Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 123, Issue 2, pp 601–623 | Cite as

Parental Divorce, Psychological Well-Being and Educational Attainment: Changed Experience, Unchanged Effect Among Swedes Born 1892–1991

  • Michael GählerEmail author
  • Eva-Lisa Palmtag
Article

Abstract

During the last century, the proportion of children and adolescents who have experienced a parental divorce or separation has increased dramatically, in Sweden and elsewhere. Vast research has shown that children in these families fare less well than children in intact families, both in the short and in the long run and on a number of outcomes. Much less is known about whether parental divorce means the same for children and adolescents today as it did a century ago. Have living conditions changed and, if so, how? Moreover, has the association between parental divorce and child well-being changed in magnitude over time? To answer these questions six waves of the Swedish Level of Living Survey were used. The data set contains indicators on childhood living conditions for an entire century of Swedes, born 1892–1991. We show that living conditions for children of divorce have indeed changed on a number of dimensions but there is no evidence of magnitude change in the association between parental divorce/separation and two child outcomes, psychological well-being and educational attainment.

Keywords

Parental divorce Living conditions Cohort change Psychological well-being Educational attainment Sweden 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Marie Evertsson, Juho Härkönen, Charlotta Magnusson, Dimitri Mortelmans and Berkay Özcan for valuable comments. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) under grant agreement no. 320116 for the research project FamiliesAndSocieties. Financial support from the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research (FAS, dnr. 2006-1515) is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Amato, P. R. (1993). Children’s adjustment to divorce: Theories, hypotheses, and empirical support. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amato, P. R. (2000). The consequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1269–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amato, P. R. (2001). Children of divorce in the 1990s: An update of the Amato & Keith (1991) meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 355–370.Google Scholar
  4. Amato, P. R. (2010). Research on divorce: Continuing trends and new developments. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 72, 650–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amato, P. R., & Gilbreth, J. G. (1999). Nonresident fathers and children’s well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, 557–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Amato, P. R., & James, S. (2010). Divorce in Europe and the United States: Commonalities and differences across nations. Family Science, 1, 2–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Amato, P. R., & Keith, B. (1991a). Parental divorce and adult well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Amato, P. R., & Keith, B. (1991b). Parental divorce and well-being of children: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 26–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Amato, P. R., Loomis, L. S., & Booth, A. (1995). Parental divorce, marital conflict, and offspring well-being during early adulthood. Social Forces, 73, 895–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Amato, P. R., & Sobolewski, J. M. (2001). The effects of divorce and marital discord on adult children’s psychological well-being. American Sociological Review, 66, 900–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Andreß, H.-J., Borgloh, B., Bröckel, M., Giesselmann, M., & Hummelsheim, D. (2006). The economic consequences of partnership dissolution—a comparative analysis of panel studies from Belgium, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, and Sweden. European Sociological Review, 22, 533–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Astone, N. M., & McLanahan, S. S. (1991). Family structure, parental practices and high school completion. American Sociological Review, 56, 309–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Barrett, A. E., & Turner, R. J. (2005). Family structure and mental health: The mediating effects of socioeconomic status, family process, and social stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 46, 156–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bergström, M. (2012). Barn med växelvis boende. In Skolans betydelse för barns och ungas psykiska hälsa–en studie baserad på den nationella totalundersökningen i årskurs 6 och 9 hösten 2009 (pp. 71–82). Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen.Google Scholar
  15. Bernardi, F., Härkönen, J., Boertien, D., Andersson Rydell, L., Bastaits, K., & Mortelmans, D. (2013). State-of-the-art report. Effects of family forms and dynamics on children’s well-being and life chances: Literature review. Families And Societies working paper series 4.Google Scholar
  16. Biblarz, T. J., & Raftery, A. E. (1999). Family structure, educational attainment, and socioeconomic success: Rethinking the ‘pathology of matriarchy’. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 321–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Booth, A., & Amato, P. R. (2001). Parental predivorce relations and offspring postdivorce well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 197–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brady, D., & Burroway, R. (2012). Targeting, universalism, and single-mother poverty: A multilevel analysis across 18 affluent democracies. Demography, 49, 719–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carlsund, Å., Eriksson, U., Löfstedt, P., & Sellström, E. (2013). Risk behaviour in Swedish adolescents: Is shared physical custody after divorce a risk or a protective factor? European Journal of Public Health, 23, 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chapple, S. (2009). Child well-being and sole-parent family structure in the OECD: An Analysis. OECD social, employment and migration working papers No. 82. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  21. Cherlin, A. J. (1978). Remarriage as an incomplete institution. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 634–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Coleman, M., Ganong, L., & Fine, M. (2000). Reinvestigating remarriage: Another decade of progress. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1288–1307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. de Graaf, P. M., & Kalmijn, M. (2006a). Change and stability in the social determinants of divorce: A comparison of marriage cohorts in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review, 22, 561–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. de Graaf, P. M., & Kalmijn, M. (2006b). Divorce motives in a period of rising divorce. Evidence from a dutch life-history survey. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 483–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Destro, L., & Brady, D. (2011). Does European-style welfare generosity discourage single-mother employment? In D. Brady (Ed.), Comparing European workers Part B: Policies and institutions (Research in the sociology of work, volume 22) (pp. 53–82). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ely, M., Richards, M. P. M., Wadsworth, M. E. J., & Elliott, B. J. (1999). Secular changes in the association of parental divorce and children’s educational attainment–evidence from three British cohorts. Journal of Social Policy, 28, 437–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Erikson, R. (1984). Social class of men, women and families. Sociology, 18, 500–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Evertsson, M. (2001). Divorce and labour-market outcomes: Do women suffer or gain? In J. O. Jonsson & C. Mills (Eds.), Cradle to grave. Life-course change in modern Sweden (pp. 115–140). Durham: Sociology press.Google Scholar
  29. Frisco, M. L., Muller, C., & Frank, K. (2007). Parents’ union dissolution and adolescents’ school performance: Comparing methodological approaches. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 721–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gähler, M. (2001). Bara en mor–ensamstående mödrars ekonomiska levnadsvillkor i 1990-talets Sverige. In Å. Bergmark (Ed.), Ofärd i välfärden (pp. 15–99). SOU 2001:54. Kommittén välfärdsbokslut. Stockholm: Fritzes.Google Scholar
  31. Gähler, M. (2006). ‘To divorce is to die a bit…’: A longitudinal study of marital disruption and psychological distress among Swedish women and men. The Family Journal, 14, 372–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gähler, M., & Garriga, A. (2013). Has the association between parental divorce and young adults’ psychological problems changed over time? Evidence from Sweden, 1968–2000. Journal of Family Issues, 34, 784–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gähler, M., Jonsson, J. O., & Låftman, S. B. (2009). The importance of being present: The influence of ‘Absent’ Parents and ‘Present’ step-parents on children’s educational attainment. Paper presented at the RC-28 Spring Meeting (International Sociological Association), Beijing, May 14–16.Google Scholar
  34. Goode, W. J. (1962). Marital satisfaction and instability: A cross-cultural class analysis of divorce rates. International Social Science Journal, 14, 507–526.Google Scholar
  35. Goodman, S. H. (2007). Depression in mothers. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, 107–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Halman, L., Inglehart, R., Díez-Medrano, J., Luijkx, R., Moreno, A., & Basáñez, M. (2008). Changing values and beliefs in 85 countries. trends from the values surveys from 1981 to 2004. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hanson, T. L. (1999). Does parental conflict explain why divorce is negatively associated with child welfare? Social Forces, 77, 1283–1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Härkönen, J., & Dronkers, J. (2006). Stability and change in the educational gradient of divorce: A comparison of 17 countries. European Sociological Review, 22, 501–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hetherington, E. M. (1979). Divorce. A child’s perspective. American Psychologist, 34, 851–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Heuveline, P., Yang, H., & Timberlake, J. M. (2010). It takes a village (perhaps a nation): Families, states, and educational achievement. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 1362–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hobson, B., & Takahashi, M. (1997). The parent-worker model: Lone mothers in Sweden. In J. Lewis (Ed.), Lone mothers in European welfare regimes. Shifting policy logics (pp. 121–139). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  42. Hoem, J. M. (1997). Educational gradients in divorce risks in Sweden in recent decades. Population Studies, 51, 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jekielek, S. M. (1998). Parental conflict, marital disruption and children’s emotional well-being. Social Forces, 76, 905–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Johnson, D. R., & Wu, J. (2002). An empirical test of crisis, social selection, and role explanations of the relationship between marital disruption and psychological distress: A pooled time-series analysis of four-wave panel data. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 211–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jonsson, J. O., & Gähler, M. (1997). Family dissolution, family reconstitution, and children’s educational careers: Recent evidence for Sweden. Demography, 34, 277–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kelly, J. B., & Emery, R. E. (2003). Children’s adjustment following divorce: Risk and resilience perspective. Family Relations, 52, 352–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kiernan, K. E., & Huerta, M. C. (2008). Economic deprivation, maternal depression, parenting and children’s cognitive and emotional development in early childhood. The British Journal of Sociology, 59, 783–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kim, K. L., Jackson, Y., Conrad, S. M., & Hunter, H. L. (2008). Adolescent report of interparental conflict: The role of threat and self-blame appraisal on adaptive outcome. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 17, 735–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 36, 211–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lundberg, O. (1990). Den ojämlika ohälsan. Om klass- och könsskillnader i sjuklighet. Swedish Institute for Social Research Dissertation Series 11. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell International.Google Scholar
  51. Lundborg, P. (2000). Vilka förlorade jobbet under 1990-talet? In Fritzell, J. (ed.), Välfärdens förutsättningar–Arbetsmarknad, demografi och segregation (pp. 11–50). SOU 2000:37. Kommittén välfärdsbokslut. Stockholm: Fritzes.Google Scholar
  52. Lyngstad, T. H., & Jalovaara, M. (2010). A review of the antecedents of union dissolution. Demographic Research, 23, 257–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McLanahan, S. (2004). Diverging destinies: How children are faring under the second demographic transition. Demography, 41, 607–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McLanahan, S., & Sandefur, G. (1994). Growing up with a single parent: What hurts, what helps. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  55. McLeod, J. D., & Kaiser, K. (2004). Childhood emotional and behavioral problems and educational attainment. American Sociological Review, 69, 636–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ministry of Education and Culture (2006). Ungdomar, stress och psykisk ohälsa. Analyser och förslag till åtgärder [Young people, stress, and psychological ill-helath. Ananlyses and suggestions for action]. SOU 2006:77. Stockholm: Fritzes.Google Scholar
  57. National Board of Health and Welfare. (2009). Folkhälsorapport 2009 [Report on population health 2009]. Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare.Google Scholar
  58. Öberg, B., & Öberg, G. (1991). Skiljas-men inte från barnen. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur.Google Scholar
  59. Potter, D. (2010). Psychosocial well-being and the relationship between divorce and children’s academic achievement. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 933–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pryor, J., & Rodgers, B. (2001). Children in changing families. Boston: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  61. Rudolphi, F. (2011). Inequality in educational outcomes. How aspirations, performance, and choice shape school careers in Sweden. Doctoral dissertation. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  62. Rutter, M. (1979). Maternal deprivation, 1972–1978: New findings, new concepts, new approaches. Child Development, 50, 283–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sandström, G. (2012). Ready, willing and able. The divorce transition in Sweden 19151974. Department of Historical, Philosophical and Religious Studies, Centre for Population Studies and Umeå Centre for Gender Studies, Graduate School for Gender Studies, Umeå University.Google Scholar
  64. Schön, L. (2000). En modern svensk ekonomisk historia. Tillväxt och omvandling under två sekel. Stockholm: SNS Förlag.Google Scholar
  65. Sigle-Rushton, W., Hobcraft, J., & Kiernan, K. (2005). Parental disruption and adult well-being: A cross cohort comparison. Demography, 42, 427–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Song, C., Benin, M., & Glick, J. (2012). Dropping out of high school: The effects of family structure and family transitions. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 53, 18–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Statistics Sweden. (1995). Barn och deras familjer 1992–93. [Children and their families 1992–93]. Levnadsförhållanden. Rapport 89. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden.Google Scholar
  68. Statistics Sweden. (2003). Barn och deras familjer 2001. Del 1: Tabeller. [Children and their families 2001. Part 1: Tables]. Demografiska rapporter 2003:1.1. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden.Google Scholar
  69. Statistics Sweden. (2009). Tema: barn. Barn i dag–En beskrivning av barns villkor med Barnkonventionen som utgångspunkt. [Theme: Children. Children Today–Describing children’s living conditions based on the “Convention on the Rights of the Child”]. Temarapport 2009:2. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden.Google Scholar
  70. Sun, Y., & Li, Y. (2002). Children’s well-being during parents’ marital disruption process: A pooled time-series analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 472–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sweeney, M. M. (2010). Remarriage and stepfamilies: Strategic sites for family scholarship in the 21st century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 667–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Thomson, E., & Eriksson, H. (2013). Register-based estimates of parents’ co-residence in Sweden, 1969–2007. Demographic Research, 29, 1153–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Thornton, A., & Young-DeMarco, L. (2001). Four decades of trends in family attitudes toward family issues in the United States: The 1960s through the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 1009–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Turunen, J. (2013). Stepfamily dynamics in Sweden. Essays on family structure and children’s well-being. Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis. Stockholm University Demography Unit—Dissertation Series 8. Stockholm University.Google Scholar
  75. van de Kaa, D. J. (1987). Europe’s second demographic transition. Population bulletin 42. Washington: The Population Reference Bureau.Google Scholar
  76. Wadsby, M. (1993). Children of divorce and their parents. Linköping University Medical Dissertations No. 405.Google Scholar
  77. Wolfinger, N. (2005). Understanding the divorce cycle. The children of divorce in their own marriages. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Swedish Institute for Social ResearchStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations