Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 117, Issue 2, pp 561–576 | Cite as

The Relationship Between Social Support and Subjective Well-Being Across Age

  • Karen L. Siedlecki
  • Timothy A. Salthouse
  • Shigehiro Oishi
  • Sheena Jeswani
Article

Abstract

The relationships among types of social support and different facets of subjective well-being (i.e., life satisfaction, positive affect, and negative affect) were examined in a sample of 1,111 individuals between the ages of 18 and 95. Using structural equation modeling we found that life satisfaction was predicted by enacted and perceived support, positive affect was predicted by family embeddedness and provided support, and negative affect was predicted by perceived support. When personality variables were included in a subsequent model, the influence of the social support variables were generally reduced. Invariance analyses conducted across age groups indicated that there were no substantial differences in predictors of the different types of subjective well-being across age.

Keywords

Aging Life satisfaction Social support Subjective well-being 

References

  1. Arbuckle, J. L. (2010). Amos (Version 19.0) [Computer Program]. Chicago: SPSS.Google Scholar
  2. Barrera, M. (1986). Distinctions between social support concepts, measures, and models. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14(4), 413–445. doi: 10.1007/BF00922627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrera, M., Sandler, I. N., & Ramsay, T. B. (1981). Preliminary development of a scale of social support: Studies on college students. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9(4), 435–447. doi: 10.1007/BF00918174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolger, N., Zuckerman, A., & Kessler, R. C. (2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 953–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowling, A. (2011). Do older and younger people differ in their reported well-being? A national survey of adults in Britain. Family Practice, 28(2), 145–155. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmq082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowling, A., Gabriel, Z., Dykes, J., Dowding, L. M., Evans, O., Fleissing, A., et al. (2003). Let’s ask them: A national survey of definitions of quality of life and its enhancement among people ages 65 and over. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 56, 269–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, S. L., Nesse, R. M., Vinokur, A. D., & Smith, D. M. (2003). Providing social support may be more beneficial than receiving it: Results from a prospective study of mortality. Psychological Science, 14(4), 320–327. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.14461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Busseri, M. A., & Sadava, S. W. (2011). A review of the tripartite structure of subjective well-being, implications for conceptualization, operationalization, and synthesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 290–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carstensen, L. L. (1987). Age-related changes in social activity. In L. L. Carstensen & B. A. Edelstein (Eds.), Handbook of clinical gerontology (pp. 222–237). Elmsford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  10. Carstensen, L. L. (1992). Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Aging, 7, 331–338. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.7.3.331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Costa, P. T., Jr, & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  13. Demir, M., & Weitekamp, L. A. (2007). I am so happy cause today I found my friend: Friendship and personality as predictors of happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8(2), 181–211. doi: 10.1007/s10902-006-9012-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Personality and subjective wellbeing. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 213–229). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science, 13, 81–84.Google Scholar
  16. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diener, E., Ng, W., Harter, J., & Arora, R. (2010). Wealth and happiness across the world: Material prosperity predicts life evaluation, whereas psychosocial prosperity predicts positive feeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 52–61. doi: 10.1037/a0018066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Emmons, R. A., & Diener, E. (1986). Influence of impulsivity and sociability on subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1211–1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Emmons, R. A., Diener, E., & Larsen, R. J. (1985). Choice of situations and congruence models of interactionism. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 693–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Finch, J. F., Okun, M. A., Pool, G. J., & Ruehlman, L. S. (1999). A comparison of the influence of conflictual and supportive social interactions on psychological distress. Journal of Personality, 67, 581–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Frokjaer, V. G., Mortensen, E. L., Nielsen, F. Å., Haugbol, S., Pinborg, L. H., Adams, K. H., et al. (2008). Frontolimbic serotonin 2A receptor binding in healthy subjects is associated with personality risk factors for affective disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 63, 569–576. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.07.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gleason, M. J., Iida, M., Bolger, N., & Shrout, P. E. (2003). Daily supportive equity in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1036–1045. doi: 10.1177/0146167203253473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Goodwin, R., Costa, P., & Adonu, J. (2004). Social support and its consequences: ‘Positive’ and ‘deficiency’ values and their implications for support and self-esteem. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 465–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. doi: 10.1086/228311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (2001). Happiness, introversion-extraversion and happy introverts. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 595–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lakey, B., Orehek, E., Hain, K. L., & VanVleet, M. (2010). Enacted support’s links to negative affect and perceived support are more consistent with theory when social influences are isolated from trait influences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(1), 132–142. doi: 10.1177/0146167209349375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee, G. R., Netzer, J. K., & Coward, R. T. (1995). Depression among older parents: The role of intergenerational exchange. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57(3), 823–833. doi: 10.2307/353935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lepore, S. J., Glaser, D. B., & Roberts, K. J. (2008). On the positive relation between received social support and negative affect: A test of the triage and self-esteem threat models in women with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 17(12), 1210–1215. doi: 10.1002/pon.1347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liang, J., Krause, N. M., & Bennett, J. M. (2001). Social exchange and well-being: Is giving better than receiving? Psychology and Aging, 16, 511–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lu, L. (1997). Social support, reciprocity, and well-being. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 618–628. doi: 10.1080/00224549709595483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9, 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Magnus, K., Diener, E., Fujita, F., & Pavot, W. (1993). Extraversion and neuroticism as predictors of objective life events: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 1046–1053. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marroquín, B. (2011). Interpersonal emotion regulation as a mechanism of social support in depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 1276–1290. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.09.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Newsom, J. T., & Schulz, R. (1996). Social support as a mediator in the relation between functional status and quality of life in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 11(1), 34–44. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.11.1.34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Piferi, R. L., & Lawler, K. A. (2006). Social support and ambulatory blood pressure: An examination of both receiving and giving. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62, 328–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pinquart, M., & Sörensen, S. (2000). Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 15(2), 187–224. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.15.2.187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pinquart, M., & Sörensen, S. (2006). Gender differences in caregiver stressors, social resources, and health: An updated meta-analysis. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61B, P33–P45. doi: 10.1093/geronb/61.1.P33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pollet, T. V., Roberts, S. B., & Dunbar, R. M. (2011). Extraverts have larger social network layers: But do not feel emotionally closer to individuals at any layer. Journal of Individual Differences, 32(3), 161–169. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Post, S. G. (2005). Altruism, happiness, and health: It’s good to be good. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 12, 66–77. doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm1202_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sandler, I. N., & Barrera, M., Jr. (1984). Toward a multi-method approach to assessing the effects of social support. American Journal of Community Psychology, 12, 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sarason, B. R., Sarason, I. G., & Gurung, R. A. R. (1997). Close personal relationships and health outcomes: A key to the role of social support. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (2nd ed., pp. 547–573). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  45. Sarason, I. G., Sarason, B. R., & Shearin, E. N. (1986). Social support as an individual differences variable: Its stability, origins, and relational aspects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 845–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schimmack, U., Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2002). Life-satisfaction is a momentary judgment and a stable personality characteristic: The use of chronically accessible and stable sources. Journal of Personality, 70, 345–384. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.05008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Seidman, G., Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2006). Why is enacted social support associated with increased distress? Using simulation to test two possible sources of spuriousness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(1), 52–65. doi: 10.1177/0146167205279582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shaw, B. A., Krause, N., Liang, J., & Bennett, J. (2007). Tracking changes in social relations throughout late life. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 62B, S90–S99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shrout, P. E., Herman, C., & Bolger, N. (2006). The costs and benefits of practical and emotional support on adjustment: A daily diary study of couples experiencing acute stress. Personal Relationships, 13, 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sommer, K. L., & Bourgeois, M. J. (2010). Linking the perceived ability to influence others to subjective well-being: A need-based approach. Social Influence, 5(3), 220–244. doi: 10.1080/15534510903513860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory form Y. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  52. Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 138–161. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Taylor, J., & Turner, R. (2001). A longitudinal study of the role and significance of mattering to others for depressive symptoms. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42(3), 310–325. doi: 10.2307/3090217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Thomas, P. A. (2010). Is it better to give or to receive? Social support and the well-being of older adults. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65B, 351–357. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbp113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wethington, E., & Kessler, R. C. (1986). Perceived support, received support, and adjustment to stressful life events. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 27, 78–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Williamson, G. M., & Clark, M. S. (1989). Providing help and desired relationship type as determinants of changes in moods and self-evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 722–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karen L. Siedlecki
    • 1
  • Timothy A. Salthouse
    • 2
  • Shigehiro Oishi
    • 2
  • Sheena Jeswani
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyFordham UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations