Abstract
When designing indicators of well being attention is focused on its multidimensionality and on aggregation across different dimensions. However, two other aspects need consideration: distribution of each indicator within its dimension (inequality) and joint distribution of individual achievements or—viceversa—of deprivations. Aim of this paper is to suggest a correction to the composite well-being index; correction that takes into account some aspects concerning the joint micro distribution of achievements across dimensions. As an example we correct the human development index by means of the multidimensional poverty index.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Although there is not a clear distinction between well-being and quality of life—both being multidimensional latent constructs—we consider the first to comprise only objective domains and the second to include also subjective perceptions of well-being.
Ranks for the subset of 95 countries in our sample.
References
Alkire, S., and Foster, J. (2008). Counting and Multidimensional Poverty Measures. OPHI Working Paper 7.
Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2009). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 476–487.
Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Understandings and Misunderstandings of Multidimensional Poverty Measurement. Journal of Economic Inequality, 9(2), 289–314.
Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress.
UNDP (2011) Human development report.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Terzi, S. How to Integrate Macro and Micro Perspectives: An Example on Human Development and Multidimensional Poverty. Soc Indic Res 114, 935–945 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0182-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0182-x