Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 123, Issue 1, pp 103–126 | Cite as

Europe’s Capital Cities and the Happiness Penalty: An Investigation Using the European Social Survey

  • Alan T. Piper
Article

Abstract

This study investigates in three steps whether there is an association between happiness and living in one of Europe’s capital cities. Making use of the European Social Survey, the first step is a raw unadjusted correlation assessment which, overall, finds a negative and statistically significant effect on happiness of living in one of Europe’s capitals. The second step is the addition of socio-economic controls which (overall) increases the happiness penalty associated with living in a European capital city. The third step adds environmental factors and perceptions (safety of local area, worries about crime, for example) to control for further potential confounding factors. Tentative evidence is also presented that this is not just a big city effect. Overall, there is a happiness penalty associated with living in Europe’s capitals though this result is dominated by a few particularly unhappy capitals.

Keywords

Happiness Life-satisfaction Geography European Social Survey 

JEL Classification

I31 R19 R23 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I am very grateful to Nick Adnett, Geoff Pugh, Nils Saniter, Stefan Zins (member of the Sampling Expert Panel of the ESS), and two anonymous referees for helpful suggestions and comments. Also useful was discussion with participants of the informal research seminar series at Universität Flensburg. The Norwegian Social Science Data Services (NSD) is the data archive and distributor of the ESS data. Neither the original collectors of the data nor the Archive bear any responsibility for the analyses or interpretations presented here.

References

  1. Aassve, A., Goisis, A., & Sironi, M. (2012). Happiness and childbearing across Europe. Social Indicators Research, 108(1), 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becchetti, L., Clark A. E., & Ricca, E. G. (2011). The value of diplomacy: Bilateral relations and immigrant well-being, CEIS research paper 190, Tor Vergata University, CEIS.Google Scholar
  3. Blanchflower, D. G., Oswald, A. J., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2013). Is psychological well-being linked to the consumption of fruit and vegetables? Social Indicators Research, 114(3), 785–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Böhnke, P., & Kohler, U. (2009). Well-being and inequality. In S. Immerfall & G. Therborn (Eds.), Handbook of European societies (pp. 629–668). Heidelberg, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, A. E., D’Ambrosio, C., & Ghislandi, S. (2013) Poverty and well-being: Panel evidence from Germany, PSE Working papers hal-00814659, HAL.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. A. (2008). Relative income, explanation for the easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Neve, J., Christakis, N. A., Fowler, J. H., & Frey, B. S. (2010) Genes, economics, and happiness, CESifo working paper series 2946, CESifo Group Munich.Google Scholar
  8. Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. P. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? The factors associated with subjective wellbeing. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 94–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. Economic Journal, 111, 465–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. European Commission. (2013). Smart, sustainable and inclusive growth: EU Capital Citiesessential partners for Europe 2020, Mem 13-156.Google Scholar
  11. Ferreira, S., Akay, A., Brereton, F., Cuñado, J., Martinsson, P., & Moro, M. (2012) Life satisfaction and air quality in Europe IZA Discussion Papers 6732, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).Google Scholar
  12. Fitzgerald, C. J., & Danner, K. M. (2012). Evolution in the office: How evolutionary psychology can increase employee health, happiness, and productivity. Evolutionary Psychology, 10, 770–781.Google Scholar
  13. Frank, R. H. (1985). Choosing the right pond. Human behaviour and the quest for status. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Grinde, B. (2002). Darwinian happiness: Evolution as a guide for living and understanding human behavior. Princeton: Darwin Press.Google Scholar
  15. Grözinger, G., & Matiaske, W. (2014). The direct and indirect impact of religion on well-being in Germany. Social Indicators Research, 116(2), 373–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(21), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kamvar, S., Mogilner, C., & Aaker, J. L. (2009) The meaning of happiness stanford graduate school of business research paper no. 2026.Google Scholar
  18. Lucas, R. E., Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y., & Diener, E. (2003). Re-examining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: Reactions to changes in marital status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 527–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. MacKerron, G., & Mourato, S. (2009). Life satisfaction and air quality in London. Ecological Economics, 68(5), 1441–1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mill, J. S. (1848). Principles of political economy. In J. M. Robson (Ed.), The collected works of John Stuart Milled. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  21. Mogilner, C., Kamvar, S., & Aaker, J. (2011). The shifting meaning of happiness. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(4), 395–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Oswald, A. J., & Wu, S. (2010) Objective confirmation of subjective measures of human well-being: Evidence from the USA. IZA discussion papers 4695, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).Google Scholar
  23. Piantadosis, S., Byar, D., & Green, S. (1988). The ecological fallacy. American Journal of Epidemiology, 127(5), 893–904.Google Scholar
  24. Piper, A. T. (2013) Happiness, dynamics and adaptation. MPRA Paper 52342, University Library of Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
  25. Piper, A. T. (2014). Heaven knows i’m miserable now: Overeducation and reduced life satisfaction. Education Economics,. doi: 10.1080/09645292.2013.870981.Google Scholar
  26. Schwartz, B. (2005). The paradox of choice. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  27. Shields, M. A., & Wooden, M. (2003) Marriage, children and subjective well-being. In 8th Australian Institute of Family Studies conference, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  28. Shulevitz, J. (2013). The lethality of loneliness. New Republic.Google Scholar
  29. Smart, E. (2012). Well-being in London: Measurement and use, GLA economics current issues note 35. Greater London Authority publications.Google Scholar
  30. Steiner, L., Frey, B. S., & Hotz, S. (2013). European capitals of culture and life satisfaction, ECONworking papers 117, Department of Economics, University of Zurich.Google Scholar
  31. Stutzer, A., & Frey, B. S. (2006). Does marriage make people happy, or do happy people get married? Journal of Socio-Economics, 35, 326–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stutzer, A., & Frey, B. S. (2008). Stress that doesn’t pay: The commuting paradox. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 110(2), 339–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Van Praag, B. M. S., & Baarsma, B. E. (2005). Using happiness surveys to value intangibles: The case of airport noise. Economic Journal, 115(500), 224–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van Praag, B. M. S., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2007). Happiness quantified: A satisfaction calculus approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vatter, J. (2012) Well-being in Germany: What explains the regional variation? SOEP papers on multidisciplinary panel data research 435, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).Google Scholar
  36. Ward, P., & Meyer, S. (2009). Trust, social quality and wellbeing: A sociological exegesis. Development and Society, 38(2), 339–363.Google Scholar
  37. Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2010). The spirit level: Why equality is better for everyone (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press/Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Internationales Institut für Management und ökonomische BildungUniversität FlensburgFlensburgGermany

Personalised recommendations