Social Indicators Research

, Volume 116, Issue 2, pp 327–339 | Cite as

Walking the Dog: The Effect of Pet Ownership on Human Health and Health Behaviors

  • Rebecca L. UtzEmail author


This analysis explores whether pet owners have better physical health outcomes, and if so, whether the positive physical health benefits are explained by better health behaviors that result from having to take care of the pet’s physical needs. Data come from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a representative sample of the non-institutionalized United States population. Analyses were limited to persons living alone (n = 2,474) in order to isolate primary pet caretakers from those merely living in a pet household. Results showed that pet owners, particularly dog and cat owners, had more positive physical health outcomes when compared to non pet owners or those owning other types of pets. Surprisingly, the effect of pet ownership was not mediated by health behaviors such as recreational walking. However, the health benefits of pet ownership were largely reduced once sociodemographic variables such as age, socioeconomic status, and residential location were controlled. The positive health effects of pet ownership appear to be primarily the result of selection, not increased physical activity associated with the active caretaking of pets.


Human-animal interaction Obesity Self-rated health Exercise 


  1. Anderson, W., Reid, C., & Jennings, G. (1992). Pet ownership and risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Medical Journal of Australia, 157(5), 298–301.Google Scholar
  2. Barker, S. B., Rogers, C. S., Turner, J. W., Karpf, A. H., & Suthers-McCabe, M. (2003). Benefits of interacting with companion animals: A bibliography of articles published in refereed journals during the past 5 years. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(1), 94–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barker, S., & Wolen, A. (2008). The benefits of human-companion animal interaction: A review. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 35(4), 487–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck, A., & Katcher, A. (2003). Future directions in human-animal bond research. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(1), 79–93.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, S. (2003). Ethnic variations in pet attachment among students at an American school of veterinary medicine. Society & Animals, 10, 455–456.Google Scholar
  7. Centers for Disease Control (CDC). (1996). Analytic and reporting guidelines: The third national health and nutrition examination survey NHANES III (19881994). Hyattsville, MD.Google Scholar
  8. Centers for Disease Control (CDC). (2010). Retrieved April 2010.
  9. Cutt, H., Giles-Corti, B., Knuiman, M., & Burke, V. (2007). Dog ownership, health and physical activity: A critical review of the literature. Health & Place, 13(1), 261–272.Google Scholar
  10. Cutt, H., Knuiman, M., & Giles-Corti, B. (2008). Does getting a dog increase recreational walking? International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 5(17). doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-5-17.
  11. Garrity, T. F., Stallones, L., Marx, M. B., & Johnson, T. P. (1989). Pet ownership and attachment as supportive factors in the health of the elderly. Anthrozoos, 3(1), 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Headey, B. (1999). Health benefits and health cost savings due to pets: Preliminary estimates from an Australian national survey. Social Indicators Research, 47, 233–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Headey, B. (2003). Pet ownership: Good for health? Medical Journal of Australia, 179, 460–461.Google Scholar
  14. Headey, B., & Grabka, M. (2007). Pets and human health in Germany and Australia: National longitudinal results. Social Indicators Research, 80, 297–311.Google Scholar
  15. Headey, B., Na, F., & Zheng, R. (2008). Pet dogs benefit owners’ health: A “natural experiment” in China. Social Indicators Research, 87(3), 481–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hines, L. (2003). Historical perspectives on the human-animal bond. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(1), 7–15.Google Scholar
  17. Irvine, L. (2004). A model of animal selfhood: Expanding interactionist possibilities. Symbolic Interaction, 27(1), 3–21.Google Scholar
  18. Jorm, A., Jacomb, P., Christensen, H., Henderson, S., Korten, A., & Rodgers, B. (1997). Impact of pet ownership on elderly Australians’ use of medical services: An analysis using Medicare data. Medical Journal of Australia, 166(7), 376–377.Google Scholar
  19. Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1981). Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5, 602–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Katcher, A., Beck, A., & Levine, D. (1989). Evaluation of pet program in prison: The Pal Project at Lorton. Anthrozoos, 2(3), 175–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Knight, S., & Edwards, V. (2008). In the company of wolves—the physical, social, and psychological benefits of dog ownership. Journal of Aging and Health, 20(4), 437–455.Google Scholar
  22. Koivusilta, L. K., & Ojanlatva, A. (2006). To have or not to have a pet for better health? PLoS One, 1(1), e109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000109
  23. MacKinnon, D. P., Warsi, G., & Dwyer, J. H. (1995). A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Manson, J., Tosteson, H., Ridker, P., Satterfield, S., Hebert, P., O’Connor, G., et al. (1992). The primary prevention of myocardial infarction. New England Journal of Medicine, 326(21), 1406–1416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marx, M., Stallones, L., Garrity, T. F., & Johnson, T. P. (1988). Demographic differences of pet ownership among US adults age 21 to 64 years of age. Anthrozoos, 2(1), 33–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Motooka, M., Koike, H., Yokoyama, T., & Kennedy, N. (2006). Effect of dog-walking on autonomic nervous activity in senior citizens. Medical Journal of Australia, 184(2), 60–63.Google Scholar
  27. Müllersdorf, M., Granström, F., Sahlqvist, L., & Tillgren, P. (2010). Aspects of health, physical/leisure activities, work and socio-demographics associated with pet ownership in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 38(1), 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pachana, N., Ford, J., Andrew, B., & Dobson, A. (2005). Relations between companion animals and self-reported health in older women: Cause, effect or artifact? International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 12(2), 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Parslow, R., & Jorm, A. (2003). The impact of pet ownership on health and health service use: Results from a community sample of Australians aged 40 to 44 years. Anthrozoos, 16, 43–56.Google Scholar
  30. Raina, P., Waltner-Toews, D., Bonnett, B., Woodward, C., & Abernathy, T. (1999). Influence of companion animals on the physical and psychological health of older people: An analysis of a one-year longitudinal study. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 47(3), 323–329.Google Scholar
  31. Rijken, M., & van Beek, S. (2011). About cats and dogs … Reconsidering the relationship between pet ownership and health related outcomes in community-dwelling elderly. Social Indicators Research, 102(3), 373–388.Google Scholar
  32. Rowan, A. N., & Beck, A. M. (1988). The health benefits of human-animal interactions. Anthrozoos, 7, 85–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sanders, C. (2003). Actions speak louder than words: Close relationships between humans and nonhuman animals (pp. 405–426). Interaction: Sybolic.Google Scholar
  34. Serpell, J. (1991). Beneficial effects of pet ownership on some aspects of human health and behaviour. Journal of the Royal Social Medicine, 84(12), 717–720.Google Scholar
  35. Siegel, J. (1990). Stressful life events and the use of physician services among the elderly: Moderating effects of pet ownership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1081–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Siegel, J. M. (1993). Companion animals: In sickness & in health. Journal of Social Issues, 49(1), 157–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thorpe, R. J., Kreisle, R., Glickman, L., Simonsick, E., Newman, A., & Kritchevsky, S. (2006a). Physical activity and pet ownership in year 3 of the Health ABC study. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 14(2), 154–168.Google Scholar
  38. Thorpe, R. J., Simonsick, E., Brach, J., Ayonayon, H., Satterfield, S., Harris, T., et al. (2006b). Dog ownership, walking behavior, and maintained mobility in late life. Journal of American Geriatric Society, 54(9), 1419–1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. United States Department of Health and Human Services (US DHHS) & United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). (2005). Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2005 (6th edition, January 2005 ed. Vol. 6th edition). Washington DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  40. Watson, N. L., & Weinstein, M. (1993). Pet ownership in relation to depression, anxiety, and anger in working women. Anthrozoos, 6(2), 407–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wells, D. (2009). Associations between pet ownership and self-reported health status in people suffering from Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 15(4), 407–413.Google Scholar
  42. Wells, D., & Hepper, P. (1997). Pet ownership and adults’ views on the use of animals. Society & Animals, 5(1), 45–63.Google Scholar
  43. Wilson, C. C., & Barker, S. B. (1994). A Conceptual framework for human-animal research: A challenge revisited. Anthrozoos, 7(1), 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wood, L., Giles-Corti, B., & Bulsara, M. (2005). The pet connection: Pets as a conduit for social capital? Social Science & Medicine, 61, 1159–1173.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations