Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Further Examination of the Properties of the Workplace Well-Being Questionnaire (WWQ)

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research into the well-being of individuals in the workplace has a range of important implications not just in terms of its potential economic impact, but also with respect to physical and mental health. Thus, measurement of workplace well-being is of considerable importance. Despite the apparent need for specific measurement tools for the workplace, there has been a lack of well constructed measures. The 31-item Workplace Well-being Questionnaire (WWQ) was developed to address this area of unmet need, with results from an initial analysis identifying four factors that could account for the majority of variance. The current study examines the validity of this measure of workplace well-being in a large sample of 7,717 individuals, using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Exploratory factor analyses provided modest support for the four-factor solution of the original WWQ, with two factors showing changes in their loading pattern, and several items loading on different factors when compared to the initial findings. Confirmatory factor analysis on a revised set of items/factors from the WWQ showed reasonable fit statistics, suggesting the need for a slightly modified structure of the measure. The variables of work type, gender and age were analysed against the new WWQ structure, with findings suggesting a relatively consistent pattern of responding across these factors. Based on the findings in such a large sample the WWQ can now offer greater precision of well-being measurement in the workplace across genders, as well as different ages and job types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartlett, J. E., Kotrlik, J. W., & Higgins, C. C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19, 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, P., & White, M. P. (2007). How can measures of subjective well-being be used to inform public policy. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 71–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faragher, E. B., Cass, M., & Cooper, C. L. (2005). The relationship between job satisfaction and health: a meta-analysis. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 62, 105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuoppala, J., Lamminpää, A., Väänänen-Tomppo, I., & Hinkka, K. (2011). Employee well-being and sick leave, occupational accident, and disability pension: A cohort study of civil servants. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 53, 633–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. B., & Hyett, M. P. (2011). Measurement of well-being in the workplace: the development of the work well-being questionnaire. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 199, 394–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattison, H., & Gross, H. (1996). Pregnancy, work and women’s well-being: A review. Work & Stress, 10, 72–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudemonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, K., Faragher, B., & Cooper, C. L. (2001). Well-being and occupational health in the 21st century workplace. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 489–509.

  • Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. M. (1980, June). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew P. Hyett.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hyett, M.P., Parker, G.B. Further Examination of the Properties of the Workplace Well-Being Questionnaire (WWQ). Soc Indic Res 124, 683–692 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0805-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0805-5

Keywords

Navigation