Skip to main content

The Concept, Dimensions and Methods of Assessment of Human Well-Being within a Socioecological Context: A Literature Review

Social Indicators Research volume 116, pages 681–698 (2014)Cite this article

Abstract

The concept of well-being has evolved over the past several decades as research has continued to reveal its multidimensional, dynamic, person-specific and culture-specific nature. Most recently, the ecological embeddedness of well-being has also gained recognition, and this development of the concept demands that we explore and identify new conceptual frameworks and appropriate methodological approaches towards the assessment of quality of life within a socioecological context. This paper offers a review of seminal and current research in the fields of social indicators, human development, ecological economics, and natural resources management, with the aim of examining the concept and the various methodologies designed to assess both the objective and subjective components and the multiple dimensions that comprise well-being. We also present some methodological approaches that have the capacity to account for the role of ecosystem services, considering several studies of rural populations whose well-being depends on the flow of ecosystem services, highlighting the participatory methods these studies employed to identify and assess locally relevant well-being indicators, and addressing some of the challenges inherent in such methods. We conclude with an appraisal of what we regard as the most appropriate methodological approach for measuring human well-being in the socioecological context.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Notes

  1. The MA conceptual framework can be viewed in the cited publication, in Figures A. Linkages Between Ecosystem Services and Human Well-being, and Figure B. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Conceptual Framework of Interactions Between Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services, Human Well-being, and Drivers of Change, on pages Vi and Vii.

  2. See Maggino and Zumbo (2012) for a detailed overview of measuring quality of life, including the definition of a conceptual model, development and management social indicator sets, and selection of appropriate analytical tools and strategies.

References

  • Abdallah, S., Michaelson, J., Shah, S., Stoll, L., & Marks, N. (2012). The Happy Planet Index: 2012 Report. A global index of sustainable well-being. London, UK. www.happyplanetindex.org. Accessed 07 January 2013.

  • Abdallah, S., Thompson, S., & Marks, N. (2008). Estimating worldwide life satisfaction. Ecological Economics, 65(1), 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger, W. N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 268–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S. (2005). Why the capability approach? Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 115–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S., & Bank, T. W. (2002). Dimensions of human development. World Development, 30(2), 181–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allardt, E. (1976). Dimensions of welfare in a comparative Scandinavian study. Acta Sociologica, 19(3), 227–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: American’s perceptions of life quality. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ayanu, Y. Z., Conrad, C., Nauss, T., Wegmann, M., & Koellner, T. (2012). Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services supplies and demands: A review of remote sensing applications. Environmental Science and Technology, 46, 8529–8541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmford, A., & Bond, W. (2005). Trends in the state of nature and their implications for human well-being. Ecology Letters, 8(11), 1218–1234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, R. A. (1966). Social indicators. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington, A. (1999). Capitals and capabilities: A framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Development, 27(12), 2021–2044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (1998). Linking social and ecological systems for resilience and sustainability. In F. Berkes & C. Folke (Eds.), Linking social and ecological systems (pp. 1–25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas-Diener, R., & Diener, E. (2001). Making the best of a bad situation: Satisfaction in the slums of Calcutta. Social Indicators Research, 55(3), 329–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, H., & Reason, P. (2001). Conclusion: Broadening the bandwidth of validity: Issues and choice-points for improving the quality of action research. In H. Bradbury & P. Reason (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 343–351). London: Sage Publications Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauman, K. A., Daily, G. C., Duarte, T. K., & Mooney, H. A. (2007). The nature and value of ecosystem services: An overview highlighting hydrologic services. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32(1), 67–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K., & Westaway, E. (2011). Agency, capacity, and resilience to environmental change: Lessons from human development, well-being, and disasters. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 36(1), 321–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch, M., Gee, K., Burkhard, B., Lange, M., & Stelljes, N. (2011). Conceptualizing the link between marine ecosystem services and human well-being: The case of offshore wind farming. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 7(3), 190–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camfield, L., Crivello, G., & Woodhead, M. (2009). Wellbeing research in developing countries: Reviewing the role of qualitative methods. Social Indicators Research, 90(1), 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camfield, L., & Guillen-Royo, M. (2010). Wants, needs and satisfaction: A comparative study in Thailand and Bangladesh. Social Indicators Research, 96(2), 183–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camfield, L., & McGregor, J. A. (2005). Resilience and wellbeing in developing countries. In M. Ungar (Ed.), Handbook for working with children and youth: pathways to resilience across cultures and contexts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camfield, L., & Ruta, D. (2007). ‘Translation is not enough’: using the Global Person Generated Index (GPGI) to assess individual quality of life in Bangladesh, Thailand, and Ethiopia. Quality of Life Research, 16(6), 1039–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celentano, D., Sills, E., & Carolina, N. (2012). Welfare outcomes and the advance of the deforestation frontier in the Brazilian Amazon. World Development, 40(4), 850–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R., & Conway, G. R. (1992) Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century. IDS Discussion Paper 296, Brighton: Institute for Development Studies (IDS).

  • Chiesura, A., & de Groot, R. (2003). Critical natural capital: A socio-cultural perspective. Ecological Economics, 44(2–3), 219–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. A. (2003). Concepts and perceptions of human bell-being: Some evidence from South Africa. Oxford Development Studies, 31(2), 173–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. A. (2005). Sen’s capability approach and the many spaces of human well-being. Journal of Development Studies, 41(8), 1339–1368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, C., & Rixford, C. (1998). Lessons learned from the history of social indicators. San Francisco: Redefining Progress. http://rprogress.org/publications/1998/SocIndHist.pdf. Accessed 07 January 2013.

  • Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Ali, S., Beer, C., Bond, L., Boumans, R., et al. (2007). Quality of life: An approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being. Ecological Economics, 61(2–3), 267–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209–240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (1996). Domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38(3), 303–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, T. C., Muhar, A., Arnberger, A., Aznar, O., Boyd, J. W., Chan, K. M. A., et al. (2012). Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(23), 8812–8819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31(2), 103–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (2012). New findings and future directions for subjective well-being research. American Psychologist, November 2012, 590–597.

  • Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Sandvik, E., Seidlitz, L., & Diener, M. (1993). The relationship between income and subjective well-being: Relative or absolute? Social Indicators Research, 28(3), 195–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring the quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40, 189–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyal, L., & Gough, I. (1984). A theory of human needs. Critical Social Policy, 4(10), 6–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyal, L., & Gough, I. (1991). A theory of human need. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eakin, H., & Luers, A. L. (2006). Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31(1), 365–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A., McVey, L. A., Switek, M., Sawangfa, O., & Zweig, J. S. (2010). The happiness–income paradox revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(52), 22463–22468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) Research Group on Wellbeing in Developing Countries [WeD]. (2007). Wellbeing and International Development. Bath, UK: Economic and Social Research Council. Retrieved 30 November 2012, from http://www.welldev.org.uk/research/aims.htm.

  • Engelbrecht, H.-J. (2009). Natural capital, subjective well-being, and the new welfare economics of sustainability: Some evidence from cross-country regressions. Ecological Economics, 69(2), 380–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazey, I., Kesby, M., Evely, A., Latham, I., Wagatora, D., Hagasua, J.-E., et al. (2010). A three-tiered approach to participatory vulnerability assessment in the Solomon Islands. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 713–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontalvo-Herazo, M. L., Glaser, M., & Lobato-Ribeiro, A. (2007). A method for the participatory design of an indicator system as a tool for local coastal management. Ocean and Coastal Management, 50(10), 779–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, E. D. G., Dougill, A. J., Mabee, W. E., Reed, M., & McAlpine, P. (2006). Bottom up and top down: Analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 78(2), 114–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasper, D. (2004). Human well-being: Concepts and conceptualizations (No. 2004/06). WIDER Discussion Papers, United Nations University. Retrieved on 01 March 2013, from http://hdl.handle.net/10419/52803on01.

  • Glaser, M. (2003). Interrelations between mangrove ecosystem, local economy and social sustainability in Caeté Estuary, North Brazil. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 11, 265–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, I. (1998). What are human needs? In J. Franklin (Ed.), Social policy and social justice (pp. 50–56). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, I. (2004). Human well-being and social structures: Relating the universal and the local. Global Social Policy, 4(3), 289–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, L. W., George, M. A., Daniel, M., Frankish, C. J., Herbert, C. J., Bowie, W. R., et al. (1995). Study of participatory research in health promotion. Review and Recommendations for Development of Participatory Research in Health Promotion in Canada. Ottawa: The Royal Society of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerty, M. R., Cummins, R. A., Ferriss, A. L., Land, K., Michalos, A. C., Peterson, M., et al. (2001). Quality of life indexes for national policy: Review and Agenda for Research. Social Indicators Research, 55, 1–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, J. (2010). The case for an ecosystem service approach to decision-making: An overview. Bioscience Horizons, 3(2), 188–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., Foa, R., Peterson, C., & Welzel, C. (2008). Development, freedom, and rising happiness: A global perspective (1981–2007). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(4), 264–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Institute for Sustainable Development (2012). Sustainable Development Timeline. Retrieved on 15 March 2013, from http://www.iisd.org/publications/pub.aspx?pno=764.

  • International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). (1980). World Conservation Strategy: Living resource conservation for sustainable development. Gland: IUCN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. (2012). UNEP, The first 40 Years: A narrative. United Nations Environmental Programme. Retrieved on 10 March 2013, from http://www.unep.org/40thanniversary/.

  • Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, K. W., & Rosa, E. (2011). The environmental efficiency of well-being: A cross-national analysis. Social Science Research, 40(3), 931–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavers, T. (2007). Asking people what they want or telling them what they need? Contrasting a theory of human need with local expressions of goals (WeD Working Paper 28). Bath, UK: ESRC Research Group on Wellbeing in Developing Countries (WeD), University of Bath. Retrieved on 10 March 2013, from http://www.welldev.org.uk/research/working.htm.

  • Maggino, F., & Zumbo, B. D. (2012). Measuring the quality of life and the construction of social indicators. In: K. C. Land, A. C. Michalos & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research (pp. 201–238). Springer, Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2421-1_10.

  • Magis, K. (2010). Community resilience: An indicator of social sustainability. Society & Natural Resources, 23(5), 401–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maltby, E., & Acreman, M. C. (2011). Ecosystem services of wetlands: Pathfinder for a new paradigm. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 56(8), 1341–1359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, N., Simms, A., Thompson, S., & Abdallah, S. (2006). The happy planet index: An index of human well-being and environmental impact. London: New Economics Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, F., Rodham, K., Camfield, L., & Ruta, D. (2010). Reliability and validity of the Thai “Global Person Generated Index”: An individualized measure of quality of life. Applied Research Quality of Life, 5, 219–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Max-Neef, M. A. (1991). Human Scale Development: Conception, application and further reflections. New York: The Apex Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGillivray, M., & Clarke, M. (2006). Understanding human wellbeing. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, J. A. (2004). Researching well-being: Communicating between the needs of policy makers and the needs of people. Global Social Policy, 4(3), 337–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, J. A., Camfield, L., & Woodcock, A. (2009). Needs, wants and goals: Wellbeing, quality of life and public policy. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 4(2), 135–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, J. A., McKay, A., & Velazco, J. (2007). Needs and resources in the investigation of well-being in developing countries: Illustrative evidence from Bangladesh and Peru. The Journal of Economic Methodology, 14(1), 107–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minkler, M. (2004). Ethical challenges for the “outside” researcher in community-based participatory research. Health Education & Behavior, 31(6), 684–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, H. A., Cropper, A., & Reid, W. (2004). The millennium ecosystem assessment: What is it all about? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19(5), 221–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. D. (1979). Measuring the condition of the world’s poor: The physical quality of life index. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, D., Chambers, R., Shah, M. K., & Petesch, P. (2000). Voices of the poor: Crying out for change. New York: Oxford University Press for the World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • New Economics Foundation (NEF). (2005). Well-Being and the Environment: Achieving “One Planet Living” and maintaining quality of life. London, UK.

  • Nussbaum, M. (2003). Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen And social justice. Feminist Economics, 9(2–3), 33–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (1976). Measuring social well-being: A progress report on the development of social indicators. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2001). The well-being of nations: The role of human and social capital. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 164–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, E., Queiroz, C., Pereira, H. M., & Vicente, L. (2005). Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being: A participatory study in a mountain community in Portugal. Ecology and Society 10(2): 14. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art14/. Accessed 07 January 2013.

  • Pinedo-Vasquez, M. A., & Sears, R. R. (2011). Várzea forests: Multifunctionality as a resource for conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. In M. Pinedo-Vasquez, M. L. Ruffino, C. Padoch, & E. S. Brondízio (Eds.), The Amazon Várzea: The decade past and the decade ahead (pp. 187–206). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Qizilbash, M. (1996). Capabilities, well-being and human development: A survey. Journal of Development Studies, 33(2), 143–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, C. M., Bryan, B. A., MacDonald, D. H., Cast, A., Strathearn, S., Grandgirard, A., et al. (2009). Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 68(5), 1301–1315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, A. S. L., Ewers, R. M., Parry, L., Souza, C., Veríssimo, A., & Balmford, A. (2009). Boom-and-bust development patterns across the Amazon deforestation frontier. Science, 324(5933), 1435–1437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruta, D. A., Garratt, A. M., Leng, M., Russell, I. T., & MacDonald, L. M. (1994). A new approach to the measurement of quality of life: the Patient-Generated Index. Medical Care, 32(11), 1109–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis. IDS Working Paper, 27. Institute of Development Studies (IDS): Sussex, UK.

  • Sen, A. K. (1985a). Well-being, agency and freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984. Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), 169–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1985b). The Standard of Living (The Tanner Lectures). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. M., Case, J. L., Smith, H. M., Harwell, L. C., & Summers, J. K. (2013). Relating ecosystem services to domains of human well-being: Foundation for a US index. Ecological Indicators, 28, 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streeten, P., Burki, S. J., ul Huq, M., Hicks, N., & Stewart, F. (1981). First things first; meeting basic human needs in developing countries. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Summers, J. K., Smith, L. M., Case, J. L., & Linthurst, R. A. (2012). A review of the elements of human well-being with an emphasis on the contribution of ecosystem services. Ambio, 41, 327–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2011). Human development reports: Indices & data–human development index (HDI). http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/hdi/. Accessed on 12 December 2012.

  • Vemuri, A. W., & Costanza, R. (2006). The role of human, social, built, and natural capital in explaining life satisfaction at the country level: Toward a national well-being index (NWI). Ecological Economics, 58(1), 119–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg, P. H., van de Steeg, J., Veldkamp, A., & Willemen, L. (2009). From land cover change to land function dynamics: A major challenge to improve land characterization. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(3), 1327–1335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on earth. Gabriola Island: New Society.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is a contribution to the project CNPq 550373/2010-1–Efeito de perturbações antrópicas sobre a Estrutura florística e funcionamento das Florestas de várzea e Seu Impacto sobre os Ecossistemas aquáticos da calha do Solimões-Central do Amazonas (Process 382443/2012-8 and 384174/2012-4), and it was accomplished with financial assistance from the National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq), an organization under the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Federal Government of Brazil.. Vivian F. Renó acknowledges the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) for the financial support of her PhD program (Process 2012/02544-5).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. INPE-Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (DSR/OBT), Caixa Postal 515, 12201-970, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil

    Megan F. King, Vivian F. Renó & Evlyn M. L. M. Novo

Authors
  1. Megan F. King
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vivian F. Renó
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Evlyn M. L. M. Novo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Megan F. King.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

King, M.F., Renó, V.F. & Novo, E.M.L.M. The Concept, Dimensions and Methods of Assessment of Human Well-Being within a Socioecological Context: A Literature Review. Soc Indic Res 116, 681–698 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0320-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0320-0

Keywords

  • Well-being
  • Quality of life
  • Socioecological system
  • Millennium ecosystem assessment
  • Participatory methods
  • Indicators