Skip to main content
Log in

Are Migrants Going Up a Blind Alley? Economic Migration and Life Satisfaction around the World: Cross-National Evidence from Europe, North America and Australia

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Are migrants satisfied with their decision to move to another country? Research shows that the income-wellbeing relationship is weak in wealthy countries, usually countries of destination. Are then economic migrants mistaken? Employing data from the Gallup World Poll, a representative sample of the world population, we investigate whether a general pattern of association exists between income and the cognitive component of subjective wellbeing, and whether this pattern differs by immigration status in 16 high-income countries. In only a handful of countries do we find a distinctive immigrant advantage in translating income into higher life evaluation or life satisfaction: Australia, Belgium, the Netherlands, Portugal and Sweden. For immigrants in most of these countries, income increases cognitive wellbeing even in the fifth income quintile. Depending on the measure used, immigrants in Canada, Denmark, Finland, Italy and the US only have positive income-wellbeing associations at or below the third quintile. We take this as evidence that, among recent arrivals, income is positively associated with wellbeing up to the point in which non-pecuniary factors associated with long-term residence become dominant. We also find a number of “frustrated achievers” among the foreign born in the US, France and Finland. These immigrants report a negative association, in absolute value, between income and life satisfaction or life evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The World Values Survey, conversely, included this question in 1995 but discontinued it until 2010, when it was brought back.

References

  • Amit, K. (2010). Determinants of life satisfaction among immigrants from western countries and from the FSU in Israel. Social Indicators Research, 96, 515–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attanasio, O., & Browning, M. (1995). Consumption over the life cycle and over the business cycle. The American Economic Review, 85(5), 1118–1137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, R., & Chernova, K. (2008). Absolute income, relative income, and happiness. Social Indicators Research, 88(3), 497–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltatescu, S. (2007). Central and eastern Europeans migrants’ subjective quality of life. A comparative study. Journal of Identity and Migration Studies, 1, 67–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartram, D. (2011). Economic Migration and Happiness: Comparing Immigrants’ and Natives’ Happiness Gains From Income. Social Indicators Research, 103, 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becchetti, L., & Rossetti, F. (2009). When money does not buy happiness: The case of “frustrated achievers”. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38, 159–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D., & Oswald, A. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1359–1386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G. (1994). The economics of immigration. Journal of Economic Literature, 32(4), 1667–1717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims: is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(8), 917–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockmann, H., Delhey, J., Welzel, C., & Hao, Y. (2009). The China puzzle: Falling happiness in a rising economy. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 387–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browning, M., & Crossley, T. (2001). The life-cycle model of consumption and saving. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(3), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. A. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: an explanation for the easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46, 95–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constant, A., & Massey, D. (2003). Self-selection, earnings, and out-migration: a longitudinal study of immigrants to Germany. Journal of Population Economics, 16, 631–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramm, J. M., Møller, V., & Nieboer, A. P. (2010). Improving subjective well-being of the poor in the Eastern Cape. Journal of Health Psychology, 15(7), 1012–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, G., Chamratrithirong, A., & Tran, Q. (2002). For better, for worse: Life satisfaction consequences of migration. International Migration Review, 36, 838–863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Tella, R., Haisken-De New, J., MacCulloch, R. (2007). Happiness adaptation to income and to status in an individual panel. NBER Working Paper No. W13159.

  • Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2002). Will moneyincrease subjective well-being? A literature review and guide to needed research. Social Indicators Research, 57, 119–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, Ed., Suh, E. M., Smith, H. L., & Shao, L. (1995). National differences in reported subjective wellbeing: Why do they occur? Social Indicators Research, 34, 7–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? In P. A. David & M. W. Rede (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramowitz (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (2005). Diminishing marginal utility of income? Caveat emptor. Social Indicators Research, 70(3), 243–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 402–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup. (2012). Worldwide research methodology and codebook. Gallup: Gallup Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C., & Pettinato, S. (2002). Frustrated achievers: Winners, losers, and subjective well-being in new market economies. Journal of Development Studies, 384(April), 100–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayo, B., & Seifert, W. (2003). Subjective economic well-being in Eastern Europe. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24, 329–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J., Barrington-Leigh, C., Harris, A., et al. (2010). International evidence on the social context of well-being. In E. Diener, J. Helliwell, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), International Differences in Well-Being. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrero, Juan., Fuente, Asur., & Gracia, Enrique. (2011). Covariates of subjective wellbeing among Latin American immigrants in Spain: The role of social integration in the community. Journal of Community Psychology, 39(7), 761–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hugget, M. (1996). Wealth distribution in life-cycle economies. Journal of Monetary Economics, 38(3), 469–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 107(38), 16489–16493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J., & Gunatilaka, R. (2010a). The rural-urban divide in China: Income but not happiness? Journal of Development Studies, 46(3), 506–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J., & Gunatilaka, R. (2010b). The Subjective Well-being of Rural–Urban Migrants in China. World Development, 38(1), 113–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, R. (2000). The loss of happiness in market democracies. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  • Massey, D., & Akresh, I. (2006). Immigrant intentions and mobility in a global economy: The attitudes and behavior of recently arrived U.S. immigrants. Social Science Quarterly, 87, 954–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon (2006) Happiness: A history. New York: Grove Press.

  • Neto, F. (1995). Predictors of satisfaction with life among second generation migrants. Social Indicators Research, 35(1), 93–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouweneel, P., & Veenhoven, R. (1991). Cross-national differences in happiness: Cultural bias or societal quality. In N. Bleichrodt & P. J. D. Drenth (Eds.), Contemporary issues in cross-cultural psychology. Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palloni, A., & Arias, E. (2004). Paradox lost: Explaining the Hispanic adult mortality advantage. Demography, 41(3), 385–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, M. J. (1979). Birds of Passage. Migrant Labor and Industrial Societies: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ratha, D., Mohapatra, S., & Ani, Silwal. (2010). Migration and Remittances Factbook 2011 (2nd ed.). Washington DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saarela, J., & Rooth, D.-O. (2012). Uncertainty and international return migration: some evidence from linked register data. Applied Economic Letters, 19, 1893–1897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjaastad, L. A. (1962). The costs and returns to human migration. Journal of Political Economy, 70, 80–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2012.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Analia Olgiati.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Olgiati, A., Calvo, R. & Berkman, L. Are Migrants Going Up a Blind Alley? Economic Migration and Life Satisfaction around the World: Cross-National Evidence from Europe, North America and Australia. Soc Indic Res 114, 383–404 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0151-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0151-4

Keywords

Navigation