Skip to main content

The Happiness Workout

Abstract

This study tests for causality from exercise and physical activity to life satisfaction (LS) by applying an instrumental variable approach with the respondents’ perceived benefits of exercise participation as instruments. Using data across 25 countries from the Eurobarometer survey, our results confirm the positive association between exercise and LS. In terms of causality, the results indicate that being active increases LS for both gender, though more for men than women. One main reason for this relationship is that exercise is perceived as being pleasurable, something that policy-makers should keep in mind when designing programmes to get us off the sofa.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. We thank the reviewer for this point.

References

  • Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., & Qin, Y. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111, 1036–1060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audrain, J., Schwartz, M., Herrera, J., Golman, P., & Bush, A. (2001). Physical activity in first degree relatives of breast cancer patients. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 587–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty, G. D. (2002). Physical activity and coronary heart disease in older adults. European Journal of Public Health, 12, 171–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum-Baicker, C. (1985). The psychological benefits if moderate alcohol consumption: A review of the literature. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 15, 305–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biddle, S. J. H., Fox, K. R., Boutcher, S. H., & Faulkner, G. E. (2000). The way forward for physical activity and the promotion of psychological well-being. In S. J. H. Biddle, K. R. Fox, & S. H. Boutcher (Eds.), Physical activity and psychological well-being (pp. 154–168). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, S., Beck, J., Gerber, M., Hatzinger, M., & Holsboer-Trachsler, E. (2009). Football is good for your sleep: Favorable sleep patterns and psychological functioning of adolescent male intense football players compared to controls. Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 1144–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. A. (2005). Measuring perceived benefits and perceived barriers for physical activity. American Journal of Health Behavior, 29, 107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, H. S., Pagán, J. A., & Bastida, E. (2005). The impact of diabetes on employment: Genetic IVs in a bivariate probit. Health Economics, 14, 537–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunello, G., Michaud, P. C., & Sanz-de-Galdeano, A. (2009). The rise of obesity in Europe: An economic perspective. Economic Policy, 24, 551–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Eds.). (2007). The SAGE handbook of grounded theory. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, N., & Sanderson, C. A. (1999). Life task participation and well-being: The importance of taking part in daily life. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 230–243). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaouloff, F. (1997). The serotonin hypothesis. In W. P. Morgan (Ed.), Physical activity and mental health (pp. 179–198). Abingdon: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Incentives to exercise. Econometrica, 77, 909–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coakley, J., & White, A. (1992). Making decisions: Gender and sport participation among British adolescents. Sociology of Sport Journal, 9, 20–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa-Gomes, M. A., & Weizsäcker, G. (2008). Stated beliefs and play in normal-form games. Review of Economic Studies, 75, 729–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, D. M., Glaeser, E. L., & Shapiro, J. M. (2003). Why have Americans become more obese? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17, 93–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, A. (2008). Heterogeneous beliefs, speculation, and the equity premium. Journal of Finance, 63, 41–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Tella, R., Donna, J., & MacCulloch, R. (2008). Crime and beliefs: Evidence from Latin America. Economics Letters, 99, 566–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Tella, R., Galliani, S., & Schargrodsky, E. (2007). The formation of beliefs: Evidence from the allocation of land titles to squatters. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 209–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimeo, F., Bauer, M., Varahram, I., Proest, G., & Halter, U. (2001). Benefits from aerobic exercise in patients with major depression: A pilot study. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 35, 114–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, P., & Kahneman, D. (2008). Interpretations of utility and their implications for the valuation of health. Economic Journal, 118, 215–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, P., & Metcalfe, R. (2012). Measuring subjective well-being: Recommendations on measures for use by national governments. Journal of Social Policy, 41, 409–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 94–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2005). Promoting healthy diets and physical activity: A European dimension for the prevention of overweight obesity and chronic diseases. European Commission Green Paper, December 2005, Brussels.

  • Forrest, D., & McHale, I. (2009). Public policy, sport and happiness: An empirical study. Working paper, Salford University.

  • Foti, K. E., Eaton, D. K., Lowry, R., & McKnight-Ely, L. R. (2011). Sufficient sleep, physical activity, and sedentary behaviors. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41, 596–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, M. T., & Popovici, I. (2011). That instrument is lousy! In search of agreement when using instrumental variables estimation in substance use research. Health Economics, 20, 127–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greendorfer, S. L. (1977). Role of socialization agents in female sport involvement. Research Quarterly, 48, 304–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greendorfer, S. L., & Lewko, J. H. (1978). Role of family members in sport socialization of children. Research Quarterly, 49, 146–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H. (1998). Gender economics courses in liberal arts colleges: Further results. Journal of Economic Education, 29, 291–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamer, M., Stamatakis, E., & Steptoe, A. (2009). Dose-response relationship between physical activity and mental health: The Scottish Health Survey. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 43, 1111–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, K., & White, K. M. (2011). Identifying key belief-based targets for promoting regular physical activity among mothers and fathers with young children. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 14, 135–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, C. J., Stevens, L. C., & Coast, J. R. (2001). Exercise duration and mood state: How much is enough to feel better? Health Psychology, 20, 267–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, P. (1997). The endorphin hypothesis. In W. P. Morgan (Ed.), Physical activity and mental health (pp. 163–177). Abingdon: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, H., & Humphreys, B. (2012). Sports participation and happiness: Evidence from US micro data. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33, 776–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kan, K., & Tsai, W. (2004). Obesity and risk knowledge. Journal of Health Economics, 23, 907–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsaiti, M. S. (2012). Obesity and happiness. Applied Economics, 44, 4101–4114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavetsos, G. (2011). Physical activity and subjective well-being: An empirical analysis. In P. Rodriguez, S. Kesenne, & B. Humphreys (Eds.), The economics of sport, health and happiness: The promotion of well-being through sporting activities (pp. 213–222). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

  • Latif, E. (2009). The impact of diabetes on employment in Canada. Health Economics, 18, 577–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. H., & Park, I. (2010). Happiness and physical activity in special populations: Evidence from Korean survey data. Journal of Sports Economics, 11, 136–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly, B. F. J. (2005). Multivariate statistical methods (3rd Edn). Chapman and Hall: CRC.

  • Morris, S. (2007). The impact of obesity on employment. Labour Economics, 14, 413–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Hoffman, A., & Giovannini, E. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide, OECD, European Commission, Joint Research Centre.

  • Oswald, A. J., & Powdthavee, N. (2007). Obesity, unhappiness and the challenge of affluence: Theory and evidence. Economic Journal, 117, 441–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panter, J. R., & Jones, A. P. (2008). Associations between physical activity, perceptions of the neighbourhood environment and access to facilities in an English city. Social Science and Medicine, 67, 1917–1923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peluchette, J. V., Karl, K., & Rust, K. (2006). Dressing to impress: Beliefs and attitudes regarding workplace attire. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21, 45–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, J. W., Kline, J. P., Gencoz, T., Gencoz, F., & Joiner, T. E. (2001). Are happy people healthier? The specific role of affect in predicting self-reported health symptoms. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 521–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, K. M. (2001). Exercise in treating depression: Broadening the psychotherapist’s role. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57, 1289–1300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, W. (2006a). Perceptions of the environment, physical activity, and obesity. Social Science and Medicine, 63, 2835–2846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, W. (2006b). The prevalence and clustering of four major lifestyle risk factors in an English adult population. Preventive Medicine, 44, 124–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasciute, S., & Downward, P. (2010). Health or happiness? What is the impact of physical activity on the individual? Kyklos, 63, 256–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. E., Kaplam, G. A., Shema, S. J., & Strawbridge, W. J. (2000). Are the obese at greater risk of depression? American Journal of Epidemiology, 152, 163–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruby, M. B., Dunn, E. W., Perrino, A., Gillis, R., & Viel, S. (2011). The invisible benefits of exercise. Health Psychology, 30, 67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sari, N. (2009). Physical inactivity and its impact on healthcare utilization. Health Economics, 18, 885–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfilment. London: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, B., Singer, T., & Dolan, R. (2007). The neurobiology of punishment. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 300–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahab, L., & West, R. (2011). Differences in happiness between smokers, ex-smokers and never smokers: Cross-sectional findings from a national household survey. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 121, 38–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snoep, L. (2008). Religiousness and happiness in three nations: A research note. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 207–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbe, J. H., de Moor, M. H. M., Boomsma, D. I., & de Geus, E. J. C. (2007). The association between exercise participation and well-being: A co-twin study. Preventive Medicine, 44, 148–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stutzer, A. (2007). Limited self-control, obesity and the loss of happiness, IZA discussion paper 2925.

  • Teixeira, C. M., Vasconcelos-Raposo, J., Fernandes, H. M., & Brustad, R. J. (2013). Physical activity, depression and anxiety among the elderly. Social Indicators Research, 113, 307–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornberg, R., & Charmaz, K. (2012). Grounded theory. In S. D. Lapan, M. Quartaroli, & F. Reimer (Eds.), Qualitative research: An introduction to methods and designs (pp. 41–67). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilhjamsson, R., & Kristjansdottir, G. (2003). Gender differences in physical activity in older children and adolescents: The central role of organized sport. Social Science and Medicine, 56, 363–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F., Orpana, H. M., Morrison, H., de Groh, M., Dai, S., & Luo, W. (2012). Long-term association between leisure-time physical activity and changes in happiness: Analysis of the prospective national population health survey. American Journal of Epidemiology, 176, 1095–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, M. P., & Dolan, P. (2009). Accounting for the richness of daily activities. Psychological Science, 20, 1000–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross-section and panel data. London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, F. J. (2009). Using behavioral economics to promote physical activity. Preventive Medicine, 49, 289–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Peter Ayton, Karol Borowiecki, Daniel Fujiwara, Laura Kudrna, Andrew Oswald, Tessa Peasgood, Nick Powdthavee, Anastasia Stathopoulou, Stefan Szymanski and an anonymous referee for valuable comments and suggestions on earlier drafts of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgios Kavetsos.

Appendix

Appendix

This section presents the results of the factor analysis carried out for the perceived benefit indicators included in the survey. The methods carried out here are well documented in textbooks and handbooks—see for example Manly (2005) and Nardo et al. (2008). In brief, we first perform a factor analysis where the suggested number of factors is identified based on the Kaiser criterion, which drops factors with eigenvalues below unity. Second, the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) measure for sampling adequacy is calculated; both for individual variables and for the overall analysis. KMO values vary between zero and one, where values equal to 0.6 or above are desirable, since large values imply that a certain variable has enough information in common to produce a reliable factor analysis. Third, in order to obtain an interpretable pattern of factor loadings a varimax rotation is usually performed. Finally, factor scores are estimated.

The factor analysis here is based on tetrachoric correlations of the underlying variables (i.e. perceived benefits). An initial factor analysis on all 14 variables suggests that three factors are enough to summarize these benefit measures. These are the factors with a loading greater or equal to 1 (Kaiser criterion). However, subsequent estimation of the KMO measure of sampling adequacy suggests that the last variable, “other” (KMO Other  = 0.492) should be discarded from the analysis since any value below 0.5 is considered to be unacceptable. This also makes intuitive sense given the unspecific nature of this variable. Repeating the factor analysis on the remaining 13 variables indicates that the benefit indicators can be summarized by two factors, as reported in Table 5. Furthermore, we now obtain KMOs well above 0.75 and an overall KMO of 0.929—see Table 6.

Table 5 Factor analysis and eigenvalues
Table 6 KMO measures

Going back to Table 5, we observe that the third factor has an eigenvalue of 0.956 and does not fulfil the Kaiser criterion at the margin. Deriving the rotated factor loadings under the strictly suggested two factor model however does not yield a clear distinction of benefit factors, since under that specification the health benefit would be included together with the ‘purposeful’ benefits (e.g. ‘develop new skills’) leading to a mixed interpretation of the factors. Thus, we will allow for three factors to be extracted from the model. The varimax rotated factor loadings are reported in Table 7. Bold figures indicate the benefits with the highest loading across the three factors.

Table 7 Rotated factor loadings

Hence, benefit 1 can be summarised in Factor 1, benefits 2–5 in Factor 2 and benefits 6–13 in Factor 3. We label these factors ‘health’, ‘pleasure’ and ‘purpose’, respectively. The last column labelled ‘uniqueness’ indicates the proportion of the common variance of each benefit indicator not well-represented by the three factors, where lower values are desirable.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dolan, P., Kavetsos, G. & Vlaev, I. The Happiness Workout. Soc Indic Res 119, 1363–1377 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0543-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0543-0

Keywords

  • Subjective well-being
  • Life satisfaction
  • Happiness
  • Physical activity
  • Sport