Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Spatial Pattern of Urban Livability in Himalayan Region: A Case of Aizawl City, India

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cities are increasingly expected to provide impetus to the growth and development of their surrounding areas as well as to compete for economic activity with other cities. However, cities in developing countries are characterised by spatial differentiation and segregation due to widening inequality which are detrimental for growth and development of cities and regions. Concern over inequality in urban areas raises moral and ethical issues and demands compensatory and remedial policies to alleviate poorer places. This requires recognition of areas of relative deprivation at smaller scale through proper research. The present study is an attempt to find out patterns of inequality in livability in Aizawl-a fast growing hill city in the Himalayan region of northeastern India. Using data reduction method, levels of objective and subjective dimensions of livability are measured at neighbourhood level. The study found out that centrally located neighbourhoods are more livable in comparison to their peripheral counterparts. The study also found out that objective and subjective dimensions of livability have no significant relationship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alreck, P. L., & Settle, R. B. (1995). The survey research handbook (2nd ed.). Chicago: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andelman, R., Board, R., Carman, L., Cummins, R., Ferriss, A., Friedman, P., et al. (1998). Quality of life definition and terminology: A discussion document from the International Society of Quality of Life Studies (Monograph). Blacksburg: International Society of Quality of Life Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, C. J. (2001). Analyzing quality-of-place. Environment and Planning B Planning and Design, 23, 201–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, B. J. L., & Baker, A. M. (1968). Geographic sampling. In B. J. L. Berry & D. F. Marble (Eds.), Spatial analysis (pp. 91–100). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, D. (2008). Urban quality of life: A case study of Guwahati. Social Indicators Research, 88(2), 297–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fakhruddin, M. (1991). Quality of urban life. Jaipur: Rawat Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foo, T. S. (2000). Subjective assessment of urban quality of life in Singapore (1997–1998). Habitat International, 24(1), 31–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, T. (2006). Urban geography (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, M., & Chung, W. (2003). Quality of life of residents living near industrial estates in Singapore. Social Indicators Research, 61(2), 203–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, A., Gibb, K., & Mackay, D. (2000). Area deprivation in Scotland: A new assessment. Urban Studies, 37(9), 1535–1559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, G., & Philo, C. (Eds.). (1993). Selling places: The city as cultural capital, past and present. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, D., Manicaros, M., Mullins, P., Simpson, R., Stimson, R., & Western, J. (1997). Urban metabolism: A framework for evaluating the viability, livability and sustainability of South East Queensland. Brisbane: The Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, P., & Pinch, S. (2010). Urban social geography: An introduction (6th ed.). London: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leby, J. L., & Hashim, A. H. (2010). Liveability dimensions and attributes: Their relative importance in the eyes of neighbourhood residents. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 15(1), 67–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. J. (2008). Subjective quality of life measurement in Taipei. Building and Environment, 43(7), 1205–1215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lennard, S., & Lennard, H. (1995). Livable cities observed. Southampton: Gondolier Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marans, R. W., & Stimson, R. J. (2011). An overview of quality of urban life. In R. W. Marans & R. J. Stimson (Eds.), Investigating quality of urban life (pp. 1–29). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, E. J. (2007). Inequality and politics in the creative city-region: Questions of livability and state strategy. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(1), 188–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milbrath, L. W. (1979). Policy relevant quality of life research. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 444, 32–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, N. (2003). Neighbourhoods and social cohesion: Experiences from Europe. International Planning Studies, 2(8), 115–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moudon, A. V., & Ryan, M. (1994). Reading the residential landscape. In S. J. Neary, M. S. Symes, & F. E. Brown (Eds.), The urban experience: A people-environment perspective (pp. 183–313). Suffolk: St Esmondsbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mozammel, A. M., Mridha, H., & Moore, G. T. (2011). The quality of life in Dhaka, Bangladesh: Neighborhood quality as a major component of residential satisfaction. In R. W. Marans & R. J. Stimson (Eds.), Investigating quality of urban life (pp. 251–272). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D. (1988). Building knowledge about quality of life for urban planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 54(3), 347–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). (2002). Community and quality of life: Data needs for informed decision making. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P. W. G. (1999). Sustainability and cities: Extending the metabolism model. Landscape and Urban Planning, 44, 219–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oktay, D., & Rustemli, A. (2011). The quality of urban life and neighborhood satisfaction in Famagusta, Northern Cyprus. In R. W. Marans & R. J. Stimson (Eds.), Investigating quality of urban life (pp. 233–250). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Omuta, G. E. D. (1988). The quality of urban life and the perception of livability: A case study of neighbourhoods in Benin City Nigeria. Social Indicators Research, 20(4), 417–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacione, M. (1990). Urban liveability: A review. Urban Geography, 11, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacione, M. (1995). The geography of multiple deprivations in the clydeside conurbation. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 86(5), 407–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacione, M. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human wellbeing-a social geographical perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. J. (1998). Regions and the world economy: The coming shape of global production, competition, and political order. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. M. (1973). The geography of social well-being in the united states: An introduction to territorial social indicators. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. M. (1979). Where the grass is greener: Geographical perspectives on inequality. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesfazghi, E. S., Martinez, J. A., & Verplanke, J. J. (2010). Variability of quality of life at small scales: Addis Ababa, Kirkos Sub-City. Social Indicators Research, 98, 73–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Türkoğlu, H., Bölen, F., Baran, P. K., & Terzi, F. (2011). Measuring quality of urban life in Istanbul. In R. W. Marans & R. J. Stimson (Eds.), Investigating quality of urban life (pp. 209–232). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • UN-HABITAT (2003). Slums of the World: The face of urban poverty in the new millennium? Nairobi: UN-HABITAT.

  • Van Kamp, I., Leidelmeijer, K., Marsman, G., & Hollander, A. D. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human well being-towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts: A literature study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank the University Grants Commission (UGC), Government of India for financial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geography and Resource Management, Mizoram University, Aizawl, 796004, Mizoram, India

    Benjamin L. Saitluanga

Authors
  1. Benjamin L. Saitluanga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin L. Saitluanga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saitluanga, B.L. Spatial Pattern of Urban Livability in Himalayan Region: A Case of Aizawl City, India. Soc Indic Res 117, 541–559 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0362-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0362-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation