Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 120, Issue 2, pp 395–409 | Cite as

Income, Unemployment, Higher Education and Wellbeing in Times of Economic Crisis: Evidence from Granada (Spain)

  • Jorge GuardiolaEmail author
  • Monica Guillen-Royo
Article

Abstract

The 2008 financial crisis hit the world’s economies in different ways. In Spain, the economic crisis has had an acute effect on unemployment and access to education, aggravated by the austerity plans of the Spanish government. In order to cope with the crisis, the government′s efforts have aimed to control public deficit and stabilize financial markets, rather than to directly support citizens’ wellbeing. This paper studies the relationship between unemployment, education, income and subjective wellbeing (SWB) in the city of Granada, one of the most negatively affected by the crisis, using representative household data for 2012. We approach SWB from three different but interrelated angles through answers to questions on life satisfaction, financial satisfaction and material needs satisfaction. Results reveal that in this context of crisis and high levels of unemployment, higher education and employment status are still strong determinants of SWB but that income has a weak and non-robust relationship with SWB, except in the case of satisfying material needs. In addition, the unemployment levels of the same age-group are also negatively linked with people’s SWB, contrary to what we would expect from previous literature predicting a positive impact of having others around experiencing the same precarious situation. Thus, our results suggest that in Spain, policies to address the effects of the crisis should strengthen their focus on providing employment opportunities and keeping people in education rather than cutting public spending to meet the needs of the financial markets.

Keywords

Economic crisis Subjective wellbeing Unemployment Material needs Spain 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Francisco González Gómez, Miguel A. García Rubio, José María Tortosa, Mariano Rojas, Luis Ayala as well as two anonymous referees for their useful comments. Financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Economics and Competitiveness (Project ECO2009-08824/ECON and Project ECO2012-32189), the Government of Andalucía (Project P11-SEJ-7039) and Instituto de Estudios Fiscales (Project C-3929-00) is acknowledged.

References

  1. BOE. (2011). Real Decreto 1888/2011, de 30 de diciembre, por el que se fija el salario mínimo interprofesional para 2012. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 315, 146680–146682.Google Scholar
  2. BOE. (2012). Ley 3/2012, de 6 de julio, de medidas urgentes para la reforma del mercado laboral. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 162, 49113–49191.Google Scholar
  3. Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2009). Microeconometrics using stata. Texas: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cantril, H. (1965). The patters of human concern. New Brunswich: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Carballo-Cruz, F. (2011). Causes and consequences of the Spanish economic crisis: Why the recovery is taken so long? Panoeconomicus, 3, 309–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caritas. (2012). De la coyuntura a la estructura: los efectos permanentes de la crisis. VII Informe del Observatorio de la Realidad Social. Madrid: Cáritas Española.Google Scholar
  7. CEOE. (2013). Situación socioeconómica. Informe Mensual 1. Madrid: Confederación Española de Organizaciones Empresariales. http://www.ceoe.es/resources/image/sse_2013_01.pdf.
  8. CIS (2013). Banco de datos. http://www.cis.es/cis/opencms/ES/2_bancodatos/. Accessed January 24, 2013.
  9. Clark, A. E. (2003). Unemployment as a social norm: Psychological evidence from panel data. Journal of Labor Economics, 21(2), 289–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark, A., Frijters, P., & Shileds, M. A. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1994). Unhappiness and unemployment. Economic Journal, 104, 648–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deaton, A. (2012). The financial crisis and the well-beings of Americans. Oxford Economic Papers, 64, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Easterlin, R., Angelescu, L., Switek, M., Sawangfa, O., & Smith, J. (2010). The happiness–income paradox revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(52), 22463–22468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eurobarometer (2013) Eurobarometer interactive search system. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/cf/index_en.cfm. Accessed January 5 2013.
  15. Eurostat, (2013a). Employment and unemployment statistics. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/employment_unemployment_lfs/introduction. Accessed January 24, 2013.
  16. Eurostat, (2013b). Income distribution statistics. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Income_distribution_statistics. Accessed January 24, 2013.
  17. Fafchamps, M., & Shilpi, F. (2006). Subjective welfare, isolation and relative consumption. CEPR Discussion Paper 6002. SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=976748. Accessed February 25, 2013.
  18. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness and economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Graham, (2010). Happiness around the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Graham, C., Chattioadgyay, S., & Picon, M. (2010). The Easterlin and other paradoxes: Why both sides of the debate might be correct. In E. Dieder, J. Helliwell, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), International differences in well-being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Graham, C., & Felton, A. (2006). Inequality and happiness: Insights from Latin America. Journal of Economic Inequality, 4, 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gudmundsdottir, D. G. (2013). The impact of economic crisis on happiness. Social Indicators Research, 110, 1083–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Guillen-Royo, M. (2011). Reference group consumption and the subjective wellbeing of the poor in Peru. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(2), 259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Helliwell J., & Huang H. (2011). New measures of the costs of unemployment: evidence from the subjective well-being of 2.3 million Americans. Working Paper 16829, NBER.Google Scholar
  25. Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (Eds.). (2012). World happiness report. New York: Earth Institute, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  26. INE. (2013). INEBASE. http://www.ine.es/inebmenu/indice.htm. Accessed January 25, 2013.
  27. Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 16489–16493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kingdon, G. G., & Knight, J. (2007). Community, comparisons and subjective well-being in a divided society. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, 64, 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McBride, M. (2001). Relative-income effects on subjective well-being in the cross-section. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 45, 251–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ministerio de Hacienda y Administraciones Públicas, 2013. Presupuestos generales del estado. http://www.minhap.gob.es/es-ES/Areas%20Tematicas/Presupuestos%20Generales%20del%20Estado/Paginas/Presupuestos.aspx. Accessed January 24, 2013.
  31. Mochón, F., & Ahn, N. (2007) La felicidad de los españoles: Factores explicativos. Documentos de Trabajo FEDEA 2007-12. http://www.fedea.es/pub/papers/2007/dt2007-12.pdf.
  32. United Nations. (2012). Examen de los informes presentados por los Estados partes en virtud de los artículos 16 y 17 del Pacto. Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Committee. 48° session period. May 18, 2012.Google Scholar
  33. Van Praag, B. M. S., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2004). Happiness quantified. A satisfaction calculus approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Veenhoven, R. (2007). Happiness in hardship. In L. P. Bruni & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Economics and happiness (pp. 243–266). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Walsh, B. (2011). Well-being and economic conditions in Ireland. UCD Centre for Economic Research Working Paper Series 11, 27. http://www.ucd.ie/t4cms/WP11_27.pdf. Accessed February 25, 2013.
  36. Zarzosa, P., & Somarriba, N. (2013). An assessment of social welfare in Spain: Territorial analysis using a synthetic welfare indicator. Social Indicators Research, 111, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Department of Applied EconomicsUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain
  2. 2.Centre for Development and the Environment, University of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations