Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 124, Issue 1, pp 21–41 | Cite as

Changes in Inequality and Generalized Trust in Europe

  • Javier OliveraEmail author
Article

Abstract

This paper analyses the determinants of trust in a pool of 34 European countries over the period 2002–2012. We find that income inequality is negatively related with generalized trust when we analyze the pooled data of individuals with multilevel models, confirming a well-established result in the analysis of cross-country differences in trust. However, we are unable to find the same significant relationship when we estimate fixed effects models with a panel dataset composed by countries. It is plausible that unobserved effects may account for the significant and negative relationship between economic inequality and trust at the cross-sectional level. In contrast, in the fixed effects models, we find negative and significant effects of ethnic and linguistic fractionalization, discrimination (general or based on migrant status) and crime rates on trust.

Keywords

Generalized trust Income inequality Europe Social attitudes 

JEL Classification

D31 D63 Z13 

References

  1. Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2002). Who trusts others? Journal of Public Economics, 85, 207–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Algan, Y., & Cahuc, P. (2010). Inherited trust and growth. American Economic Review, 100(5), 2060–2092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson, A. B., Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2011). Top incomes in the long run of history. Journal of Economic Literature, 49(1), 3–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2003). Inequality and growth: What can the data say? Journal of Economic Growth, 8(3), 267–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barro, R. J. (1999). Inequality, growth, and investment. NBER working paper No. 7038.Google Scholar
  6. Berggren, N., & Jordahl, H. (2006). Free to trust? Economic freedom and social capital. Kyklos, 59, 141–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beugelsdijk, S., de Groot, L. F., & Anton van Schaik, B. T. M. (2004). Trust and economic growth: A robustness analysis. Oxford Economic Papers New Series, 56(1), 118–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bjørnskov, C. (2007). Determinants of generalized trust: A cross-country comparison. Public Choice, 130, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Delhey, J., & Newton, K. (2005). Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: Global pattern or nordic exceptionalism? European Sociological Review, 21(4), 311–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Durlauf, S. N., & Fafchamps, M. (2004). Social Capital. In S. N. Durlauf & P. Aghion (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  11. Fisher, J. A. V., & Torgler, B. (2013). Do positional concerns destroy social capital: Evidence from 26 countries. Forthcoming in Economic Inquiry.Google Scholar
  12. Gustavsson, M., & Jordahl, H. (2008). Inequality and trust in Sweden: Some inequalities are more harmful than others. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 348–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Herzer, D., & Vollmer, S. (2012). Inequality and growth: evidence from panel cointegration. Journal of Economic Inequality, 10, 489–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hooghe, M., & Reeskens, T. (2008). Cross-cultural measurement equivalence of generalized trust. Evidence from the European Social Survey (2002 and 2004). Social Indicators Research, 85(3), 515–532.Google Scholar
  15. Hooghe, M., Reeskens, T., Stolle, D., & Trappers, A. (2009). Ethnic diversity and generalized trust in Europe. A cross-national multilevel study. Comparative Political Studies, 42, 198–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jordahl, H. (2009). Economic inequality. In G. T. Svendsen & G. L. H. Svendsen (Eds.), Handbook of social capital. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  17. Karabarbounis, L. (2011). One dollar, one vote. The Economic Journal, 121, 621–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic pay-off? A cross country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 1251–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Knack, S., & Zak, P. J. (2002). Building trust: Public policy, interpersonal trust, and economic development. Supreme Court Economic Review, 10, 91–107.Google Scholar
  20. Leigh, A. (2006a). Does equality lead to fraternity? Economics Letters, 93(1), 121–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leigh, A. (2006b). Trust, inequality, and ethnic heterogeneity. Economic Record, 82(258), 268–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (1994). Is inequality harmful for growth? American Economic Review, 84(3), 600–621.Google Scholar
  23. Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rothstein, B., & Uslaner, E. M. (2005). All for all: Equality, corruption, and social trust. World Politics, 58(1), 41–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Seligman, A. B. (2000). The problem of trust. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Solt, F. (2009). Standardizing the world income inequality database. Social Science Quarterly, 90(2), 231–242 (SWIID Version 3.1, December 2011).Google Scholar
  27. Steijn, S., & Lancee, B. (2011). Does income inequality negatively affect general trust? Examining three potential problems with the inequality-trust hypothesis. GINI discussion paper No. 20.Google Scholar
  28. Sunders, P. (2010). Beware false prophets. Equality, the good society and the spirit level. London: Policy Exchange.Google Scholar
  29. Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Uslaner, E. M., & Brown, M. (2005). Inequality, trust, and civic engagement. American Politics Research, 33(6), 868–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2010). The spirit level. Why equality is better for everyone (2nd ed.). London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  32. Zak, P. J., & Knack, S. (2001). Trust and growth. Economic Journal, 111(470), 291–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Research on Socio-Economic InequalityUniversity of LuxembourgWalferdangeLuxembourg

Personalised recommendations