Social Indicators Research

, Volume 116, Issue 3, pp 681–698 | Cite as

The Concept, Dimensions and Methods of Assessment of Human Well-Being within a Socioecological Context: A Literature Review

  • Megan F. King
  • Vivian F. Renó
  • Evlyn M. L. M. Novo


The concept of well-being has evolved over the past several decades as research has continued to reveal its multidimensional, dynamic, person-specific and culture-specific nature. Most recently, the ecological embeddedness of well-being has also gained recognition, and this development of the concept demands that we explore and identify new conceptual frameworks and appropriate methodological approaches towards the assessment of quality of life within a socioecological context. This paper offers a review of seminal and current research in the fields of social indicators, human development, ecological economics, and natural resources management, with the aim of examining the concept and the various methodologies designed to assess both the objective and subjective components and the multiple dimensions that comprise well-being. We also present some methodological approaches that have the capacity to account for the role of ecosystem services, considering several studies of rural populations whose well-being depends on the flow of ecosystem services, highlighting the participatory methods these studies employed to identify and assess locally relevant well-being indicators, and addressing some of the challenges inherent in such methods. We conclude with an appraisal of what we regard as the most appropriate methodological approach for measuring human well-being in the socioecological context.


Well-being Quality of life Socioecological system Millennium ecosystem assessment Participatory methods Indicators 


  1. Abdallah, S., Michaelson, J., Shah, S., Stoll, L., & Marks, N. (2012). The Happy Planet Index: 2012 Report. A global index of sustainable well-being. London, UK. Accessed 07 January 2013.
  2. Abdallah, S., Thompson, S., & Marks, N. (2008). Estimating worldwide life satisfaction. Ecological Economics, 65(1), 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adger, W. N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 268–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alkire, S. (2005). Why the capability approach? Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 115–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alkire, S., & Bank, T. W. (2002). Dimensions of human development. World Development, 30(2), 181–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Allardt, E. (1976). Dimensions of welfare in a comparative Scandinavian study. Acta Sociologica, 19(3), 227–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: American’s perceptions of life quality. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ayanu, Y. Z., Conrad, C., Nauss, T., Wegmann, M., & Koellner, T. (2012). Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services supplies and demands: A review of remote sensing applications. Environmental Science and Technology, 46, 8529–8541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Balmford, A., & Bond, W. (2005). Trends in the state of nature and their implications for human well-being. Ecology Letters, 8(11), 1218–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bauer, R. A. (1966). Social indicators. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bebbington, A. (1999). Capitals and capabilities: A framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Development, 27(12), 2021–2044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (1998). Linking social and ecological systems for resilience and sustainability. In F. Berkes & C. Folke (Eds.), Linking social and ecological systems (pp. 1–25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Biswas-Diener, R., & Diener, E. (2001). Making the best of a bad situation: Satisfaction in the slums of Calcutta. Social Indicators Research, 55(3), 329–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  15. Bradbury, H., & Reason, P. (2001). Conclusion: Broadening the bandwidth of validity: Issues and choice-points for improving the quality of action research. In H. Bradbury & P. Reason (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 343–351). London: Sage Publications Limited.Google Scholar
  16. Brauman, K. A., Daily, G. C., Duarte, T. K., & Mooney, H. A. (2007). The nature and value of ecosystem services: An overview highlighting hydrologic services. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32(1), 67–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brown, K., & Westaway, E. (2011). Agency, capacity, and resilience to environmental change: Lessons from human development, well-being, and disasters. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 36(1), 321–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Busch, M., Gee, K., Burkhard, B., Lange, M., & Stelljes, N. (2011). Conceptualizing the link between marine ecosystem services and human well-being: The case of offshore wind farming. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 7(3), 190–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Camfield, L., Crivello, G., & Woodhead, M. (2009). Wellbeing research in developing countries: Reviewing the role of qualitative methods. Social Indicators Research, 90(1), 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Camfield, L., & Guillen-Royo, M. (2010). Wants, needs and satisfaction: A comparative study in Thailand and Bangladesh. Social Indicators Research, 96(2), 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Camfield, L., & McGregor, J. A. (2005). Resilience and wellbeing in developing countries. In M. Ungar (Ed.), Handbook for working with children and youth: pathways to resilience across cultures and contexts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Camfield, L., & Ruta, D. (2007). ‘Translation is not enough’: using the Global Person Generated Index (GPGI) to assess individual quality of life in Bangladesh, Thailand, and Ethiopia. Quality of Life Research, 16(6), 1039–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundations.Google Scholar
  24. Celentano, D., Sills, E., & Carolina, N. (2012). Welfare outcomes and the advance of the deforestation frontier in the Brazilian Amazon. World Development, 40(4), 850–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chambers, R., & Conway, G. R. (1992) Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century. IDS Discussion Paper 296, Brighton: Institute for Development Studies (IDS).Google Scholar
  26. Chiesura, A., & de Groot, R. (2003). Critical natural capital: A socio-cultural perspective. Ecological Economics, 44(2–3), 219–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Clark, D. A. (2003). Concepts and perceptions of human bell-being: Some evidence from South Africa. Oxford Development Studies, 31(2), 173–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Clark, D. A. (2005). Sen’s capability approach and the many spaces of human well-being. Journal of Development Studies, 41(8), 1339–1368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cobb, C., & Rixford, C. (1998). Lessons learned from the history of social indicators. San Francisco: Redefining Progress. Accessed 07 January 2013.
  30. Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Ali, S., Beer, C., Bond, L., Boumans, R., et al. (2007). Quality of life: An approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being. Ecological Economics, 61(2–3), 267–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209–240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Cummins, R. A. (1996). Domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38(3), 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Daniel, T. C., Muhar, A., Arnberger, A., Aznar, O., Boyd, J. W., Chan, K. M. A., et al. (2012). Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(23), 8812–8819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31(2), 103–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Diener, E. (2012). New findings and future directions for subjective well-being research. American Psychologist, November 2012, 590–597.Google Scholar
  36. Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Diener, E., Sandvik, E., Seidlitz, L., & Diener, M. (1993). The relationship between income and subjective well-being: Relative or absolute? Social Indicators Research, 28(3), 195–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring the quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40, 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Doyal, L., & Gough, I. (1984). A theory of human needs. Critical Social Policy, 4(10), 6–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Doyal, L., & Gough, I. (1991). A theory of human need. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  41. Eakin, H., & Luers, A. L. (2006). Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31(1), 365–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Easterlin, R. A., McVey, L. A., Switek, M., Sawangfa, O., & Zweig, J. S. (2010). The happiness–income paradox revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(52), 22463–22468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) Research Group on Wellbeing in Developing Countries [WeD]. (2007). Wellbeing and International Development. Bath, UK: Economic and Social Research Council. Retrieved 30 November 2012, from
  44. Engelbrecht, H.-J. (2009). Natural capital, subjective well-being, and the new welfare economics of sustainability: Some evidence from cross-country regressions. Ecological Economics, 69(2), 380–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Fazey, I., Kesby, M., Evely, A., Latham, I., Wagatora, D., Hagasua, J.-E., et al. (2010). A three-tiered approach to participatory vulnerability assessment in the Solomon Islands. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 713–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 253–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Fontalvo-Herazo, M. L., Glaser, M., & Lobato-Ribeiro, A. (2007). A method for the participatory design of an indicator system as a tool for local coastal management. Ocean and Coastal Management, 50(10), 779–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Fraser, E. D. G., Dougill, A. J., Mabee, W. E., Reed, M., & McAlpine, P. (2006). Bottom up and top down: Analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 78(2), 114–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Gasper, D. (2004). Human well-being: Concepts and conceptualizations (No. 2004/06). WIDER Discussion Papers, United Nations University. Retrieved on 01 March 2013, from
  50. Glaser, M. (2003). Interrelations between mangrove ecosystem, local economy and social sustainability in Caeté Estuary, North Brazil. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 11, 265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Gough, I. (1998). What are human needs? In J. Franklin (Ed.), Social policy and social justice (pp. 50–56). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  52. Gough, I. (2004). Human well-being and social structures: Relating the universal and the local. Global Social Policy, 4(3), 289–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Green, L. W., George, M. A., Daniel, M., Frankish, C. J., Herbert, C. J., Bowie, W. R., et al. (1995). Study of participatory research in health promotion. Review and Recommendations for Development of Participatory Research in Health Promotion in Canada. Ottawa: The Royal Society of Canada.Google Scholar
  54. Hagerty, M. R., Cummins, R. A., Ferriss, A. L., Land, K., Michalos, A. C., Peterson, M., et al. (2001). Quality of life indexes for national policy: Review and Agenda for Research. Social Indicators Research, 55, 1–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hancock, J. (2010). The case for an ecosystem service approach to decision-making: An overview. Bioscience Horizons, 3(2), 188–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Inglehart, R., Foa, R., Peterson, C., & Welzel, C. (2008). Development, freedom, and rising happiness: A global perspective (1981–2007). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(4), 264–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. International Institute for Sustainable Development (2012). Sustainable Development Timeline. Retrieved on 15 March 2013, from
  58. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). (1980). World Conservation Strategy: Living resource conservation for sustainable development. Gland: IUCN.Google Scholar
  59. Johnson, S. (2012). UNEP, The first 40 Years: A narrative. United Nations Environmental Programme. Retrieved on 10 March 2013, from
  60. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Knight, K. W., & Rosa, E. (2011). The environmental efficiency of well-being: A cross-national analysis. Social Science Research, 40(3), 931–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lavers, T. (2007). Asking people what they want or telling them what they need? Contrasting a theory of human need with local expressions of goals (WeD Working Paper 28). Bath, UK: ESRC Research Group on Wellbeing in Developing Countries (WeD), University of Bath. Retrieved on 10 March 2013, from
  63. Maggino, F., & Zumbo, B. D. (2012). Measuring the quality of life and the construction of social indicators. In: K. C. Land, A. C. Michalos & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research (pp. 201–238). Springer, Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2421-1_10.
  64. Magis, K. (2010). Community resilience: An indicator of social sustainability. Society & Natural Resources, 23(5), 401–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Maltby, E., & Acreman, M. C. (2011). Ecosystem services of wetlands: Pathfinder for a new paradigm. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 56(8), 1341–1359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Marks, N., Simms, A., Thompson, S., & Abdallah, S. (2006). The happy planet index: An index of human well-being and environmental impact. London: New Economics Foundation.Google Scholar
  67. Martin, F., Rodham, K., Camfield, L., & Ruta, D. (2010). Reliability and validity of the Thai “Global Person Generated Index”: An individualized measure of quality of life. Applied Research Quality of Life, 5, 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Max-Neef, M. A. (1991). Human Scale Development: Conception, application and further reflections. New York: The Apex Press.Google Scholar
  69. McGillivray, M., & Clarke, M. (2006). Understanding human wellbeing. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  70. McGregor, J. A. (2004). Researching well-being: Communicating between the needs of policy makers and the needs of people. Global Social Policy, 4(3), 337–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. McGregor, J. A., Camfield, L., & Woodcock, A. (2009). Needs, wants and goals: Wellbeing, quality of life and public policy. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 4(2), 135–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. McGregor, J. A., McKay, A., & Velazco, J. (2007). Needs and resources in the investigation of well-being in developing countries: Illustrative evidence from Bangladesh and Peru. The Journal of Economic Methodology, 14(1), 107–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  74. Minkler, M. (2004). Ethical challenges for the “outside” researcher in community-based participatory research. Health Education & Behavior, 31(6), 684–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Mooney, H. A., Cropper, A., & Reid, W. (2004). The millennium ecosystem assessment: What is it all about? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19(5), 221–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Morris, M. D. (1979). Measuring the condition of the world’s poor: The physical quality of life index. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  77. Narayan, D., Chambers, R., Shah, M. K., & Petesch, P. (2000). Voices of the poor: Crying out for change. New York: Oxford University Press for the World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. New Economics Foundation (NEF). (2005). Well-Being and the Environment: Achieving “One Planet Living” and maintaining quality of life. London, UK.Google Scholar
  79. Nussbaum, M. (2003). Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen And social justice. Feminist Economics, 9(2–3), 33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (1976). Measuring social well-being: A progress report on the development of social indicators. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  81. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2001). The well-being of nations: The role of human and social capital. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  82. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 164–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Pereira, E., Queiroz, C., Pereira, H. M., & Vicente, L. (2005). Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being: A participatory study in a mountain community in Portugal. Ecology and Society 10(2): 14. Accessed 07 January 2013.
  84. Pinedo-Vasquez, M. A., & Sears, R. R. (2011). Várzea forests: Multifunctionality as a resource for conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. In M. Pinedo-Vasquez, M. L. Ruffino, C. Padoch, & E. S. Brondízio (Eds.), The Amazon Várzea: The decade past and the decade ahead (pp. 187–206). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Qizilbash, M. (1996). Capabilities, well-being and human development: A survey. Journal of Development Studies, 33(2), 143–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Raymond, C. M., Bryan, B. A., MacDonald, D. H., Cast, A., Strathearn, S., Grandgirard, A., et al. (2009). Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 68(5), 1301–1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Rodrigues, A. S. L., Ewers, R. M., Parry, L., Souza, C., Veríssimo, A., & Balmford, A. (2009). Boom-and-bust development patterns across the Amazon deforestation frontier. Science, 324(5933), 1435–1437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Ruta, D. A., Garratt, A. M., Leng, M., Russell, I. T., & MacDonald, L. M. (1994). A new approach to the measurement of quality of life: the Patient-Generated Index. Medical Care, 32(11), 1109–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis. IDS Working Paper, 27. Institute of Development Studies (IDS): Sussex, UK.Google Scholar
  93. Sen, A. K. (1985a). Well-being, agency and freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984. Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), 169–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Sen, A. K. (1985b). The Standard of Living (The Tanner Lectures). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Smith, L. M., Case, J. L., Smith, H. M., Harwell, L. C., & Summers, J. K. (2013). Relating ecosystem services to domains of human well-being: Foundation for a US index. Ecological Indicators, 28, 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Streeten, P., Burki, S. J., ul Huq, M., Hicks, N., & Stewart, F. (1981). First things first; meeting basic human needs in developing countries. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  97. Summers, J. K., Smith, L. M., Case, J. L., & Linthurst, R. A. (2012). A review of the elements of human well-being with an emphasis on the contribution of ecosystem services. Ambio, 41, 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2011). Human development reports: Indices & datahuman development index (HDI). Accessed on 12 December 2012.
  99. Vemuri, A. W., & Costanza, R. (2006). The role of human, social, built, and natural capital in explaining life satisfaction at the country level: Toward a national well-being index (NWI). Ecological Economics, 58(1), 119–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Verburg, P. H., van de Steeg, J., Veldkamp, A., & Willemen, L. (2009). From land cover change to land function dynamics: A major challenge to improve land characterization. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(3), 1327–1335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on earth. Gabriola Island: New Society.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Megan F. King
    • 1
  • Vivian F. Renó
    • 1
  • Evlyn M. L. M. Novo
    • 1
  1. 1.INPE-Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (DSR/OBT)São José dos CamposBrazil

Personalised recommendations