Social Indicators Research

, Volume 115, Issue 3, pp 1031–1055 | Cite as

Youth Future Civic Participation in Europe: Differences Between the East and the Rest

  • Plamen Mirazchiyski
  • Daniel H. Caro
  • Andrés Sandoval-Hernández
Article

Abstract

European countries were economically and politically separated during the Cold War, but since its end processes of globalization and the formation of the European Union have contributed to blur the borders. Previous studies suggest that the social transformations have affected differently civic participation of youths, but shortage of more recent data has precluded researchers from examining the differences in a country-comparative fashion. Along these lines, this paper has two main objectives: to explore the differences in the levels of expected civic participation across Europe, and to evaluate the fit of a theoretical model of civic participation in regard to the different points in time their democracies were established. To achieve these goals, data from 22 European educational systems (9 post-communist and 13 established democracies) participating in the International Civic and Citizenship Study (2009) conducted by International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement is used. The results, in accordance with the literature, suggest differentiated patterns of future civic participation between the new and established democracies, but they are not that clear, suggesting that convergence between the two groups is ongoing. However, the tested empirical model of civic participation functions in a better way in the established than in the new democracies. In contrast with previous findings, differences in levels of expected civic participation seem to be related not only with the countries’ experience with democracy, but also with their cultural similarities and common history.

Keywords

Youth Expected civic participation ICCS Post-communism Democracy 

References

  1. Bobek, D., Zaff, J., Li, Y., & Lerner, R. M. (2009). Cognitive, emotional, and behavioral components of civic action: Towards an integrated measure of civic engagement. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 615–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bradshow, J., Hoelscher, P., & Richardson, D. (2007). An index of child well-being in the European Union. Social Indicators Research, 80, 133–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brese, F., Jung, M., Mirazchiyski, P., Schulz, W., & Zuehlke, O. (2011). ICCS 2009 User Guide for the International Database. Supplement 3: Variables Derived from the Survey.Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, D. E. (2007). Sticking together classroom diversity and civic education. American Politics Research, 35(1), 57–78. doi:10.1177/1532673X06294503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caro, D. H., & Mirazchiyski, P. (2012). Socioeconomic Gradients in Eastern European Countries: evidence from PIRLS 2006. European Educational Research Journal, 11(1), 96.Google Scholar
  6. Cerych, L. (1997). Educational reforms in Central and Eastern Europe: Processes and outcomes. European Journal of Education, 32(1), 75–96.Google Scholar
  7. Clougherty, C. H. (2009). Critical evaluation of the nobis projecta creative process approach to service-learning and global citizenship education (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from Retrieved from eThesis Repository (ID Code: 272).Google Scholar
  8. Coffé, H., & van der Lippe, T. (2009). Citizenship norms in Eastern Europe. Social Indicators Research, 96(3), 479–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cornia, G. A. (2010). Transition, structural divergence, and performance: Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union over 20002007 (Working Paper No. 2010/32). United Nations University Working Paper. Retrieved from http://www.wider.unu.edu/publications/working-papers/2010/en_GB/wp2010-32/_files/83199208506917095/default/2010-32.pdf.
  10. Dalton, R. J. (2008). Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. Political Studies, 56, 76–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Flanagan, C. A., Bowes, J. M., Jonsson, B., Csapo, B., & Sheblanova, E. (1993). Ties that bind: Correlates of adolescents’ civic commitments in seven countries. Journal of Social Issues, 54(3), 457–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foster-Bey, J. (2008). Do race, ethnicity, citizenship and socio-economic status determine civic engagement. (CIRCLE Working Paper No. #62). Boston: CIRCLE (The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement). Retrieved from http://www.civicyouth.org/PopUps/WorkingPapers/WP62_Foster.Bey.pdf.
  13. Geske, A., Grinfelds, A., Dedze, I., & Zhang, Y. (2006). Family background, school quality and rural-urban disparities in student learning achievement in Latvia. Prospects, XXXVI(4), 419–431.Google Scholar
  14. Hoskins, B. (2009). Monitoring active citizenship in the European Union: The process, the results and initial explanations. CAMDO, 1, 1–16. doi:10.3280/CAD2009-001008.Google Scholar
  15. Howard, M. M. (2002). The weakness of postcommunist civil society. Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 157–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. IEA. (2012). IEA IDB analyzer (version 2.0) [computer software]. Hamburg: IEA Data Processing and Research Center.Google Scholar
  17. Immerfall, S., Priller, E., & Delhey, J. (2010). Association and community. In S. Immerfall & G. Therborn (Eds.), Handbook of European societies: Social transformations in the 21st century (pp. 7–35). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kahne, J. E., & Sporte, S. E. (2008). Developing citizens: The impact of civic learning opportunities on students’ commitment to civic participation. American Educational Research Journal, 45(3), 738–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kotásek, J. (1996). Structure and organisation of secondary education in central and Eastern Europe. European Journal of Education, 31(1), 25–42.Google Scholar
  20. Letki, N. (2004). Socialization for participation? Trust, membership, and democratization in east-central Europe. Political Research Quarterly, 57, 665–679. doi:10.1177/106591290405700414.Google Scholar
  21. Listhaug, O., & Grønflaten, L. (2007). Civic decline? Trends in political involvement and participation in Norway. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 272–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Masters, G. N., & Wright, B. D. (1997). The partial credit model. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 101–122). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ménard, M. (2010). Youth civic engagement. Ottawa: Parliamentary Information and Research Service, Social Affairs Division.Google Scholar
  24. Mishler, W., & Rose, W. (2002). Learning and re-learning regime support: The dynamics of post-communist regimes. European Journal of Political Research, 41(1), 5–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mondak, J. J., & Gearing, A. F. (1998). Civic engagement in a post-communist state. Political Psychology, 19(3), 615–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pattie, C., Seyd, P., & Whiteley, P. (2003). Citizenship and civic engagement: Attitudes and behaviour in Britain. Political Studies, 51, 443–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Kerr, D., & Losito, B. (Eds.). (2010a). ICCS 2009 international report: Civic knowledge, attitudes, and engagement among lower secondary school students in 38 countries. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.Google Scholar
  28. Schulz, W., Ainley, J., & van de Gaer, E. (2010). Preparedness for active citizenship among lower secondary students in international comparison. Presented at the 4th IEA international research conference, Gothenburg, Sweden. Retrieved from http://www.iea-irc.org/fileadmin/IRC_2010_papers/CIVED_ICCS/Schulz_Ainley_Vandegaer.pdf.
  29. Schulz, W., Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Losito, B., & Kerr, D. (Eds.). (2009). International civic and citizenship education study: Assessment framework. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.Google Scholar
  30. Schulz, W., & Friedman, T. (2011). Scaling procedures for ICCS questionnaire items. In W. Schulz, J. Ainley, & J. Fraillon (Eds.), International civic and citizenship education study: Technical report (pp. 157–259). Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.Google Scholar
  31. Schwartz, S. H., & Bardi, A. (1997). Influences of adaptation to communist rule on value priorities in Eastern Europe. Political Psychology, 18(2), 385–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith, D. H. (1994). Determinants of voluntary association participation and volunteering: A literature review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 23(3), 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Starosta, P. (2010). Civic participation in rural Europe. Przeglad Socjologiczny, 59(2), 77–108.Google Scholar
  34. Torney-Purta, J. (2002a). The school’s role in developing civic engagement: A study of adolescents in twenty-eight countries. Applied Developmental Science, 6(4), 203–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Torney-Purta, J. (2002b). Patterns in the civic knowledge, engagement, and attitudes of European adolescents: The IEA civic education study. European Journal of Education, 37(2), 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Torney-Purta, J., Richardson, W., & Barber, C. H. (2004). Trust in government-related institutions and civic engagement among adolescents: analysis of five countries from the IEA Civic Education Study (Working Paper No. 17). College Park, MD: CIRCLE.Google Scholar
  37. Warm, T. A. (1989). Weighted likelihood estimation of ability in item response theory. Psychometrika, 54(3), 427–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Whitely, P. (2005). Citizenship education longitudinal study second literature review. (Research Report No. 631). Berkshire: National Foundation for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  39. Wing, N. (2009). Transformation of students into active and participatory citizens: An exploratory study in Hong Kong. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 8, 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zaff, J., Boyd, M., Li, Y., Lerner, J. V., & Lerner, R. M. (2010). Active and engaged citizenship: Multi-group and longitudinal factorial analysis of an integrated construct of civic engagement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 736–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Plamen Mirazchiyski
    • 1
  • Daniel H. Caro
    • 2
  • Andrés Sandoval-Hernández
    • 1
  1. 1.IEA Data Processing and Research CenterHamburgGermany
  2. 2.Oxford University Centre for Educational AssessmentOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations