Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 116, Issue 3, pp 661–679 | Cite as

A System of Sustainability Indicators for the Province of Thai Binh, Vietnam

  • Le Trinh HaiEmail author
  • Pham Hoang Hai
  • Pham Thi Thu Ha
  • Nguyen Manh Ha
  • Ly Trong Dai
  • Pham Viet Hoa
  • Nguyen Cao Huan
  • Lai Vinh Cam
Article

Abstract

Sustainable Development is a broad and universal concept. Indicators are a basis to measure sustainability and to direct policies that aim to achieve a better quality of life. Thai Binh, a coastal province in North Vietnam is strongly concerned about strategic sustainability development. To select a system of sustainability indicators, the Delphi method was applied in 2012. A two-round questionnaire was organized to use with 32 experts, who acted as participants. 69 indicators were selected from 98 listed indicators: 15 related to economic development, 5 to the sea and coastal zone, 1 to the global economic partnership, 4 to consumption and production patterns, 7 to poverty, 3 to governance, 9 to health, 4 to education, 3 to demographics, 2 to natural hazards, 5 to atmosphere, 7 to land, and 3 to freshwater. Conversely, 29 other indicators were rejected. The Delphi method allows indicator selection for identification of the process of sustainability. The system of indicators, as the first important step of the sustainable development process, provides useful information for decision makers and planners as well sustainability strategy. It is planned that the indicators selected should be applied in the province.

Keywords

Thai Binh province Delphi process, experts Sustainability indicators Vietnam 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study is a part of the project: “A scientific base for establishing an indicator system for sustainable development: a case study in the Thai Binh province, Vietnam” funded by Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology (NAFOSTED) under grant number 105.99-2011.08. We would like to thank the Thai Binh People’s Committee and Departments (e.g. Natural Resources and Environment, Science and Technology, Agriculture and Rural Development, Planning and Investment, Transport, Trade), Institutes, and Universities for their kindness and supplying materials; experts who were most collaborative in completing the questionnaires and in providing feedback on the results. We would like to thank Mr. James Hennessy (Australian—Sustainable Development Research Assistant, Vietnam National Museum of Nature) who helped us ensure correctness of English.

References

  1. ALM (Adaptation Learning Mechanism). (2009). Vietnam Country profile. http://www.adaptationlearning.net. Accessed 8 February 2012.
  2. Boothroyd, P. (2000). Doi moi, poverty reduction, and the role of the academy. In International conference on Vietnam in the 20th Century, Hanoi, 19th–21st September 2000. http://www.chs.ubc.ca/lprv/PDF/lprv0600.pdf. Accessed 8 March 2012.
  3. Campbell, S., Braspenning, J., Hutchinson, A., & Marshall, M. (2002). Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. Quality & Safety Health Care, 11, 358–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chu, H. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2007). A Delphi-based approach to developing experts system with the cooperation of multiple experts. Experts System with Application. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.05.034.
  5. Cochran, S. W. (1983). The Delphi method: Formulation and refining group judgments. Journal of Human Sciences, 2, 111–117.Google Scholar
  6. DCMS. (1999). Sustainable tourism indicators workshop. 7th May and 3rd June. London: SMS.Google Scholar
  7. Delbecq, A. L., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1975). Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Glenview, IL: Gustafson D.H. Scott-Foreman.Google Scholar
  8. DONRE. (2010). Environmental protection program by 2015. Thai Binh, Vietnam.Google Scholar
  9. DONRE. (2011). Environmental situation of Thai Binh province in 2010. Thai Binh, Vietnam.Google Scholar
  10. DONRE. (2012). Building action plans for climate change adaptation in Thai Binh province (20112015). Thai Binh, Vietnam.Google Scholar
  11. Gallagher, M., Bradshaw, C., & Nattress, H. (1996). Policy priorities in diabetes care: A Delphi study. Quality Health Care, 5, 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gobin, A., Linh, P. H., Hai, L. T., Hens, L. (2012). Social impacts of desertification. This study in the frame of the Bilateral BelgianVietnamese Project on “Impact of global climate change and desertification on the environment and society in Southern Centre of Vietnam (a case study in the Binh Thuan province)”. VITO, Mol, Belgium.Google Scholar
  13. Hai, L. T. (2010). Health and environment: Core aspects of sustainable development in the province of Quang Tri (Vietnam). Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
  14. Hai, L. T., Hai, P. H., Khoa, N. T., & Hens, L. (2009). Indicators set for sustainable development indicators: A case study in the province of Quang Tri, Vietnam. International Journal of Human Ecology, 27(3), 217–227.Google Scholar
  15. Hai, L. T., Hai, P. H., Thai, C. L., Hugé, J., Ahenkan, A., & Quynh, L. X., et al. (2011). Software for sustainability assessment: A case study in Quang Tri province, Vietnam. Environmental Model Assessment. Doi: 10.1007/s10666-011-9264-4.
  16. Hart, S. (1997). Strategic for a sustainable development. Harvard Business Review, 1997, 67–76.Google Scholar
  17. Hasson, D., Keeney, S., & McKenna, H. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32, 1008–1015.Google Scholar
  18. Hathan, H. S. K., & Reddy, B. S. (2010). Selection criteria for sustainable development indicators. Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research (IGIDR), India.Google Scholar
  19. Helmer, O. (1983). Looking forward: A guide to future research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. http://www.hta.nhsweb.nhs.uk/fullmono/mon505.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2012.
  20. Hens, L., & Nath, B. (2005). The world summit on sustainable development. The Johannesburg Conference (pp. 17–18). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Hugé, J., Hai, L. T., Hai, P. H., Jan, K., & Hens, L. (2009). Indicators for sustainability assessment for a clean development mechanism project in Vietnam. International Journal of Environment, Development and Sustainability, 7(4), 519–536.Google Scholar
  22. Keeney, S., Hasson, F., & McKenna, H. P. (2001). A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 28(2001), 195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Landaeta, J. (2006). Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences. Technological Forecasting and Social, 73, 467–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Murry, J. W., & Hammors, J. O. (1995). Delphi, a versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research. The Review of Higher Education, 18, 423–436.Google Scholar
  25. NASA. (2003). Sustainable development indicators. http://www.hq.nasa.gov/iwgsdi/Welcome.html. Accessed 20 February 2012.
  26. Ryan, M., Scott, D. A., Reeves, C., Bate, A., & Teijlingen, V. E. R. (2001). Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: A systematic review of techniques. Health Technology Assessment, 5(5), 1–186.Google Scholar
  27. UN. (1992). Information for decision-making and participation. http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/susdevtopics/sdt_infodecimaki.shtml. Accessed 31 October 2012.
  28. UN. (2001). Indicators of sustainable development: Guidelines and methodologies. New York: United Nations publication.Google Scholar
  29. UN. (2007a). Indicators of sustainable development: Guidelines and methodologies (3rd Ed.). New York: United Nations Publication.Google Scholar
  30. UN. (2007b). United Nations and sustainability. http://www.un.org/en/sustainability. Accessed 28 February 2012.
  31. UN. (2012). United Nations conference on sustainable development, Rio + 20. http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/rio20.html. Accessed 5 November 2012.
  32. VIDS. (2005). Formulating framework for sustainable development indicators in Vietnam. http://www.vids.org.vn/en/asp/NewsDetail.asp?area=1&cat=828&ID=276. Accessed 5 November 2012.
  33. WCED. (1987). Report on the world commission on environment and development: General assembly. 96th plenary meeting. http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/42/ares42-187.htm. Accessed on 5 June 2012.
  34. Yusuf, A. A., & Francisco, H. (2009). Climate change vulnerability mapping for Southeast Asia. IDRC, Sida, EEPSA & ACDI.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Le Trinh Hai
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pham Hoang Hai
    • 1
  • Pham Thi Thu Ha
    • 2
  • Nguyen Manh Ha
    • 1
  • Ly Trong Dai
    • 1
  • Pham Viet Hoa
    • 3
  • Nguyen Cao Huan
    • 4
  • Lai Vinh Cam
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Geography (IG)Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VAST)HanoiVietnam
  2. 2.Faculty of EnvironmentHanoi University of Science, Vietnam National UniversityHanoiVietnam
  3. 3.Space Technology Institute (STI)Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VAST)HanoiVietnam
  4. 4.Faculty of GeographyHanoi University of Science, Vietnam National UniversityHanoiVietnam

Personalised recommendations