Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multidimensional Wellbeing: An Index of Quality of Life in a Developing Economy

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human wellbeing indices can shed light on a society’s quality of life. This study ranks human wellbeing by employing objective and subjective indicators of quality of life for hundred districts of Pakistan. Households level data used for the analysis includes ‘The Pakistan Social and Living Standards Measurement Survey’ for the year 2006–2007. The human wellbeing is examined in four domains: education, health, living conditions and economic situation. Principal component analysis is employed for indexing human wellbeing, rated in five quintiles are generated. The paper demonstrates the importance of education, health and living condition domains in determining the human wellbeing. Objective indicators of education i.e., adult literacy rate, net primary enrolment and gender equality in education are important variables in ranking of districts. Economic status of the households and communities are important variables in subjective perception of wellbeing. The results indicate substantial variation in human wellbeing among districts of Pakistan It may be considered that disparity in objective condition and in subjective perceptions are adequately depicting wellbeing differences. Finally, it is argued that objective indicators and subjective wellbeing measures are needed in unison to understand human quality of life and to make informed policy decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. First five factors variance is 15.49 out of total (21) variance, contributing 73.76 % of total variation.

  2. To get communalities for each variable, square root of five factors are computed and summed.

  3. The same exercise can be repeated for rest of the other 20 variables to get communalities.

References

  • Akhtar, S., & Sarwer, M. (2007). Social development and quality of living in districts of Pakistan. Comparative ranking between 1998 and 2004-05, Centre for Research on Poverty Reduction and Income Distribution. Discussion paper series no: 16.

  • Amjad, R., Arif, G. M., & Mustafa, U. (2008). Does the labor market structure explain differences in poverty in rural Punjab? The Lahore Journal of Economics, Special edition, 139–162.

  • Bradshaw, Y., & Fraser, E. (1989). City size, economic development and quality of life in China: New empirical evidence. America Sociological Review, 54, 986–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, K. (1985). Value dimensions cultural differences, and the prediction of perceived quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 17, 345–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheema, A., Khalid, L., & Patnam, M. (2008). The geography of poverty: Evidence from the Punjab. The Lahore Journal of Economics, Special edition, 163–188.

  • Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social Indicators Research, 31, 103–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., Schimmack, U., & Helliwell, J. (2008). Well being and public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40, 189–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaus, A., Pasha, H., & Ghaus, R. (1996). Social development ranking of districts of Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 35(4 Part II), 593–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Pakistan. (2008). Pakistan social and living standards measurement survey (2006–2007). Islamabad: Pakistan Bureau of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C. T., & Liu, B. C. (1983). The pursuance of better quality of life: In the long run, better quality of social life is the most important factor in migration. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 42, 431–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamal, H., & Amir, K. J. (2007). Trends in regional human development indices. Research report no. 73. Social Policy Development Centre, Islamabad.

  • Kao, C. H., & Liu, B. C. (1984). Socioeconomic advance in the Republic of China (Taiwan): An intertemporal analysis of its quality of life indicators. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 43(4), 399–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midhet, F. (2004). Development ranking of rural districts of Pakistan: A methodology to identity contextual determinants of safe motherhood. Population Association of Pakistan.

  • Murtag, F., & Heck, A. (1987). Multivariate data analysis. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel Publishing Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pasha, A. G., & Naeem, A. (1999). Pakistan’s ranking in social development: Have we always been backward? The Pakistan Development Review, 38(4), 739–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasha, H. A., & Tariq, H. (1982). Development ranking of districts of Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Applied Economics, I(2), 157–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasha, H. A., et al. (1990). The changing profile of regional development in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Applied Economics, 9(1), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott-Allen, R. (2001). The wellbeing of nations: A country-by-country index of quality of life and the environment. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmack, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2008). The influence of environment and personality on the affective and cognitive component of subjective wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 89, 41–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, D. C., & Snyder, W. (1983). Economic growth, quality of life, and development policy: A case study of South Korea. Comparative Political Studies, 16, 195–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui, R. (2008). Income, public social services, and capability development: A cross-district analysis of Pakistan. Working papers no. 43, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad.

  • Siddiqui, R. (2009). Human capital vs. physical capital: A cross-country analysis of human development strategies. Working papers no. 51, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad.

  • Sumner, L. W. (1996). Welfare, happiness, and ethics. Oxford: Claredon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nation Development Programme. (2003). Pakistan national human development report 2003. Poverty, growth and governance. Pakistan: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nation Development Programme. (2007). Fighting climate change: Human solidarity in divided world. Human development report 2007/2008. USA: New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. (2007). Subjective measures of well-being. In Mc. Gillvray (Ed.), Human well-being, concepts and measurement. Houndmills, NH: Palgrave/McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rashida Haq.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haq, R., Zia, U. Multidimensional Wellbeing: An Index of Quality of Life in a Developing Economy. Soc Indic Res 114, 997–1012 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0186-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0186-6

Keywords

Navigation