Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 116, Issue 2, pp 593–610 | Cite as

Do Values Matter? The Impact of Work Ethic and Traditional Gender Role Values on Female Labour Market Supply

  • Kirsten StamEmail author
  • Ellen Verbakel
  • Paul M. de Graaf
Article

Abstract

This article aims to gain a better understanding of the explanatory value of work ethic and traditional gender role values with regard to variation in female labour market supply. Although women’s labour market participation has increased dramatically over the past decades, it still lacks behind that of men. A high female participation rate is desirable for several reasons, for instance to cover rising costs due to the ageing of society. The existing literature has mostly focused on micro-economic and macro factors to explain differences between women in participation rate. However, more recently it has been argued that women’s values may also play an important role in women’s labour market decisions. Work ethic, expressing the moral duty to work in terms of paid employment, is argued to positively affect women’s labour supply. However, it is argued that it can have negative implications too if women who hold more traditional gender role values interpret work and work ethic in terms of housework or in terms of paid employment for men only. This exemplifies the need to study both values at the same time. We used longitudinal Dutch data (LISS panel, 2007–2010) and estimated both cross-sectional and longitudinal models. Both types of models revealed a similar pattern: work ethic is positively associated with women’s labour market participation, but only if we take into account women’s gender role values, which negatively relate to women’s labour market supply.

Keywords

Event history analyses Female labour market supply Traditional gender roles Work ethic 

References

  1. Albrecht, J. W., Edin, P., & Vroman, S. B. (2000). A cross-country comparison of attitudes towards mothers working and their actual labour market experience. Labour, 14(4), 591–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Applebaum, H. (1992). Work and its future. Futures, 24(4), 336–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, G. S. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. Economic Journal, 7(299), 493–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S. (1985). Human capital, effort, and the sexual division of labor. Journal of Labor Economics, 3(1), s33–s58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bongaarts, J. (2004). Population aging and the rising costs of public pensions. Population and Development Review, 30(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruegel, I. (1996). Who’s myths are they anyway? British Journal of Sociology, 47(1), 175–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burniaux, J. M., Duval, R., & Jaumotte, F. (2004). Coping with aging: A dynamic approach to quantify the impact of alternative policy options on future labour supply in OECD countries. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 371.Google Scholar
  8. De Witte, H. (2000). Houdingen tegenover arbeid in België op de drempel van de eenentwintigste eeuw. In K. Dobbelaere, M. Elchardus, B. Bawin-Legros, & L.Voye (Eds.) Verloren zekerheid. De Belgen en hun waarden, overtuigingen en houdingen (pp. 107–123). Tielt: Lannoo.Google Scholar
  9. Dose, J. J. (1997). Work values: an integrative framework and illustrative application to organizational socialization. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70, 219–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Drew, E., & Emerek, R. (1998). Employment, flexibility and gender. In E. Drew, R. Emerek, & E. Mahon (Eds.), Women, work and the family in Europe (pp. 85–99). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Drobnic, S., Blossfeld, H.-P., & Rohwer, G. (1999). Dynamics of women’s employment patterns over the family life course: A comparison of the United States and Germany. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61(1), 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Felmlee, D. H. (1984). A dynamic analysis of women’s employment exits. Demography, 21(2), 171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fortin, N. M. (2005). Gender attitudes and the labour-market outcomes of women across OECD countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21(3), 416–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Freeman, R. B. (1998). War of the models: Which labour market institutions for the 21st century? Labour Economics, 5(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hakim, C. (1996). Key issues in women’s work: Female heterogeneity and the polarisation of women’s employment. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hakim, C. (1998). Developing a sociology for the twenty-first century: Preference Theory. The British Journal of Sociology, 49(1), 137–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hakim, C. (2000). Work-lifestyle choices in the 21st century: Preference Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hakim, C. (2002). Lifestyle preferences as determinants of women’s differentiated labor market careers. Work and occupations, 29(4), 428–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Halman, L., Sieben, I., & Van Zundert, M. (2011). Atlas of European values: Trends and traditions at the turn of the century. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hendrickx, J., Bernasco, W., & De Graaf, P. M. (2001). Couples’ labour-market participation in the Netherlands. In H. P. Blossfeld & S. Drobnic (Eds.), Careers of couples in contemporary society. From male breadwinner to dual earner families (pp. 77–97). Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Jaumotte, F. (2003). Labour force participation of women: Empirical evidence on the role of policy and other determinants in OECD countries. OECD Economic Studies, 37, 51–108.Google Scholar
  22. Kluckhohn, F. R., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1961). Variations in value orientations. Oxford: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
  23. Lewis, J., Campbell, M., & Huerta, C. (2008). Patterns of paid and unpaid work in Western Europe: Gender commodification, preferences and the implications for policy. Journal of European Social Policy, 18(1), 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McRae, S. (1998). Part-time employment in a European perspective. In E. Drew, R. Emerek, & E. Mahon (Eds.), Women, work and the family in Europe (pp. 100–111). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McRae, S. (2003). Constraints and choices in mother′s employment careers: a consideration of Hakim′s Preference Theory. British Journal of Sociology, 54(3), 317–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Niles, F. S. (1999). Toward a cross-cultural understanding of work-related beliefs. Human Relations, 52(7), 855–867.Google Scholar
  27. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  28. Rosenfeld, P. A., & Birkelund, G. E. (1995). Women’s part-time work: A cross-national comparison. European Sociological Review, 11(2), 111–134.Google Scholar
  29. Ruitenberg, J., & De Beer, P. (2012). The impact of attitudes and work preferences on Dutch mothers’ employment patterns. AIAS working paper, 120.Google Scholar
  30. SCP. (2009). Deeltijd (g)een probleem. Mogelijkheden om de arbeidsduur van vrouwen met een kleine deeltijdbaan te vergroten. Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau: Den Haag.Google Scholar
  31. Stam, K., Verbakel, E., & De Graaf, P. M. (2012). Explaining variation in work ethic in Europe: Religious heritage rather than modernization, the welfare state and communism. European Societies. doi: 10.1080/14616696.2012.726734.
  32. Statistics Netherlands. (2012b). Begrippen. http://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/menu/methoden/begrippen/default.htm?conceptid=1013. Accessed 3 October 2012.
  33. Ter Bogt, T., Raaijmakers, Q., & Van Wel, F. (2005). Socialization and development of the work ethic among adolescents and young adults. Journal of Vocational behaviour, 66, 420–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Triandis, H. (1979). Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 27, 195–260.Google Scholar
  35. Van der Lippe, T., & Van Dijk, L. (2002). Comparative research on women’s employment. Annual review of sociology, 28, 221–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Van Gils, W., Kraaykamp, G., & Van der Lippe, T. (2007). Levensloop van voltijd werkende paren in Nederland. In T. Van der Lippe (Ed.), De maakbaarheid van de levensloop (pp. 113–134). Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
  37. Van Oorschot, W. (2004). Flexible work and flexicurity policies in the Netherlands. Trends and experiences. European Review of Labour and Research, 10, 208–225.Google Scholar
  38. Van Wel, F., & Knijn, T. (2006). Transitional phase or a new balance? Working and caring by mothers with young children in the Netherlands. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 633–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Walsh, J. (1999). Myths and counter-myths: an analysis of part-time female employees and their orientations to work and working hours. Work, Employment & Society, 13(2), 179–203.Google Scholar
  40. Walters, S. (2005). Making the best of a bad job? Female part-timers’ orientations and attitudes to work. Gender, Work and Organization, 12(3), 193–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wielers, R., & Raven, D. (2009). Part-time work and work norms in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcr043.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kirsten Stam
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ellen Verbakel
    • 2
  • Paul M. de Graaf
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyTilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Sociology/ICSRadboud University NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations