Social Indicators Research

, Volume 120, Issue 1, pp 197–212 | Cite as

Neighbourhood Effects Influencing Early Childhood Development: Conceptual Model and Trial Measurement Methodologies from the Kids in Communities Study

  • Sharon Goldfeld
  • Geoffrey Woolcock
  • Ilan Katz
  • Robert Tanton
  • Sally Brinkman
  • Elodie O’Connor
  • Talya Mathews
  • Billie Giles-Corti


Socio-environmental factors, including the neighbourhoods in which children live and grow, are key determinants of children’s developmental outcomes. Thus, it is important to examine and consider the relationships between these factors and the multiple contexts that influence children. Drawing on a broad disciplinary range of existing research, we aimed to develop a conceptual model of neighbourhood effects influencing early childhood development. The neighbourhood effects literature was reviewed with a specific focus on existing models and frameworks. This review was then further expanded through consultation with our cross-disciplinary research collaboration (Kids in Communities Study Collaboration). From this a theoretical model specific to early childhood development was developed. The hypothesised model comprised five interconnected domains: physical, social, service, socio-economic, and governance. A small trial of indicator measurement was conducted and findings were used to make a series of recommendations regarding measures or indicators which might provide useful and effective for neighbourhood effects research. The proposed model provides a useful and novel conceptual framework for classifying neighbourhood effects research. By synthesising disparate but related areas of research, the resultant five domains provide a useful approach to understanding and measuring child development in the context of community and environment, therefore advancing knowledge in this area. Expanding the current neighbourhood effects paradigm to accommodate broader constructs appears critical in considering the multiple environments that may act as key determinants of children’s wellbeing and psychosocial outcomes.


Australian Early Development Index (AEDI) Community indicators Early childhood development Environment Neighbourhood 



Thanks to previous KICS members Paul Kershaw and John Wiseman for their contribution, and to Corinne opt H’oong for her initial input. This work has been funded by the Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth (Australian Research Council/National Health and Medical Research Council Collaborative network), the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation, and the Australian Government. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


  1. Atkinson, A. B. (1998). Social exclusion, poverty and unemployment. In A. B. Atkinson & J. Hills (Eds.), Exclusion, employment and opportunity. Case paper 4. Centre for the analysis of social exclusion (pp. 1–20). London: London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2006). Information paper: An introduction to socio-economic indexes for areas (SEIFA). Canberra: Australia Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  3. Barry, F. D. (1994). A neighborhood based approach: What is it? In G. B. Melton & F. D. Barry (Eds.), Protecting children from abuse and neglect: Foundations for a new national strategy. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, L. (1993). Rethinking neighbourhoods, neighbourhood research, and neighbourhood policy: Lessons from uptown. Journal of Urban Affair, 15, 245–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradshaw, J. (2003). How has the notion of social exclusion developed in the European discourse? Plenary address to the 2003 Australian social policy conference. Social Policy Research Centre: University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
  6. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992). Ecological systems theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Six theories of child development: Revised formulations and current issues (pp. 187–249). London, England: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. International Encyclopedia of Education (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 1643–1647). Oxford: Elseview.Google Scholar
  11. Bronfenbrenner, U. (2004). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. USA: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Brooks-Gunn, J., Duncan, G. L., & Britto, P. (1999). Are socio-economic gradients for children similar to those for adults? Achievement and health of children in the United States. In D. Keating & C. Hertzman (Eds.), Developmental health and the wealth of nations: Social, biological and educational dynamics. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  13. Brooks-Gunn, J., Duncan, G. J., Klebanov, P. K., & Sealand, N. (1993). Do neighborhoods influence child and adolescent development? American Journal of Sociology, 99(2), 353–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burchardt, T. (2000). Social exclusion: Concepts and evidence. In D. Gordon & P. Townsend (Eds.), Breadline Europe. The measurement of poverty. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  15. Byron, I. (2010). Place-based approaches to addressing disadvantage: Linking science and policy. Family Matters, 84, 20–27.Google Scholar
  16. Centre for Community Child Health (2011). Place-based approaches to supporting children and families. Policy Brief No. 23.Google Scholar
  17. Centre for Community Child Health. (2012). Place-based initiatives transforming communities: Proceedings from the place-based approaches roundtable. Melbourne: Centre for Community Child Health.Google Scholar
  18. Centre for Community Child Health, & Telethon Institute for Child Health Research. (2009). A snapshot of early childhood development in Australia: AEDI National report 2009. Canberra: Australian Government.Google Scholar
  19. Centre for Community Child Health, & Telethon Institute for Child Health Research. (2012). A snapshot of early childhood development in Australia: AEDI National report 2012. Canberra: Australian Government.Google Scholar
  20. Christensen, P. (2003). Place, space and knowledge: Children in the village and the city. In P. Christensen & M. O’Brien (Eds.), Children in the City: Home, neighbourhood and community. London: Routledge/Falmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Coleman, J. S., & Hoffer, T. B. (1987). Public and private schools: The impact of communities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  23. Department of Human Services. (2006). Neighbourhood renewal: Participation and partnership framework 2005–2008. Victoria: Office of Housing.Google Scholar
  24. Eckersley, R. (2004). Separate selves, tribal ties, and other stories. Family Matters, 68(Winter), 36–42.Google Scholar
  25. Edwards, B. (2006). Views of the village: Parents’ perceptions of their neighbourhoods. Family Matters, 74, 26–33.Google Scholar
  26. Ellen, I., & Turner, M. (1997). Does neighbourhood matter? Assessing recent evidence. Housing Policy Debate, 8, 833–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Feinstein, L., Duckworth, K., & Sabates, R. (Eds.). (2008). Education and the family: Passing success across the generations. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Galster, G. C. (2012). The mechanism(s) of neighbourhood effects: Theory, evidence and policy implications. In M. Van Ham, D. Manley, N. Bailey, L. Simpson, & D. Maclennan (Eds.), Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Garbarino, J. (1995). Raising children in a socially toxic environment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. Goldfeld, S., Mathews, T., Brinkman, S., Woolcock, G., Myers, J., Kershaw, P., et al. (2010). The Kids in Communities Study: Measuring community level factors influencing children’s development. Report for VicHealth. Melbourne: Murdoch Children’s Research Institute.Google Scholar
  31. Hertzman, C. (2010). Framework for the social determinants of early child development. In R. E. Tremblay, R. G. Barr, R. D. Peters, & M. Boivin (Eds.), Encyclopedia on early childhood development. Montreal, Quebec: Centre of Excellence for Early Childhood Development.Google Scholar
  32. Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  33. Janus, M., & Offord, D. (2007). Development and psychometric properties of the early development instrument (EDI): A measure of children’s school readiness. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 39(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1037/cjbs2007001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jencks, C., & Mayer, S. (1990). The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighbourhood. In L. E. Lynn Jr & M. G. H. McGeary (Eds.), Inner-city poverty in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kohen, D. E., Leventhal, T., Dahinten, V. S., & McIntosh, C. N. (2008). Neighborhood disadvantage: Pathways of effects for young children. Child Development, 79(1), 156–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 309–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2003). Children and youth in neighbourhood contexts. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(1), 27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2008). Neighborhood residence and youth development: Empirical findings and theoretical models. The Prevention Researcher, 15(2), 3–6.Google Scholar
  39. Luthar, S. (2003). The culture of affluence: Psychological costs of material wealth. Child Development, 74(6), 1581–1593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. March, D., & Susser, E. (2006). The eco- in eco-epidemiology. International Journal of Epidemiology, 35(6), 1379–1383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moore, T. (2005). Towards improved support for families of young children: The role of communities. 9th Australian Institute of Family Studies Conference, Melbourne, Centre for Community Child Health. Google Scholar
  42. Muhajarine, N., Vu, L., & Labonte, R. (2006). Social contexts and children’s health outcomes: Researching across the boundaries. Critical Public Health, 16(3), 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. O’Toole, K. (2003). Exploring community governance in Victorian Local Government. 51st annual conference of the Australasian Political Studies Association, Hobart, University of Tasmania. Google Scholar
  44. Painter, J., & Philo, C. (1995). Spaces of citizenship: An introduction. Political Geography, 14(2), 107–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Preston-Shoot, M., & Wigley, V. (2005). Mapping the needs of children in need. British Journal of Social Work, 35, 255–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Prior, M. (2005). Neighbourhood influences on children. In S. Richardson & M. Prior (Eds.), No time to lose: The wellbeing of Australia’s children. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 443–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shonkoff, J. P., & Boyce, W. T. (2009). Neuroscience, molecular biology, and the childhood roots of health disparities: Building a new framework for health promotion and disease prevention. Journal of the American Medical Association, 301(21), 2252–2259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stanley, J., & Kovacs, K. (2003). Accessibility issues in child abuse prevention services. Child Abuse Prevention Issues, no. 18, Spring 2003.  Melbourne: National Child Protection Clearinghouse, Australian Institute of Family Studies.Google Scholar
  50. Susser, M., & Susser, E. (1996a). Choosing a future for epidemiology: I. Eras and paradigms. American Journal of Public Health, 86, 668–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Susser, M., & Susser, E. (1996b). Choosing a future for epidemiology: II. From black box to Chinese boxes and eco-epidemiology. American Journal of Public Health, 86, 674–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Swisher, R. (2008). Neighborhoods and youth: How neighborhood demographics and social processes affect youth outcomes. The Prevention Researcher, 15(2), 7–11.Google Scholar
  53. Wandersman, A., & Nation, M. (1998). Urban neighbourhoods and mental health: Psychological contributions to understanding toxicity, resilience, and interventions. American Psychologist, 53, 647–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sharon Goldfeld
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Geoffrey Woolcock
    • 4
    • 5
  • Ilan Katz
    • 6
  • Robert Tanton
    • 7
  • Sally Brinkman
    • 8
    • 9
  • Elodie O’Connor
    • 1
  • Talya Mathews
    • 2
  • Billie Giles-Corti
    • 10
  1. 1.Centre for Community Child HealthRoyal Children’s HospitalParkvilleAustralia
  2. 2.Murdoch Children’s Research InstituteRoyal Children’s HospitalMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.Department of PaediatricsUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  4. 4.Wesley MissionBrisbaneAustralia
  5. 5.School of Human Services and Social WorkGriffith UniversityLoganAustralia
  6. 6.Social Policy Research CentreThe University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  7. 7.National Centre for Social and Economic ModellingUniversity of CanberraCanberraAustralia
  8. 8.Telethon Institute for Child Health ResearchUniversity of Western AustraliaWest PerthAustralia
  9. 9.School of Population HealthUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
  10. 10.McCaughey VicHealth Centre, School of Population and Global HealthUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations