Social Indicators Research

, Volume 116, Issue 2, pp 373–387 | Cite as

The Direct and Indirect Impact of Religion on Well-Being in Germany

  • Gerd GrözingerEmail author
  • Wenzel Matiaske


A European Social Survey (ESS)—based study of Clark and Lelkes on the European level showed a double positive connection between religion and life-satisfaction: not only did a personal involvement have a positive impact, but there was also a regional externality. Even atheists seemed to be happier in areas with many religious people. However, the regional structure of the ESS can be seen as methodologically doubtful. We therefore replicated the study with more rich German data. In our study we confirm the positive individual effect of religion, but we did find a negative regional externality. However, further analysis revealed, this was an effect of an omitted variable: the degree of urbanization. In a more detailed approach we show that this effect is confined to areas with a protestant majority. We conclude that the positive degree of urbanization influence on life-satisfaction is presumably due to the chance for more political participation in the (protestant) city states in Germany.


Life satisfaction Religion Regions Germany 


  1. Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung (2009). INKAR 2007—Indikatoren und Karten zur Raum- und Stadtentwicklung. Bonn.Google Scholar
  2. Clark, A. E., & Lelkes, O. (2009). Let us pray: Religious interactions in life satisfaction. Paris.Google Scholar
  3. Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness & economics. Princeton.Google Scholar
  4. Grözinger, G., & Matiaske, W. (ed.) (2005). Deutschland regional. Sozialwissenschaftliche Daten im Forschungsverbund. Munich.Google Scholar
  5. Harrell, F. E. (2001). Regression modeling strategies: With applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. New York: Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Headey, B., Schupp, J., Tucci, I., & Wagner, G. G. (2010). Authentic happiness theory supported by impact of religion on life satisfaction: A longitudinal analysis with data for Germany. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(1), 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Heineck, G. (2002). Treasures in heaven? The relationship between religion, belief and earnings in Germany. Bamberg.Google Scholar
  8. Jelen, T. G. (2005). Religion and politics in the United States: Persistence, limitations and the prophetic voice. Social Compass, 53(3), 329–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Koenig, H. G., McCullough, M., & Larson, D. (Ed). (2001). Handbook of religion and health. Oxford.Google Scholar
  10. Meulemann, H. (2004). Religiösität: Die Persistenz eines Sonderfalls. In J. W. van Deth (Ed.), Deutschland in Europa. Ergebnisse des European Social Survey 20022003. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  11. Myers, D. G. (2008). Religion and human flourishing. In M. Eid, R. J. Larsen (Ed.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 323–343). New York.Google Scholar
  12. Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. New York.Google Scholar
  13. Prognos (2008). Engagementatlas09. Basel.Google Scholar
  14. Snoep, L. (2008). Religiousness and happiness in three nations: A research note. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 207–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tiryakian, E. A. (1993). American religious exceptionalism: A reconsideration. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 527, 40–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Traunmüller, R. (2008). Religion as a resource: Individual religiosity, religious context and the creation of social capital in Germany. In 8th international German socio-economic panel user conference, Berlin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Flensburg UniversityFlensburgGermany
  2. 2.Helmut-Schmidt-University, University of the Federal Armed Forces HamburgHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations