Skip to main content

The Simple Structure of Positive Affect

Abstract

The structure of affect is often studied through the circumplex: a circular model on which similar (i.e. highly correlated) states lie close to each other. While very informative, the circumplex lacks simple structure, as items spread more or less uniformly around its perimeter. Consequently, affect scales loading close to each other on the circumplex are likely to overlap substantially and have poor discriminant validity. The present study aims to identify distinct dimensions of affect. Based on theory and previous findings, the following hypotheses were formulated: (1) only positive affect items loading on the most distant segments of the circumplex will form two separate factors and approximate a simple structure; (2) moderate-arousal positive affect (MAP) should be representative of general positive affect; (3) MAP should substantially overlap with life satisfaction (LS). The hypotheses were tested in an Australian sample (N = 424) through exploratory analyses and structural equation modelling, and were all supported. The paper contributes to current research by encouraging a more parsimonious measurement of positive affect. Studies focusing on different levels of arousal may only use scales of calmness and energy. Studies that aim to measure positive affect in general may simply use a MAP scale, as a promising alternative to the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS, Watson et al. in J Pers Soc Psychol 54(6):1063–1070, 1988). Finally, since MAP also explained 68 % of the variance in LS, it shows potential as a brief measure of subjective well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Alfonso, V. C., Allison, D. B., Rader, D. E., & Gorman, B. S. (1996). The extended satisfaction with life scale: Development and psychometric properties. Social Indicators Research, 38(3), 275–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bao, K. J., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2013). The rewards of happiness. In S. A. David, I. Boniwell, & A. C. Ayers (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of happiness (pp. 119–133). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. London: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, A. M., Tugade, M. M., Catalino, L. I., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions: Form, function, and mechanisms. In S. A. David, I. Boniwell, & A. C. Ayers (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of happiness (pp. 17–34). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davern, M. T., Cummins, R. A., & Stokes, M. A. (2007). Subjective wellbeing as an affective-cognitive construct. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8(4), 429–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Chan, M. Y. (2011). Happy people live longer: Subjective well-being contributes to health and longevity. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 3(1), 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekkekakis, P. (2013). The measurement of affect, mood, and emotion: A guide for health-behavioral research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fabrigar, L. R., & Wegener, D. T. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman Barrett, L., & Russell, J. A. (1998). Independence and bipolarity in the structure of current affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 967–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 300–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L., & Cohn, M. A. (2008). Positive emotions. In M. Lewis, J.M. Haviland-Jones, & L. Feldman Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions, (pp. 777–796). New York: The Guildford Press.

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. New York: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hone, L., Jarden, A., & Schofield, G. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Flourishing Scale in a New Zealand sample. Social Indicators Research. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11205-013-0501-x.

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, R. J., & Diener, E. (1992). Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion. In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Emotion (pp. 25–59). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavallee, L. F., Hatch, P. M., Michalos, A. C., & McKinley, T. (2007). Development of the contentment with life assessment scale (CLAS): Using daily life experiences to verify levels of self-reported life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 83(2), 201–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’ Boyle, E.H., & Williams, L.J. (2010). RMSEA-P and 90% confidence interval calculator. Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/235340737_O’Boyle__Williams_RMSEA-P_CI_calculator/file/9fcfd51111a663c088.xls.

  • Pressman, S. D., & Cohen, S. (2005). Does positive affect influence health? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 925–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remington, N. A., Fabrigar, L. R., & Visser, P. S. (2000). Reexamining the circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(2), 286–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A., & Feldman Barrett, L. (1999). Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5), 805–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A., Lewicka, M., & Niit, T. (1989). A cross-cultural study of a circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 848–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (2000). Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implication. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: Foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 61–84). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sortheix, F. M., & Lönnqvist, J. E. (2014). Personal value priorities and life satisfaction in Europe: The moderating role of socioeconomic development. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(2), 282–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer, R. E. (1967). Measurement of activation through self-report. Psychological Reports, 20(2), 663–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thayer, R. E. (2012). Moods of energy and tension that motivate. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 408–419). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, M.W. (2000) Monte Carlo PCA for Parallel Analysis (Mac version). Real basic.

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 219–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yik, M., Russell, J. A., & Steiger, J. H. (2011). A 12-point circumplex structure of core affect. Emotion, 11(4), 705–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Economic and Social Research Council grant ES/J500100/1 to Ylenio Longo. Portions of this article served as part of Ylenio Longo’s PhD thesis. Thanks are due to Robert A. Cummins for providing the data, and to Stephen Joseph, Nick Manning, and Cees van der Eijk for comments on prior versions of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ylenio Longo.

Appendices

Appendix I: Scree plots (2 levels)

figure a

Appendix II: Factor loadings (2 levels–2 factors)

 

1

2

Energy and HAP

 Lively

.646

−.262

 Elated

.643

.251

 Alert

.633

 

 Delighted

.607

.304

 Aroused

.546

 

 Enthusiastic

.426

.414

 Energized

 

.947

 Excited

.150

−.774

Energy and MAP

 Satisfied

.982

−.110

 Content

.873

 

 Happy

.808

 

 Pleased

.711

.217

 Energized

.443

.413

 Lively

.213

.772

 Aroused

 

.548

 Alert

.148

.439

Energy and LAP

 Relaxed

.901

 

 At ease

.884

 

 Calm

.780

 

 Serene

.748

 

 Lively

.196

.773

 Aroused

−.108

.573

 Energized

.338

.514

 Alert

 

.510

HAP and MAP

 Delighted

.869

 

 Elated

.867

 

 Excited

.820

 

 Pleased

.548

.375

 Enthusiastic

.520

−.290

 Satisfied

 

−.998

 Content

 

−.791

 Happy

.281

−.615

HAP and LAP

 Relaxed

.835

−.332

 Delighted

.830

.243

 At ease

.827

−.276

 Serene

.779

−.148

 Excited

.757

.327

 Calm

.752

−.320

 Elated

.749

.352

 Enthusiastic

.735

.224

MAP and LAP

 Satisfied

.974

 

 Pleased

.861

 

 Happy

.825

 

 At ease

.548

.363

 Content

.509

−.407

 Serene

.434

.357

 Relaxed

 

−1.004

 Calm

.101

−.676

  1. Items with stronger loadings on the comparison factor are in bold

Appendix III: Factor loadings (2 levels–1 factor)

 

1

Energy and HAP

 Excited

.852

 Delighted

.851

 Lively

.841

 Elated

.826

 Energized

.824

 Enthusiastic

.785

 Alert

.506

 Aroused

.467

Energy and MAP

 Happy

.876

 Satisfied

.874

 Pleased

.858

 Content

.833

 Energized

.734

 Lively

.732

 Alert

.459

 Aroused

.303

Energy and LAP

 Relaxed

.859

 At_ease

.844

 Calm

.807

 Serene

.799

 Lively

.672

 Energized

.667

 Alert

.407

 Aroused

.272

HAP and MAP

 Pleased

.881

 Delighted

.872

 Happy

.857

 Satisfied

.853

 Content

.804

 Enthusiastic

.776

 Excited

.776

 Elated

.765

HAP and LAP

 Delighted

.822

 At_ease

.815

 Relaxed

.811

 Serene

.784

 Excited

.753

 Elated

.742

 Calm

.740

 Enthusiastic

.739

MAP and LAP

 Satisfied

.896

 At_ease

.874

 Content

.871

 Relaxed

.852

 Happy

.832

 Pleased

.803

 Serene

.768

 Calm

.730

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Longo, Y. The Simple Structure of Positive Affect. Soc Indic Res 124, 183–198 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0776-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0776-6

Keywords

  • Positive affect
  • Life satisfaction
  • Subjective well-being
  • Circumplex
  • Vitality