news can make the difference, even though this effect is positive when users consume news from online traditional media while social media has a negative effect, which is mediated by the level of online disagreement and the potential emergence of flames.

Keywords

Satisfaction with democracy Network heterogeneity Deliberation Traditional media New media Social media 

Notes

Acknowledgments

A previous version of this paper has been presented at the XXIII Ipsa World Congress (19–24 July 2014, Montréal). The authors wish to thank the participants as well as the journal editors and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

References

  1. Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2000). Participation in heterogeneous communities. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 847–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez, M. R., & Hall, T. E. (2011). Electronic elections: The perils and promises of digital democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Anduiza, E., Cantijoch, M., & Gallego, A. (2009). Political participation and the Internet: A field essay. Information, Communication & Society, 12(6), 860–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailard, C. S. (2012). Testing the Internet’s effect on democratic satisfaction: A multi-methodological, cross-national approach. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 9, 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakker, T. P., & De Vreese, C. H. (2011). Good news for the future? Young people, Internet use, and political participation. Communication Research, 20(10), 1–20.Google Scholar
  6. Bakshy, E., Rosenn, I., Marlow, C., & Adamic, L. (2012). The role of social networks in information diffusion. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web, 519–528.Google Scholar
  7. Bellucci, P., & Memoli, V. (2012). The determinants of democratic support in Europe. In P. Magalhaes, D. Sanders, & G. Toka (Eds.), Citizens and the European polity: Mass attitudes towards the European and national polities (citizenship, identity and European integration). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bennett, W. L., Lawrence, R. G., & Livingston, S. (2007). When the press fails: Political power and the news media from Iraq to Katrina. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berry, W. D., DeMeritt, J. H. R., & Esarey, J. (2010). Testing for interaction in binary logit and probit models: Is a product term essential? American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 248–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Besley, T., & Prat, A. (2006). Handcuffs for the grabbing hand? Media capture and government accountability. American Economic Review, 96(3), 720–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boullianne, S. (2009). Does Internet use effect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political Communication, 26(2), 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Camaj, L. (2013). The media’s role in fighting corruption: Media effects on governmental accountability. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(1), 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Campante, F., Durante, R., & Sobbrio, F. (2013). Politics 2.0: The multifaceted effect of broadband Internet on political participation. Working paper. http://www.iae.csic.es/investigatorsMaterial/a13174085038513.pdf
  15. Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, H. K. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ceron, A., Curini, L., Iacus, S., & Porro, G. (2014). Every tweet counts? How content analysis of social media can improve our knowledge of citizens political preferences with an application to Italy and France. New Media & Society, 16(2), 340–358.Google Scholar
  17. Ceron, A., Curini, L., & Iacus, S. (2013). Social Media e Sentiment Analysis. L’evoluzione dei fenomeni sociali attraverso la Rete. Milano: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  18. Ceron, A., & Memoli, V. (2015). Trust in government and media slant: A cross-sectional analysis of media effects in 27 European countries. The International Journal of Press/Politics, forthcomingGoogle Scholar
  19. Chadwick, A. (2009). Web 2.0: New challenges for the study of e-democracy in an era of informational exuberance. Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 51, 9–42.Google Scholar
  20. Curini, L., Jou, W., & Memoli, V. (2012). Satisfaction with democracy and the winner-loser debate: The role of policy preferences and past experience. British Journal of Political Science, 42(2), 241–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dahlberg, S., & Holmberg, S. (2013). Democracy and bureaucracy: How their quality matters for popular satisfaction. West European Politics,. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2013.830468.Google Scholar
  22. Dalton, R. J. (1996). Citizen politics in western democracies: Public opinion and political parties in the Unites States, Britain, Germany and France. Chatham: Chatham House.Google Scholar
  23. Dalton, R. J. (1999). Political support in advanced industrial democracies. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical citizens: Global support for democratic governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Diamond, L., & Morlino, L. (2005). Assessing the quality of democracy. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Dimitrova, D. V., Shehata, A., Strömbäck, J., & Nord, L. R. (2014). The effects of digital media on political knowledge and participation in election campaigns: Evidence from panel data. Communication Research, 41, 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Djankov, S., McLeish, C., Nenova, T., & Shleifer, A. (2003). Who owns the media? The Journal of Law and Economics, 46(2), 341–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Easton, D. (1975). A re-assessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science, 5, 435–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Falk, O., Gold, R., & Heblich, S. (2012). E-lections: Voting behavior and the Internet. IZA DP No. 6545, Germany.Google Scholar
  29. Hilbert, M. (2009). The maturing concept of e-democracy: From e-voting and online consultations to democratic value out of jumbled online chatter. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 6(2), 87–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hindman, M. (2009). The myth of digital democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Jacobs, L. R., & Shapiro, R. Y. (2000). Politicians don’t pander: Political manipulation and the loss of democratic responsiveness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Jennings, M., & Zeitner, V. (2003). Internet use and civic engagement: A longitudinal analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 311–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kaufhold, K., Valenzuela, S., & Gil de Züniga, H. (2010). Citizen journalism and democracy: How user-generated news use relates to political knowledge and participation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 87(3–4), 515–529.Google Scholar
  34. Khazaeli, S., & Stockemer, D. (2013). The Internet: A new route to good governance. International Political Science Review, 34(5), 463–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Klingemann, H. D. (1999). Mapping political support in the 1990s: A global analysis. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical citizens: Global support for democratic governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kobayashi, T., Ikeda, K. I., & Miyata, K. (2006). Social capital online, collective use of the Internet and reciprocity as lubricants of democracy. Information, Communication & Society, 9, 582–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lee, J. K., Choi, J., Kim, C., & Kim, Y. (2014). Social media, network heterogeneity, and opinion polarization. Journal of Communication, 64, 702–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Memoli, V., & Splendore, S. (2014). Media use and confidence in institutions: a comparative analysis of Hallin and Mancini’s three models. Italian Political Science Review, 44(2), 175–192.Google Scholar
  39. Meraz, S. (2009). Is there an elite hold? Traditional media to social media agenda setting influence in blog networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 682–707.Google Scholar
  40. Miner, L. (2012). The unintended consequences of Internet diffusion: Evidence from Malaysia. Working paper, (New Economic School).Google Scholar
  41. Morlino, L. (2009). Legitimacy and the quality of democracy. International Social Science Journal, 60(196), 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Morlino, L. (2011). Changes for democracy: Actors, structures, processes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Morlino, L., & Quaranta, M. (2014). The non-procedural determinants of responsiveness. West European Politics, 37(2), 331–360. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2014.887878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Morozov, E. (2011). The net delusion: The dark side of Internet freedom. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  45. Mutz, D. C. (2002). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 838–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nisbet, E. C., Stoycheff, E., & Pearce, K. E. (2012). Internet use and democratic demands: A multinational, multilevel model of Internet use and citizen attitudes about democracy. Journal of Communication, 62, 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Norris, P. (2000). A virtuous circle: Political communications in postindustrial societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Östman, J. (2012). Information, expression, participation: How involvement in user-generated content relates to democratic engagement among young people. New Media & Society, 14(6), 1004–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Touchstone.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Quintelier, E., & Vissers, S. (2008). The effect of Internet use on political participation. Social Science Computer Review, 26(4), 411–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Robinson, M. (1976). Public affairs television and the growth of political malaise: The case of “The Selling of the Pentagon”. American Political Science Review, 70, 409–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Scheufele, D. A., Hardy, B. W., Brossard, D., Waismel-Manor, I. S., & Nisbet, E. (2006). Democracy based on difference: Examining the links between structural heterogeneity, heterogeneity of discussion networks, and democratic citizenship. Journal of Communication, 56(4), 728–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Scheufele, D. A., & Nisbet, M. C. (2002). Being a citizen online: New opportunities and dead ends. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 7, 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stoycheff, E., & Nisbet, E. C. (2014). What’s the bandwidth for democracy? Deconstructing Internet penetration and citizen attitudes about governance. Political Communication, 31(4), 628–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sudulich, M., Wall, M., & Baccini, L. (2014). Wired voters: The effects of Internet use on voters’ electoral uncertainty. British Journal of Political Science,. doi: 10.1017/S0007123413000513.Google Scholar
  57. Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Swigger, N. (2013). The online citizen: Is social media changing citizens’ beliefs about democratic values? Political Behavior, 35(3), 589–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tewksbury, D., & Rittenberg, J. (2012). News on the Internet: Information and citizenship in the 21st century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Torcal, M., & Maldonado, G. (2014). Revisiting the dark side of political deliberation. The effects of media and political discussion on political interest. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(3), 679–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vergeer, M. (2012). Politics, elections and online campaigning: Past, present… and a peek into the future. New Media & Society, 15(1), 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wagner, A. F., Schneider, F., & Halla, M. (2009). The quality of institutions and satisfaction with democracy in Western Europe: A panel analysis. European Journal of Political Economy, 25(1), 30–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Xenos, M., & Moy, P. (2007). Direct and differential effects of the Internet on political and civic engagement. Journal of Communication, 57(4), 704–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social and Political SciencesUniversità degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly
  2. 2.Department of Political and Social SciencesUniversità degli Studi di CataniaCataniaItaly

Personalised recommendations